Social Media: A Hurdle for Wealth Managers and Financial Advisors

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

According to a report by Ortec Finance, wealth managers and financial advisors are influenced by social media activity when discussing valuations and stocks, which sometimes hinders their ability to provide professional advice to clients. This is affirmed by 95% of the respondents in the firm’s survey.

Of these, more than eight in ten (82%) say they are increasingly influenced by this factor, and more than one in ten (13%) are highly influenced. Only 4% say they are not particularly swayed by social media activity around the stock market and equities, and just 1% say they are not influenced at all.

Additionally, 93% of wealth managers and financial advisors believe that social media noise about the stock market and specific stocks makes it harder for them to provide professional advice to clients due to how clients react to this noise or the impact it has on advisors and wealth managers.

“Despite the many benefits that social media brings, our research shows that the noise surrounding it is an obstacle for many financial advisors and wealth managers. With a younger generation increasingly turning to social media as their source of information for everything from politics to DIY, they are also using it as a source of financial advice. However, our research shows that social media is having a negative impact on many financial advisors and wealth managers, as well as hindering their ability to provide solid professional advice to clients,” explains Tessa Kuijl, Managing Director of Global Wealth Solutions at Ortec Finance.

Powell: “The Time Has Come for policy to adjust”

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell announced this Friday at the Jackson Hole symposium that the time for monetary policy tightening has arrived, but the pace will depend on macroeconomic data.

“The time has come for policy to adjust. The direction of travel is clear, and the timing and pace of rate cuts will depend on incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks,” Powell said according to the speech published by the Fed.

The head of the federal monetary authority reviewed the evolution of the country’s macroeconomic situation since the pandemic and assured that the Fed will do “everything in our power to support a strong labor market while continuing to make progress toward price stability.”

With appropriate moderation in monetary policy, “there are good reasons to believe that the economy will return to 2% inflation,” he said. Powell also emphasized the importance of maintaining the strength of the labor market at the same time.

“The current level of our official interest rate gives us ample room to respond to any risks we may face, including the risk of further unwanted weakening of labor market conditions,” he explained.

At the 2024 annual symposium entitled “Reassessing the Effectiveness and Transmission of Monetary Policy”, the president addressed the presidents of the Fed’s divisions in each state. He provided explanations as to why the measures implemented in recent years, including rate hikes to control rising prices, had been taken.

In this regard, Powell analyzed the behavior of inflation from the peak during the pandemic to the current decline.

The onset of the pandemic quickly led to shutdowns in economies around the world, which meant a time of radical uncertainty and severe downside risks. Additionally, the Fed chairman recalled the government and congressional assistance, such as the passing of the CARES Act.

“At the Fed, we used our powers in unprecedented ways to stabilize the financial system and help prevent an economic depression,” he emphasized.

However, Powell assured that pent-up demand, stimulus policies, pandemic-related changes in work and leisure practices, and additional savings associated with restricted service spending contributed to a historic increase in consumer spending on goods.

“That’s how inflation arrived. After being below target throughout 2020, inflation surged in March and April 2021. The initial inflation burst was concentrated rather than widespread, with extremely large price increases for scarce goods like motor vehicles,” he asserted, later insisting that this situation indicated a transitory inflation regime.

“The Transitory Inflation ship was full, with most analysts and central bankers from advanced economies on board. The common expectation was that supply conditions would improve reasonably quickly, that the rapid recovery in demand would run its course, and that demand would rotate from goods to services, reducing inflation,” he commented.

However, in June 2022, inflation reached its peak of 7.1 percent, forcing the Fed into a rate hike rally throughout 2023 and part of this year.

After this review, Powell concluded by assuring that “the pandemic economy has proven to be unlike any other, and much remains to be learned from this extraordinary period.”

SEC Adopts Rule to Update Definition of Qualifying Venture Capital Funds

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted a rule updating the dollar threshold for a fund to be considered a “qualifying venture capital fund” for purposes of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

The rule updates the dollar threshold to $12 million in aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital, up from the original threshold of $10 million.

Qualifying venture capital funds are excluded from the Act’s definition of an “investment company.” The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 requires the Commission to index the dollar amount for this threshold for inflation once every five years.

New rule 3c-7 implements this statutory directive and adjusts the dollar amount to $12 million dollars, based on the Personal Consumption Expenditures Chain-Type Price Index.

The rule also establishes a process for the Commission to make future inflation adjustments to the threshold every five years.

It will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Principal names Deanna Strable President and Chief Operating Officer

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesy

Principal Financial Group announced that Deanna Strable, executive vice president and current chief financial officer, is named president and chief operating officer. Dan Houston will continue to serve as CEO and Chairman of the Board.

“Deanna has been instrumental in driving strategy, financial results, and operations to enable Principal to grow and continue to create value for our customers, shareholders, and employees,” said Houston. “Her appointment as president and COO reflects her extensive experience and proven leadership within the organization, and I am excited to continue our strong partnership.”

In this new role, Strable will have direct responsibility for the three businesses of Principal – Retirement and Income Solutions, Benefits and Protection, and Asset Management. Strable has served as CFO since 2017, after previously serving as president of the company’s workplace benefits and insurance business. She joined Principal in 1990 as an actuarial assistant and has held various actuarial and management roles throughout her career.

“In my nearly 35 years at Principal, I’m more confident than ever in our ability to deliver value and grow sustainably to continue to serve our customers and meet the expectations of our shareholders,” said Strable. “I look forward to the opportunity to further contribute to our ongoing success in this new role.”

As part of this transition, Joel Pitz, senior vice president and controller, will serve as interim chief financial officer. Pitz has been with Principal for nearly three decades, holding senior executive finance roles across the company, including serving as CFO for the international pension and long-term savings business.

His deep expertise in financial management and his comprehensive knowledge of the company’s operations make him well suited to oversee financial functions at Principal during this period.

Financial Advisors Need More Technology Training and Support

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Managing technological needs remains one of the biggest challenges for advisors, according to the latest Cerulli Edge-The Americas Asset and Wealth Management Edition.

According to the research, the most frequently identified challenges in using technology include compliance restrictions that limit functionality or impose other limitations on advisors’ ability to use technology (73%), followed by a lack of integration between tools/applications (71%), and a lack of time to learn and implement (70%).

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, advisors have significantly increased their use of technology. While adoption has proven to be a boon for practices that have incorporated these types of tools, the industry still has a long way to go, the report notes.

Additionally, there is an opportunity for central offices and fintech companies to strengthen the training and support they offer.

“Many of the challenges advisors identify in using technology are challenges that can be overcome through knowledge-sharing efforts to educate and inform advisors about the potential power of more effectively leveraging the technology tools they already have at their disposal,” says Michael Rose, director.

However, according to the study, only half of the advisors are satisfied with the training and support they receive. More structured advisors, who can better leverage specialized technology and offer more comprehensive services to their clients, represent one of the most important market segments for software providers, brokers, and custodians, who are the primary technology providers for these advisors.

“Given the great importance that advisors place on the technology at their disposal, it is crucial that brokers/dealers, custodians, turnkey asset management providers, and other companies that provide technology platforms to advisors obtain sufficient and ongoing feedback to ensure that the technology stack they offer remains aligned with the evolving needs of the practices they serve,” concludes Rose.

 

Jackson Hole: More Focus on Monetary Policy Tools than on Interest Rates

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Central banks are taking a break from their respective monetary policy meetings in August, but the markets are not entirely devoid of news related to the activities of these institutions. The Jackson Hole Central Bankers Symposium (Wyoming, United States) is the summer’s key event to observe potential decisions in the meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year.

From Thursday, August 22 through Saturday, August 24, senior central bank officials from around the world will share their views on the state of the economy. A significant part of the market is also waiting for clues about the next steps in interest rates.

The main event will take place on Friday, with the appearance of U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. All eyes are on him, considering that the U.S. monetary authority has yet to lower interest rates like other institutions.

Bank of America notes that Fed chairs “tend to keep a low profile at Jackson Hole” and that the easiest course for Powell “would be to repeat his July message.” The firm has reasons to believe this will be the case this time, as last week’s economic data delivered a “clear” message: inflation is low enough for the Fed to start cutting, but not so low as to focus solely on its employment mandate. “We remain convinced that the Fed will cut twice this year, in September and December,” the firm asserts, adding that a shift in language from July “would suggest that the committee is ‘very close’ or ‘close’ to the point where monetary policy easing is likely.”

Meanwhile, George Curtis, Portfolio Manager at Vontobel, points out that the data known so far “points to a slowing economy, but one that is still growing,” and expects Powell to highlight this on Friday. “We don’t believe he will rule out a 50 basis point cut, especially considering that another labor report will be released before the September meeting,” he says, but admits that his baseline scenario remains a 25 basis point cut.

There could also be market reactions, as Federal Reserve officials have not changed their tone since the weak non-farm payroll data that triggered mass selling. “There’s a possibility that equities could continue to retreat to mid-July levels.” The S&P 500 equity index has erased its losses for the month, and credit spreads have almost done the same. However, government bond yields remain near their monthly lows, so “either Powell validates this more bearish view, or government bonds will give back some of their recent gains,” Curtis asserts.

David Kohl, Chief Economist at Julius Baer, does not expect many clues at this meeting either. He anticipates that this year’s symposium will offer fewer insights into the path of interest rates and focus more on the appropriate tools for monetary policy. “The return to the trade-off between price stability and maximum employment makes the arguments for cutting rates much clearer, as long as inflation is falling and unemployment is rising,” argues Kohl, who notes that recent positive economic data supports a gradual reduction in interest rates.

The expert points to the event’s title – “Reevaluating the Effectiveness and Transmission of Monetary Policy” – to infer that there will be a debate on the appropriate tools for guiding monetary policy. “This includes the appropriate interest rate, the level or range of inflation, and the amount of liquidity the Federal Reserve wants to provide to financial markets,” he explains.

At the same time, Kohl does not expect much in terms of what is most interesting for financial markets: the trajectory of official interest rates in the coming months. “We expect the scope and pace of monetary easing to depend more on economic data than on the fundamental issue of monetary policy debated at the symposium,” says the expert, who, on the other hand, sees “much clearer” arguments in favor of cutting rates now that falling inflation is accompanied by rising unemployment. Kohl anticipates a 25 basis point cut at each of the upcoming FOMC meetings through the end of the year.

For James McCann, Deputy Chief Economist at abrdn, Powell’s speech at Jackson Hole could signal “that rate cuts are on the horizon, but the speed and extent of the easing remain uncertain.” Given the current moderation in inflation and the cracks appearing in the labor market, the Federal Reserve may prioritize attempting a soft landing by reducing the restrictive nature of monetary policy, according to McCann. He believes it is likely that Powell will indicate the start of an ongoing easing cycle, “setting the stage for rate cuts at each of this year’s remaining meetings.” And while he acknowledges that the good news for the Federal Reserve is that last week’s data from the U.S. confirms that the economy is not heading for an imminent recession, he also notes that U.S. monetary policymakers will have a better perspective on the recent health of the labor market when the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages benchmark revisions are released this week.

Jean-Paul van Oudheusden, market analyst at eToro, is also aware that these speeches at Jackson Hole have “sometimes” hinted at significant changes in monetary policies. In this case, he expects Powell to highlight the success in controlling inflation and prepare markets for a potential rate cut in September in a speech where he will not take questions. “Although speculation about a 50 basis point cut has increased, July’s CPI data – which largely met expectations – does not currently support an adjustment of such magnitude,” the expert explains, adding that the actual magnitude of the rate cut “will likely depend on August’s labor market data, which will be released in two weeks.”

Guy Stear, Head of Developed Markets Strategy at Amundi Investment Institute, is convinced that the Fed will cut rates three times before the end of the year and could suggest as much at the Jackson Hole symposium. “We expect the Fed to cut rates by 75 basis points between now and the end of the year, with successive 25 basis point cuts at each Fed meeting, and we expect its chairman to continue signaling that the first rate cut is planned for September,” argues Stear.

However, the expert does not rule out the possibility that investors might be disappointed by comments referencing the stickiness of inflation. “If the U.S. two-year yield were to rise back to 4.2%, from its current 4.05%, it would be a good opportunity to increase long positions at the front of the U.S. curve,” he concludes.

ECB

Although Powell will be in the spotlight, ECB President Christine Lagarde will also command market attention. This is the view of Martin Wolburg, senior economist at Generali AM – part of the Generali Investments ecosystem – who expects a rate cut from the European monetary authority, in line with what the Federal Reserve might do.

“The ECB made no changes at its June meeting, as expected. However, the Governing Council considered that the inflation outlook was in line with its forecasts, and the rhetoric on wage growth seemed less concerning in June,” explains Wolburg, who also recalls that at that time, Lagarde herself stated that “what we do in September is totally open.” The expert is aware that July’s inflation data clearly provides some ammunition to the “hawks,” but he expects the “reduction” process to continue, with quarterly cuts in official interest rates of 25 basis points, “until the deposit rate reaches 2.5%.”

China Leads the “Brand Value” of Banking Entities Worldwide

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

The total brand value of the world’s top 500 banks has doubled in a decade, according to the latest edition of the Brand Finance Banking 500 2024 ranking. The combined value of the 500 most valuable banking brands in the world has reached a record high of €1.35 trillion ($1.44 trillion), nearly double what it was a decade ago, according to Brand Finance’s sector report.

Notably, China dominates this ranking, with its entities occupying the top four positions: ICBC, China Construction Bank, Agricultural Bank of China, and Bank of China. The report indicates that Chinese banking brands have appreciated in value, retained the top four positions, and increased their brand value.

“The Chinese banking sector shows remarkable recovery, with the four major banks far ahead of their U.S. counterparts. ICBC (Industrial and Commercial Bank of China) remains the most valuable banking brand in the world for the eighth consecutive year, with a brand value of €67 billion. China Construction Bank, Agricultural Bank of China, and Bank of China occupy the second, third, and fourth positions, respectively,” the report states.

Another trend evident in the evolution of this ranking is that local banking brands prove to be stronger than global ones: BCA, from Indonesia, stands as the strongest banking brand in the world, and regional African operators score high in brand strength. In contrast, the brand value of Russian banks continues to plummet.

For U.S. banks, it is notable that they have experienced a slight decline of 6.6% in terms of brand value. Despite this, Bank of America retains the title of the leading U.S. banking brand for the fourth consecutive year, ranking fifth overall with a value of €34.8 billion. Meanwhile, Wells Fargo, which ranks sixth overall, has narrowed the gap with its U.S. competitor, with a 5% increase, reaching a brand value of €33.4 billion.

Commenting on these results, David Haigh, Chairman and CEO of Brand Finance, stated: “As the world’s leading banking brands reach new heights, Chinese megabanks continue to dominate at the top of the brand value ranking. Another key finding from our market study is that local banks are increasingly eclipsing their larger counterparts in brand strength. Dominant brands thrive in unique markets with limited competition, while banks that expand into multiple markets can successfully increase their brand value but risk diluting their strength.”

Regarding these trends, Brand Finance’s market study indicates that local and regional banks are performing as well as, and in many cases better than, banks with a global presence in terms of positioning their brand in the hearts and minds of customers.

For example, BCA of Indonesia is the strongest banking brand in the world, with a score of 93.8/100 in the Brand Strength Index (BSI) and an elite AAA+ rating. Three African brands, Equity Bank, First National Bank, and Kenya Commercial Bank, along with Romania’s Banca Transylvania, are among the five strongest brands in the world, all with AAA+ ratings.

Finally, regarding movements within the ranking, only 11 of the top 50 countries experienced declines in aggregate value, led by Russia (69%), Nigeria (28%), and Malaysia (20%). “As expected due to the international sanctions imposed on Russia, the country’s two largest brands—Sber and VTB—are at the forefront of those that have seen the largest percentage drops in brand value, with declines of 64% and 91%, respectively,” the report notes.

Possible Scenarios for the Upcoming U.S. Elections and Their Implications

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

At the start of the year, one of the most frequently analyzed topics was the volatility that the U.S. elections could bring to the market. However, what was not anticipated was the volatility stemming from the candidates themselves.

The dynamics of the U.S. elections have been altered by President Joe Biden’s resignation and the entry of Vice President Kamala Harris, leading to a new electoral probability landscape.

In this context, UBS Global Wealth Management has adjusted its probabilities for the possible scenarios.

According to a report shared on LinkedIn by Solita Marcelli, Chief Investment Officer Americas, Harris has a 40% chance of winning the Presidency with a divided Congress. On the other hand, UBS warns that the probability of a possible Trump red sweep has decreased from 40% to 35%.

Harris remains below Trump in the likelihood of winning with majorities in both chambers, but the trend is positive, rising from 10% to 15%.

Lastly, the possibility of Trump winning with a divided Congress has dropped to 10%.

According to UBS, if Harris wins with a divided Congress, there will be limited changes in policies, and thus, a more moderate impact on financial markets.

Additionally, policy enacted through executive action and regulatory oversight will continue significantly, although recent Supreme Court decisions are likely to reduce the Executive Branch’s agencies’ ability to interpret federal statutes. Support initiatives for green energy, efficiency, and electric vehicles are expected.

On the other hand, if Trump wins with majorities in both chambers, UBS expects the extension of the 2017 tax cuts, with a potential further reduction in corporate tax rates. The funding for these projects might come from cutting the green energy provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act.

According to the report led by Marcelli, stock markets would applaud lighter regulation and lower taxes, but this could be partially offset by concerns about the costs and inflationary impact of higher tariffs and trade wars.

The Dutch bank ING presented three possible outcomes for the U.S. elections and analyzed the implications from four perspectives: domestic policy, foreign policy, trade policy, and monetary policy.

The first scenario is the “red sweep” with Trump as president and Republicans winning both chambers.

Domestic Policy: Expanding the 2017 tax cuts as a priority. New immigration controls. No significant fiscal consolidation.

Foreign Policy: Less support for Ukraine and Taiwan. Trump focuses on domestic growth and employment.

Trade Policy: Tariffs, with China particularly exposed. Implementation might be delayed as initial focus is on domestic policy.

Fed Policy: A loose fiscal policy is likely to be accompanied by more restrictive monetary policy if the Fed takes its 2% inflation target seriously.

The second possible outcome is Trump as president but with a Democratic Senate.

Domestic Policy: Trump could extend the 2017 tax cuts, but Democrats might block new cuts and spending priorities.

Foreign Policy: The domestic agenda is limited, so a greater emphasis on foreign policy is likely, with Trump seeking a deal with Russia over Ukraine.

Trade Policy: Trade protectionism is faster and tougher as Trump seeks to leverage actions he believes will boost the U.S. economy.

Fed Policy: Persistent inflationary fears from tariffs and extended tax cuts might make the Fed wary of cutting rates too much in 2025.

Finally, ING estimates the possibility of Harris as president with Republicans dominating the House of Representatives.

Domestic Policy: Increased taxes for businesses and the wealthy, but tax credits and spending in other areas suggest modest fiscal consolidation.

Foreign Policy: Continued support for Ukraine, but funding is restricted by Republican opposition. Middle East tensions persist, and Taiwan maintains U.S. support.

Trade Policy: A more “carrot” approach of incentives for offshoring rather than Trump’s “stick” of tariffs.

Fed Policy: The Fed feels more compelled to bolster the U.S. economy given the reduced fiscal support.

GoldenTree Asset Management Expands Private Credit Team

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesy

GoldenTree Asset Management has announced the hiring of Avineet Punhani as Principal. He will be based in the firm’s New York office and will report to Grady Frank, Partner and Head of Private Credit Origination.

Punhani brings to GoldenTree nearly 15 years of credit expertise alongside his robust private equity relationships. He joins GoldenTree from PNC Financial Services, where he served as a Managing Director with responsibilities that included leading their global origination efforts in the technology industry.

“Throughout our 25-year history, GoldenTree has been a leader in developing innovative private credit solutions, consistently delivering value to issuers and private equity sponsors. This success has created compelling investments for our funds. We are excited to welcome Avi to our team, and are confident that his expertise will enhance our relationships with private credit issuers,” said Grady Frank.

Lee Kruter, Partner and Head of Performing Credit added, “GoldenTree’s deliberate, investment-centric approach sets us apart from our peers. In today’s uncertain economic and market environment, we believe GoldenTree is uniquely positioned, given our broad reach across credit asset classes, our experienced investment team, and our expertise in analyzing complex transactions. We look forward to growing our team and expanding our capabilities to continue delivering differentiated value to our investors.”

Punhani said, “GoldenTree’s diverse industry expertise, expansive capital base and ability to structure unique transactions swiftly and at scale create a truly differentiated value proposition. I am thrilled to join GoldenTree’s leading private credit platform and collaborate with Grady, Lee and this talented team to further enhance our market presence, deepen our relationships with key stakeholders and create attractive investment opportunities that can continue to drive differentiated returns for our investors.”

GoldenTree Asset Management is a global asset management firm with approximately $55 billion in assets under management, according the firm information.

Is it Worth Investing a Trillion Dollars in Generative Artificial Intelligence?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Wikimedia Commons

In the coming years, nearly a trillion dollars is expected to be invested in generative artificial intelligence, but is it worth it?

To understand where the industry is headed, Brook Dane and Sung Cho, portfolio managers from Goldman Sachs Asset Management’s Fundamental Equity team, met with executives from 20 leading technology companies driving innovation in artificial intelligence.

There are risks. Only a handful of companies can compete in the development of large-scale, general-purpose language models. It could become a market where the winner takes all, with significant losses for companies that fall behind, even after massive investment. The applications that justify the enormous amount of spending have yet to fully emerge. For now, AI competition is largely concentrated among a few large companies with substantial resources.

However, the team sees signs that industry-specific and vertical models may emerge, leading to a broader range of winners in the AI arms race. Conversations with leading tech companies indicate that some executives are already seeing a return on their AI hardware investments. And a new generation of products from chip manufacturers is beginning to enter the market, which could mean a wider range of beneficiaries in the semiconductor industry from the AI wave.

Click here to access the full Goldman Sachs report.