U.S. Housing Recovery Offers Sustainable Opportunity

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

The U.S. housing market appears headed for a recovery after years of volatility, as the compounding pressures of high interest rates, steep prices and scarce supply are expected to ease. New-home construction is forecast to rise 2% in 2024, while the home-improvement market should grow in 2024 and 2025 after a challenging 2023.

Morgan Stanley Research is anticipating structural changes in affordability, supply and financing in the next housing cycle. This could provide particular opportunity for sustainable investing in the housing market as demand for green home construction and renovation is expected to coincide with the U.S. housing market recovery, says equity strategist Michelle Weaver.

“Environmentally conscious consumers, government financial incentives and—in some cases—the declining cost of clean technologies should all drive growth in sustainable housing investing as the broader housing market picks up steam,” says Weaver.

Incentives to Go Green

The U.S. government is expected to continue playing a significant role in supporting environmentally friendly solutions and technologies, and developing local supply chains as the transition to greener homes gathers pace. For instance, the Inflation Reduction Act and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act included various tax credits, loans and grants to improve the energy efficiency and climate resiliency of residential buildings.

“These incentives don’t just benefit builders, developers and homeowners, they also bode well for shareholders of companies that manufacture and/or install energy-efficient and smart equipment, green building materials and clean technology for the home, as they boost demand by improving the economics of the green products,” says Laura Sanchez, head of sustainability equity research for the Americas.

Room for Improvement

Homeowners may also see a cost benefit from investment in green projects—but they need to be selective. Some projects pay off in the short to medium term, while others come with higher financial costs that may be difficult to recoup.

The shift to clean technologies used in onsite power generation, such as solar panels, stationary batteries and electric vehicle chargers, should bring down homeowners’ energy prices right away—especially in states such as California, where utility costs are high and rising.

Contracts with solar power companies, for instance, can yield savings immediately, since homeowners lease solar panels without any upfront costs and pay a monthly bill that typically works out to be cheaper than traditional utilities. These cost savings should help bolster the solar market, which Morgan Stanley Research analysts predict to grow from around $20 billion in 2024 to more than $30 billion by 2035.

Even products that involve an upfront cost can yield savings over the life of the investment. For example, the initial cost of insulating a home can pay for itself in a few years because of lower utility bills. The EPA estimates that homeowners can save an average of 15% on heating and cooling costs, or an average of 11% on total energy costs, by sealing and insulating their homes.

The drive for greener building standards can raise the cost of homes, putting them out of reach for large parts of the population. Already, increases in house prices and mortgage rates, combined with supply constraints, have meant affordability is at its worst levels since the 2007-08 global financial crisis. This environment disproportionately affects people based on race and ethnicity, age, socioeconomic status and other factors.

“So far, equity investment opportunities around the construction of social housing remains hard to find, but we think concerns about housing affordability should ultimately spur the government to implement policy aimed at supporting supply,” Sanchez says.

BNY Mellon Launches its New Platform Universal FX

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

BNY Mellon announced the launch of Universal FX, a new foreign exchange (FX) platform that meets client needs to manage execution across their entire portfolio and access market-leading price transparency.

Universal FX supports BNY Mellon clients across all market segments, such as investment managers, corporates, hedge funds and wealth managers, as well as helping them navigate the industry transition to T+1 settlement.

The investment management industry often manages portfolios across several providers resulting in an inconsistent FX execution experience. Through Universal FX, clients can now manage their whole portfolio, irrespective of where they custody, prime broker or settle trades.

The solution provides access to Developed Market and Emerging Market currency execution, enhancing the FX experience for clients globally.

“Clients often have fragmented portfolios, causing friction, lack of transparency and inconsistency while accessing services across pricing, execution and post-trade,” said Jason Vitale, Head of Global Markets Trading, BNY Mellon. “With the launch of Universal FX and our existing OneFX product suite, our clients can now control and customize their portfolio in one place – gaining 360-degree insight, providing a seamless experience across the entire execution process. This also comes at a unique moment as clients seek streamlined solutions to adjust to the T+1 settlement cycle.”

This new offering builds on BNY Mellon’s OneFX suite of innovative solutions and banking capabilities for all FX trading, FX hedging and cross-border payment activities. OneFX is designed to seamlessly connect the entire FX spectrum, ensuring clients around the world have access to the latest new features and functionalities from BNY Mellon as they become available.

More than 50% of asset managers continue to bet on the 60/40 model

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Did the year 2022 destroy the relevance of the 60/40 model? Are portfolio managers willing to implement other options? What alternatives are available in the market for asset managers to facilitate portfolio diversification? According to FlexFunds, a leading company in the design and launch of investment vehicles (ETPs), uncertainty becomes the playing field, and adaptation becomes imperative.

FlexFunds, has taken the initiative to prepare the 1st Report of the Asset Securitization Sector: a study of the main trends of these financial instruments to raise capital in international markets. This report reveals that despite poor results in the last year, more than half of the surveyed asset managers continue to bet on the 60/40 portfolio diversification model (request this full report by sending an email to info@flexfunds.com).

The 60/40 portfolio management model is an asset allocation strategy that involves a 60% weighting of the portfolio in equities and a 40% in fixed-income assets. This approach is commonly used by portfolio managers as a way to diversify risk and ensure a certain level of return in an investment portfolio.

The year 2022 marked a dark milestone for 60/40 portfolios, worsening even the negative returns experienced during the economic crises of 2001 and 2008. Traditional recipes failed, and both the fixed-income and equity markets suffered significant losses. The war in Ukraine and the rapid rise in interest rates in the U.S. and the eurozone created a very complex scenario where the orthodoxy of the price relationship between stocks and bonds was not met.

To the question, “Do you think the 60/40 portfolio composition model worked in the last 12 months?” more than 68% of asset managers and investment experts answered that the 60/40 model did not work, while 15.4% believe it did. However, 16.5% of the sample does not have a clear opinion on the matter. It is worth noting that among those who believe it did not work, almost 75% think it was due to the rise in interest rates, while nearly 10% argue that it was due to the decrease in equities.

Amid the uncertainty, portfolio management becomes a delicate art. Diversification, a cornerstone, was challenged by the lack of correlation between fixed income and equities. Traditional strategies, such as the 60/40 model, faltered, revealing their vulnerability to the changing economic and financial paradigm.

However, despite the majority of respondents agreeing that the 60/40 model did not work, when asked, “Do you think the 60/40 model will remain relevant?” 59% of asset managers and investment experts believe that this strategy will continue to be relevant. This fact highlights two aspects: first, its future application will depend on how the markets and economic conditions evolve, and second, perhaps paradoxically, it contradicts the earlier assertion that most respondents believe it did not work in 2022, yet now there is a majority opinion that it will remain a relevant strategy.

The global trend in portfolio diversification with new asset classes such as real estate, crypto assets, and private equity offers divergent alternatives to the classic 60/40 model in the international market. FlexFunds, through its asset securitization program, provides investment managers with the flexibility to design a portfolio with multiple asset classes and repackage it for distribution through Euroclear to private banking platforms.

How should asset managers adapt? What investment vehicles do investment advisors prefer to diversify their portfolios? What are the industry’s biggest challenges for clients and capital acquisition? Discover all of these key trends and more in the 1st Report of the Asset Securitization Sector by FlexFunds, which gathers the opinions of more than 80 asset managers and investment experts from 15 countries in Latin America, the U.S., and Europe.

Request it by sending an email to: info@flexfunds.com

Adepa Chooses BlackRock’s eFront to Enhance its Private Assets Offer to Clients

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Adepa, the Luxembourg-based Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) and Fund Administrator, has selected eFront, a BlackRock technology solution dedicated to private markets.

This has allowed Adepa to strengthen the tailored services it provides to clients across private equity, private debt, infrastructure and real estate.

Following a competitive search process, Adepa chose the eFront platform for its client-service led approach and market leading alternative investment and data analytics capabilities. eFront solutions are available across Adepa’s entire business, including the Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) services, as well as Fund Administration and Transfer Agency.

Esteban Nogueyra, Head of Fund Administration at Adepa, said: “We are delighted to have partnered with BlackRock to implement its eFront technology, enhancing our Fund Administration and Investor Services solutions for leading alternative asset managers globally. By integrating eFront in our technology platform, we will provide a one-stop-shop combining the advantages of our back-office capabilities and leading alternative fund services expertise in Europe and Latin America, supporting our international expansion, and allowing our clients to focus on their core business.”

According to BlackRock’s 2023 Global Investment Outlook, investors will need to make more frequent changes to portfolios to adjust to a new investment regime characterized by greater volatility. The eFront platform provides clients with the data and analytics needed to inform investment decisions across all private capital asset classes.

“We’re incredibly proud to be working with Adepa, an industry leader dedicated to giving clients deeper portfolio insights that lead to unique, and meaningful, investment outcomes,” said Melissa Ferraz, Global Head of Aladdin Alternatives.

Miami Fintech Club Launches with Inaugural Networking Event Featuring Keynote by Fintech Leader Hanoi Morillo

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesy

The Miami Fintech Club announced its official launch and inaugural networking event on Thursday, November 2nd, 2023 featuring a keynote presentation by globally renowned fintech leader Hanoi Morillo.

As an esteemed investor, executive, speaker, and author, Morillo will share her invaluable insights on driving innovation, growth, and digital transformation within the financial services industry during this special event marking the club’s debut.

Attendees will have the opportunity to gain perspective on exponential technologies, diversity in business, and strategies for achieving digital transformation from this highly respected thought leader, the press release said.

Founded by Scalto and Transcard, the club will be focused on connecting the area’s innovative fintech talent and enabling valuable networking.  The Miami Fintech Club provides a dynamic forum for leaders to exchange ideas, forge connections, and advance Miami’s status as a hub for financial services technology and innovation.

The inaugural Miami Fintech Club event will take place at 6:00 PM at PwC Miami Office and is exclusively for South Florida-based fintech entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and others actively engaged in the region’s thriving fintech ecosystem.

For information about membership and attendance requirements for this launch event, visit the following link

Insigneo Welcomes Verónica López-López as Managing Director

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesy

Insigneo announced the appointment of Verónica López-López as Managing Director in Miami.

Before joining Insigneo, López-López served as Executive Director at Morgan Stanley for 14 years, where she cultivated her expertise in wealth management and client relationship building.

López-López brings a wealth of experience and a distinguished career to her new role as a Managing Director at Insigneo. With a professional journey that spans over three decades, she has gathered vast knowledge of the financial industry.

Her financial career commenced in 1988 at The Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi (MUFG) in Japan. Subsequently, she ventured into the Japanese Chamber of Trade and Investments in Venezuela. Her international experience includes working in Corporate Finance as well as serving in private banking and wealth management divisions at Citibank, Merrill Lynch International, and UBS International, across cities such as Miami, New York, and Caracas.

“Veronica’s expertise in providing wealth management services to high-net-worth individuals, families, and corporations is extremely well-rounded,” said Jose Salazar, Market Head for Insigneo. “Her years of experience combined with her intellectual and social capital have allowed her to build close and enduring relationships with her clients, making informed decisions jointly with them. We are very excited to have someone of Veronica’s caliber as part of the Insigneo team of Financial Advisors.”

“I am thrilled to embark on this exciting journey with Insigneo alongside a new team and associates. I look forward to contributing my knowledge and experience to provide our clients with exceptional financial advisory services, leveraging my deep-rooted relationships with clients to help them make informed decisions about their financial futures with the open and flexible architecture of Insigneo and their world-class custodians,” expressed Verónica López-López, Managing Director at Insigneo.

Lopez-Lopez’s appointment comes amid the departure of many financial advisors from Morgan Stanley after the wirehouse announced significant changes for accounts in several Latin American countries.

Among the firms that have added more advisors are Bolton, Insigneo, Raymond James and UBS.

Pictet Asset Management: Caution Prevails

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesyLuca Paolini, Chief Strategist of Pictet Asset Management

In the face of economic uncertainty and stubborn inflation, we continue to favour bonds over equities.

Asset allocation: looming economic slowdown casts shadow over stocks

The outlook for most major developed economies remains uncertain.

Economic growth in the US is likely to turn anaemic and stay below its long-term trend, while Europe is not expected to recover anytime soon.

We expect earnings growth of US companies to contract more than 2 per cent next year, in stark contrast to the estimates of analysts who forecast growth of as much as 10 per cent.

Also concerning is that developed central banks are poised to withdraw more liquidity from the financial system at a time when inflationary pressure is building once more.

With economic conditions unfavourable in much of the developed world, we retain a neutral stance on equities and an overweight on bonds; we are also underweight cash.

Fig 1. Monthly asset allocation grid
October 2023

Source: Pictet Asset Management

Our business cycle analysis indicates the US economy is in a delicate state.

Industry surveys point to a drop in services consumption, which represents 70 per cent of economic activity in the country, while non-residential investment is also likely to fall because of high interest rates and a tight labour market.

All of this should weigh on the world economy, which we expect to grow just 0.5 per cent year on year next year, well below its pre-pandemic trend. Europe also remains weak as the economy feels the chill from tightening monetary policy and our leading indicator and consumer confidence are weakening.

In contrast, Japan is going from strength to strength.

We expect the world’s third largest economy to grow at 1.5 per cent next year, above potential and driven by strong exports. We expect higher private consumption in the coming months, and a sustained pick up in wage growth should prompt the Bank of Japan (BoJ) to end its negative interest rate policy.

China is showing early signs of an economic recovery. Consumption appears to have stabilised in the short term, leaving plenty of scope for improvement given retail sales remain 16 per cent below trend at a time when household deposits are 20 per cent above trend.

A recovery in the property sector is a missing piece of puzzle that would bolster consumer confidence.

Growth in the rest of the emerging world is likely to accelerate into next year, comfortably outpacing that of developed peers.

Our liquidity indicators support our neutral stance on equities.

Developed market central banks, apart from Japan, continue to withdraw liquidity from the financial system, even as they approach the end of their interest rate hike campaigns.

Liquidity conditions are likely to remain tight as inflation could well prove stickier than previously thought – not least because of a spike in oil and food prices.

In the US, a pick-up in government bond issuance expected in the coming months should also add to the liquidity squeeze.

Liquidity remains ample in Japan, however, as monetary policy there is accommodative, underpinning the flow of money and credit.

The beginning of an interest rate cut cycle in some parts of emerging markets should be positive for liquidity conditions there. Our valuation score supports our preference for bonds over equities.

The US equity risk premium – or extra return investors get over risk-free rate — has fallen to 3.4 per cent, the lowest in more than 20 years (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 – US stocks still too risky
12-month earnings yield minus 10-year local government bond yield in percentage points

Source: Refinitiv, data covering period 26.09.2003 – 26.09.2023

On comparison, offering a 10-year yield of more than 4.5 per cent, US bonds look particularly attractive.

Our technical indicators support our neutral stance on equities.

Investor sentiment and positioning indicators show that equities are falling out of favour, but they are not quite depressed enough to give us a contrarian buy signal.

Piece of opinion written by Luca Paolini, Pictet Asset Management’s Chief Strategist.

Discover Pictet Asset Management’s macro and asset allocation views here.

Why an active approach matters in fixed income?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

While passive investments have seen rapid growth in recent years, we believe there are several crucial advantages for choosing active management when investing in fixed income. This is especially true in the current climate, as uncertainty over the future path of interest rates and inflation continues to drive heightened volatility across the asset class. How active bond managers can add value?

We believe that fundamental credit analysis is a key driver of relative performance, as it is only through this process that investors are able to gain a thorough understanding of a company’s financial situation and business model. With one of the largest teams of credit analysts in Europe, we believe M&G is particularly well placed to identify the companies and sectors that should be in the strongest position to perform in a variety of economic scenarios, including a prolonged economic downturn.

As part of their assessment, our credit analysts consider all factors that could have an impact on a company’s financial performance, covering areas such as business risk (management, market position and product strategy, for example), financial risk (such as cashflow, debt and profit margins) and bond structure and covenants. In addition, our analysts carry out a detailed assessment of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors.

Active managers also typically benefit from greater flexibility, giving them the freedom to adjust portfolio positioning in accordance with the economic environment. The ability to adjust sector and company exposure, benefit from careful bottom-up security selection and position portfolios to seek to minimise the impact of rising interest rates provides active managers with crucial levers to take advantage of the investment opportunities – something not afforded to passively manged funds.

Active managers have the flexibility to capture a broad range of relative value opportunities that can often exist across fixed income markets. One of the ways in which we seek to do this is by comparing different bonds from the same issuer (such as those issued in different currencies or maturities) in order to take advantage of pricing mismatches, which can often occur during periods of market volatility. We may also be able to identify instances when similar companies (those in the same sector and with similar credit metrics) trade at different valuations. Another example is where the spreads offered by physical corporate bonds can sometimes differ from what is available through the credit default swap (“CDS”) market.

Active managers are also well-placed to capitalise on the additional yield pick-up that issuers typically offer when pricing new issues versus their existing debt. We believe this is a key area where active managers can add value versus their passive counterparts.

Passive bond funds have seen steady growth in recent years, but we believe there are a number of reasons why fixed income may not always be suitable for a passive approach. We explain below some of the shortcomings of passive fixed income.

While an equity index tracker will typically be weighted towards a market’s biggest and arguably most profitable corporations, a bond index by contrast gives exposure to the most indebted governments or companies – so-called ‘sinners, not winners’. For example, the largest constituents of a typical corporate bond index will usually be those with the largest outstanding amounts of debt – far from the type of issuer to which investors may choose to have a sizeable exposure.

It is also a common misconception that credit indices are, by definition, well diversified. They actually have a poor diversification. The ICE BofAML Global High Yield Index, for example, has an exposure of around 80% to US dollar denominated assets, making it very reliant on the US economy and highly exposed to oil prices. In another example, the ICE BofAML European Investment Grade Credit Index has some 40% exposure to financials. This highlights why investors must be careful to look through to the underlying assets to make sure that they are gaining an exposure that corresponds with their appetite for risk – as well as providing them with sufficient diversification.

Recent market volatility has again highlighted the dislocations that can occur between fixed income ETF prices and their underlying net asset values (NAVs). During sharp market sell-offs, there have been instances where ETFs have lagged their underlying benchmarks as the market is unable to absorb large amounts of selling. During severe sell-offs, there have even been cases when ETF prices have fallen below their NAVs. Furthermore, unlike active managers, index funds are fully invested and therefore cannot hold cash and other liquid instruments to act as a buffer against market falls.

To varying degrees, active bond managers have the ability to adjust portfolio positioning depending on their macro outlook and their assessment of valuations. For instance, they may choose to reduce interest rate risk to mitigate the risk of rising interest rates, or to move into higher quality credits where they have concerns over the economic backdrop. Passive bond strategies do not have the ability adjust exposure in this way; instead, they will seek to match the interest rate and credit risk of a specific bond index.

As noted above, market volatility has created significant spread dispersion across credit markets. This type of environment can create an abundance of opportunities for active managers to capture value, but this is not something passive bond vehicles are able to exploit. Similarly, passive managers would not usually have the flexibility to sell a position, whether due to a deterioration in its credit profile or simply on valuations grounds.

 

Opinion tribune by Jim Leaviss, CIO of M&G Investments’ Public Fixed Income.

Top Ten Broker/Dealers Control 58% of Retail Assets

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

The 10-largest broker/dealer (B/D) firms by assets under management (AUM) have 123,000 financial advisors and account for 58% of the total retail financial advisor industry. Fueled by a steady stream of mergers and acquisitions over the last decade, this top-heavy skew in the marketshare of AUM toward the largest firms underscores the need for scale to remain competitive in the marketplace, according to Cerulli’s latest Report, U.S. Broker/Dealer Marketplace 2023: The Challenging Pursuit of Organic Growth.

According to the research, over the last decade, one-fifth of the top-25 B/D firms by AUM as of 2012 have either been acquired or merged, reflecting the consolidation that has been characteristic of the B/D marketplace as firms are pressured to increase scale to remain competitive and maximize profit margins.

Very large B/Ds have leveraged their scale and their capital positions to outgrow their smaller counterparts with a five-year AUM compound annual growth rate of 8.4%, compared to large and medium-sized B/Ds with annualized growth rates of 6.6% and 6.9%, respectively.

The size and scale these firms offer make them attractive to financial advisors and to asset managers seeking shelf space.

“The advantages of scale for B/Ds include the ability to spread fixed investments in areas such as infrastructure, technology, and regulatory compliance across a larger advisorforce, which increases the return on those investments,” says Michael Rose, director.

It also provides B/Ds with leverage to maximize revenue from asset managers for distribution in its various forms, including revenue sharing, strategic marketing costs, and data packages. “Scale provides B/Ds with stronger negotiating power over asset managers that rely on B/Ds and their financial advisors to distribute their products, to include their offerings in B/D home-office models, or to select them within portfolios that advisors directly manage,” he adds.

Scale, however, is not a panacea for the many challenges that face B/D firms. “A growing number of advisors are demonstrating dissatisfaction with the bureaucracy associated with working for a large financial institution and are choosing alternative affiliation options, particularly hybrid RIA and independent RIA affiliation,” says Rose.

Cerulli recommends that B/D firms growing inorganically through M&A stay laser-focused on their firm cultures to ensure that their growth doesn’t have negative ramifications for advisor retention.

Is Cash Really King? Why Bonds Should Reign

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

In the world of investing, fixed income has traditionally been associated with stability and income generation. This role has been uniquely challenged since the spring of 2022, when the Federal Reserve embarked on a series of massive rate hikes – at one point, four 75 basis points hikes in a row – which the markets have not experienced in a generation. Not surprisingly, many fixed income strategies and indices posted the worst total returns in their history, but the silver lining to rate hikes has been the return of higher yields in short-dated instruments such as Treasury bills. Naturally, many investors flocked to the front-end of the curve, taking advantage of these elevated yields, but now is an opportune time to reallocate some of this cash into the fixed income space.

  

Let’s begin by discussing the current interest rate environment, specifically the implications of the Fed’s hiking cycle. The Fed and other central banks have used their policy rates as tools to bring exceedingly elevated levels of inflation back towards what they deem to be “normal” or within their respective target ranges. While this has caused some anxiety among investors, particularly in risky asset markets, it has also led to attractive yield generation in short-term instruments like Treasury bills, money market funds, and certificates of deposit (CDs). As of July 31, 2023, the 6-month Treasury bill yielded 5.46%, the highest level in 23 years. As yields have risen, the money has followed, with prime and taxable money market funds taking in a combined $744 billion in flows for the 1-year period ending July 31, 2023, per Morningstar. Contrast this to the taxable bond space, which has experienced a net outflow of $85 billion over the same period.

Rising rates also have the effect of increasing the coupons paid on new fixed income securities, which should support forward looking returns. But perhaps more importantly, the rate sell-off has decreased the dollar price of bonds already in existence, many of which are government or investment-grade corporate bonds with low credit risk. As a result, the bond market is priced at a discount even though fixed income securities, with the exception of a default event, mature at “par” or $100. It is this “pull to par” that should drive attractive returns and ultimately better economic outcomes than even the seemingly attractive yields provided by cash instruments today.

The term “pull-to-par” refers to the tendency of fixed income securities to move towards their face value (par value, or $100) as they approach maturity. Bonds priced at a discount will see their prices rise as they get closer to maturity, while bonds trading at a premium (that is, above $100) will see their values fall to par over time. In today’s environment, with the Fed near or at the end of the tightening cycle (as of this writing), fixed income securities with prices below their par value have potential for meaningful price appreciation. That appreciation, in addition to regular coupon payments, leads to larger total returns for investors. We believe this total return likely eclipses the yields that may be earned on short-end instruments.

To illustrate how unique the current fixed income environment is, let’s examine historical price data for various fixed income indices over the last 10 years. In the chart below, we show average price for the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. For the vast majority of the 10-year period, average price for the index was either near or above par, with the mean dollar price at about $102. Rising rates have driven the average dollar prices of the index, and active portfolios as well, down to near unprecedented levels, currently below $90. Given the quality of the constituents of the index, it is reasonable for an investor to believe that these bonds will pull back to par as they get closer to maturity, thereby providing investors with an additional boost to performance over and above just clipping coupon payments.

Another lens to look at the relative value of owning fixed income versus cash instruments can be seen in historical data on how both have performed in an environment similar to the present one, that is, with the Fed near or at the end of its hiking cycle. We looked at data for the last four Fed tightening cycles going back to the mid-1990s to see how both cash and fixed income performed as the cycles ended. We used the ICE BofA U.S. Treasury Bill Index as a proxy for short-term instruments and selected four Bloomberg indices representing both above and below investment-grade securities for fixed income. As the table shows, the subsequent one- and two-year returns produced, in most cases, better economic outcomes when owning fixed income as opposed to staying invested in Treasury bills. In the current environment where the Fed is at or near the end of its tightening cycle, and with an elevated chance of economic weakness going into 2024, fixed income has a similar potential to outperform cash instruments this time around.

By combining both the return generators of coupon and the “pull-to-par” effect, investors may outperform Treasury bills, CDs, and money market funds in the months and years ahead. We believe active management remains a valuable tool to capture these excess returns and potentially add alpha over benchmark indices. Many fixed income securities with attractive risk and reward characteristics, such as short-dated, investment-grade rated bonds within the asset-backed securities and residential mortgage space, sit outside of benchmarks and represent some of today’s most compelling opportunities.

The concept of earning coupon plus the pull-to-par represents a valuable opportunity for fixed income investors moving forward. By understanding how this phenomenon impacts fixed income securities’ total return, investors can capitalize on the current opportunity it presents. When combined with effective active management strategies, the pull-to-par effect may serve as a powerful tool to achieve outperformance and enhance overall returns. But timing is of the essence. The economy will eventually weaken, and perhaps tip into recession. Yields today look to be interesting even in a high-quality portfolio. So now is the time to make those moves, not to wait until yields fall.

 

 

Opinion article by Rob Costello, client portfolio manager in Thornburg Investment Management.