Allfunds launches nextportfolio3, a new version ready to meet the industry’s ESG challenges. The continued evolution of this tool reinforces Allfunds’ leading role in the digital transformation of the wealth management industry, the company said.
The third version of Allfunds’ nextportfolio tool, which offers advanced portfolio management solutions to more than 400 global institutions, responds to the high demand from financial institutions for ESG analysis and information. According to them, in this new version of nextportfolio3 users will now benefit from four major services such as ESG reports and filters at fund and portfolio level, so that clients can better direct their investments towards ESG-oriented funds, thus meeting the demand for more sustainable portfolios.
It will also feature a portfolio optimizer by asset allocation and fund selection, which allows firms to adjust their portfolios to achieve optimal allocation and efficiency in line with specific levels of risk; and an advanced risk and return attribution module that helps detect the specific contribution of holdings or assets, and provides information to determine the effectiveness of investment diversification. It also features a new end-client portal and mobile app that offers an excellent user experience with new investment analysis and tracking functionality.
“We are delighted to launch a new version of our nextportfolio solution, building on Allfunds’ 20 years of experience in developing technology products that support asset and wealth management with greater efficiency and agility in response to evolving market dynamics. We have leveraged Allfunds’ deep expertise and access to market data to achieve a stronger and more powerful portfolio analysis tool in nexportfolio3. Analysis and reporting tools have been incorporated with a clear focus on ESG management, helping distributors make the best decisions for their clients,” explained Salvador Mas, Global Head of Digital at Allfunds.
This tool is part of the set of digital solutions of the Allfunds platform available for fund managers and distributors. According to the company, the launch of this new version of nextportfolio proves its commitment to the constant development of its offering, introducing new leading solutions to offer efficiency and growth paths to companies in the midst of the transition to an increasingly digitized industry.
Miami-based SupraBrokers created its Supra Wealth Management division to offer new investment opportunities and enhanced financial planning solutions for its clients.
To support the launch of the new Wealth Management division, the company signed an agreement with StoneX, a global financial services platform, expanding its product and solutions offerings for businesses, organizations and investors.
SupraBrokers, with presence in the US, Mexico, Guatemala, Ecuador, Argentina and Uruguay, has Juan Camilo Vargas as Managing Partner of the Wealth Management operation, together with a “team of professionals and specialists in capital markets”, says the company’s press release accessed by Funds Society.
Supra Wealth Management will be the division specialized in wealth management, investments, planning and financial solutions, and is designed to meet the challenges of access to global markets through customized products according to the needs of its clients. It is a registered and supervised entity by the Central Bank of Uruguay with an active license as a Portfolio Manager.
StoneX Group, formerly known as INTL FCStone, connects clients to global markets by offering them access to a wide range of investment solutions and products.
It begins “a new stage with great challenges, but we are sure that our more than 30 years of experience are a guarantee of quality and added value for our entire network,” said Vargas.
On the other hand, SupraBrokers CEO, Robert Parra spoke about the new bet on the Wealth Management division that “is a game changer for us and allows our distribution partners to broaden their horizons by offering their high-level clients a competitive private banking platform, as well as professional investment advice”.
SupraBrokers defines itself as a leading insurance and investment broker in Latin America, with more than 30 years in the industry. It is headquartered in Miami and has offices in Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Montevideo, Guatemala, Quito and Guayaquil.
Through its platform, it connects agents and insurers “in a transparent ecosystem that allows all parties to work efficiently, guaranteeing the well-being of individuals and corporate clients,” the company explains.
After a strong rally alongside developed market equities in 2020, 2021 was a difficult period for emerging markets investors. Last year, the MSCI EM Index trailed it’s developed market counterpart, the MSCI World Index, by nearly 25%– the largest spread between the two indices in nearly a decade. Hampered by a lack of vaccine availability, many emerging economies reopened in fit and starts, often lagging the pace of restart in developed markets. Implications of inflation, and the overhang of expected monetary tightening, were points of consternation. In China and Brazil, the first and third largest economies in EM, regulatory uncertainty and geopolitical tensions roiled local stock markets.
Despite these challenges we believe there’s a lot of positive energy stored up in emerging markets right now, and that investors may be overlooking a potential opportunity in 2022.
Valuations are Supportive
On a forward-looking earnings basis, the MSCI EM Index is trading at a 42% discount relative to the S&P 500 Index. This represents a significant increase in the pre-COVID spread between the markets— as U.S. valuations have expanded by 17% over the past two-years while EM valuations have contracted by 3%.
Valuation’s differentials are even more stark on a historical basis. Over the past decade, forward looking valuations for the S&P 500 Index have stretched by nearly 75% while emerging market valuations have expanded less than 25%. As we look forward to a more normal post-pandemic market environment, where elevated levels of economic uncertainty begin to dissipate, the prospect of a valuation re-rate provide opportunity for EM relative performance.
EM’s Relative Growth Potential is Attractively Priced
While growth expectations in 2022 are above long-term trend for both developed and emerging markets, the IMF forecasts that EM economies will continue to see strong post-COVID growth over the next five years. On the other hand, developed economies are expected to return to sub 2% real growth following 2022. While widening spreads between valuation estimates would seem to support a narrowing of the EM vs. DM growth spread, markets are anticipating an acceleration of the relative growth gap between developed and emerging economies.
Coupling relative valuation estimates with growth forecasts, emerging market equities appear to have priced in a healthy degree of caution and reflect an attractive longer-term relative value.
EM is Ahead of the Curve on Monetary Tightening
Inflationary pressure mounted globally as supply-and-demand mismatches were driven by COVID disruptions and exacerbated by the record amount of government stimulus deployed to avoid a deep global recession. While a cycle of policy rate tightening is expected to begin soon across many developed markets, with the Federal Reserve signaling its first rate hike in March, nearly half of the central banks represented in the MSCI EM Index, including South Korea, Mexico and Brazil, have already began raising rates in an attempt to contain rising prices.
With a head start at combating inflation, and generally less burdened by the aggressive stimulus measure out of developed markets like the U.S. and Europe, EM central banks may be able to turn dovish at an earlier pace than many advanced economies.
EM Laggards may be Poised to Bounce Back in 2022
Brazil saw significant deterioration in its macro outlook during the second half of 2021, as political tensions related to upcoming election, and economic uncertainty driven by COVID stimulus, both accelerated. To manage surging inflation, (which was up 11% YoY) the Brazilian Central Bank has had to raise their target rate to 10,75% (from only 2,75% in March 2021). The increasing likelihood of a more centrist president, coupled with aggressive rate raising aimed at stabilizing the currency and inflation, should be a positive catalyst for 2022.
As a result of these issues, the MSCI Brazil Index is trading at a Forward 12mo P/E of 7X. For context, Brazil was trading at 14X (12mo fwd) entering 2020. While not free of problems, the substantial valuation de-rate seems to be compensating for heightened uncertainty and may presents a strong buying opportunity in 2022 and beyond.
Similar to Brazil, China was major drag on EM performance during the second half of 2021. Regulatory tightening measures, especially on property and technology sectors, caused a lot of heartburn. From an economic perspective, China’s twenty year history of unprecedented growth should garner the benefit of the doubt from investors. Additionally, we have seen some positive policy signs recently which should provide an increased level of investor confidence. During December’s Central Economic Work Conference, an annual meeting where the CCP sets 2022’s economic agenda, policymakers stressed the importance of stabilizing growth and the potential for regulatory easing to support the property sector. Despite 2021 headwinds, China is still looking at ~5% GDP growth in 2022 and better-than-expected reflationary efforts out of Beijing could lead to an overshooting of that target.
Prior to 2021, the last yearly period where we saw China underperform EM by a double-digit margin was 2016. There were some similarities in 2016 to what we saw in 2021. Most notably, a lack of clarity around regulatory policy that pushed investors for the doors. As investor uncertainty faded, China led a strong rebound for emerging markets in 2017—posting a return of 54% and outpacing the MSCI World Index by more than 30%. The MSCI EM Index as a whole beat the MSCI World Index by ~15%.
While we are not necessarily calling for a repeat of 2016 in 2022, it’s important to remember that following periods when sentiment towards EM has waned, it’s often be a great entry point for investing in EM equities.
Thornburg is a global investment firm delivering on strategy for institutions, financial professionals and investors worldwide. The privately held firm, founded in 1982, is an active, high-conviction manager of fixed income, equities, multi-asset solutions and sustainable investments. With $49 billion in client assets ($47 billion AUM and $1.9 billion AUA as of December 31, 2021) the firm offers mutual funds, closed-end funds, institutional accounts, separate accounts for high-net-worth investors and UCITS funds for non-U.S. investors. Thornburg’s U.S. headquarters is in Santa Fe, New Mexico with offices in London, Hong Kong and Shanghai. For more information, please visit www.thornburg.com.
2022 will be a transitional year for active exchange-traded funds (ETFs), according to Cerulli Associates. Its latest researchU.S. Exchange-Traded Fund Markets 2021: Reaching a Growing Investor Basefinds ETF industry participants are adamant that the active ETF opportunity is currently the most significant. In this context, as managers look to bring active product to market, they should continue monitoring the various approaches to launch and understand the tradeoffs associated with each.
The research asserts that the transparent active opportunity is most attractive relative to semi-transparent, strategic beta, and passive offerings. 70% of polled ETF issuers are either currently developing or planning to develop transparent active ETFs. With 266 billion dollars in assets encompassing multiple asset classes and a consistent growth trajectory, transparent active ETFs are already a well-built category and development has more recently been spurred by the ETF rule.
However, Cerulli notes that out of 104 billion dollars in active equity exposures, only a sliver is in true active equity products given that a significant portion is allocated to thematic and strategic-beta-like offerings.
The research points out that managers can also be successful with semi-transparent offerings. 50% of polled ETF issuers either are currently developing or planning to develop semi-transparent active ETFs. “Because holdings overlap and the number of holdings between the same product in two structures can vary significantly, this can lead to performance dispersion. This also complicates the cost-benefit analysis, requiring additional diligence from advisors and home offices”, Cerulli explains.
“Managers considering launching active ETFs should also keep an eye on the dual-share-class structure used by Vanguard, which comes off patent in 2023,” according to Daniil Shapiro, associate director. Previous Cerulli research finds that 38% of issuers are at least considering offering products via this structure. “Considering managers’ interest in offering products in a wrapper-agnostic manner, there is certainly some simplicity to be gained from having the same exposure available for sale via two structures—therein avoiding some of the previously referenced concerns about different exposures in what may be expected to be the same semi-transparent ETF,” adds Shapiro.
Cerulli believes that as issuers and legacy mutual fund managers seek to identify their market entry approach—whether via launching transparent or semi-transparent product, a conversion, or dual-share-class structure—many are still taking a wait-and-see approach to see which firms win out while others are placing bets.
“Ultimately, while the transparent active opportunity may be the most significant asset-gathering opportunity, managers can also be successful via semi-transparent ETFs with the right distribution approach. Conversions should be considered in unique circumstances, while developments regarding the dual-share-class structure should be monitored”, concludes Shapiro.
The true market opportunity for financial technology firms lies in the hands of 2,000 wealth management firms controlling roughly $10 trillion in assets under management, according to Cerulli’s latest report, State of U.S. Wealth Management Technology 2021: Aligning Firm Strategy with Technology Decisions.
The segment of the market most likely to license market-leading vendors consists of broker/dealers (B/Ds), RIAs, and bank/trust firms looking to distinguish themselves to advisors and investors by controlling the client experience and building what they believe to be a best-in-breed tech stack.
These firms are not at scale to do massive internal development like the wirehouses, but are at scale to sign meaningful enterprise agreements with wealth tech vendors, according to the research. These firms are constantly in search of organic growth through client acquisition or inorganic growth through advisor recruiting or M&A.
According to the research, three-quarters of these firms state that their tech philosophy is to license market-leading vendors and to maximize integration between tools.
“There is a meaningful segment of firms that is seeking to leverage top external vendors while also optimizing integration,” states Bing Waldert, managing director of Cerulli.
As noted for many of these firms, their value proposition revolves around optimizing the advisor experience, in part through technology. “Market-leading tools in categories such as performance reporting or financial planning should help the advisor create a better service experience for his or her clients,” he adds.
Portfolio accounting (75%), financial planning (58%), tax-optimization (56%) are the top-three applications licensed from external vendors by wealth managers, according to the research.
For wealth managers working in the high-net-worth (HNW) and ultra-high-net worth (UHNW) segments, the complexity of more affluent clients dictates more specialized solutions. This will be most true in categories such as performance reporting and financial planning.
Performance reporting systems will need to support private investments that are not valued daily and often not held at mainstream custodians. Likewise, a firm might offer a standard offering, such as a homegrown goal and financial planning system, but still offer connectivity to other third-party solutions for more complex clients. “HNW investors are trying to solve for issues such as illiquid business interests, minimization of taxes, and estate planning. Financial planning for this segment must be able to support the necessary complexity,” states Waldert.
The 2021 Glasgow Climate Pact has had one indisputable positive outcome: a greater acceptance by governments globally to accelerate efforts to keep temperatures from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2050 because actual progress toward earlier commitments has not been good enough.
But COP26, as the climate summit was known, also had uncertain outcomes, including the specific roles of government, regulations, and public and private enterprises. Another uncertainty: How to finance the transition and its economic impact on the world economy? The answers to these questions and the behavior of investors as stewards of capital will determine how turbulent the road to Net Zero will be. That’s why we believe that investing for impact should be a primary concern for investors today.
But what does “investing for impact” really mean?
First, it means taking a broad view of Sustainability, one that encompasses Climate Change, Planetary Boundaries, and Inclusive Capitalism. Second, it involves taking a long-term view that focuses on the structural changes the global economy will likely experience over the next 30 years and beyond.
Taking a holistic view of sustainable investing
Investing for positive impact on emissions starts by accepting that Net Zero does not mean that the use of fossil fuels should be zero or that investors should divest completely from all oil and gas.
While renewables (such as wind and solar) are forecast to represent an increasing part of the energy mix, both oil and natural gas will still play a crucial role in producing a steady supply of energy. “Even when the world achieves net-zero emissions, it will hardly mean the end of fossil fuels,” two academics—co-founding Dean of the Columbia Climate School Jason Bordoff and Harvard Kennedy School Professor Meghan O’Sullivan—write in Foreign Affairs. “A landmark report published in 2021 by the International Energy Agency (IEA) projected that if the world reached net zero by 2050 … it would still be using nearly half as much natural gas as today and about one-quarter as much oil.”
Reducing gross greenhouse gas emissions will not be enough. We also need to remove what is already in the atmosphere—called carbon sequestration—and evaluate nascent technologies that can facilitate such mitigations. Taken as a whole, these areas can create ample opportunities around investing for impact.
Thinking in terms of planetary boundaries allows investors to take a more holistic view of investing with a sustainability lens. For example, the two major carbon sinks our planet has are oceans and forests, so ensuring they remain healthy will be crucial in limiting global warming to 1.5-degrees Celsius. Additionally, oceans and forests also impact food, water, and human health, which are core to our livelihoods. Managing the impact of biodiversity loss is another example where investors will find plenty of opportunity to make a positive impact with their capital.
Inclusive capitalism is also a major “investing for impact” theme, one that advances a “just transition,” where all stakeholders are considered. For example: If the global population expands to nine billion people, there will be constraints that will make it difficult to produce the required number of calories to sustain that population. However, creating solutions that ensure such constraints will not exacerbate hunger or cause social unrest would create many investment opportunities.
Augmenting access to credit is another area that can advance a more just transition and should also produce many investment opportunities. Diversity and inclusion in the workplace, often cited as a starting point for inclusive capitalism, also offers opportunities, given research from firms like McKinsey & Co. showing that firms with greater diversity tend to outperform their less diverse peers.
Taking the long (term) road to Net Zero
Investing for impact requires a long-term view that takes account of the structural changes needed for the global economy as well as the considerable macroeconomic implications of climate change. It also entails adopting a broad, climate-aware, risk-management framework. For example: Climate change can impact the economy gradually (i.e., rising sea levels or changes in rainfall patterns) or abruptly (i.e., more extreme weather events, such as droughts, wildfires, and floods.)
It will also impact inflation, as many costs that had been externalized—in other words, taken out of the product level and absorbed elsewhere—will likely have to be internalized back into the production process. Examples of costs that have been externalized include the environmental toll of unincumbered gross emissions, the over-exploitation of the commons (such as oceans and forests,) and labor costs being driven lower by globalization. Climate change can also produce exogenous shocks that can affect the supply (and consequently the cost) of key commodities.
Daunting as all this may sound, it is our firmly held belief that the challenges we face on the road to Net Zero will be equally met with solutions that, in turn, will generate potentially attractive investment opportunities. Adopting an investing for impact mindset will not only help us successfully reach our Net Zero destination, it may also provide a less bumpy ride for investor portfolios.
(Matt Christensen is Global Head of Sustainable and Impact Investing for Allianz Global Investors, based in Paris, Mark Wade is Head of Sustainability Research and Stewardship for Allianz Global Investors, based in London.)
The year 2021 saw a strong recovery in global dividends that more than offset cuts made during the worst of the pandemic, according to the latest Janus Henderson Global Dividend Index. Global dividends soared 14.7% on an underlying basis to a new record high of $1.47 trillion.
According to data from the Janus Henderson index, records were broken in a number of countries, including the United States, Brazil, China and Sweden, although the fastest growth was recorded in those parts of the world that had experienced the largest declines in 2020, notably Europe, the United Kingdom and Australia. Overall rate growth was 16.8%, driven by record extraordinary dividends. In addition, 90% of companies raised or held dividends steady, indicating widespread growth.
“Against the backdrop of the spectacular rally seen in the banking sector and the exceptional cyclical upside in mining companies, it would be easy to overlook the encouraging dividend growth seen in sectors that have made steady rises in recent years, such as technology. We expect many of these habitual patterns to consolidate in 2022 and beyond. The big unknown for 2022 is what will happen in the mining sector, but it is reasonable to assume that dividends in this area will be lower than the record levels of 2021, in light of recent trends in the iron ore, other metals and coal markets. For the full year, we forecast global dividends to reach a new record high of $1.52 trillion, up 3.1% on an overall basis or 5.7% on an underlying basis,” the company’s analysis notes.
Upward revision of the forecast
The exceptionally strong fourth-quarter distributions figures, coupled with the improved outlook for 2022, have led Janus Henderson to upgrade its full-year forecast. In 2022, Janus Henderson expects global dividends to reach a new record of $1.52 trillion, an increase of 3.1% on an overall rate or 5.7% on an underlying basis.
As the report accompanying the release of this index indicates, banks and mining companies were responsible for 60% of the $212 billion increase in payouts in 2021.
Another 25% of the increase responded to the resumption of distributions that companies had halted in 2020. Most of it was due to banks, whose dividends soared 40%, or $50.5 billion, and distributions returned to 90% of their pre-pandemic highs in 2021. In this regard, the manager explains that dividends were boosted by the restoration of payouts to more normal levels, given that regulators had curbed distributions in many parts of the world in 2020.
“More than 25% of the $212 billion annual increase came from mining companies, which benefited from the stellar rise in commodity prices. Record dividends from mining companies reflect the strength of their earnings. The mining sector distributed $96.6 billion over the year, nearly double the previous record of 2019, and ten times more than during the trough of 2015-16. In addition, BHP became the company that distributed the most dividends in the world. However, as a highly cyclical sector, its distributions will return to more normal levels when the commodity cycle turns around,” it notes in its findings.
The global economic recovery allowed distributions from consumer discretionary and industrial companies to grow by 12.8% and 10.0%, respectively, in underlying terms, while healthcare and pharmaceutical groups increased their dividends by 8.5%. Meanwhile, technology companies, whose profits continued to grow relatively immune to the pandemic, added $17 billion in payouts, an increase of 8%. Interestingly, 25% of the increase was attributable to just nine companies, eight of which were banks or mining companies.
Rebound in the United Kingdom and Australia
Geographically, the most accelerated growth in dividends was recorded in the regions where, in 2020, the largest cuts took place, such as Europe, the United Kingdom and Australia.
According to the firm, distributions reached new records in several countries such as the United States, Australia, China and Sweden, although 33% of the upturn came from just two countries, Australia and the United Kingdom, where the combination of increased distributions from mining companies and the restoration of distributions from banks made the biggest contribution to shareholder remuneration growth.
“Much of the dividend recovery in 2021 came from a small number of companies and sectors in a few areas of the world. However, behind these excellent figures, there was widespread growth in distributions both geographically and by sector,” says Jane Shoemake, client portfolio manager in Janus Henderson’s Global Equity Income team.
As Shoemake explains, against the backdrop of the spectacular rally seen in the banking sector and the exceptional cyclical upside in mining companies, it would be easy to overlook the encouraging dividend growth seen in sectors that have made steady gains in recent years, such as technology. “The same goes for geographic trends. The United States, for example, is often ahead of other countries, but in 2021 it recorded slower dividend growth than the rest of the world. This was due to the resilience shown in 2020, so the scope for recovery was now more limited,” he adds.
On its outlook, the manager indicates that many of the long-term dividend growth trends observed since the index’s launch in 2009 will be consolidated in 2022 and beyond. “The big unknown for 2022 is what will happen in the mining sector, but it is reasonable to assume that dividends in this area will be lower than the record levels of 2021, in view of the significant correction in the price of iron ore,” he says.
Commenting on the report’s findings, Juan Fierro, director at Janus Henderson for Iberia, says: “Following the strong recovery in global dividends that we saw over the past year, our 2022 forecasts put payouts for listed companies at a new record of $1.52 trillion – an increase of 3.1% overall or 5.7% underlying. While 90% of companies globally raised or held their dividends stable in 2021, in Spain we have seen this percentage drop to 36%. Despite this, dividends in our country registered an underlying growth of 14.6%, in line with global growth but higher in general terms (+22.5%) thanks to extraordinary payments.”
Fierro believes that, in the current context, “with a turbulent start to the year due to geopolitical tensions and potential changes in central banks’ monetary policy, it will be key to rely on active management and maintain a global and diversified approach in portfolios”.
DoubleLine Capital, the $134 billion asset manager, moved to Florida, continuing a trend of the state continuing to establish itself as a top choice for U.S. companies to set up shop.
The company led by billionaire Jeffrey Gundlach, moved its headquarters from Southern California to Tampa as of last month, according to Finra records.
The move adds to those of Dynasty Financial Partners and ARK Investment Management.
Elsewhere in the wealth management business, German firm Deutsche Bank announced its expansion in the southeastern U.S. with the promotion of Charlie Burrows.
Working from home, the increase in technology for remote meetings and the tax facilities available to industry representatives make the Sunshine State very attractive.
As a result, Miami has been named the new Wall Street of the South for months.
Miami’s strength as a financial center, a leader in sustainability and a thriving creative hub are huge assets, and “Friday’s discussions suggest the city is working hard to capitalize on them”, reflected those present at Bloomberg’s “The New Miami” forum held in December of last year.
Robeco has announced the appointment of Ivo Frielink as Head of Strategic Product & Business Development and member of the Executive Committee (ExCo), effective 1 March.
Karin van Baardwijk, CEO Robeco, said: “We are very pleased to have Ivo joining the ExCo and taking on this strategic position for our clients and Robeco. It also makes me proud that we are able to fill this position from our own ranks, which underlines the strength of our organization. Having worked closely with Ivo in the past, I have full confidence that the experience and insights he has gained over his extensive career will be a great asset that we can all profit from.”
Mr. Frielink, currently Regional Business Manager APAC at Robeco Hong Kong, will in his new role be responsible for further aligning Robeco’s product offering with its key commercial priorities and focus, as well as adding capabilities that complement the company’s current offering and drive Robeco’s strategic agenda.
He started his career at Price Waterhouse Coopers in 2000 and moved to Robeco in 2005, where he held different roles including Corporate Development. At the end of 2017, he moved to NN Investment Partners, where he served as Head of Product Development & Market Intelligence. After just over two years, he returned to Robeco, where he was appointed Regional Business Manager for APAC at Robeco Hong Kong.
Ivo Frielink, Head of Strategic Product & Business Development: “Having spent the majority of my career at Robeco, I am honored to be taking on this important position and working together with the ExCo members and all the different teams within Robeco. I look forward to connecting with and supporting our clients to achieve their financial and sustainability goals by providing superior investment returns and solutions. With Sustainable Investing, Quant, Credits, Thematic and Emerging Market Equities we have a strong suite of capabilities, and I look forward to aligning this even further with what our clients are looking for and where we can add value to them.”
JP Morgan has recruitedEduardo Perez Balli in New York as banker associate for the Global Families Group.
“We are pleased to welcome Eduardo Perez Balli to the Global Families Group as a banker“, the company posted on LinkedIn.
Perez Balli comes from BlackRock where he was responsible for driving sales of active mutual funds and separate managed accounts with Citibanamex financial advisors in Mexico. In addition, he advised and supported Citi’s investment advisors and private banking bankers on indexed solutions and mutual fund products and supported the sales team leader as an internal contact for existing clients, according to his LinkedIn profile.
“He has vast experience as a wealth relationship manager supporting individuals and families domiciled in Mexico,” the company release adds.
Perez Balli will work with clients domiciled in Spain, according to the firm.
The advisor returns to JP Morgan after working in Mexico City between 2015 and 2019.
“I am very happy to share that I moved to New York City to join JPMorgan Chase & Co. as a banker associate in the Global Families Group,” the banker posted on the social network.