A Disciplined Approach to Global Equity Income

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

ingresos renta variable global
Photo courtesyMatt Burdett, Head of Equities and Managing Director, Thornburg

Narrow market leadership, elevated valuations, and unevenly priced risk are raising the bar for portfolio construction. For many investors, the challenge is maintaining equity exposure while reducing reliance on concentration, duration sensitivity, and multiple expansion. In this Q&A, Matt Burdett, Head of Equities at Thornburg, explains how the Thornburg Equity Income Builder Fund is positioned to deliver resilient income and diversification through disciplined global stock selection.

What role is Equity Income Builder designed to play in a portfolio?

We think of the Fund as a diversified global equity allocation where income plays a meaningful role in total return. Investors often use it as a core holding with a defensive tilt, or as a complement to growth-oriented or U.S.-heavy strategies.

The idea isn’t to replace growth exposure, but to balance it. By focusing on high-quality global companies with durable cash flows, the strategy brings valuation discipline and diversification back into portfolios that may have become more concentrated over time.

How has the Fund delivered income across market cycles?

One thing that’s been very consistent is dividend growth. That’s been driven by companies with resilient earnings and management teams that take capital allocation seriously. Dividends increased again in 2025, which reinforces our focus on sustainability rather than chasing yield.

From a total return standpoint, the Fund has tended to participate in market upside while cushioning more of the downside. That balance has helped deliver positive returns in most calendar years since inception and contributed to a smoother return profile across different environments.

Markets feel stretched, and leadership remains narrow. What is the key challenge today?

In many parts of the market, investors aren’t being paid much for taking risks. Valuations are elevated, and the margin for error is thin. In that kind of environment, broad, benchmark-driven exposure can struggle, especially when returns are concentrated in a small number of stocks.

That’s why we stay very focused on bottom-up stock selection and balance-sheet strength. When markets become less forgiving, those fundamentals really start to matter.

What changes in global equity markets matter most for income investors?

For a long time, capital appreciation did most of the heavy lifting for equity returns. That’s starting to change. Returns are becoming more dispersed across regions and sectors, which means income and dividend growth are again becoming more important contributors to total return.

In our view, that shift favours strategies that can source income from different parts of the market rather than relying on a narrow leadership group.

How is the portfolio positioned today?

The portfolio is built around high-quality global businesses with durable cash flows and the ability to sustain and grow dividends. While markets delivered positive returns in 2025, leadership remained quite narrow in some places. Our positioning reflects a preference for balance and income resilience rather than leaning heavily into a small group of dominant names.

Where is dividend growth coming from?

It’s largely coming from business quality rather than leverage or short-term cycles.

In telecoms, recurring revenues and scale support steady cash generation. Utilities and energy benefit from regulated assets and long-lived infrastructure. Healthcare holdings tend to have stable demand and strong balance sheets. In financials, dividend growth reflects more conservative payout ratios and improved capital efficiency. And in select technology holdings, dividends are supported by strong free cash flow rather than aggressive payout policies.

Where are you most cautious?

We’re careful around businesses where dividends depend on leverage, refinancing conditions, or very supportive capital markets. As the cost of capital rises, dividend sustainability must be supported by free cash flow. We’re also mindful of situations in which valuation has run ahead of fundamentals, and income has become secondary to growth narratives.

How does this approach support downside resilience?

Downside resilience comes from diversification across sectors and regions, strong balance sheets, and a focus on recurring revenues. Because income is sourced from multiple areas of the market, the portfolio isn’t reliant on any single economic outcome. Historically, that’s translated into meaningfully lower downside capture during market drawdowns.

 

 

 

To learn more, visit Thornburg.com

Professionalization, Holistic Vision, and Impact: The Three Trends Shaping Philanthropy

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

state street etf listed private abs
Canva

As philanthropy and impact investing take on a more strategic role in how families manage their wealth, and as the great wealth transfer accelerates, family offices are not only adapting but are also beginning to influence how capital is deployed to address social and environmental challenges.

In this regard, the UBS Global Family Office Report 2025 identifies three clear trends in how these high-net-worth entities approach philanthropy: greater professionalization of these services, a stronger role for family offices within philanthropy, and a shift from isolated impact toward integration across the entire family asset portfolio.

According to the report’s conclusions, the family office landscape is not changing in a single direction, nor at the same pace for everyone. Rather, we are seeing a global trend in which different factors point to a shift toward more integrated ways of organizing capital and aligning wealth, business, and philanthropy.

Response of family offices

“For some family offices, this has meant looking beyond mere portfolio construction and thinking more deliberately about alignment between governance structures, investment strategies, and operating businesses. Others are placing greater emphasis on internal coordination, with the family office increasingly acting as the connective tissue between entities, advisors, and decision-makers,” explain UBS.

In their view, in practice this has less to do with adopting a specific ideology and more with responding to increasing complexity through better governance, clearer mandates, and stronger execution.

On the other hand, the report finds that collaboration has become another common theme: “Whether working with peers, co-investors, public institutions, or philanthropic partners, family offices are seeking to operate in more interconnected ways. The ability to convene and contribute within partnerships is becoming just as important as financial expertise.”

In this context, a relevant aspect is the role being played by technology and AI, which are not yet widely integrated into philanthropy or family office governance. “Many firms recognize their longer-term potential, especially for improving transparency, comparability, and insight in increasingly complex structures. Over time, digital capability will likely become an important support for decision-making, alongside judgment and experience,” the report notes as a trend.

According to its conclusions, the family offices best positioned for what lies ahead will be those that combine disciplined execution with openness to new ways of working; those that view alignment, collaboration, and continuous learning as essential capabilities. “For those seeking to manage their wealth with purpose and influence, this moment offers an opportunity: to shape their own legacy and, equally important, the broader systems in which their capital operates,” the report concludes.

State Street IM Launches an ETF of Listed and Private ABS

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

ucits corporate bond funds shocks
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

State Street Investment Management has announced the launch of the State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF (PRAB), an actively managed exchange-traded fund designed to expand investor access to a fast-growing, higher-quality segment of global credit markets.

PRAB primarily invests in investment grade asset-backed securities (ABS), both listed and private, including collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), as well as residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities. The fund’s innovative exposure to both listed and private ABS responds to growing investor demand for income-oriented strategies with higher ratings. The fund’s allocation to private ABS may include, among others, securities provided by Apollo Global Securities, LLC.

By investing across a broad range of investment grade ABS — including ABS sectors that have historically had limited or no representation in the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond IndexPRAB can serve as an effective complement to core bond allocations and help diversify sources of income within a bond portfolio.

“Although the global asset-backed financing market exceeds $20 trillion, ABS have long been underrepresented in investor portfolios,” said Anna Paglia, Chief Business Officer at State Street Investment Management. “With PRAB, we are expanding investor access to a higher-quality yet still largely untapped segment of the global credit market, which offers diverse sources of potential income and the possibility of higher returns compared to corporate bonds with a similar risk profile,” she concluded.

Managed by State Street Investment Management’s active fixed income team, the PRAB ETF adopts a risk-aware top-down approach combined with bottom-up security selection designed to overweight the most attractive sectors and issuers.

PRAB adds to State Street Investment Management’s growing range of innovative public and private credit solutions, following the launches of the State Street® IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRIV) and the State Street® Short Duration IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRSD) in 2025. The range had attracted approximately $980 million in assets as of the end of February 2026.

How UCITS Corporate Bond Funds Behave in the Face of Financial Shocks

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

obstaculos inversor minorista esma

International investors consider UCITS funds to be a solid, reliable vehicle with very clear regulation. Achieving this success has required the commitment of European authorities, which, following recent financial crises, have intensified scrutiny over the role of redemptions in bond funds as a potential amplifier of market stress. In particular, they have emphasized the need to strengthen liquidity management tools and market-wide stress testing frameworks. But have they succeeded?

According to the latest study published by the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA), although there were periods of higher redemptions, the magnitude of outflows in corporate bond funds remained relatively contained during three recent and clearly distinct financial shocks. For EFAMA, the results of the study contradict concerns expressed by financial regulators and international institutions, such as the FSB, the ECB, and the ESRB, which have argued that corporate bond funds — especially those offering daily liquidity — may amplify market stress during periods of turbulence.

“These concerns are based on the theoretical belief that a potential mismatch between the liquidity of fund assets and investors’ redemption rights could trigger forced asset sales (fire sales) and greater financial instability. However, our data indicate that such scenarios did not materialize in practice. Even during periods of high market volatility, fund managers appeared able to meet investor redemptions without resorting to disruptive asset sales or experiencing severe liquidity stress,” states the latest Market Insights report titled “Fund redemptions in periods of shock: evidence from outflows in UCITS corporate bond funds.”

EFAMA’s experts reached this conclusion after conducting a comprehensive analysis of daily and monthly redemption patterns of listed European corporate bond funds during the three most recent financial shocks — COVID-19 in 2020, the interest rate hikes of 2022, and the tariff shock of 2025 — assessing whether the observed redemption levels could pose a material threat to financial stability.

“This analysis suggests that risk-based supervision is more effective than regulation in addressing potential liquidity mismatches in the fund sector. Rather than applying broad measures across the entire fund universe, it may be more effective to focus regulatory attention on specific groups of funds that are structurally more exposed to the risk of extreme outflows,” highlighted Federico Cupelli, Deputy Director of Regulatory Policy at EFAMA.

Following the evidence
The organization explains that the evidence suggests that, at least in the cases analyzed, corporate bond funds acted as relatively stable investment vehicles rather than becoming sources of systemic risk. For example, although the analysis shows that the largest monthly fund redemptions ranged between 3% and 6% of the previous month’s net assets across all observations, ESMA’s stress test scenarios assume redemptions of 22% in a single week. “These results invite a more nuanced view of the role of corporate bond funds in financial stability debates and suggest that current liquidity management practices are more robust than sometimes assumed,” EFAMA notes.

In fact, they argue that the entire debate about the role of bond funds should be framed within a broader context, as investment funds are not the only holders of bonds. “Other key players, such as central banks, banks, pension funds, insurers, and sovereign wealth funds — among others — represent a much larger share of fixed income holdings compared to investment funds,” they point out.

Finally, they emphasize that this analysis suggests that risk-based supervision is more effective than broad-based regulation in addressing potential liquidity mismatches in the fund sector. “Rather than applying broad measures across the entire fund universe, it may be more effective to focus regulatory attention on specific groups of funds that are structurally more exposed to the risk of extreme outflows,” they argue.

EFAMA’s proposal
Based on its previous analysis, EFAMA has identified several principles that supervisors should take into account when overseeing funds:

  1. The notion of liquidity mismatch used by supervisors to identify vulnerabilities in the fund sector is inappropriate. In their view, rather than examining how much investors can redeem over a given period according to the fund’s rules, supervisors should consider how much outflow volume a fund can reasonably expect based on its historical behavior.
  2. Fund subcategories, such as investment grade and high-yield corporate bond funds, are not homogeneous categories. Therefore, they do not consider it appropriate to limit the analysis to their aggregate behavior (for example, by stating that “high-yield corporate bond funds exhibit structural liquidity mismatches”). “A more granular analysis is needed to identify those funds that are more vulnerable to liquidity shocks. Similarly, in top-down stress test scenarios, it is not appropriate to assume that all funds within a category will face similar levels of redemptions. Stress test exercises based on these assumptions are unlikely to accurately identify where vulnerabilities truly lie, if they exist,” they argue.

    3. It is relatively rare for a fund to experience daily outflows exceeding 3%. “This means that, in most cases, asset managers do not face sudden and significant outflows that could trigger forced asset sales. Moreover, large outflows are usually driven by the exit of an institutional investor from the fund,” they explain. In such cases, they note that the investor is typically required to provide sufficient advance notice to the manager so that preparations can be made for the withdrawal. For this reason, persistent daily outflows above 3% could be an indication of stress in a fund and may warrant closer supervisory attention.

Geopolitical conflicts: Tools to benefit from market volatility in investment portfolios

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

geopolitical conflict market volatility
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainAutor: sergeitokmakov

Tensions between the United States, Israel, and Iran are once again placing geopolitics at the center of financial markets. For asset managers, the challenge is not only to react to volatility, but to design portfolios capable of withstanding energy shocks, unexpected inflation, and recurring episodes of global uncertainty.

For years, institutional investors operated under an implicit assumption: geopolitics could trigger episodes of volatility but rarely altered the long-term functioning of global markets. That paradigm is now changing.

The conflict in the Middle East serves as a reminder that geopolitical risks can directly affect energy markets, inflation dynamics, and the behavior of financial assets.

The critical point lies in the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most important energy corridor, through which approximately 20% of global oil consumption flows. Any disruption in this strategic route could trigger sharp movements in energy prices, inflationary pressures, and greater volatility across financial markets.

For asset managers, the key question is clear: how to construct portfolios capable of withstanding and adapting to a more volatile geopolitical environment.

This geopolitical context arrives at a time when the asset management industry was already undergoing structural changes.

The world’s largest asset managers currently oversee nearly $140 trillion in assets, intensifying competition to generate alpha, innovate in product offerings, and expand distribution channels.

At the same time, several analyses point to clear trends shaping the industry:

  • accelerated growth of private markets
  • fee pressure in traditional products
  • greater use of technology and artificial intelligence in portfolio management
  • increasing demand for alternative strategies

In this environment, reports such as Northern Trust’s Global Investment Outlook 2026 warn that markets may face greater dispersion among assets, more persistent inflation, and recurring episodes of volatility—factors that reinforce the importance of active management.

Another important transformation is the growing convergence between public and private markets. Increasingly, traditional asset managers are incorporating private market strategies, while alternative firms are seeking structures that allow them to broaden their investor base.

The result is a new asset management model in which public and private markets begin to integrate within a single investment architecture.

Portfolio resilience in the new geopolitical era

In this new environment, portfolio resilience no longer depends solely on diversification between equities and bonds. It increasingly relies on a combination of structural factors and the architecture of the investment vehicle itself.

How markets typically react to geopolitical shocks

Although geopolitical conflicts often trigger initial episodes of volatility, they can also create temporary dislocations across financial markets. Historically, such events tend to affect asset classes and economic sectors in different ways.

In the case of tensions in the Middle East, markets usually react through four primary channels:

  • Energy and commodities: risk to strategic routes such as the Strait of Hormuz can push oil and natural gas prices higher.
  • Safe-haven assets: during periods of heightened risk aversion, assets such as gold, the U.S. dollar, and U.S. Treasury bonds often attract stronger inflows.
  • Defense and security: geopolitical conflicts are often accompanied by increased defense and national security spending.

Market volatility: rising uncertainty tends to increase volatility and dispersion across asset classes.

From strategy to investment vehicle

In this context, the structure of the investment vehicle becomes almost as important as the underlying strategy itself.

Asset securitization allows investment strategies or portfolios to be transformed into more efficient and scalable vehicles, offering several advantages for asset managers:

  • facilitating access to international capital
  • consolidating institutional track records
  • improving transparency and distribution
  • providing flexibility in the selection of underlying assets and enhancing diversification 
  • connecting private market opportunities with the liquidity of public markets

These solutions are gaining traction precisely because they address one of the industry’s biggest challenges today: how to expand access to new investment strategies in an increasingly competitive environment.

Geopolitical crises generate uncertainty, but they also tend to create new investment opportunities.

In this environment, institutional asset managers are paying greater attention to risk diversification, exposure to real-economy assets, and the use of more flexible investment structures.

In a world where geopolitics once again plays a decisive role in financial markets, firms that successfully combine structural innovation, genuine diversification, and global access to capital will be better positioned to transform volatility into a competitive advantage.

In line with this evolution in the industry, solutions such as those offered by FlexFunds enable asset managers and investment firms to transform strategies into efficient and scalable investment vehicles, facilitating access to international markets and distribution to a global investor base. For more information, please contact our experts at info@flexfunds.com

Financial Institutions That Have Closed or Evacuated Offices in the Middle East

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

latin american resilient currencies
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

In recent weeks, several international financial institutions and major financial services firms have adopted extraordinary measures in the Middle East — especially in Dubai and other Gulf financial centers — after Iran threatened to attack “economic centers and banks” as part of the escalation of the regional conflict. These warnings triggered temporary office evacuations, branch closures, or the shift to remote work for employees in some of the region’s main financial hubs.

One of the most notable cases is Citigroup. The US bank ordered the evacuation of several of its offices in Dubai, including facilities located in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) and in the Oud Metha district. As a precautionary measure, Citi also temporarily closed some branches in the United Arab Emirates and asked its employees to work from home until the security situation stabilizes.

Another of the affected institutions was Goldman Sachs, which also asked its staff in Dubai and other Gulf countries to avoid going to the office.

JPMorgan Chase adopted similar measures: the bank allowed a large part of its workforce in the Middle East to work remotely while risks to corporate facilities and staff were being assessed.

Among the banks with a strong historical presence in the Gulf, Standard Chartered also asked its employees to temporarily leave offices in Dubai’s financial district and continue their activities remotely. The British bank generates a significant share of its revenue from Asia and the Middle East.

Another international institution affected was HSBC, which temporarily closed some branches in Qatar and expanded remote work policies for its staff in several Gulf countries.

In addition to banks, several global financial services and consulting firms — part of the international financial ecosystem — also adopted similar measures. Among them were PwC and Deloitte, which evacuated or temporarily closed offices in Dubai and other Gulf countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait, as a precautionary measure in response to the Iranian threats.

Note prepared using sources from Euronews, Reuters/AFP (L’Orient Today), The Times, Bloomberg, Middle East Monitor, and The New Arab.

Chilean and Colombian Peso, the Latin American Currencies With the Greatest Resilience

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

private bdcs united states
Canva

The Brazilian real and the Colombian peso should be the currencies that show the greatest resilience during the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, as they are net exporters of oil. Even so, the most notable movement for Ebury is the appreciation of the dollar of between 1% and 4% against the Latin American currencies that they usually cover, “given the shift that has taken place in global markets toward safe-haven assets.”

In its latest report, the firm’s experts highlight that the Chilean peso appears especially vulnerable as it is one of the largest net importers of oil among emerging markets. “In addition, the weight of energy in the national CPI is relatively higher than in other countries,” they add. By contrast, the second key conclusion of the report is that in Peru, local disruptions in the supply of natural gas have further worsened the situation.

The Brazilian real (BRL)

According to Ebury’s report, the Brazilian real has corrected some of its losses, but it has still depreciated by 1.5% against the greenback since the conflict in the Middle East escalated. “As a net exporter of oil, the Brazilian real should be less impacted than other emerging market currencies by the recent rise in oil prices. However, it has not emerged completely unscathed from the generalized flight toward safe-haven assets and currencies such as the dollar,” they note.

As for economic data, which have been completely overshadowed by the geopolitical conflict, Brazil’s fourth-quarter GDP growth came in line with expectations, registering a modest expansion of 0.1% quarter-on-quarter. According to their analysis, this clearly reflects the high interest rates set in Brazil, which they also believe have recently caused some slowdown in the labor market: the unemployment rate rose to 5.4%, although it remains close to historical lows. “Looking ahead, we still believe that Brazil’s central bank will begin its rate-cutting cycle this year, but it may act more cautiously while the conflict in the Middle East persists,” they conclude.

The Chilean peso (CLP)

As indicated in the previously mentioned conclusions of the report, the Chilean peso is one of the currencies most affected by the conflict in the Middle East, and not only at the regional level. “Chile’s position as a net importer of oil, together with the fall in copper prices amid the possibility of weaker global demand, have been the main factors behind the depreciation of the peso, which exceeded 4% last week. Given the risk of an inflationary rebound if the conflict drags on and if oil prices remain elevated, swap markets have drastically adjusted their expectations for rate cuts by the Central Bank of Chile this year,” Ebury argues.

They also highlight that just a few weeks ago markets were pricing in a rate cut at the next meeting with a probability close to 70%; now that figure has fallen to around 25%. “As a result, it is reasonable to anticipate a cautious BCCh at its next Monetary Policy Meeting, despite the recent slowdown in inflation observed in February. As long as geopolitical uncertainty persists and clear signs of de-escalation do not appear, the Chilean peso, like other emerging market currencies, will remain under downward pressure,” the report notes.

The Colombian peso (COP)

In the case of the Colombian peso, Ebury’s analysis indicates that it has also been one of the most resilient currencies in Latin America since the conflict in Iran broke out, as it is a net exporter of oil. That said, the document notes that it has also lost ground against the greenback (just over 1%) amid the generalized flight from risk assets and currencies.

In addition, the parliamentary elections do not appear to have had a significant impact on the exchange rate, with the expected political fragmentation taking place. “Pacto Histórico emerged as the political force with the greatest representation in Congress, while the strong result of Paloma Valencia puts her in a good position to compete with De la Espriella for the right-wing vote. Given the high percentage of undecided voters, the potential outcome of the presidential election continues to generate uncertainty in the local market, which could add a risk premium to the peso,” they note.

The Mexican peso (MXN)

For its part, the Mexican peso has fallen by more than 3% against the greenback since the outbreak of the conflict. According to the report, amid the possibility of higher inflation, markets have stopped pricing in rate cuts by Banxico. “In addition to developments in oil prices and geopolitical tensions, markets will closely monitor the negotiations over the USMCA, which are scheduled to begin next week,” they note.

In part, according to their view, this could be positive news for the Mexican economy, as trade uncertainty could dissipate sooner than expected. However, they believe that the net impact on the economy and the Mexican peso will depend largely on the content of the agreement that is ultimately ratified. In this sense, Ebury’s forecast is clear: additional volatility around the Mexican peso can be expected in the coming weeks.

The Peruvian sol (PEN)

Finally, the report highlights the performance of the Peruvian sol, which has fallen almost 4% since the first attacks by the United States and Israel on Iran, depreciating to levels not seen since late September. It is worth recalling that, as a net importer of oil, Peru is vulnerable to this energy shock.

“Although it started from more favorable inflation levels than other countries, a leak in a gas pipeline in the south of the country is causing a severe shortage, leading to energy rationing across different sectors. A significant rebound in inflation is expected in upcoming readings, which will partially correct once the leak is repaired. This is believed to take approximately two weeks. In this regard, it will be interesting to analyze how the BCRP responds to these developments at this week’s meeting,” Ebury concludes.

The Liquid and the Solid: What Is Happening with Private BDCs in the United States

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

fondos ucits bonos corporativos shocks
Canva

Tensions, crisis, a reminder of a structural reality, a turning point, and opportunity: in recent weeks the alternative assets and private credit sector has experienced episodes of lack of immediate liquidity that have led major asset managers to limit capital withdrawals.

This phenomenon does not necessarily imply insolvency, but it does reflect a structural problem in the segment: the difficulty of offering frequent liquidity in vehicles that invest in very illiquid assets, such as direct loans to companies.

There is a “liquidity mismatch,” or as Jaime Cruz, Portfolio Manager Private Debt USA at Fynsa AGF, notes in a recent report: “In simple terms, the market is remembering a structural reality: private credit is not a liquid asset, even though some structures attempt to offer periodic exit windows.”

A new difficulty for investors already saturated with uncertainty

Amid the enormous uncertainty generated by the new war in the Middle East and the chronic instability of public markets, experts are observing these movements that until recently “seemed unlikely,” according to Cruz himself.

For analysts at Apollo Academy (a firm specialized in alternative assets), we are facing a turning point.

During the period roughly between 2010 and 2022, low interest rates, abundant liquidity, and multiple expansion allowed many managers to generate returns without needing to rely heavily on operational value creation. However, the macroeconomic environment has changed structurally, and the sector now faces a scenario in which those factors can no longer sustain the same level of returns. In this context, the future success of private equity will depend on recovering the principles that historically defined the industry: discipline in acquisitions, operational improvement of portfolio companies, and clear strategies to generate liquidity at exit, argue David Sambur, Partner Co-Head of Private Equity and Head of Equity; Matt Nord, Partner Co-Head of Private Equity and Head of Hybrid; and Antoine Munfakh, Partner Deputy Glob, in a report attached at this link.

The Apollo report argues that private equity must return to its roots: “Traditionally, the attractiveness of this asset class was based on managers’ ability to acquire companies with potential for improvement, implement strategic and operational changes, and subsequently monetize that value through an exit. This approach involved active participation in the management of companies, with the objective of improving their efficiency, optimizing their cost structure, driving growth, or redefining their competitive positioning. Because they were not subject to the pressure of quarterly results typical of public markets, companies under private equity ownership could adopt long-term transformation strategies.”

Greater differentiation among asset managers

Experts agree that opportunities in the sector will depend on greater differentiation among asset managers’ strategies.

“Greater competition among managers, together with the return of some banks to certain segments of corporate financing, has begun to put pressure on origination conditions. This has translated into lower origination in some segments and a gradual compression of spreads, particularly in corporate direct lending, where most BDCs operate.

This adjustment is creating an increasingly clear differentiation within the universe of private credit. While many BDCs compete in the corporate direct lending segment, there are other areas of private credit where competition remains significantly lower,” says Jaime Cruz, Portfolio Manager Private Debt USA at Fynsa AGF.

In particular, financing backed by real assets — such as asset-backed lending and real estate financing — continues to offer attractive spreads and more defensive structures, with origination dynamics that remain favorable, the expert adds.

“For those investing with a long-term horizon, this dynamic is not necessarily negative. In fact, it can strengthen the ecosystem. When speculative flows decrease and the capital that remains is truly patient, managers can focus on what truly generates value: originating quality credit, structuring solid transactions, and capturing attractive spreads. In that sense, what is happening today with private BDCs is not a crisis, but a natural transition in a market that has grown rapidly over the past decade. And as often happens in financial markets, periods of adjustment are also those that ultimately consolidate long-term opportunities,” concludes Cruz.

Bond Market: An Unusual Behavior to Watch

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

kevin warsh economic debate
Canva

Rising oil prices and adjustments in global equity markets are capturing investors’ attention; however, investment firms are urging investors to watch what is happening in the fixed income market, especially with bonds. Since the start of the war between the U.S. and Iran at the end of February, the bond market has behaved in an unusual way for a geopolitical conflict.

According to experts, it is striking that instead of clearly acting as a safe haven, bonds have experienced selling pressure and their yields have risen. For example, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury exceeded 4%, driven by rising oil prices and inflation expectations. Normally, during geopolitical episodes there is a “flight to quality,” meaning investors buy sovereign bonds as safe-haven assets. However, this time the opposite has happened because inflation risk has weighed more heavily than the safe-haven effect. Some analysts have even noted that the bond market “is not functioning as a safe haven” in this episode.

Bond Market Behavior

“In the case of sovereign bonds, the most common pattern during periods of geopolitical tension has been a decline in yields due to demand for safe-haven assets. This was the initial reaction following the announcement of the military operation. However, yields subsequently rose throughout the week. With the exception of Japan, the main government debt markets have experienced a bear flattening so far this month, with short-term yields showing significantly worse performance. The so-called ‘bond vigilantes’ could argue that this reflects the increasingly fragile state of public balance sheets, given the high level of debt and ongoing fiscal expansion, which could undermine the traditional role of sovereign bonds as a store of value during periods of global uncertainty,” explain experts at Muzinich & Co.

Daniel Loughney, Head of Fixed Income at Mediolanum International Funds (MIFL), agrees that, so far, sovereign debt has shown the weakest performance, as inflation concerns have led to the dismantling of expectations for interest rate cuts. “In fact, the ECB is now expected to tighten monetary policy by around 50 basis points. As a result, short-term bonds have been the most affected, while longer-maturity bonds have suffered less,” he notes.

In the view of Luke Hickmore, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income at Aberdeen, the reason for this behavior is that the bond market is highly focused on the problems that could arise from rising hydrocarbon prices, particularly the impact of natural gas prices in Europe and the United Kingdom. “U.K. government bonds have performed very poorly during this period, with the yield on 10-year bonds rising by around 0.5% during this conflict, and shorter-dated bonds are now moving to price in an interest rate hike by the Bank of England in June.”

For their part, Adam Hetts, Global Head of Multi-Asset, and Oliver Blackbourn, Portfolio Manager at Janus Henderson, explain that concerns about rising European inflation—or simply prolonged stickiness in the United States—would explain why bond yields have increased. “Yields on U.S. Treasury bonds have risen as markets have priced out one of the interest rate cuts by the U.S. Federal Reserve that had been expected for the end of the year. Yields on 10-year Treasuries have moved less than their European counterparts, as Friday’s U.S. employment figures helped offset part of the upward pressure on yields stemming from expected inflation,” they note.

A Look at the Credit Market

In contrast, since the conflict between the U.S. and Iran began, investment grade credit has not significantly reflected economic tensions in prices. According to market reports, spreads have moved slightly but continue to reflect the excellent fundamental quality of most large companies in this environment.

“That is likely where the risk lies in the coming weeks: if oil and gas supply issues persist, which have a lasting negative impact on corporate quality, corporate credit is likely to underperform expectations. In recent months we have favored higher quality in credit markets, reducing risk and holding more cash than we normally would. It is not yet time to put that cash to work,” explains Hickmore.

Muzinich & Co acknowledges that total returns in credit markets are lower so far this month, although, interestingly, high yield has slightly outperformed investment grade credit. “In fact, a European investor positioned in U.S. high yield without currency hedging would probably be quite satisfied with that investment decision so far this month.” As for riskier assets, the U.S. asset manager expects credit spreads to widen.

The Conclusions

After this quick analysis of both markets, according to Luke Hickmore, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income at Aberdeen, what is happening is clear: “The increase in government bond yields is doing part of the heavy lifting and has prevented credit spreads from widening as much as we might have expected before the conflict began.”

Despite these unusual dynamics, Loughney argues in favor of staying invested and says conservative investors should not overreact. “Much of the downside risk has already been priced in under the assumption of a prolonged conflict. Any sign of resolution in the coming week could trigger some reversal of last week’s moves, from which investors could benefit,” he says.

Investment firms argue that the escalation of geopolitical risks has occurred at a time when inflationary pressures have been steadily moderating worldwide. As a result, they explain, over the past 12 months there have been more signs that fixed income can act as a counterweight to weakness in equity markets. “Central banks are likely to look through the brief spike in energy and commodity prices in general. However, a prolonged conflict that increases the likelihood of a sustained rise in oil prices will raise concerns about increasingly entrenched inflation. It is this secondary effect—if inflation expectations become unanchored—that could worry central banks. For now, we see some short-term upside risk for yields, but still within the recent trading range. Recent developments reiterate the need to actively manage fixed income portfolios, not only to take advantage of opportunities but also to protect against downside risks. As always, diversification remains key,” argues James Ringer, fund manager at Schroders.

Why Do We Still Have to Talk About Kevin Warsh?

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

snowden lane partners msci wealth manager
LinkedIn

One week before the meeting of the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed), and with attention focused on the effect that rising oil prices may have on inflation, it is necessary to bring the name of Kevin Warsh back into focus if we want to analyze what we can expect from U.S. monetary policy this year.

Warsh has been noted for his extensive experience, credibility, and strong reputation in the markets, as well as his leadership capacity and firm stance on inflation. In terms of monetary policy, experts consider him hawkish, as he has openly supported interest rate cuts under certain circumstances, although they add that he has a flexible attitude.

According to Raphael Olszyna-Marzys, international economist at J. Safra Sarasin Sustainable AM, the reasons why he was chosen are clear: “He is seen as politically loyal. In addition, he is the son-in-law of Ronald Lauder, a close friend and ally of Trump for many years. He is also a longstanding critic of what he considers the Fed’s overreach, such as financial regulation, consumer protection, the focus on inequality, and quantitative easing (QE). Finally, he has a reputation as a hawk due to his public opposition to the second round of QE, which ultimately led him to resign as a Fed governor in 2011. All of this should give him some credibility with the markets and potentially greater influence within the FOMC than other candidates.”

Robeco: A Genuine “Hawk”?

For experts at Robeco, although he has been portrayed as an “inflation hawk,” some nuances are necessary in the current context. They recall that during his time as a Federal Reserve governor, Warsh expressed concern about the inflationary risks stemming from quantitative easing (QE) and became one of its most outspoken internal critics. “Today we mainly know QE as a policy that has expanded the Fed’s balance sheet. For that reason, it is not surprising that, in an opinion article published in The Wall Street Journal in November 2025, he argued that ‘the Fed’s swollen balance sheet… can be significantly reduced.’ This stance has reinforced his recent portrayal as an ‘inflation hawk,’” they acknowledge.

However, the European asset manager believes that the image of Kevin Warsh as a “hawk” is exaggerated and expects him to support another reduction in official interest rates by June, which would likely be his first meeting as chairman. “In reality, his views suggest room for lower interest rates, not higher ones, and his goal of reducing the Fed’s balance sheet may prove to be more of a desire than a reality. As for his view that the Fed’s balance sheet may be excessively large, we believe that, in practice, it will be difficult to reduce it significantly without regulatory adjustments to the ‘abundant reserves’ regime of the banking system,” they argue.

MFS IM: Non-Traditional Monetary Easing

Regarding what to expect from him, Benoit Anne, Senior Managing Director of the Strategy and Insights Group at MFS Investment Management, believes that the “new Fed chairman” thinks there is room for monetary policy easing, but perhaps not in the most traditional way. “Warsh believes that the United States is experiencing a productivity miracle that will not only boost the country’s long-term growth potential but will also generate significant disinflationary pressures. As inflation moves lower, the Fed will have more room to continue cutting rates, which will please the White House. However, this is where a possible contradiction arises,” notes Anne.

According to the asset manager’s chief economist, Erik Weisman, a trajectory of stronger growth driven by productivity would normally tend to be associated with an increase in the neutral rate. This means that, on this basis, the room for maneuver for the Fed’s monetary policy in that macroeconomic scenario would be smaller, not greater, in the long term.

“Turning to Kevin Warsh’s view of the Fed’s balance sheet, it is clear to everyone that the new Fed chairman favors a certain degree of moderation. But if implemented, a reduction of the balance sheet could affect liquidity and interest rate volatility in a way that might be seen as contradictory to the initial goal of lowering rates,” adds Anne.

Something for Everyone, According to Wellington Management

At Wellington Management, they believe that Warsh could take a step toward reducing the Fed’s power with respect to its current broad mandate and could also play a key role in changing the Fed’s structure and in closer collaboration with the Treasury in managing the Fed’s balance sheet.

“The level of control that the Trump administration has over interest rates, as well as broader regulatory and supervisory decisions, will depend on the final composition of the Fed’s Board, including whether Jerome Powell decides to remain in his position. It will take some time before these decisions are made and before they matter to the markets, but in the medium term I expect them to be significant for the conduct of both monetary and broader policies,” explains Juhi Dhawan, macro strategist at Wellington Management.

Finally, the expert adds that the choice of Warsh, who has advocated restrictive monetary policies throughout his career, should somewhat ease concerns that managing inflation might take a back seat to political priorities. “Markets will be more willing to believe that economic data will dictate how monetary policy is conducted, which should stabilize the dollar from the perspective of devaluation risk,” Dhawan acknowledges.