Two Questions for Japan Inc.

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Dos preguntas para “Japan Inc.”
Photo: Cors. Two Questions for Japan Inc.

During my last research trip in November, we visited mostly consumer-facing companies in Japan where we took the opportunity to pose two key questions to the management teams we met. The first was—“Are you planning to increase prices for products or services after Japan’s consumption tax hike (scheduled for April)?” And secondly: “Will you raise employee wages?”

To our surprise, many of the firms we met with said it would be difficult to increase prices for their products or services. While they seemed concerned about the rising costs of imports due to the weakening yen, they were also wary of meeting resistance from their customers, or possibly losing customers to competitors who may keep prices more stable. They also said they were quite reluctant to increase base salaries for their employees, noting that they would first need greater confidence that a more permanent, fundamental turnaround was occurring in Japan’s economy.

Opinion writer and Waseda University Professor Norihiro Kato has argued that Japan’s younger generations, those who came of age after the bursting of the country’s economic bubble, have never known what a booming economy feels like. They have not experienced inflation or rising wages. “They are accustomed to being frugal,” he wrote in The New York Times. “Today’s youths, living in a society older than any in the world, are the first since the late 19th century to feel so uneasy about the future.”

I suspect a similar trait has been embedded somewhat into parts of corporate Japan, especially in consumer-facing companies. Like Japan’s younger generations, many Japanese companies also have not experienced rising prices, regular wage increases and investments rather than savings over the last two decades; some firms may have experienced only the same sense of frugality and caution as the youth in its society.

Shaking this mentality of a deflationary environment may be key to what some parts of Japan Inc. need to help boost its economy. The central bank can overcome this obstacle by sticking to its guns on its monetary policy, creating expectations of higher nominal GDP. Fortunately, since the beginning of this year some larger Japanese companies have already announced wage or price increases. Also, some recent statistics in Japan, such as an increase in the consumer price index and the availability of jobs (measured as the ratio of job offers per job seeker), may pressure companies to raise wages. We hope to see more signs that Japan appears to be finding a virtuous cycle of economic recovery and growth.

Kara Yoon, Research Analyst at Matthews Asia

The views and information discussed represent opinion and an assessment of market conditions at a specific point in time that are subject to change.  It should not be relied upon as a recommendation to buy and sell particular securities or markets in general. The subject matter contained herein has been derived from several sources believed to be reliable and accurate at the time of compilation. Matthews International Capital Management, LLC does not accept any liability for losses either direct or consequential caused by the use of this information. Investing in international and emerging markets may involve additional risks, such as social and political instability, market illiquid­ity, exchange-rate fluctuations, a high level of volatility and limited regulation. In addition, single-country funds may be subject to a higher degree of market risk than diversified funds because of concentration in a specific geographic location. Investing in small- and mid-size companies is more risky than investing in large companies, as they may be more volatile and less liquid than large companies. This document has not been reviewed or approved by any regulatory body.

 

Walking on a Tightrope: Risks for Risky Assets

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Giordano Lombardo, Group Chief Investment Officer at Pioneer Investments, opens this month’s CIO Letter quoting Marcus Aurelius: “Look beneath the surface; let not the several quality of a thing nor its worth escape thee”. The subject of this letter is risk. An extract of the main risks that may break the support for risky assets, according to Lombardo, follow. You may access the complete document through the attached pdf file or through this link.

Walking on a Tightrope (Amid the Credibility of Central Banks and the Risk of Crisis)

The first month of the year has confirmed the main scenario presented in our latest Outlook: developed countries’ economies are gathering momentum and Central Banks retain accommodative monetary policies, extending support for risky assets. However, there is no shortage of reasons for being careful going forward.

Emerging Markets stand out as the weakest spot, as most investors refrain from entering countries with high current- account deficits (Argentina, Turkey and other Asian countries are again under the spotlight) or with political uncertainties putting the skids on overdue economic reforms.

None of the sources of volatility spotted recently has dramatically changed our constructive view on risky assets, especially equities. However, in this letter, I believe it is worth focusing on the main risks that may undermine our investment strategy, notably a change in investors’ expectations on monetary policies and the deflation, particularly in Europe:

  • – The main risks to an investment strategy favoring risky assets are a change in investors’ expectations on monetary policies and deflation in Europe. Playing with market expectations is not an easy task. In our view, the FED is walking on a tightrope and the risk of disappointing the markets is not negligible.
  • – The second main risk to our base scenario is deflation. Deflation is hardly a healthy condition for the economy: it tends to defer consumption and investments, to aggravate the debt burden and dampens economic growth as a result. Being in a low inflation/disinflation scenario or in outright deflation can make a significant difference for financial markets. Equities tend to anticipate the deflation, thus proving how important is the role of expectations and the credibility of the Central Bank.

The place where the deflation risk appears to be more tangible is Euroland. In the Eurozone, the drop of inflation below 1% hides a high dispersion in individual data.

The ECB needs to decide what is the lesser evil: avoiding deflation in the periphery, while allowing for some inflation in the core, or sticking to an “anti- inflationary” orthodoxy, which is going to kill the hopes of an economic recovery. We believe that the market has not fully realized nor priced the risk that the ECB has no plan to counter deflation and that political disagreement will lead to a prolonged standoff on the course of action.

  • Another source of risk to our global scenario is a marked slowdown in the world economy, coming from increasing turmoil in Emerging Markets, as we briefly mentioned. As we have seen, the risk is that they become “victims” of a change in the US monetary policy.

You may access Pioneer Investment’s  full CIO Letter through this link or by accessing the pdf attached at the top left corner of this page.

How Far Will China Travel in the Year of the Horse?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

How Far Will China Travel in the Year of the Horse?
Foto cedidaCaroline Maurer, Manager del fondo Henderson Horizon China Fund . ¿Dónde vemos China en el Año del Caballo?

With further policy details provided by the central government in 2013, we see 2014 as the year for actual implementation. With the focus now shifted from politics to the economy, we believe that economic growth, forecast at a lower rate than 2013 at 7.5% for 2014, is likely to be more stable given better macro-economic management.

Given the more stable growth rate, we believe that there are reasons to continue staying positive on the China market.

The new government led by President Xi Jinping has set a positive groundwork for reform by communicating growth targets and reiterating the government’s commitment to change. Following the release of comprehensive reform plans after the 3rd Plenum meeting in November 2013, there has been a general uplift in overall sentiment. We feel that this level of transparency has done much to boost the confidence of people and better manage their expectations. We also have more confidence in the government’s execution capabilities to push for a wider scale of reforms as power is now more centralised. Not only is Xi Jinping the current president, but he is also Head of China’s Communist Party (CPC) and chairman of the country’s Central Military Commission.

The latest reported audited local government debt of 17.9tn RMB (end June 2013) is manageable, but has been an overhang for the market. Potential opening up of the municipal bond market will provide the local governments with a new source of long term financing outside of the traditional bank loans. This would help ease market concerns on duration mismatch of debt terms and infrastructure project cash flow generation cycles. Other measures to deleverage such as privatising government owned assets (eg: infrastructure, natural resources mining rights and state owned enterprises) are also positive to drive the improvement of operating efficiency. Lining up the interest of management and shareholders is likely to improve Returns on Equity (ROE) and benefit minority shareholders.

Apart from the traditional investment into roads, railways and ports, we are seeing incremental demand into the city mass transit system, drainage network, gas power plant, hospitals and other environmental protection areas. The process of local government deleveraging may put some pressure on project financing in the short term, however is expected to be mitigated in the longer term. We expect investment into infrastructure to remain stable in 2014.

The Chinese government is looking to aid income redistribution by increasing the number of regions that will have pilot programs privatising the residential land of farmers. Rural residences account for over half of the Chinese population and improving the wealth level of these residences may benefit domestic consumption.

 

As seen from the chart above, the dispersion between corporate earnings and PE has gone wider over the past three years. Market consensus is between 10-15% of corporate earnings growth in 2014 and we see further potential upside given the more positive business sentiment. The market has potential to rerate and we remain constructive, looking out for potential trading opportunities, as market valuation at below 10x 2014 estimated P/E still looks cheap. Valuation gaps between sector/names have been getting wider with “old economy” names such as China Communication Construction, Weichai Power and banks trading at 5-10x PE; and “new economy” names such as Tencent and Wantwant trading at 20-50x PE range.

The strategy for 2014 is to continue being focused on stock picks in quality growth sectors. The key sectors we favour are Consumer Discretionary, IT, New Energy, Selective industrials and Non-banking Financials. In the past year, we have seen the easing of overcapacity in the industrial sectors which occurred as a result of credit boom post financial crisis. We may start seeing supply cuts in industries such as cement, steel, paper due to a tightening of environmental standards and less capacity expansion in the past 12-18 months as companies had poor profitability. This will help improve the utilisation rate and profitability of cyclical industries especially for industry leaders.

Conclusion

There is likely to be some near term volatility as a result of tackling the accumulating debt risks of local governments and implementation of financial liberalisation amongst other reforms. Recently released PMI data slowed to 50.5 for the month of January 2014, but we feel that this is likely due to the Chinese New Year effect and is better to wait for February data before analysing this in depth.

With China’s reform plan taking shape, we believe that there is long term value to be found. The volatile market sentiment would allow us the opportunity to build up positions in stocks that we have identified as being attractive in the longer term.

Realistically due to the large scale nature of some reform projects, implementation will expectedly take some time. However this is to be expected and from an investment standpoint, we would much rather the government take time to lay the foundations right.

Caroline Maurer, Manager of the Henderson Horizon China Fund

Factor Investing and Its Implementation: ‘All Roads Lead to Rome’

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Factor Investing and Its Implementation: ‘All Roads Lead to Rome’
Alfred Slager, profesor de Pension Fund Management en TiasNimbas Business School de la Universidad de Tilburg, Holanda. Factor Investing y su implementación: ‘Todos los caminos llevan a Roma’

Robeco recently interviewed Alfred Slager, professor in Pension Fund Management at the TiasNimbas Business School at the University of Tilburg, the Netherlands. Alfred Slager wrote the research paper Factor Investing in Practice: A trustees’ Guide to Implementation” together with Professors Kees Koedijk and Philip Stork. This paper concludes that factor investing can take several forms: “But eventually – all roads lead to Rome.”

What is the background to this second research paper?

Factor investing has been much talked about, but so far we have little information on how it can be implemented. A follow-up paper was therefore needed to assemble the knowledge and experience of funds that have already started using factor investing in order to help other funds find their own way of implementing this investment strategy.

When we started our first study, it soon became clear that we were dealing with two separate questions. The first of these focuses on how factor investing is developing. This is the theoretical angle, which we dealt with in our first paper. The second asks how exactly institutional investors apply factor investing, and this is the subject of our second paper.

What surprised you most in this paper?

That there are different ways of implementing factor investing. Little was known about the practical aspects before we started our study (e.g. about incorporating factor investing into your investment process – managing it – the role of the regulator).

Why is factor investing in the limelight now?

Two simultaneous signals triggered this interest. First, the big financial crisis of 2008/2009; diversification turned out to be more of a problem than expected, which caused this and other basic investment principles to become important items on everyone’s agenda. How can we fix things to ensure we emerge stronger from the next financial shock?

Second, pension funds have become more critical about the role of active management. Pension funds, while willing to pay for the skills of a portfolio manager, are not prepared to do so to achieve factor-based returns that they could also generate in their portfolio by other means. Factor investing contributes to the discussion of the role of active management.

What is your own experience of the way pension funds look at factor investing?

There are funds that implement factor investing and feel that it contributes positively to their portfolio composition. They may use factor-based benchmarks, for instance. Other funds are still watching from the sidelines. They see factor investing as a kind of black box. But they, too, would like to strengthen their portfolio and diversify more effectively.

Why are Dutch and Scandinavian investors ahead of the pack in this area?

They have large amounts of institutional capital and a long-term investment horizon. But they also want to control the risks of negative shocks more effectively in the short term. In addition, Dutch and Scandinavianfunds emphasize transparency, cost control and well thought-out investment processes. Finally, they focus strongly on investing scientifically.

Will all institutional investors apply factor investing in future?

We will see this increasingly in many different variants. Something for everybody. What all these investors have in common is their desire to combine stable and enhanced diversification with new opportunities for returns.

Which other professional investors will decide to use factor investing?

I wouldn’t be surprised to see foundations, associations and private wealth funds applying factor investing.

There is a barrier to this, however. We are turning away from our familiar equities and bonds. Term spread and liquidity premium are concepts that are more abstract, and also harder to explain. On the other hand, a factor portfolio can be seen to ensure more stable returns.

What different methods of implementing factor investing are there?

In our research paper we discuss different variants. Institutional investors often implement factor investing in stages.

They may initially decide to use the first variant, the so-called ‘risk due-diligence’ method. Without immediately adjusting the portfolio, they consider exposure to different factors. You can use asset allocation to increase or decrease your exposure. An analogy would be a health scan.

The second variant entails making a more conscious choice to use factors for strategic asset allocation. In this case, you adapt your investment style and benchmark to these factors. Factors that are not used in your traditional investments can be applied to alternatives. The third variant is the most logical one. For this, you base your entire portfolio on factor premiums. However, there are only a few parties that currently do this.

What are the three biggest obstacles to implementation for institutional investors?

Firstly, the language of factor investing is an obstacle. It is less concrete, and the terms are less well known.

Secondly, there is the implementation issue of re-balancing; incorporating this effectively into investment processes requires a major effort by investors. And a third obstacle is that these are new and complex investments for many managers. It’s not really in the spirit of our times to try out new and challenging things.

What are the main differences between these approaches?

The difference lies in how rigorously you wish to implement factor investing. You can apply different variants. But whatever option you choose, you will be fully aware of what is happening in your portfolio.

What do the regulators think about factor investing?

There are positive and negative aspects. A robust portfolio is a positive aspect. Increased transparency of costs is another. Factor investing gives pension funds a better idea of what they do and don’t pay for.

There is also a clear negative aspect from the regulator’s point of view. The notion of being in control produces potential conflicts between the regulator on the one hand and the manager or pension fund on the other. There is much to regulate. In operating terms, this raises the bar somewhat for those who wish to start factor investing. However, practical experience has already demonstrated that there are many feasible ways to implement this strategy. Professional investors will therefore increasingly be allocating to factors in future.

Edyficar, A Subsidiary of The Credicorp Group, Acquires Mibanco

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Credicorp, a través de Edyficar, compra el 60,68% de Mibanco por 179,4 millones
Photo: Taxiarchos228. Edyficar, A Subsidiary of The Credicorp Group, Acquires Mibanco

Credicorp has announced to its shareholders and the market that its indirectly held subsidiary Edyficar has reached an agreement with Grupo ACP Corp (“ACP”) to buy the shares they hold in Mibanco, the country’s largest micro-lending operation, which represent 60.68% of total shares.

Credicorp’s Executive Committee of the Board of Directors approved the transaction in its session of February 5th, 2014, and agreed to pay US$ 179,484,000.00 for the 60.68% stake, which represents a multiple of 1.3 times book value of Mibanco as of December 31st, 2013.

This agreement represents an important step to expand Edyficar’s micro-lending business, joining the efforts of the two most successful micro and PYME lending operations in the Peruvian market, which will provide ample access to credit with high standards of risk management to a growing sector of the population. As a result of this transaction, the new entity will become the largest micro lending entity in the country with a 19.5% share of the micro-lending and PYME market or 3.7% share of the total loan portfolio of the financial system, 886 thousand clients, S/. 9,343 million in assets and S/. 7,098 million in outstanding loans; and will hold a platform for future growth. 

The acquisition is expected to be completed, subject to the necessary approvals, in the course of the next month. Subsequent to the acquisition of ACP’s share of Mibanco, and according to regulatory requirements, a public offer (OPA) will take place in order to tender the purchase offer to the minority shareholders of Mibanco.

This operation will create significant value for Edyficar’s shareholders, and consequently Credicorp’s shareholders, through important economies of scale, rationalization of organizational structures, savings through more appropriate funding structures, less client acquisition costs and broad efficiencies once the extensive synergies identified are effectively captured. The new micro-lending operation will be the strongest in the market, with the largest branch network almost exclusively dedicated to micro-lending and PYME, both being the fastest growing sectors, with the lowest level of penetration of the financial system, high levels of informality, but at the same time, highest rate of entrepreneurship and therefore, highest potential for future growth.

The closing of the acquisition is subject to compliance with certain conditions precedent and approvals, mainly the regulatory approval by the Peruvian Superintendency of Banks, Insurance and Pension Funds (SBS).

With this transaction, Credicorp reinforces its commitment to generate long-term shareholder value through the growth opportunities our market offers. Following this transaction, and true to the nature of its business, Edyficar will lead the development of the micro-lending and PYME businesses, which are considered the engine of future growth and development of the Peruvian economy for the future years.

Rodrigo Mello to Join Greenhill as Managing Director in Sao Paulo

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Rodrigo Mello to Join Greenhill as Managing Director in Sao Paulo

Greenhill & Co., Inc., an independent investment bank, has announced that Rodrigo Mello will join the Firm in Sao Paulo as a Managing Director.

Mr. Mello has more than 16 years of transaction experience, most recently as a Managing Director at Goldman Sachs, where he worked for 13 years.  At Goldman Sachs, he was responsible for the investment banking coverage of financial institutions and consumer & retail clients, and during his career worked on complex mergers and acquisitions for clients across a variety of industry sectors, including financial services, consumer products, retail, media, industrials, telecom and natural resources.

Mr. Mello started his career in Goldman Sachs in 1999.  He left Goldman Sachs in 2005 and worked for two years at Monte Cristalina, a holding company that controls Hypermarcas, a leading Brazilian consumer goods company, where he was responsible for Corporate Strategy and Finance. He rejoined Goldman Sachs as a Vice President in 2007.

Scott L. Bok, Chief Executive Officer of Greenhill, said, “We are pleased to strengthen our Brazilian team with the broad expertise and deep relationships that Rodrigo brings.  We are very excited about our prospects in Brazil and are pleased to be able to quickly strengthen the team with a key hire at a time when we see the potential for significantly increased M&A activity in Brazil.”

Daniel Wainstein, Head of Greenhill Brazil, said, “It is great to have the opportunity to work with Rodrigo again. We worked in close partnership for almost fifteen years.  Rodrigo is widely recognized as one of the most important senior bankers in Brazil, particularly in sectors like financial services and consumer and retail, and we look forward to leveraging his success and breadth of experience as we focus on building a leading M&A franchise for Greenhill in Brazil.”

A Surprising Gift for Chinese New Year

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Un regalo sorprendente por el Año Nuevo Chino
Wikimedia Commons. A Surprising Gift for Chinese New Year

Beijing-based China Credit Trust Company, a firm that operates as a non-banking financial institution in China, announced this week it reached an agreement to restructure a risky high-yield product that had earlier ignited worries over the health of China’s trust industry. Just in time for the Lunar New Year, investors in the troubled trust may receive a big (metaphorical) red envelope—a monetary gift traditionally given during Chinese New Year or other special occasions—or at least avoid a financial hit.

China Credit Trust unveiled its plan to arrange a bailout for buyers of the product. It plans to restructure the loan behind the approximately US$496 million high-yielding investment product that is slated to mature on the Lunar New Year holiday, January 31. 

Trust products in China are privately placed investment vehicles similar to private equity or hedge funds in the West. These products are not allowed to solicit public investment, and are available only to certain qualified (sufficiently wealthy) investors through commercial banks and securities companies. Given the flexibility of their investment universe, ranging from commodities to equities, the trust industry has seen rapid growth in the past several years. The industry’s total assets under management now stands at about US$1.6 trillion (or 9.6 trillion renminbi).

One factor behind this significant growth has been the off-balance sheet lending activity of Chinese banks. During the phase of rapid credit expansion since 2009, Chinese banks increasingly found that their own lending capacity no longer satisfied strong loan demand. To escape regulatory constraints, some banks moved loans into trust products, then sold them to investors who were attracted to generally higher annual yields of approximately 10%. 

The problem came when these products went bad. Who should be held responsible for the loss to investors? Bankers who sold these products said they were just helping to distribute the products. Trust managers blamed banks, often the entities from which the products originated. In reality, several trusts facing the risk of default were bailed out by local governments. This is partly because borrowers were state-owned enterprises, and valuable collateral assets can be auctioned. 

The situation with China Credit Trust is a bit different. The struggling private coal mining company, which was the borrower of the funds from the trust, recently found the value of its mining assets collapse with the slumping price of coal. It is therefore surprising that “strategic investors” would be willing to take over the assets and pay back investor principal in full. It has been widely reported that local government officials helped arrange the bailout behind the scenes. However, the financial market is clearly nervous over whether the potential for default of a trust product may trigger more serious systematic risk. This concern might be overblown for the following reasons: 

  • Unlike many troubled structured products during the global financial crisis, trust products in China were primarily simple straight-forward credit instruments. Trust products do not employ leverage and there are no derivatives linked to trust products. Thus, the ripple effect caused by a default on a trust product tends to be better contained.
  • In contrast to wealth management products, which were sold to mass market retail investors as a deposit alternative, trust products are sold to qualified individual and institutional investors. Such investors generally have a higher risk tolerance than the average investor. Losses suffered by such investors are generally unlikely to result in street protests and widespread unrest. Instead, they may lead to legal court disputes.

In my view, the moral hazard that comes from bailing out these investors outweighs the short-term stability of a bailout. So long as trust investors continue to believe their high returns are implicitly guaranteed by Chinese banks or the government, China‘s real risk-free interest rate may be much higher than the current government bond yield suggests. Thus, the cost of borrowing for many Chinese companies has exceeded the lending rate set by the central bank. At the same time, equity investors of Chinese banks continue to worry about the potential risk of bailing out troubled trust products. If China’s government is serious about economic reform, based on true market principles, then allowing the market to allocate credit, based on the risk/reward analysis of its market participants, is the possibly the most important step it needs to take.

Even in the spirit of the Chinese New Year tradition, red envelopes are primarily for children. It may be time for trust product investors to face consequences as grown ups. 

Sherwood Zhang, CFA, Research Analyst at Matthews Asia

The views and information discussed represent opinion and an assessment of market conditions at a specific point in time that are subject to change.  It should not be relied upon as a recommendation to buy and sell particular securities or markets in general. The subject matter contained herein has been derived from several sources believed to be reliable and accurate at the time of compilation. Matthews International Capital Management, LLC does not accept any liability for losses either direct or consequential caused by the use of this information. Investing in international and emerging markets may involve additional risks, such as social and political instability, market illiquid­ity, exchange-rate fluctuations, a high level of volatility and limited regulation. In addition, single-country funds may be subject to a higher degree of market risk than diversified funds because of concentration in a specific geographic location. Investing in small- and mid-size companies is more risky than investing in large companies, as they may be more volatile and less liquid than large companies. This document has not been reviewed or approved by any regulatory body.

EFG AM Hires Award Winning Swiss Equity Fund Manager Urs Beck

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

EFG AM Hires Award Winning Swiss Equity Fund Manager Urs Beck
Urs Beck. EFG AM Hires Award Winning Swiss Equity Fund Manager Urs Beck

EFG Asset Management, an international provider of actively managed investment products and services, has recruited top Swiss equity fund manager Urs Beck, as part of its on-going development of Swiss investment strategies.

Based in Zurich, Urs will be responsible for Swiss equities and will manage a dedicated Swiss equity fund to complement the firm’s New Capital UCITS IV fund range.

Prior to his move to EFG Asset Management, Urs was Head of Swiss Equities at Zurich Cantonal Bank (ZKB) where he ran both institutional and retail Swiss mandates for seven years. During his tenure at ZKB, Urs received the FERI award for best fund in the Swiss equities category in 2013 and 2014 respectively.

Urs has over 18 years of investment experience and has previously held positions with Julius Baer, Bank Leu and UBS. He is a CFA charter holder and has a Masters in Economics from the University of St. Gallen (HSG).

“We are very pleased to have an experienced portfolio manager of Urs’ calibre and proven track record join EFG Asset Management. The development of Swiss equities as one of our core competencies further underlines our commitment to investment management in Switzerland”, says Patrick Zbinden, CEO, EFG Asset Management Switzerland.

Global AuM To Exceed $100 Trillion by 2020 with Nearly 50% Residing in North America

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

La industria global de gestión de activos, un sector de 102 billones de dólares para 2020
Barry Benjamin, responsible at PwC's Global Asset Management, commenting the report. Global AuM To Exceed $100 Trillion by 2020 with Nearly 50% Residing in North America

According to Asset Management 2020: A brave new world, a new report from PwC released on Monday, global assets under management (AuM) will rise to roughly $102 trillion by 2020 from a 2012 total of $64 trillion, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 6 percent. This forecasted expansion aligns with the findings of the firm’s recently released Global CEO Survey where growth projections among asset management CEOs eclipsed CEOs from numerous other sectors.

AuM in North America is predicted to grow at a CAGR of 5.1 percent to reach over $49 trillion by 2020 (from a 2012 total of $33.2 trillion), exceeding expected AuM for Europe, Asia Pacific and Middle East & Africa combined.

The game changers

As the global asset management industry progresses towards a significant moment in its evolution, PwC has identified six dynamics that should be analyzed and addressed to capitalize on emerging opportunities:

  1. Asset management moves center stage:The changing focus of banks and insurance companies and shifting demographics/markets could propel asset management from the shadows to the forefront. However, rising assets and prominence are typically accompanied by rising costs.  As the asset management industry expands and becomes more visible, new investments in data, technology and talent may be needed to respond to heightened regulatory and competitive pressures.  These expenses could continue to burden profits, which, according to industry analysis, are still 15-20 percent below their pre-crisis levels.
  2. Distribution is redrawn – regional and global platforms dominate: By 2020, four distinct regional fund distribution blocks in North Asia, South Asia, Latin America and Europe are expected to develop regulatory and trade linkages with each other, reshaping the way that asset managers view distribution channels. North American asset managers may need to evaluate their strategy to consider the impact of these linkages.
  3. Fee models are transformed: By 2020, it is likely that major territories with distribution networks may look to introduce regulations to better align interests for the end-customer, which may place more transparency pressure on asset managers and have a substantial impact on the cost structure of the industry. In the US, asset managers are facing the unique confluence of imminent mass retirement and growing healthcare costs which is likely to shift investment strategy towards longer term wealth accumulation with more emphasis on fixed income and income generating assets.
  4. Alternatives become more mainstream, passives are core and ETFs proliferate: Traditional active management should continue to be the core of the industry as the rising tide of assets lifts all strategies and styles of management. However, traditional active management could grow at a less rapid pace than passive and alternative strategies, and the overall proportion of actively managed traditional assets under management is likely to shrink. PwC estimates that alternative assets will grow by some 9.3 percent a year between now and 2020, reaching $13 trillion.
  5. A new breed of global managers: By 2020, the industry is likely to see the emergence of a new breed of global managers, one with highly streamlined platforms, targeted solutions for the customer, and a stronger and more trusted brand. These managers will not only emerge from the traditional fund complexes, but from among the ranks of large alternative firms as well.
  6. Asset management enters the 21st century: Today, asset management operates within a relatively low-tech infrastructure, but by 2020 technology may become mission critical to customer engagement, data mining for information on clients and potential clients, operational efficiency and regulatory and tax reporting. Moreover, cyber risk will intensify, ranking as a top priority alongside operational, market and performance risk.

“Amid unprecedented economic turmoil and regulatory change, most asset managers have not had time to bring the future into focus,” said Barry Benjamin, global asset management leader, PwC. “However, as the industry stands on the precipice of a number of fundamental shifts and the potential for significant volumes of assets, there is more responsibility on firms than ever to manage these assets to the best of their collective ability. Strong branding and investor trust in 2020 will only be achieved by those firms that place a premium on transparency, a concrete value proposition to customers, and a firm commitment to avoiding practices that could prompt concerns among investors, regulators and policymakers.”

Overarching trends fueling growth

According to the report, the asset management environment is being reshaped by the convergence of several significant global megatrends including demographic changes, accelerating urbanization, technological breakthroughs and shifts in economic power.  At the client level, PwC predicts that global growth in assets will be driven by three key factors:

  • The increasing use of defined contribution (DC) plans partly driven by government-incentivized or government-mandated shift to individual retirement plans.
  • The increase of mass affluent and high-net-worth-individuals in the SAAAME (South America, Asia, Africa, Middle East) regions where economies are set to grow faster than those in the developed world in the years leading up to 2020.
  • The expansion and emergence of new sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) with diverse agendas and investment goals.

In 2012, the AM industry managed 36.5 percent of assets held by pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, insurance companies, mass affluent and high-net-worth-individuals. If the AM industry is successful in penetrating these clients assets further, PwC believes that share of managed assets can increase by 10 percent to a level of 46.5 percent, which would represent $130 trillion in Global AuM.

Pension funds assets

Overall, assets held by mass affluent (wealth between $100,000 and $1 million) and HNWI investors (wealth of $1 million or more) are expected to rise to more than $100 trillion and $76 trillion, respectively by 2020, as compared to $59 trillion and $52 trillion, respectively, in 2012.

While emerging wealth economies in the SAAAME regions will likely serve as the dominant catalyst for growth, North America is projected to continue expanding at a solid pace and ahead of expectations for a similarly mature market like Europe. In 2020, North American mass affluent assets are expected to reach $21.7 trillion (from $13.7 trillion in 2012, a CAGR of 4.9 percent) while HNWI assets will likely top $30 trillion relative to $20.1 trillion in 2012 (CAGR of 4.4 percent).

The size of SWFs is rising fast and their presence in international capital markets is becoming more prominent.  AuM for SWFs is currently above $5 trillion and PwC predicts this figure will surge to nearly $9 trillion by 2020. SWFs based in the Middle East and Africa will grow the fastest, with Asia Pacific also seeing a rapid rise in SWF assets.  This is a significant opportunity for strategic expansion for North American asset management firms that invest in the resources and capabilities required to effectively meet the unique needs of SWFs.

“Responding to the impact of the global megatrends and the game changers we’ve identified will require considerable thought in order to create a great strategy – there is no silver bullet to building the successful asset manager of 2020 and beyond,” said John Siciliano, managing director and strategy lead, asset management advisory, PwC US.  “Those that are proactive about developing coherent strategies and act with integrity towards clients are likely to build the brands that are not only successful in 2020, but that are still trusted in 2020.”

To access the whole report, please use the following link.

 

H.I.G. Capital Opens Milan Office And Names Raffaele Legnani Managing Director

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

H.I.G. Capital abre oficina en Milán y pone al frente a Raffaele Legnani
Piazza Duomo. H.I.G. Capital Opens Milan Office And Names Raffaele Legnani Managing Director

H.I.G. Capital, a global private equity firm with more than $13 billion of equity capital under management, has announced that it has opened a Milan office and appointed Raffaele Legnani as a Managing Director to lead its efforts in Italy.

H.I.G., through its H.I.G. Europe affiliate, currently has a team of over 50 investment professionals based in Europe, operating out of offices in London, Hamburg, Madrid and Paris. H.I.G. Europe is one of the most active private equity investors in Europe, having completed 28 investments since it began investing in 2008. In July 2013, H.I.G. Capital successfully closed H.I.G. European Capital Partners II at €825 million ($1.1 billion), significantly above its initial target. The fund will follow the strategy of its predecessor fund, focusing on buyout and growth capital investments in middle-market companies primarily in Western Europe.

Mr. Legnani was previously founding partner of Atlantis Partners in Milan, the leading independent institutional investment firm focused on Italian mid-size companies in Special Situations. Before that, Mr. Legnani has successfully invested in a significant number of buyout transactions, both directly and through specialized private equity funds (the London based Stellican and the US based Wexford Management) serving as operating board member for several portfolio companies. Previously, he worked in investment banking for Goldman Sachs in London.

In commenting on his appointment, Mr. Legnani stated, “I am very excited to join the H.I.G. team. H.I.G. is ideally positioned to successfully invest in Italy, given the significant amount of capital at its disposal and its experience in working with both growth companies and businesses facing operational and/or financial challenges. Focusing on midsize companies with a turnover above €50 million, H.I.G. targets the backbone of the Italian economy.” Mr. Legnani also added that he expects H.I.G. to be flexible in its approach in Italy, providing both debt and equity capital and investing in either majority or minority stakes in promising Italian businesses with a strong and sustainable competitive position. He also expects H.I.G. Capital to assist Italian companies to capitalize on international growth and expansion opportunities, given its global presence and its wide team of international experienced professionals.