The U.S. ETF Industry Bets on a Dual Share Class Structure

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

US ETF industry dual share class
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Asset managers are generally optimistic about the possibility of a future approval of the dual-class share structure. Most ETFs issuers stated that they expect active mutual funds (74% of applicants) and passive mutual funds (26%) to incorporate ETF share classes for approval.

Furthermore, 93% of active applicants requested such an exemption in their applications as of December 2024, according to the latest report by consulting firm Cerulli Edge—U.S. Product Development Edition.

The appeal of the dual-class share structure makes sense from a product development perspective, as such approval would greatly benefit both financial advisors and end investors by expanding investment options and simplifying the process for those seeking greater exposure through their preferred structure.

According to Cerulli’s survey, 69% of ETFs issuers indicated that they have already submitted exemption requests, while 29% are planning to apply at a later date or are considering a dual-class share structure initiative and monitoring developments (29%).

SEC filings from various applicants clearly list advantages such as “lower portfolio transaction costs,” “greater tax efficiency,” and an “additional distribution channel for asset growth and economies of scale” concerning ETF share classes in mutual funds, as well as “efficient portfolio rebalancing” and “greater basket flexibility” for mutual fund share classes in ETFs, noted Sally Jin, an analyst at Cerulli.

“Other arguments in favor of the dual-class share structure point to ongoing initiatives that offer similar benefits—such as cloning mutual fund strategies in ETFs and converting mutual funds to ETFs—which simultaneously respond to investor demand and pose fiduciary challenges that the dual-class share structure might be better suited to address,” she added.

However, significant regulatory and distribution challenges persist, and it remains to be seen whether the SEC will approve these measures and, if so, what they will entail exactly, according to the Boston-based consulting firm.

The SEC has raised numerous concerns, including excessive leverage, conflicts of interest, investor confusion, the risk of cross-subsidies, discrepancies in cash redemptions and fund expense payments, and unequal voting power.

Regarding distribution, ETF managers cited the main obstacles as brokerage firms’ reluctance to approve or make ETF share classes available on platforms (54%), the operational complexity of managing mutual fund and ETFs share classes (43%), and asset managers’ reluctance to provide transparency into mutual fund strategies (29%).

Additionally, 69% of ETF asset managers agreed that adopting the dual-class share structure would be more significant for registered independent advisor (RIA) channels, compared to 42% of firms that expressed the same view regarding central offices.

“Despite these obstacles, half of the asset managers who responded to Cerulli’s survey remain optimistic about the possibility of future approval of the dual-class share structure, although the timeline for such approval remains uncertain,” Jin stated. “The growing number of applicants, who make up a significant portion of the investment sector, could be a decisive factor,” she concluded.

Trump, Central Banks, or the Climate: What Dynamics Are Driving the Commodities Market?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

commodities market driving factors
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Even as the world enters a phase of deglobalization, the connection between markets and the global economic and geopolitical landscape remains strong. That is why international asset managers are closely watching how the commodities market is responding to expectations surrounding steel and aluminum tariffs, a potential U.S. recession, increased spending in Europe, possible sanctions on Russia, and shifts in energy demand—a long and complex list of factors.

According to Marcus Garvey, Head of Commodities Strategy at Macquarie, their economists have revised global GDP growth projections for 2025 down to 2.2% year-over-year, expecting expansion to slow to a quarterly low of 0.3% in Q3 2024.

He explains that the possibility of tariffs on commodity imports has driven up duty-free prices in the U.S.

“This has led to increased demand for materials that can be moved to the U.S. before potential tariffs are imposed, as seen in the growing gold reserves within the country. However, this merely brings forward demand, and once there is tariff clarity, these additional purchases should subside. Furthermore, once tariffs are confirmed, excess inventory in the U.S. is likely, and the resulting price hikes for consumers could lead to demand destruction,” Garvey adds.

He also notes that the reciprocal tariffs expected after April 1st may be lower than the market anticipates, which could provide some relief.

Garvey’s base-case scenario is that weakening global demand for goods and slower industrial production growth will negatively impact primary commodity consumption.

“We therefore expect most commodity prices to decline in the second half of the year, with most physical commodity trade balances posting global surpluses. However, gold is a notable exception—given the U.S. fiscal deficit shows no improvement, it could test its all-time high of around $3,500 per ounce,” he states.

Tariffs: The Impact on Steel and Aluminum

The 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum announced by the U.S. are now in effect, significantly impacting Australia, Canada, Argentina, and the European Union.

Garvey explains that these tariffs will be implemented through the reinstatement and extension of the Section 232 tariffs from 2018. “This means the same mechanism cannot be easily used to impose tariffs on other commodities in the short term, as it would first require an investigation by the Department of Commerce. As a result, recent volatility in copper spreads on the CME and LME, as well as in the exchange-for-physical (EFP) prices of precious metals, may have been excessive. Still, prices remain vulnerable to broad-based tariffs or country-specific tariffs affecting a large portion of U.S. imports,” he says.

According to Garvey, while some of these costs will be passed on to U.S. processors and consumers, a portion of the tariffs will be absorbed by exporters, as their best net-margin strategy remains delivering to the U.S. Given the greater availability of materials outside the U.S., this could put downward pressure on regional prices elsewhere.

“In steel, there is room for a supply response that could mitigate this situation. However, for aluminum, we do not expect any smelters to restart production. Ultimately, demand will be key in determining the extent of sustained cost pass-through, and we still see the overall backdrop of rising trade tensions as a bearish factor for industrial metal prices,” he adds.

Crude Oil Market and the Impact of Russian Sanctions

In the oil market, projections suggest that supply will continue to outpace demand in 2025 by approximately 1 million barrels per day. However, market perception varies—while sour crude buyers face supply shortages, light sweet crude buyers see a well-supplied market.

Norbert Rücker, Head of Economics and Next Generation Research at Julius Baer, notes that with oil hovering around $70 per barrel, it appears to be stabilizing after its recent drop.

“Market sentiment is cooling, and uncertainties around economic outlooks and oil demand are keeping prices under pressure. Beyond geopolitical noise, structural shifts appear to be taking shape,” Rücker explains.

He argues that increased production from oil-producing nations is intensifying competition in the crude market, which is likely to limit U.S. shale oil’s market share.

“U.S. dominance is facing broader scrutiny. From a fundamental perspective, we believe the oil market is heading toward a surplus, with prices declining to around $65 per barrel by the end of the year,” he states.

Additionally, the impact of Russian sanctions remains a crucial factor.

Vikas Dwivedi, Global Energy Strategist at Macquarie, explains that if sanctions remain in place, reduced Russian exports to India, China, and Turkey could drive a significant price increase. Conversely, if sanctions are weakened or lifted, crude could drop by $5–$10 per barrel.

“While the public focus has been on the U.S. back-and-forth over tariff announcements and suspensions, we believe Russian sanctions could have a much greater impact on crude prices throughout at least the first half of the year. If sanctions on Russia are not eased, the ongoing decline in shipments—currently around 1 million barrels per day—could continue and become a catalyst for a major price surge,” he warns.

Gold’s Surge Amid Economic and Political Uncertainty

No commodities discussion is complete without mentioning gold, which has risen 50% in a year—and may not stop there.

Matthew Michael, Chief Investment Officer at Schroders, explains that a year ago, gold prices began to break out of their previous stagnation.

“At the time, the rally was fueled by major central banks increasing their gold purchases to reduce reliance on U.S. dollar reserves and Treasury holdings amid rising uncertainty. This partially broke gold’s historical correlation with real (inflation-adjusted) interest rates. Additionally, Trump’s trade war will further boost the precious metal,” he states.

Meanwhile, Charlotte Peuron, a precious metals fund manager at Crédit Mutuel AM, adds that gold continued its 2024 uptrend into January 2025, driven by economic and political risks (trade wars, U.S. inflation, political instability, etc.).

She notes that Western investor demand for gold is rising, both through ETFs and physical deliveries.

“China, in addition to central bank purchases, has just launched a pilot program allowing insurance companies to invest in gold for their medium- and long-term asset allocation strategies. All signals are green, which should support gold demand. Silver is also rallying, up 12.8% since the beginning of the year, reaching $32.60 per ounce,” she adds.

Agricultural Commodities: The Coffee Price Surge

One notable commodity trend is the relentless rise in coffee prices. Since early 2024, the price of high-quality Arabica beans—known for their smoother, less bitter taste—has risen by about 90%, while Robusta beans—typically used for instant coffee—have increased by over 90%.

Michaela Huber, Senior Cross-Asset Strategist at Vontobel, attributes this mainly to climate conditions.

“Brazil, which accounts for nearly 40% of global coffee production and is the top supplier of Arabica, has suffered from a devastating combination of frost and prolonged drought. In Vietnam, the world’s second-largest producer and the top supplier of Robusta, extreme weather fluctuations—droughts followed by heavy rains—have also wreaked havoc. As a result, crop yields have plummeted, reducing supply,” she explains.

Huber warns that unless harvests improve or consumers significantly cut back on consumption, the price rally could persist.

PGIM Fixed Income Welcomes Daleep Singh Back

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

PGIM Fixed Income Daleep Singh return
Photo courtesy

PGIM Fixed Income announced the return of Daleep Singh as vice chair, chief of global economist, and head of global macroeconomic research, effective April 21, 2025. 

Sing rejoins the firm after serving as U.S. deputy national security advisor for international economics and deputy director of the National Economic Council from February 2024. He previously held these roles from 2021 to 2022, advising President Biden on economic policy at the intersection of economics and national security. 

Before his time in government, Singh was PGIM Fixed Income’s global chief economist and head of macroeconomic research from 2022 to 2024. 

In his new role, Singh will oversee the global macroeconomic research team and play a key part in expanding PGIM Fixed Income’s global presence. He will also be on the senior leadership, reporting to Gregory Peters, co-chief investment officer. 

“Daleep’s extensive experience and insight at the highest levels of government will be fundamental in helping our firm navigate the increasingly complex macroeconomic and geopolitical forces driving global financial markets,” said Peters.

Singh’s previous roles include executive vice president at the New York Federal Reserve and positions at the U.S. Department of the Treasury and Goldman Sachs, focusing on U.S. interest rates and emerging markets. 

“I’m excited to return to PGIM Fixed Income and contribute to the firm’s success during this transformative period,” said Singh

Singh’s return strengthens PGIM Fixed Income’s leadership as it continues shaping the future of global investment strategies. 

Ben Harper Joins I Squared Capital as new Managing Director, Head of Sustainability

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Ben Harper I Squared Capital sustainability
Photo courtesyLinkedIn Image

I Squared Capital has announced the appointment of Ben Harper as Head of Sustainability. Based on the firm’s Miami office, Harper will oversee sustainability initiatives and climate risk mitigation strategies across I Squared Capital’s portfolio assets. 

Harper brings extensive experience in ESG leadership. Before joining I Squared Capital, he served as Managing Director, Head of ESG at Stonepeak, where he played a pivotal role in integrating sustainability across investment strategies.

“We are delighted to welcome Ben,” said Sadek Wahba, Chairman and Managing Partner at I Squared Capital. “We are confident that Ben’s expertise and leadership will further enhance our overall efforts to create long-term value for our stakeholders,” he added. 

Beyond his corporate experience, Harper has actively shaped public policy and industry best practices. His contributions include work with the White House Interagency CCS Task Force and the European Union’s Zero Emission Platform. 

Additionally, he served on advisory boards for organizations such as the American Society of Civil Engineers Infrastructure Resilience Division and the United States Principles for Responsible investment Infrastructure Advisory Committee. 

Harper’s expertise in sustainability and infrastructure resilience will enhance I Squared Capital’s ongoing efforts to create long-term value for its stakeholders. 

Assets in Tokenized Investment Products to Reach $317 Billion by 2028

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

tokenized investment products growth
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Innovation in investment products is essential for asset managers to adapt to new market opportunities and shifting investor preferences. In the past, financial engineering played a key role in the evolution of investment vehicles, but now, technology is emerging as the primary driver of innovation.

According to the 2024 Asset and Wealth Management Report by PwC, one of the most prominent trends is the growth of tokenized investment products.

“In our base-case scenario, we project that assets under management in tokenized investment funds—including mutual funds and alternative funds, but excluding mandates—will grow from $40 billion in 2023 to over $317 billion by 2028,” the report states.

PwC explains that while this still represents a small fraction of the total market, it is expanding at an impressive compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 50%. This surge is driven by the need for greater liquidity, enhanced transparency, and broader investment access, particularly within alternative funds, which may include private equity, real estate, commodities, and other non-traditional assets.

The PwC report highlights that tokenization is providing investors with greater opportunities to diversify their portfolios into digital asset classes, especially as regulatory restrictions gradually ease.

According to the report’s conclusions, this innovation allows asset and wealth management firms to diversify portfolios, access non-correlated asset classes, and attract a new generation of tech-savvy clients.

“Currently, 18% of surveyed asset and wealth managers offer digital assets within their product offerings. While these products are still in their early stages, investor interest is growing. Eight out of ten managers who offer digital assets have reported an increase in inflows,” the report states.

PwC identifies a second major advantage of tokenized investment products: the ability to develop applications and platforms that enable retail investors to purchase fractional shares in private markets or tokenized funds.

“Tokenized fractional ownership could expand market opportunities by lowering minimum investments and allowing traditionally illiquid assets to be traded on secondary markets,” PwC analysts explain.

In fact, the survey highlights strong interest in tokenized private market assets from both asset managers and institutional investors, with more than half of each group identifying private equity as the primary tokenized asset class.

Nearly 8 in 10 Workers Report Concern Over Rising Medical Costs

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

workers concern rising medical costs
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

MetLife’s 2025 U.S. Employee Benefit Trends Study paints a concerning picture for today’s workplace, revealing significant drops in holistic health -5%, productivity -5%, and engagement -7%. Financial stress is a major factor, with 77% of employees citing rising medical costs and 68% pointing to economic uncertainty as their main sources of stress. 

In the face of these challenges, employees increasingly turn to their employers for support and stability. The study reveals that 81% of employees believe their employer should build trust in the workplace, and employees are 1.5 times more likely to trust their employer than other institutions. 

With responsibility to foster trust comes a significant opportunity for employers to improve workplace outcomes. MetLife’s research shows that employees who trust their employer and feel cared for are 3.8 times more likely to feel holistically healthy, 2.4 times more engaged, and 1.9 times more productive than those who don’t experience this care. 

Employers can build trust by creating a supportive workplace culture and offering benefits that are easy to understand and use. It’s important to give employees opportunities to provide feedback and help them make the most of their benefits. 

“Our research shows that employers who demonstrate they care for their employees see better workplace health and results,” said Todd Katz, head of Group Benefits at MetLife. 

The study also finds that employees who use their benefits effectively are 2.4 times more likely to feel holistically healthy, 2.1 times more likely to trust their employer during tough economic times, and 1.8 times more likely to trust their employer’s leadership. 

“Benefits give employees stability and protection in uncertain times, which strengthen trust,” Katz added.

To help employees make informed decisions about their benefits, MetLife offers tools like Upwise, reminders, and guidance. In 2024, 64% of employees who had access to Upwise during enrollment used it, and 84% of those completed the steps to get a benefits recommendation. 

MetLife’s study found that employers who prioritize employee care, build trust, and offer clear benefits experiences can foster a more engaged, productive, and healthy workforce. 

Nasdaq Expands in Texas with New Dallas Hub

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Nasdaq expansion Texas Dallas
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Nasdaq announced new investments to enhance liquidity, transparency, and financial integrity in Texas with the creation of a new Hub in Dallas, which will serve as a center for business leaders and innovators.

The company behind the famous index reaffirmed its commitment to the state of Texas and highlighted Texas’s role as a global innovation hub at an event held last Tuesday alongside Governor Greg Abbott, Ross Perot Jr., and state leaders.

With over $750 million in revenue generated in Texas and the southeastern U.S., according to company data, Nasdaq works with more than 2,000 clients—800 of them in Texas—and is home to over 200 Texas-based companies with a combined market capitalization of $1.98 trillion as of December 2024.

“Nasdaq is deeply embedded in the fabric of Texas’s economy, and we look forward to maintaining our leadership as the preferred partner to the state’s most innovative companies,” said Adena Friedman, Nasdaq’s Chair and CEO.

The firm continues to advocate for corporate issuers on matters such as the SEC’s climate and cyber disclosure rules, AI regulation, and proxy advisory reform.

Nasdaq’s investments strengthen Texas’s position as a financial and technology powerhouse, driving business expansion and economic resilience for years to come, the statement concluded.

Fixed Income: Navigating Between Tailwinds and Geopolitical and Commercial Uncertainty

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

fixed income geopolitical uncertainty
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

“The excess return of 2024 as a whole shows the highest performance in high beta segments, meaning the riskiest market segments that offer greater return potential, and in euro markets,” explains the Amundi Investment Institute in its latest report.

According to the asset manager’s outlook for this year, corporate fundamentals remain strong, as companies have taken advantage of the post-pandemic period of ultra-low interest rates and economic recovery to improve their credit profiles, while technical conditions remain favorable.

“Structurally higher interest rates should support demand for corporate credit from investors seeking yields before central banks cut rates further. Official rate cuts could help support bond flows from money markets into longer-duration interest rate products to secure higher income. Net supply remains limited, as issuance is largely allocated to refinancing. Lastly, the buoyant dynamics of CLOs are also indirectly fueling demand for high-yield bonds, contributing to overall demand support in this market segment,” the report states.

Factors Driving the Fixed Income Market

According to Marco Giordano, Investment Director at Wellington Management, fixed income markets continue to rebound, while concerns about the potential negative impact on economic growth from global tariffs, turmoil in the U.S. federal government, and growing uncertainty are affecting overall sentiment.

“Credit spreads widened, with most sectors showing lower returns compared to equivalent government bonds,” Giordano highlights.

According to his analysis, four factors are currently moving the market: the Trump Administration’s tariff policy, Germany’s new political landscape, and European fiscal stimulus.

For the Wellington Management expert, one of the most significant implications of this scenario is that Europe is experiencing a major boost.

“Germany’s commitment to increasing its debt-to-GDP ratio to 20% has shaken markets, with bond yields surging across the eurozone. The 10-year German bund yield recorded its largest single-day increase since March 1990, rising 25 basis points. The spread between 10-year Italian bonds and German bunds fell below 100 basis points. Outside the eurozone, bond yields rose slightly in Australia, New Zealand, and Japan,” notes Giordano.

Meanwhile, in the U.S. fixed income market, yields continue to trend downward.

“At the end of February, long-term U.S. Treasury bonds with 7-10 year maturities had risen 3.5%, while the S&P 500 index had gained only 1.4%. In fact, so far this year, U.S. bonds have outperformed U.S. equities. As surprising as it may seem, there could be a perfectly valid reason for this relative performance. Naturally, recent U.S. economic data has tended to disappoint, which may explain why the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield has fallen from 4.57% to 4.11% year to date,” explains Yves Bonzon, Chief Investment Officer (CIO) at Swiss private bank Julius Baer.

IG, CoCos, Frontier Bonds, and Corporate Credit: Asset Managers’ Investment Proposals

According to Benoit Anne, Managing Director of the Strategy and Insights Group at MFS Investment Management, euro credit valuations appear attractive from a long-term perspective.

“Given the current appealing level of euro-denominated investment-grade bond yields, the expected return outlook has improved considerably. Historically, there has been a strong relationship between initial yields like the current ones and solid future returns,” explains Anne.

He supports this with a clear example:

“With an initial **3.40% yield for euro IG bonds, the average annualized return for the following five years (using a range of ±30 basis points) is 4.40%—a hypothetically attractive return, with a range of 3.09% to 5.88%. In comparison, the 20-year annualized return for euro IG bonds stands at 2.72%, suggesting that, given current yields, this asset class is well-positioned to potentially offer above-average returns in the coming years.”

Crédit Mutuel AM, on the other hand, is focusing on the subordinated debt market.

According to their assessment, this type of asset posted positive returns of 0.6% to 1%, with a particularly dynamic primary market in AT1 CoCos.

“European banks took advantage of favorable conditions to prefinance upcoming issuances, with sustained demand. Additionally, bank earnings were solid, balance sheets became increasingly robust, and there was ongoing interest in mergers and acquisitions,” say Paul Gurzal, Co-Head of Fixed Income, and Jérémie Boudinet, Head of Financial and Subordinated Debt at Crédit Mutuel AM.

According to their analysis, the market maintained the trend of previous months, with positive inflows, strong primary market dynamics, and continued risk appetite, despite more mixed signals at the end of the month.

“The primary market was particularly dynamic for AT1 CoCos, with €11.6 billion issued during the month, which we estimate will account for 25%-30% of all 2025 issuances, as European banks took advantage of favorable market conditions to prefinance their upcoming 2025 calls,” add Gurzal and Boudinet.

The third fixed income investment idea comes from Kevin Daly, Chief Investment Officer and Emerging Markets Debt Expert at Aberdeen.

“After a strong 2024, we remain cautiously optimistic about the outlook for frontier bonds. Overall, fundamentals have improved, and there is still ample upside potential in terms of returns. Duration risk is low, which could help mitigate the impact of rising U.S. Treasury yields. Additionally, default risk—by all indicators—has also declined over the past year, driven by debt restructurings and improved maturity profiles. Risks related to the new Trump 2.0 administration are valid, but we believe the situation is more nuanced than generally discussed,” says Daly.

Lastly, Amundi believes that investment opportunities will remain linked to the pursuit of yields, which will continue to be a priority for most investors.

“We believe credit spread compression may have reached its peak in this cycle. After two consecutive strong years, credit spreads for both investment-grade and high-yield bonds are undeniably tight, but yields remain attractive compared to long-term trends. For this reason, we believe corporate bonds should continue to be an attractive income-generating option in 2025,” the asset manager states in its latest report.

Santander Hires Peter Huber as New Global Head of Insurance

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Santander Peter Huber insurance
Photo courtesy

Banco Santander strengthens its insurance business with the appointment of Peter Huber as its new global head, replacing Armando Baquero, who has decided to leave the bank to pursue new professional projects. Huber, who has over 20 years of experience in the sector, joins from the insurtech Wefox, where he held the position of director of insurance.

In his new role at Santander, Huber will report to Javier García Carranza, global head of Wealth Management and Insurance. According to Bloomberg, he will also join Santander’s Board of Directors as vice chairman, while Jaime Rodríguez Andrade will be appointed CEO of the holding company.

According to the financial news agency, Santander has also announced that it will split its Insurance division into two: Life and Pensions, and Protection Insurance, with the former being led by Jaime Rodríguez Andrade, who will report to Huber.

Startups Led by a Solo Founder Have More Than Doubled, But Are Less Successful in Raising Venture Capital

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

solo-founder startups venture capital
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Startups led by a solo founder have more than doubled in the past decade, while new companies with three, four, or five founders have become less common. However, solo founders are less likely to secure venture capital funding. At the same time, equal equity splits are becoming more common among founding teams, and founder ownership decreases more sharply in the early stages of financing.

These are the main takeaways from the Founder Ownership Report 2025 by Carta, a software and services platform for private equity firms. The report, based on the analysis of anonymized data from over 45,000 startups founded between 2015 and 2024, sheds new light on how startup ownership works across the U.S. entrepreneurial ecosystem.

“How should a company spend this valuable resource? We hope this data helps founding teams and their investors think through this question at every stage of the financing journey,” write the report’s authors, Peter Walker and Kevin Dowd, in its introduction.

Key Highlights

In recent years, the percentage of all Carta-tracked startups with a solo founder has been rising, with the trend accelerating in 2024. About 35% of all new startups last year had a single founder, compared to 29% in 2023 and 17% in 2017.

Conversely, larger founding teams are becoming less frequent. In 2024, only 16% of all new startups had three founders, 7% had four, and 4% had five—each representing the lowest levels in the past ten years.

These shifts in founding team sizes have continued steadily, even as the broader venture capital market has experienced considerable volatility, the report notes.

The report also highlights that solo founders are less likely to receive venture capital funding compared to larger founding teams. While solo founders made up 35% of all startups launched in 2024, they accounted for just 17% of those that also closed a VC round before the end of the year.

On the other hand, startups with three, four, or five founders tend to outperform expectations. Roughly 11% of startups founded last year that had already raised VC funding had five founders.

“While the data doesn’t show the exact reasons behind this observed preference for co-founders, we can speculate that investors seek both a safety net (in case a lead founder exits the company) and complementary skill sets (perhaps a commercial founder paired with a technical one) to reduce the risk of early-stage bets,” the report explains.

Another important point highlighted by Carta’s research is the growing trend toward equal equity splits. While most founding teams still choose to split equity unequally, an increasing number of co-founders are opting for equal division. The data shows that in 2024, 45.9% of two-person founding teams split their equity equally, up from 31.5% in 2015.

The report also underscores that founder ownership declines the most in the earliest stages: after raising an initial funding round, the average founding team collectively holds 56.2% of their startup’s equity. By Series A, that figure drops to 36.1%, and to 23% by Series B.

“In some cases, the founding team consists of just one person—a solo entrepreneur eager to do it all. In others, it includes multiple co-founders looking to leverage their complementary skills to win in the market,” the report states. “From the beginning, deciding how to split equity among co-founders, investors, employees, and other stakeholders is a strategic choice, and it remains critical as the company grows,” it adds.

The report also analyzes startups across different industries. One finding: in general, software-focused startups tend to have smaller founding teams compared to startups in research-intensive sectors that produce physical products.

Carta, with 12 years of experience in private equity and five offices across different continents, supports over 45,000 venture-backed companies and 2.4 million security holders, helping them manage more than $3 trillion in equity.