Nordea: “We Still Believe That the Risk Aversion Towards Emerging Markets is Too High”

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Nordea: "Seguimos pensando que la aversión al riesgo en los mercados emergentes es demasiado elevada"
Foto cedidaEmily Leveille, courtesy photo. Nordea: "We Still Believe That the Risk Aversion Towards Emerging Markets is Too High"

The current economic fundamentals in many emerging countries, along with the perception that they involve too much risk, generate interesting opportunities for investors with a medium to long-term investment horizon according to Nordea‘s Emily Leveille. In this interview with funds society she discusses Emerging market opportunities.

Apart from valuations, which other attractions do the Emerging Markets investments currently have?

We still believe that the risk aversion towards emerging markets is too high; this is partly based on concerns over the impact on these markets of the Federal Reserve raising interest rates. In our view, however, the current economic fundamentals in many emerging markets, combined with this perception that they are too risky, creates an attractive investment opportunity for investors with a medium to longer term horizon. We acknowledge that EM in general have been performing well recently – particular in 2017 – but because of valuations, which are still at a discount to developed markets, growth rates which are higher than in developed markets, and the great companies that we can find in emerging markets, we still see an attractive long-term opportunity here.

Are all the regions cheap, or are there some cheaper than others?

We are bottom-up investors, so we don’t have strong views about the valuations of particular markets, but what I can say is that we find a lot of opportunities across regions in companies exposed to domestic development. These could be companies focused on urban consumers in India, healthcare companies in China, or education businesses in Brazil. We also find lots of innovative companies in the technology space in emerging markets, where we see that there is a lot of potential for earnings growth that is not being priced by the market.

Which are the main challenges that the emerging countries are facing? Would they be affected by FED’s monetary normalization? Mainly in Latin America? 

We believe there is already a sufficiently large valuation buffer that exists between emerging markets and developed markets due to the expectation of monetary tightening in United States, such that emerging markets are able to stomach future increases in the Fed’s benchmark rate.  When we look at the underlying medium to long-term economic drivers of a large number of EM countries relative to a group of DM countries – and here of course as the key benchmark the USA – and look at the 10 year yield, we see a significant risk premium already priced into EM. In particular when we look at the underlying growth and debt dynamics of EM vs DM, and how EM has improved since 2013. Of course, we cannot rule out some short-term volatility in EM, particularly if the Fed increases rates at a faster pace than the market expects, but we would argue that this would be a an opportunity for adding to the asset class.

In order to look for opportunities in the Nordea 1 – Emerging Stars Equity Fund…which are the most important criteria for you? And, following these criteria, in which region do you see more opportunities?

When we look for new investments for the Emerging Stars Fund, we look for high quality businesses that can grow their earnings sustainably for many years to come, and then we make sure that we buy them at a discount to their intrinsic value. We can find companies like this all around the world, but as an example, right now we find a lot of interesting companies in India, where you will see we have a big overweight positon. Many of the reforms implemented by the current administration have created a more favourable business environment and lowered the cost of investing, creating many new opportunities for good businesses to take advantage of. 

Focusing in Latin America (where we have a lot of audience), which are the opportunities, divided by sectors or type of company, that you see? Could you give any example? Is it key to have a fundamental bottom-up focus or is the macro view important for you as well?

We see a lot of opportunities in industries like healthcare and education, particularly in Brazil, where an ageing population and rising middle class provide a tailwind for higher spending in these areas. We also still see that banking penetration is very low in many countries across the region, and the competitive environment for banks is very favourable, so we also have a positive view on banks like Banorte and Itau, for example.

With regards to the importance of macroeconomics- for us, the most important thing is to find good businesses that generate returns above their cost of capital for many years. We often find however, that there are many more investable companies in countries with stable macroeconomic environments, because it is difficult to grow a company and invest in a market which experiences a lot of economic volatility. Furthermore, when we make projections as part of our valuation work, we of course take into account projections of inflation, GDP growth, and interest rates and we can have a higher degree of confidence in these projections if there is a stable macroeconomic backdrop.

By countries, in Latin America, where do you see a more promising economic situation that can lead to the creation of investment opportunities in these markets and why?

We have been very impressed by the reforms being implemented in Argentina since the change in administration. The equity market is still very small, but with reforms in monetary and fiscal policy, we are already seeing a lot of businesses coming to the market that want to grow because the economy is growing and the political environment is more stable. In Brazil as well we are encouraged by the economic recovery, very low inflation, a consumer with less leverage, and recent reforms in the labour market and long term interest rates, though we still need to see reform to the pension system in order for us to feel comfortable with debt dynamics longer-term. Finally in Mexico we see a government and central bank committed to prudent fiscal and monetary policy and the ongoing adjustment to government spending due to falling oil production. We believe that the energy reform will be transformational to many sectors of the economy and is already creating many new investment opportunities.

In which Latin American markets is Nordea 1 – Emerging Stars Equity fund overweight?

We currently have no overweight positions in any markets in Latin America, but that is not because we do not find interesting companies in which to invest. Our process is a bottom-up, company by company analysis, and our under- and overweight positions are a result of individual companies that we find to invest in at the right price. We are invested in a concentrated group of companies that we like very much in the region, but we happen to have more investments at the moment in Asia and India primarily.

Does the region face a wave of positive changes and reforms for its equities?

Every country is so different in Latin America, from their size to the components of their economy and their politics. Though we have seen some positive and market-friendly reforms in recent years in places like Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico, I do not necessarily see these as related to some sort of general consensus in the region about a move to the right or to the left of the political or economic spectrum. Each case has been very much related to specific domestic situations.

The weakness of the dollar … how is it helping the region? Do you consider currencies when investing or covering them?

We do consider currencies in our fundamental analysis as we think about the impact of currency movements to the operating profits of our investments, but we do not try to predict currency movements and we do not cover our currency exposures from being invested in local markets. The weakness of the dollar helps certain industries and hurts others- in general, because commodity exports are a big portion of many Latin American economies, they tend to benefit from the inverse correlation between the dollar and commodity prices; furthermore, the weak dollar makes imported goods in local currency more affordable. However, a dollar that is too weak can also overly inflate the value of Latin American currencies and reduce their relative competitiveness in manufactured exports, as we saw during the financial crisis in 2008-2009, but we are not seeing these types of movements at this point.
 

Thomas Johnston and Nuno Loureiro Will Lead Amundi Pioneer AM’s US Offshore and LatAm Efforts

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Amundi Pioneer AM impulsa su negocio Offshore y nombra a Thomas Johnston como wholesaler en Miami junto a Nuno Loureiro
Foto cedidaPhoto: Thomas Johnston, senior wholesaler at Amundi Pioneer AM. Thomas Johnston and Nuno Loureiro Will Lead Amundi Pioneer AM's US Offshore and LatAm Efforts

Following the completion of Amundi’s purchase of Pioneer Investments on July 3, 2017, Amundi has restructured its brand and team in the US, where the Latin American and Offshore businesses are an important part of their organization.

Michelle Boquiren, CEO of Amundi Distributors USA, has left the company. According to an internal memo Funds Society had access to, Amundi “thank her for her dedication and many contributions and wish her well in the future.”

As of October 3, 2017, Amundi Distributors USA, LLC terminated its registration with FINRA and the SEC. The licenses of the former Amundi Distributors USA registered representatives are now held by Amundi Pioneer Distributor, which continues to be led by Laura Palmer, as Head of U.S. Intermediary and Offshore Distribution at Amundi Pioneer.

Looking to continue focusing on this business going forward, Amundi has made some recent appointments, including two wholesalers – one in Miami and one in New York – and an Internal Sales Representative based in Miami, to support U.S. Offshore and Latin America.

Thomas Johnston, Senior Wholesaler, will be relocating from NY to Miami to cover this crucial market in concert with Nuno Loureiro. Thomas will also manage the Texas region on an interim basis. Alejandro Espina will assume coverage of the NY region, with the West Coast as well on an interim basis. Felix Canela has recently joined the team as internal sales support, based in Miami. 

Amundi plans to expand its team further in the coming months, they are looking to hire two additional Offshore wholesalers, for the Texas & West Coast regions. 

Managing the Exit: How to Position Portfolios for the Withdrawal of Monetary Stimulus?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Gestionando la salida: ¿Cómo posicionar las carteras ante la retirada de los estímulos monetarios?
Foto cedidaPhoto: Mark Nash, Head of Global Bonds for Old Mutual Global Investors and Lead Manager of the Old Mutual Strategic Absolute Return Bond Fund. Managing the Exit: How to Position Portfolios for the Withdrawal of Monetary Stimulus?

During the fourth annual conference of the OMGI Global Markets Forum 2017, Mark Nash, Head of Global Bonds for Old Mutual Global Investors and Lead Manager of the Old Mutual Strategic Absolute Return Bond Fund, explained the implications and risks to financial markets from the gradual withdrawal of monetary stimulus by central banks. Furthermore, he disclosed the bets they are implementing in the portfolio in order to manage the exit of excess liquidity in the markets.

Following the financial crisis, the US Federal Reserve was the first central bank to react by cutting interest rates. The situation was so dramatic that when the traditional instruments failed to take effect, the Fed had to inject liquidity into the economy through several rounds of quantitative easing to get consumers to revive spending.

Almost a decade later, what is the nature of economic recovery? According to Mark Nash, recovery has been slow and somewhat disappointing, with the gradual increase in consumer spending being the main driver. With the recovery, consumers in developed markets, especially the United States, were able to get out of debt.

Fiscal spending soared. Deficits in developed countries skyrocketed as governments were forced to replace consumer demand, with the implementation of austerity measures being particularly counterproductive. Companies have not been especially collaborative, not being especially comfortable with the global scenario; they stopped investing and began to increase recruitment. 2017 has been the year in which investment spending has finally started, the economic cycle is perceived to be long-term sustainable, not overheated, with some improvement in terms of productivity.

But there are two fundamental issues that threaten the cycle: wages and inflation. Globalization and the automation of production processes keep wages down, while the global production gap is widening, technology business models and weak commodity prices helped to depress inflation.

“As regards inflation, what we think is happening is a kind of struggle between the elements that play in favor and those structural elements that play against, such as globalization and the increase of new technological business models, for example, Amazon, Airbnb and Uber, which not only offer new uses of the internet to lower costs, and therefore lower prices, but also attract new supply to the market, helping to keep inflation levels low. In terms of wages, these are down since companies can outsource their employees easily or send their factories to countries where labor is cheaper. Also, the advance of the technology affects wage prices, since many of those jobs will be automated in the future. Unemployment levels have also declined and more people have rejoined the workforce,” Nash said.

What will happen to asset prices once liquidity is withdrawn?

With the injection of liquidity in the markets, financial asset prices have not stopped rising. Bonds boosted their prices as interest rates fell, and shares rose as the only alternative to negative or incredibly low interest rates.

But what will happen to the price once the stimulus is withdrawn? A strong impact is expected, there are clear pressure points: wages and inflation will begin to grow with the withdrawal QE and the increase in interest rates. Furthermore, the current financial conditions are too relaxed, corporate debt continues to grow: “If you lend money to activities that are not being productive, there is a risk that that debt will not be returned to the lender in the end. There is no reason to keep interest rates at the current minimum levels.”

Also, asset prices are high, running the risk of being surprised by a sharp drop when market conditions tighten. Another variable that must be taken into account are the technical factors, the European Central Bank is running out of bonds to buy.

Market consequences and risks

The Bank of England points out that a reduction of stimulus begins to be necessary, the Bank of Canada that the interest rate reduction has already served its purpose, Mario Draghi that the threat of deflation has already been eliminated, and Janet Yellen maintains the rate hike cycle and announced the beginning of the Fed’s balance-sheet reduction.

“Central banks are beginning to undo their positions, bond yields will obviously rise, liquidity in markets will disappear, and markets will start to do their jobs, which is precisely to assign the correct price to assets. Volatility will reappear and passive investment, especially ETFs, which have enjoyed exceptional years due to ‘anything goes’, will fail to yield higher returns than active management. The stock markets and the real estate market will be affected. In addition, assets with lower liquidity such as emerging markets, high yield debt, and REITS will be affected, and may suffer a correction.”

The market may react in a disorderly way, if this happens; adverse conditions that could affect the economic cycle could appear in the market, with economies with the highest debt-to-GDP ratio being the most vulnerable. There is an additional risk in economies such as Australia, Canada, and Singapore, which did not get to deleverage, and whose real estate market may be directly damaged. It is also possible that those mutual funds that have grown disproportionately in recent years may be in a liquidity problem when they are forced to sell and there is not enough liquidity in the market. Finally, the sustainability of the Italian debt may be questioned, raising the risks of the Euro zone.

Looking to the future, as the baby boomer generation and China’s new middle class retires, labor supply will decline, something that should lead to a rise in wages and a decline in global savings. The automation of jobs will help raise productivity above growth levels, supporting the economy. As a result, higher rates are expected, which will be bad for bonds, average for equities and good for inflation and wages. It is expected to be an economic cycle similar to that of the 60s, 70s and 80s.

How to position the portfolio

Finally, Mark Nash explained how to position the portfolio to benefit from the outflow of liquidity in the markets. He recommended a commitment to Long-Short funds and tofavor active management versus passive, to be in the short part of the curve in developed markets, to be short in Italian debt, and to take into account that yield curves will steepen. “Curves have flattened because terms have been eliminated; investors in Japan and Europe buy the long part of the US yield curve, with the withdrawal of liquidity it should steepen.”

Also, he expects an adjustment in the credit markets, which is why he recommends a short position in this asset class because the market ignores the individual credit situation, causing the spreads to be compressed. Regarding currencies, Nash believes the dollar should remain at current levels, but the Euro and other European currencies like Swedish kronor will appreciate. While he recommends avoiding the Swiss franc, which is perceived as an active safe-haven.

Likewise, he recommends buying volatility and protection against inflation, as both should reach the markets naturally once the structural factors are overcome. Investment in emerging markets, as well as high-yield debt, can turn out to be a good bet, both assets have become the means by which to obtain superior returns. When the Fed raises rates again, US bond yields will rise, there will be outflows in these two types of assets, so it would be advisable to exit these asset classes now, and wait for a correction before returning.

BlackRock: “We Think The Chinese Economy Is Doing Well and Do Not See Any Worrying ‘Bubbles’ Forming Up At This Stage”

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

BlackRock: "Por el momento, la economía china funciona bien y no creemos que se estén formando burbujas preocupantes"
Foto cedidaJean-Marc Routier, courtesy photo. BlackRock: "We Think The Chinese Economy Is Doing Well and Do Not See Any Worrying ‘Bubbles’ Forming Up At This Stage"

Jean-Marc Routier, Director, and Product Strategist for the Asian Equities team in the Fundamental Equity division of BlackRock‘s Active Equity Group is convinced that there are many fundamental reasons for investing in Asian equities, an asset still not well favored by investors: not only its growth surpasses the rest of the world, but the reforms are improving its quality and there are solid advances in urbanization, consumption and the services sector that can not be overlooked. Besides China, which dominates the investment universe, in this interview with Funds Society, he speaks of the attractiveness of markets such as India and Indonesia,

Are investors coming back round to Asian equities as an alternative to the high prices of the US stock market? Is Asia just an alternative or are there fundamental reasons to invest in their equity markets?

Investors are still relatively underweight Asian Equities (source EPFR). Whilst Asia would indeed be a nice alternative to other markets and a good source of diversification, investors remain cautious to allocate as they are still unsure about China and don’t yet believe in the earnings recovery story that we have been observing now for the last 18 months. We believe that Asia benefits from attractive valuations, low ownership and good fundamentals. The fundamentals reasons to invest in Asia are that growth is outpacing the rest of the world, reforms are improving the quality of growth and we are seeing strong urbanization, consumption and services sector developments.

Growth could be one of the reasons for the return to the Asian equity markets, but this growth will slow down due to China’s effect. Do you think that less growth in the future will impair returns? Or do you consider a more balanced growth as positive for the region?

We think growth in China has now normalised – in fact China has doubled its GDP growth in nominal terms from Q1 2016 to Q1 2017. We expect growth to be lower than a decade ago but we also expect the growth to be better quality (less reliant on capital investments) which we think is positive for company returns and therefore markets. Yes definitely more balanced growth is a positive for the region

Regarding China… Do you see opportunities in the framework of the country’s new growth? In what sectors? Do you opt for the old or the new economy in the BGF Asian Dragon fund?

Contribution from consumption to GDP growth has gained importance over the year and now contributing to around 2/3 of China’s GDP growth.  The importance of investment component will be reduced over time. The economy transition from an investment-driven model to a consumer-led model is a multi-year process, but well-supported by urbanization, job creation (mainly driven by private sector employment due to privatization progress), strong labor market (very low unemployment rate), and wage growth. We have recently seen very strong growth in the e-commerce and internet part of the market – China has one of the world best penetration of e-commerce (15% of retail sales) and most of its population online.

How will the recently announced inclusion of China’s A-shares in the MSCI emerging markets index affect the Chinese and Asian markets?

MSCI’s A-share inclusion decision represents a significant step in opening China’s equity markets to foreign investment and to aligning the weight of China in global indices with the country’s emerging status as an economic superpower (China’s weight in MSCI ACWI is only 3% but China accounts for around 17% of world GDP in 2015 per IMF).

While A-share inclusion may lift sentiment temporarily, we believe the impact in the China onshore market will be minimal at the initial stages of inclusion. Firstly, the actual inclusion implementation will not happen until mid-2018. Secondly, incremental inflows to A-share market will be modest initially.  Incremental active inflows at initial inclusion stages shall actually be minimal since active investors who took a view on A-share would have already increased exposure given the multiple market access channels already in place (including QFII and Stock Connect).

However, the long-term investor implications are likely to be far-reaching.  At full inclusion, China weight (offshore and A-share equity together) can exceed 40% in MSCI EM index.  Therefore as MSCI moves towards full inclusion of China A-share, China allocation will be strategically important for international investors.  The entry of more institutional investors would also help drive the healthy development of China’s onshore equity markets.

To what extent could economic slowdown in China and its debt and financial issues impact the rest of Asia? Will there be firewalls or is there a real danger of these problems spreading?

While we recognize that China’s debt makes up 250% of its economy and is increasing at a rapid pace, we think concerns are overblown. The likelihood of a debt contagion is minimal as China is a close-ended economy and debt is concentrated in state-owned companies whilst consumers, private corporate and government debt is very low. But more importantly, we believe we have seen the peak in the non-performing loan cycle as reform progress in the past few years is starting to come through and many of the structural problems such as overcapacity and credit growth are starting to be addressed. Furthermore, good cyclical momentum within China as well as a pickup in global demand in developed markets may also help lift the economy.

On account of China, is there a risk that the volatility in the Asian stock markets could surge once again, as they did in 2015 or is this risk more controlled than in the past? And why?

There are always risks that situations that move on non-fundamental drivers come back to normalised levels. At the moment we think the Chinese economy is doing well and do not see any worrying ‘bubbles’ forming up at this stage.

Is the Asian equity market just China? What other regions offer decent opportunities to be taken into account? Do you like the Indian market? And other more modest markets, such as Indonesia, Philippines..?

China now makes up 35% of the Asian index (MSCI AC Asia ex Japan) and is the biggest constituent. But indeed, we see a lot of value in more peripheral markets. Specifically, we have good exposures to Indonesia at the moment as we see the economy normalising after a period of sub trend growth. We like India and have good exposure there too specifically to cyclicals and financials. We are currently cautious on the Philippines where the twin deficit is increasing

Following the strong rally which Asian equities experienced in 2016, is it still the right time to enter?

Asian equities are trading below the 40years long term average so valuations are not yet on mid-cycle levels yet. Investor ownership is low. Earnings drivers should remain positive as long as the main world economies continue to see normalising growth and we can maintain the domestic reform agenda in the region.

When investing in Asia, what is the most important thing to bear in mind, the macroeconomic aspects or the companies’ fundamentals and why? What are the characteristics that you look for in the companies which you invest in?

The Asian Equity team believes that stock prices are driven by fundamentals, liquidity and perceptions of risk. Markets frequently exhibit sharp swings of sentiment and misprice a company’s true worth. By combining fundamental research with local market knowledge and quantitative and qualitative screening and valuation techniques, we can exploit market inefficiencies. By investing over the medium to long term, we aim to invest in companies that are both relatively cheap to reasonably priced (valuation conscious), which can meet or beat market expectations.

Investing in Asia, is it better to cover currency risk or take it on? What are the current risks for Asian currencies against the dollar?

We invest with currency un-hedged as we take a view when we pick a stock that we make a deliberate call on the company, where it is listed, the sector it is in and the currency it is traded under. We do recommend investors to hedge to their local currency to avoid surprises unless they have very strong and informed views otherwise.

LatAm Fixed Income: “Despacito” [Slowly] Evolving Beyond a Passing Fad

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

LatAm Fixed Income: “Despacito” [Slowly] Evolving Beyond a Passing Fad
Photo: Geralt . LatAm Fixed Income: “Despacito” [Slowly] Evolving Beyond a Passing Fad

The times in which investing in bonds of Latin American issuers was something done only by managers of the most daring funds and/or those specialised in that region are behind us. In fact, these days practically everybody holds some LatAm fixed income investments in their portfolios.

There are several key factors typically pinpointed to justify international investors’ rising demand for bonds of Latin American issuers: the expansionary policies of the main central banks and the consequent search for returns under a global scenario of low/negative interest rates. However, we should also bear in mind other factors as well: the improvement of the region’s economies, adjustments to their trade and current account balances, a decline in inflationary pressures, company earnings growth, greater political stability, structural reforms, the rise in the number of issuers as well as the number of issuances in international markets, etc. These factors also underpin the rising presence of this region’s debt in a greater number of portfolios.

According to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), in June 2016 the value of international debt outstanding by non-financial Latin American and Caribbean companies amounted to $406 Billion or triple the June 2010 figure. According to Dealogic’s data, in the first half of 2017 new international issues of LatAm bonds had already reached $93 Billion. With regards to LatAm’s presence in international debt markets, we would mention the stellar reappearance of Argentina in April of last year – after suffering a 15-year shutout from international debt markets – with its $16.5 Billion issue which was then followed by a $2.75 Billion centenary bond in June 2017 (initial yield of 7.9% and it was 3.5x oversubscribed). We would also highlight the fact that numerous corporate issues have been carried out in international primary markets, often (40% in 2016) accompanied by buybacks of outstanding issues: thus leading to healthier financial positions thanks to refinancing at lower rates and with longer-term maturities.

Clearly, this wave of primary issues has greatly improved the liquidity, diversity and size of the LatAm debt market. But, as some voices are saying, is this also a symptom of excessive leverage and a potential bubble? Well, based on June 2016 data compiled by Bank of America Merrill Lynch, LatAm issuers with investment grade ratings are 30% less leveraged than North American companies. As for liquidity levels, LatAm corporations are quite comparable to their North American peers.

Obviously, neither all Latin American countries nor all of their companies face similar situations and/or have identical outlooks. Opportunities arising in the region’s debt markets are certain to be diverse and changing, but can investors aiming to build solid medium-term portfolios opt to completely ignore LatAm debt? Investing in this region no longer seems to be a temporary fad. Its greater resilience may help prevent price upheavals such as we suffered in 2013 on the back of the taper tantrum caused by Bernanke. Moreover, this asset class is increasingly becoming a key element for well diversified portfolio construction.

Column by Crèdit Andorrà Financial Group Research, written by Meritxell Pons, Asset Management Director at Beta Capital Wealth Management.

Yves Perrier and Amundi, Considered the Best in Europe

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Yves Perrier y Amundi, los ganadores en los Premios Financial News
Foto cedidaPhoto: Financial News. Yves Perrier and Amundi, Considered the Best in Europe

Amundi was the standout winner at Financial News’s 16th Asset Management Awards last night, fending off fierce competition from a strong line-up of contenders to claim three of the top awards on offer.

Europe’s largest fund house was the only asset manager to take home more than one award — no mean feat in a year where several top prize winners only just pipped their closest contenders to claim victory.

Amundi was crowned Asset Manager of the Year after a distinguished panel of industry judges deemed its €3.5bn acquisition of Pioneer Investments last year worthy of the top award.

Amundi also beat Lyxor Asset Management and AQR Capital Management, Ossiam and Tobam to take home the award for Smart Beta Manager of the Year.

Yves Perrier picked up Amundi’s third award, for Chief Executive of the Year, after judges felt much of the firm’s success in the past 12 months was driven by its senior leadership team.

The other industry personality to receive recognition was Dominic Rossi. He picked up the Chief Investment Officer of the Year award as a result of his work to bolster Fidelity International’s stance on corporate governance.

Among exchange traded fund providers, Lyxor stormed to success after beating BlackRock’s iShares division — the world’s largest ETF firm.

Emerging markets proved to be the most competitive categories this year, with Ashmore only just beating Hermes Investments to claim success.

It was also a closely fought battle for Environmental, Social and Governance Manager of the Year, with Hermes emerging the victor after managing to outshine rivals Legal & General Investment Management and Nordea.

An enviable track record for Terry Smith, who holds a concentrated portfolio of 20-30 stocks in global equities, was enough for the judges to hand Fundsmith the award for Boutique Manager of the Year.

Others continued their winning streak from last year. Insight Investment once again picked up the Liability-Driven Investment Manager of the Year award — the eighth year the asset manager has claimed victory in this category.

Edinburgh-based Baillie Gifford was the runaway winner in the Equities Manager of the Year category, with its performance alone enough to impress the judges it should be awards the top prize.

Redington held onto its prize for Investment Consultancy of the Year, demonstrating again it has the ability to fend off larger rivals Mercer, Hymans Robertson and Aon Hewitt for the top award.

Anglo-Dutch outfit Cardano continued to steamroll competition and claim top prize in the fiduciary management category — the ninth consecutive year it has won the award.

Winners of the Asset Management Awards Europe 2017:

  • Chief Executive Officer of the Year — Yves Perrier, Amundi
  • Asset Manager of the Year — Amundi
  • Chief Investment Officer of the Year — Dominic Rossi, Fidelity International
  • Investment Consultant of the Year — Redington
  • Index Funds/ETF Provider of the Year — Lyxor Asset Management
  • Fiduciary Manager of the Year — Cardano
  • Boutique Manager of the Year — Fundsmith
  • ESG Strategy of the Year — Hermes Investment Management
  • Equity Manager of the Year — Baillie Gifford
  • Fixed Income Manager of the Year — M&G Investments
  • Multi-Asset Manager of the Year — Nordea Asset Management
  • Smart Beta Manager of the Year — Amundi
  • LDI Manager of the Year — Insight Investment
  • Emerging Markets Manager of the Year — Ashmore

Aegon Launches an Asset Management Company in Mexico

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Aegon lanza una gestora en México
Foto cedida Fernando Quiroz, courtesy photo. Aegon Launches an Asset Management Company in Mexico

Aegon NV and its subsidiary Transamerica have joined forces with Administradora Akaan to create an asset management company named Akaan Transamerica.  Akaan Transamerica has recently received formal approval from the Mexican Banking and Securities Commission (CNBV) to initiate operations and go to market.

Akaan Transamerica will offer a wide variety of Mexican and International mutual funds as well as diversified global investment solutions. Akaan Transamerica has implemented Aladdin, BlackRock‘s trading and risk management system which combines leading-edge risk analytics with comprehensive portfolio management, trading and operations on a single platform.

Akaan Transamerica will leverage the extensive investment knowledge and experience from a highly skilled team of investment management professionals.  Its product offering includes alternative investments, actively- and passively-managed funds, and bespoke investment strategies. In addition to the wide variety of investment products, Akaan Transamerica will offer integrated investment solutions for individuals and companies based on their financial needs. Akaan’s Chairman and Founder, Fernando Quiroz, was formerly CEO and Vice Chairman of Citigroup’s ICG Mexico and Latin America as well as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors for Banco De Chile.  Mr. Quiroz was also a Board member of Banamex, Grupo Financiero Banamex, Aeromexico and the Mexican Stock Exchange (BMV).

Mark Mullin, President and CEO of Transamerica, commented, “We are thrilled to form this partnership with the highly respected firm of Akaan and to benefit from the tremendous expertise of Fernando Quiroz. We are determined to help individuals and corporations in Mexico pursue wealth accumulation and growth as they work toward securing a sound financial future.”

Fernando Quiroz, commented, “We are delighted to have formed a JV and a strategic alliance with Aegon and Transamerica. Our teams worked extremely hard to set up a new asset management company, with a state-of-the-art technological platform and the most innovative financial solutions for our clients.”

Kent Callahan, President and CEO of Transamerica Latin America, added, “This unique combination of experienced professionals and cutting edge technology sets a new bar for customer service excellence in the asset management business in Mexico.”

 

Loomis Sayles & Company, JP Morgan Asset Management, and Alliance Bernstein Get 700 Million Dollars From Afore XXI Banorte’s Mandate

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Afore XXI Banorte fondea 700 millones de dólares en renta variable estadounidense
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainPhoto: freephotos. Loomis Sayles & Company, JP Morgan Asset Management, and Alliance Bernstein Get 700 Million Dollars From Afore XXI Banorte's Mandate

Afore XXI Banorte, the largest pension fund in Mexico, successfully completed the funding of its third investment mandate. On this occasion it granted $700 million to three managers to actively invest in US equities. Alliance Bernstein received $250 million, JP Morgan Asset Management $150 million and Loomis Sayles & Company (owned by Natixis Global Asset Management) received $300 million.

To date, the pension fund administrator of Grupo Financiero Banorte and the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), has funded three investment mandates; the first in European stock markets for approximately $1.1 billion, the second in the Asian market for approximately $1 billion and the latter with exposure to the United States for $700 million.

Mauricio Giordano, CEO of Natixis Global Asset Management Mexico, told Funds Society  that “US equities are not normally considered to be alpha-generating, since the average manager does not beat the market, and what I tell the players is why to see the average if there are managers like Loomis who consistently present an overperformance.” The director added that the funding of this mandate came in only two months which is proof that “when you have well-structured teams with a very clear plan things can be done very fast.” Loomis will actively manage 3 segregated US Equity portfolios for Afore XXI Banorte. The Large Cap Growth accounts will be managed by seasoned US growth manager Aziz Hamzaogullari and his dedicated research team, using their proprietary bottom up research structured around quality, growth and valuation.

Aziz Hamzaogullari, VP and Portfolio Manager Loomis Sayles Growth Equity Strategies team, commented: “We are delighted that Afore XXI Banorte has chosen Loomis Sayles as a strategic partner. We believe in taking a long-term, private equity like approach to investing. Through fundamental research, we look to invest in those few high-quality businesses that we believe have sustainable competitive advantages and secular growth when they trade at a significant discount to intrinsic value”.

This transaction gives Afore XXI Banorte the opportunity to take advantage of the conditions of the United States stock markets and actively manage the portfolio for the benefit of its clients. “With the funding of this mandate, Afore XXI Banorte confirms its commitment to affiliates, offering the best investment product for their retirement in Mexico under the management of specialized firms with extensive international experience. In addition to this, we used the services of a temporary administrator known as “transition manager” and a proven international custody model, all in order to enhance the performance of our portfolio for the benefit of our affiliates in the long term”, said Juan Manuel Valle, Chief Executive Officer at Afore XXI Banorte.

Sergio Méndez, Chief Investment Officer at the pension fund, commented: “With the funding of this mandate with exposure to the North American region we finalized the first phase of our plan on the outsourcing of investment services, maximizing the use of our investment regime, which places Afore XXI Banorte at the forefront in the local market.”

How Could Individual Investors Outperform Institutional Investors?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

¿Cómo podrían los inversores individuales superar a los inversores institucionales?
C4_0010_shutterstock_540575218. How Could Individual Investors Outperform Institutional Investors?

Portfolio management is the art and science of making decisions about mixing investment with policy, matching investments to objectives. Within Crèdit Andorrà, the Advisory team is dedicated to portfolio construction and to guiding clients on capital markets.

There are two categories of investors in the financial markets:  individual investors and institutional investors.  The term institutional investors refers to just what the name implies: large institutions, such as banks, insurance companies, pension funds, and mutual funds.

Institutional investors outperform individual investors

Institutional clients usually use a benchmark to manage their portfolios, meaning that they have to follow defined rules of asset allocation that they cannot derive too much from. Those rules are hard constraints, with a defined level of active exposure (also called tracking error) that they can implement. Those hard constraints oblige them to own assets on which they have negative views, which is highly inefficient. More constraints are usually bad for portfolio management if you are talented, as you cannot completely implement your views on capital markets. As most of the portfolios from individual investors are not benchmarked, their portfolios’ returns should on average outperform the ones from institutional clients. However, we are seeing the opposite as institutional clients outperform individual clients by 1% per year on average. We explore the reasons behind this phenomena and what could be done to reduce this performance gap.

Outperformance is less due to skills differential

One could think that this outperformance mostly comes from skills. Institutional money, which is also called “smart money”, is managed by professionals that not only have a lot of experience in managing money but also dedicate 100% of their time to this activity. On the other hand, individuals usually manage their portfolio when they have the time, mostly during weekends or at night, and they do not always have the technical background to do so.

However, most of the outperformance is not due to the difference in skills, but to basic mistakes coming from individual investors that could be easily corrected.
Thanks to investment behavioural mistakes

For instance, we see patterns of investor behaviour biases that have a negative impact on portfolio returns. Most clients have a home bias, which is the natural tendency for investors to invest in large amounts in domestic markets because they are familiar with them. This results in an unnecessary concentration in assets and less portfolio diversification. In addition, many Latin clients look for assets that provide yields, as they perceive them as being less risky. This is not true, as the demand for this type of assets is high and, therefore, they end up being expensive from a valuation point of view. Finally, individuals have a bias towards loss aversion. Loss aversion refers to people’s tendency to strongly prefer avoiding losses rather than acquiring gains. As a result, investors keep assets in their portfolio with large losses for years even though those assets have very little probability of recovery.

We believe that individual investors could reduce the performance gap with institutional investors by simply focusing on three aspects of portfolio management:

#1 Focus on diversification by holding alternative assets

Everybody knows that diversification is key in portfolio management. But the reality is that few portfolios are well diversified within private banks. Many Latin American clients’ portfolios are only invested in US stocks and emerging market bonds, which is a strategy that has worked very well over the last 3 years. There are benefits to being exposed to direct names to reduce the cost of management fees; however, it is also primordial to use funds to benefit from diversification. Indeed, it is wiser to use funds in the following asset classes: high yield bonds, preferred shares, catastrophic bonds, small caps Equity, and emerging markets equities.

We believe that most portfolios should have an exposure to the alternative assets class. We define alternative assets as those assets that have a low correlation with equity and fixed income.

Those are strategies such as long/short equity, CTAs, Global Macro, Merger Arbitrage, Real Estate and Private Equity, for instance. Adding alternative assets allows portfolios to be more robust during phases of market correction; in other terms, they reduce downside risks.

#2 Focus on the right asset allocation instead of on picking securities

The second advice is to stop spending too much time on picking the right securities. What is important is asset allocation, where most of the portfolio performance will come from. A top down approach should be implemented to determine the right exposure to equity vs. fixed income, at the region level and sector level.

Indeed, what is important is not if you own Facebook instead of Google, but your exposure to technology vs. energy, as technology has been the best performing sector in the US this year and energy the worse one. Stocks within the same sector tend to be highly correlated in average.

A common mistake for individual investors is to do the opposite. They focus on trade ideas applying a bottom-up approach without taking the interconnection amongst all those ideas.

Worse, they usually cumulate all the trading ideas without having specific target returns and stop losses. If the ideas do well, they will sell it -most of the time too early. And if the ideas do not work, they will keep it until they recover their losses. This is a bad idea, as returns are auto correlated (following a negative return, an asset has a higher probability to go down than to go up).

#3 – Do not overreact by taking more risks than you can afford

Following a market correction, some individual investors start to feel nervous and prefer to sell their positions, basically selling at the worse time. This happens because they took more risks than they could afford. 

The most important question investors should be able to answer is how much they can lose before they start selling their positions, basically knowing their capacity to lose investments. Once you know that the most you can lose is a 20% for instance, you can manage your risk exposure accordingly.

To manage your risk, you need to rebalance you portfolio on a regular basis. As equity usually tends to outperform fixed income, its weight in the portfolio increases over time. Rebalancing allows a reset of the portfolio to the initial portfolio weight.

Conclusion:

We saw that institutional money tends to be benchmarked, which adds constraints for portfolio management. Individuals, on the other hand, do not have all those constraints. By focusing on diversification, asset allocation, and risk tolerance, they can generate alpha and manage risks efficiently in the long term.

Column by Stephane Prigent, Investment Advisor at Banco Crèdit Andorrà Panamá. Crèdit Andorrà Financial Group Research.

Old Mutual Latam Launches Their Wealth Management Segment in Mexico

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Old Mutual Latam Launches Their Wealth Management Segment in Mexico
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainMexico City's financial district. Old Mutual Latam Launches Their Wealth Management Segment in Mexico

Old Mutual has decided to enter into the Wealth Management segment in Mexico. This new division is being led by Rodrigo Iñiguez, a professional with over 11 years in the group.

Mexico is the second largest market in the Latin American region, after Brazil, so Old Mutual expects that in the next 5 years this line of business will generate a high percentage of its sales for Mexico and complement that of Latin America. According to McKinsey Global Wealth Management, Mexicans have over 800 billion dollars in different financial institutions.

Agustín Queirolo, who is in charge of the Wealth Management segment for Latin America, said: “We will face this new challenge by leveraging our experience and the great acceptance we already have in countries such as Chile, Peru, Switzerland and the United States…We are sure that this new and innovative Mexican solution will help us in advising our clients in an integral way with a local and international vision. Our solution allows Mexican clients and residents in Mexico the possibility of guarding their investments both locally and abroad.”

Julio Méndez, Group CEO in Mexico, said: “The company has achieved significant growth in its different segments in recent years. We maintain a leading position in the Institutional business through the administration of Private Pension Plans and have managed to expand our distribution through more than 3,000 investment advisors across the country. The DNA of our Group is constantly pushing the creation of new investment solutions with a constant innovation in the creation of products and today we visualize great opportunities to enter the Wealth segment.”

Thinking of complementing Private Banks, Family Offices and Wealth Managers that advise affluent and high net worth Mexican families, they will be using a life insurance solution, with an investment component, as an asset planning tool, as well as other innovative instruments that fit the segment and its clients.