Investors Fret Over Monetary Policy as End of U.S. QE Looms

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Investors Fret Over Monetary Policy as End of U.S. QE Looms

Concerns over the imminent end of quantitative easing in the U.S. have left investors much less confident in the outlook for the global economy and corporate profitability, according to the BofA Merrill Lynch Fund Manager Survey for October. An overall total of 220 panelists with US$640 billion of assets under management participated in the survey from 3 October to 9 October 2014.

After a sharp fall of more than 20 percentage points from September, only a net 32 percent of respondents expect the global economy to strengthen over the next 12 months. This is the lowest reading in two years. Inflation and earnings expectations have slumped: recent consensus over the world experiencing both below-trend inflation and below-trend growth is even stronger this month at 77 percent.

Monetary policy underlies this shift in sentiment. Only a net 18 percent of fund managers now view policy as too stimulative, down 14 percentage points to the lowest level since August 2012 – just before the last QE initiative in the U.S. Perceptions of monetary risk have also risen, along with Emerging Market risk.    

Investors’ response has been to reduce riskier exposures. Cash balances have risen to 4.9 percent, while investment horizons have shortened and equity overweights have fallen rapidly (down a net 13 percentage points month-on-month). Underweights in commodities have also risen, while sectors sensitive to the asset class like energy and materials have seen large moves to net underweight positions.           

Respondents have lost their appetite for Emerging Markets and European equities. Both current positioning and intentions for the next 12 months have turned negative or neutral. Instead, they have regained faith in the U.S. market and increased their preference for Japan.

“Cash balances are high, but investors are retreating to benchmark positions rather than staging an exodus from markets,” said Michael Hartnett, chief investment strategist at BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. “With the European Central Bank ‘hope trade’ gone, performance in European equities is reverting to fundamentals. As our view remains downbeat, we continue to favor defensive dividend yield stocks and expect any rallies in cyclical stocks to be short lived,” added Manish Kabra, European equity and quantitative strategist.

European enthusiasm fades

Following the European Central Bank’s press conference at the start of the month, respondents are uncertain over policy in Europe. Twenty-six percent of the global panel now does not expect the ECB to initiate a program of QE, up from last month’s 19 percent.

Expectations over Europe’s growth have declined markedly. Only a net 16 percent of regional fund managers now expect the continent’s economy to strengthen over the next year. This compares to a net 45 percent last month.

The outlook for corporate profitability is heavily affected by this. After a month-on-month decline of nearly 30 percentage points, a net 52 percent now does not expect double-digit earnings growth in the region, while an even high proportion of fund managers judge earnings-per-share estimates for European companies as too high.    

Against this background, positioning in European equities has declined. Only a net 4 percent of global investors report overweighting the region now, down 14 percentage points from last month.

Moreover, the market has lost its appeal as investors’ top pick for overweighting in the next 12 months. Only a net 3 percent still view it so positively.

Japanese appetite grows

In contrast, appetite for exposure to Japan has increased further. A net 14 percent of asset allocators would most like to overweight the country’s equities over the next year – a reading that is some 10 percentage points more bullish than that for any other major market.

In contrast to other regions, Japanese fund managers’ inflation expectations are on the rise. A net 46 percent expect consumer price to climb in the next year, up from a net 18 percent last month.

Investors’ increasingly negative outlook for the yen contributes to these assessments. Global fund managers are now equally bearish on the Japanese currency and the euro. This marks a striking shift from last month, when the differential between the two was more than 20 percentage points.  

Fiscal and monetary concerns climb

Besides their less upbeat stance on monetary policy, panelists are also concerned over fiscal policy. A net 19 percent of global fund managers now regard fiscal policy as too restrictive.

After a 12-percentage point rise in the space of two months, this represents the highest reading on this measure in more than a year.

High Net Worth Individuals Optimistic about China Market

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pekín y la Fed: "Yo te tengo, tú me tienes"
La Fed está entre la espada y la pared, según SYZ AM. Foto: AndyCastro, Flickr, Creative Commons. Pekín y la Fed: "Yo te tengo, tú me tienes"

In a landmark research collaboration, Julius Baer and Bank of China Limited have jointly launched the 2014 annual report on wealth trends in Asia. The report finds domestic investors, High Net Worth Individuals (HNWI) in China have a positive stance on risky assets and are turning increasingly to private banks to meet their financial service needs.

This year’s Julius Baer – Bank of China Wealth Report: Asia provides a focused China Lifestyle Index of 12 mainland China cities. The report also examines pivotal shifts in the world’s second largest economy and how HNWI in China see private banking as well as the education for their next generation.

Shumin Zhu, Executive Vice President of Bank of China Limited commented: “Internationalization of the renminbi is a key element in China’s wider economic reform process and Bank of China is at the forefront of this development. As a bank, we are committed to contributing to supporting China’s businesses and entrepreneurs, who strive to further develop the country’s economy and contribute to the China Dream. We are very pleased to cooperate with Julius Baer in producing this landmark report. The findings confirmed that our clients, many of whom are entrepreneurs, are confident about the future of the Chinese economy and investment environment. As the leading wealth manager in China, sharing expertise with Julius Baer as new opportunities emerge in global private banking, is an exciting proposition for Bank of China.”

Boris F.J. Collardi, Chief Executive Officer of Julius Baer Group Ltd, said: “Our strategic partnership with Bank of China comes as the economies in the region are becoming increasingly synchronised and financially integrated. It is clear to us that the combination of these factors, together with the internationalisation of the renminbi, Asia’s growth drivers are evolving rapidly. These are important issues, and our partnership with Bank of China places Julius Baer in a prime, unique and privileged position to engage with our international clients on these matters.”

The Julius Baer – Bank of China Wealth Report: Asia features a unique survey of a representative sample of Bank of China’s onshore private banking clients across the nation. On the forefront of China’s economic transition, Bank of China’s private banking client base represents mostly entrepreneurs who cherish the services that Bank of China offers.

Internationalization is a key theme that echoes throughout the report. Be it from the perspective of High Net Worth Individuals (HNWI) as parents or investors, respondents to the surveys on private banking service and education planning for their next generation expressed clear interests in broadening horizons. This parallels with the joint Julius Baer and Bank of China stance on what is happening in China’s economy and broader policy making arena today.

Macro landscape

Among the key highlights of the 2014 Julius Baer – Bank of China Wealth Report: Asia, worries over ‘hard landings’ in China are unfounded, as these ignore the important progress already made in the context of evolving the economic model. Also, the Bank of China proprietary Cross-Border RMB Index (CRI) points to the continual internationalisation of the currency, echoing the shared view that reserve currency status is attainable in the medium term. 


Private banking clients in China

In a landmark research enterprise, Bank of China has surveyed over 200 of its private banking clients in 30 branches across the country. The face-to-face interviews took place in mid-June 2014, gauging client preferences with regard to private banking products and services and their outlook on financial markets.

Structured products that offer capital protection remain the preferred investment vehicle, but foreign exchange-linked products, bonds and overseas equities were listed as being of interest over the coming 12 months.

In terms of cross-border investing, the top two interests over the next 12 months are to invest overseas financially (44%) and buy properties (40%). In terms of investment destination, the United States and Canada (61%) took the top spot, followed by Hong Kong (34%), Australia (21%), continental Europe (15%) and the United Kingdom (11%) tying with Singapore (11%) in fifth place.

The preferred long-term investment is real estate (53%). In terms of gold, survey respondents see the longer term value of holding gold (35%) in their portfolios, but have limited return expectations in the shorter term. Equities (14%) ranked last as a ‘long-term investment’.

The Julius Baer – Bank of China Lifestyle Index

2014 marks the launch of the Julius Baer – Bank of China Lifestyle Index, covering the cost of luxury goods and services as relevant to HNWI entrepreneurs across China. The data will be collected on an annual basis, in tandem with the enhanced Julius Baer Lifestyle Index.

There are twelve cities grouped into four regions. Bohai Economic Rim (Beijing, Tianjin, Dalian), Yangtze River Delta Zone (Nanjing, Shanghai, Wuxi), Pearl River Delta Zone (Guangzhou, Jiangmen, Huizhou) and the Western China Emerging Zone (Chongqing, Chengdu, Xian).

The items covered are: business registration fees, dental implants, first class domestic air travel, golf club memberships, hospital, hotel suites, luxury property and wedding banquets.

The highest average costs are found in the Bohai Economic Rim, with a significant gap between Beijing and the other two member cities (Tainjin and Dalian). The lowest costs can be found in the Western China Emerging Zone – as well as the gaps between the three cities (Chongqing, Chengdu and Xian) are the smallest. 
Investing in future generations

Within the Julius Baer Lifestyle Index, the education-related components (university tuition and boarding school fees) have shown the most consistent increases, double-digit increases since 2011. Taking this as a starting point, Julius Baer commissioned a survey of over affluent 800 parents across Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Mumbai and Singapore, to ascertain their attitudes, preferences and expectations in terms of investing for their children’s futures.

Parents in Beijing and Shanghai (98%) have the highest expectations that their children will achieve advanced degrees (Bachelor degree or above).

Singapore (64%) stands out for the strongest preference for local universities. Parents in China (66%) have the clearest preference for overseas education, in particular the United States and United Kingdom. Interestingly, this echoes the results of the Bank of China private banking survey in terms of desired overseas investment destinations.

Parents in Mumbai (91%), Beijing and Shanghai (88%) have the strongest expectation that 
their children will enjoy higher incomes than themselves.

In terms of generational transfers, parents in Beijing and Shanghai (62%) feel that passing on 
personal values to their children is simultaneously the most important and challenging aspect of being an affluent household. By contrast, for parents in Mumbai (39%), the most important qualitative aspect of generational transfer cited was ‘skill’. 
Thomas R. Meier, Region Head Asia Pacific of Julius Baer said: “Julius Baer and Bank of China have been working together to promote the exchange of wealth management experience and knowledge, as well as to enhance the understanding and confidence in the strong fundamentals of the Chinese economy and investment space for our international clientele.”

Active and Passive U.S. Equity Fund Flows Continued to Move in Opposite Directions in October

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Active and Passive U.S. Equity Fund Flows Continued to Move in Opposite Directions in October

Morningstar has reported estimated U.S. mutual fund and exchange-traded fund (ETF) asset flows for September 2014. Long-term mutual funds and ETFs attracted $9.0 billion of new investor cash during the month.

Active taxable-bond funds registered their most significant monthly outflow since June 2013, $18.7 billion, spurred by the Sept. 26, 2014 announcement of Bill Gross’ departure from PIMCO. Outflows from PIMCO Total Return aside, taxable-bond funds have otherwise seen relatively consistent inflows year to date.

Active and passive U.S. equity fund flows continued to move in opposite directions—active U.S. equity funds saw outflows for the seventh consecutive month, and passive U.S. equity funds collected inflows for the eighth consecutive month.

Among passive funds, all categories except commodities funds saw inflows in September, most notably U.S. and international-equity offerings. Total passive flows were larger than total active flows for the seventh straight month.

The three active funds with the heaviest outflows during the month were PIMCO funds formerly managed by Bill Gross, which lost a little more than $23.3 billion. Two intermediate-term bond funds that appeared to be reaping the benefits of investors seeking alternatives to PIMCO include Metropolitan West Total Return Bond, which has a Morningstar Analyst Rating™ of Gold, and unrated Fidelity® Series Investment Grade Bond. On the passive side, Vanguard Total Bond Market Index also collected large sums of fixed-income-oriented money.

Changes for several U.S. funds

Morningstar has also announced Morningstar Analyst Rating changes for several U.S. funds. In the six weeks since the end of August, Morningstar analysts upgraded one U.S. fund rating and downgraded three fund ratings, including PIMCO Total Return. On Sept. 26, Morningstar placed all 39 analyst-rated PIMCO funds Under Review following the departure from the firm of Bill Gross, founder, managing director, and chief investment officer. As of Oct. 10, Morningstar analysts had reaffirmed, upgraded, or downgraded Analyst Ratings for 10 PIMCO funds. Morningstar will continue to review Analyst Ratings for PIMCO funds as part of an ongoing assessment of Gross’ departure based on the Morningstar Analyst Rating methodology.

Morningstar reaffirmed Analyst Ratings for the following PIMCO funds as of Oct. 10:

  • PIMCO All Asset, reaffirmed Analyst Rating of Gold
  • PIMCO All Asset All Authority, reaffirmed Analyst Rating of Silver
  • PIMCO EqS® Long/Short, reaffirmed Analyst Rating of Neutral
  • PIMCO Income A, reaffirmed Analyst Rating of Silver
  • PIMCO Municipal Income II, reaffirmed Analyst Rating of Neutral

Morningstar upgraded the following PIMCO fund as of Oct. 10:

  • PIMCO Municipal Bond, upgraded to Bronze from Neutral

Morningstar downgraded the following PIMCO funds as of Oct. 10:

  • PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunities, downgraded to Neutral from Bronze
  • PIMCO Emerging Local Bond, downgraded to Silver from Gold
  • PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond A, downgraded to Silver from Gold
  • PIMCO Total Return, downgraded to Bronze from Gold

As of Sept. 30, 2014, 138 U.S. funds had a Morningstar Analyst Rating of Gold, 285 funds had a Silver rating, 325 funds were rated Bronze, 330 funds had a Neutral rating, and 40 funds were rated Negative. Approximately 10 percent of mutual funds available for sale in the United States are currently Morningstar Medalists. Morningstar’s manager research team covers about $8 trillion of U.S. investor assets, which is equivalent to approximately 70 percent of total investor assets in the United States.

Aside from Analyst Rating changes for PIMCO funds, Morningstar changed Analyst Ratings for the following U.S. mutual funds in September:

  • Franklin Flex Cap Growth, downgraded to Neutral from Bronze
  • Invesco International Growth, upgraded to Silver from Bronze
  • TFS Market Neutral, downgraded to Silver from Gold

Fidelity Investments Names Abigail Johnson as CEO

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Fidelity Investments Names Abigail Johnson as CEO

Fidelity Investments named Abigail Johnson chief executive of the financial services company, the third CEO of the company founded by her grandfather.

Johnson, 52, is replacing her father, 84-year-old Edward Johnson, who has been CEO of Fidelity since 1977. He will stay on as chairman of the company’s board.

The changes were announced Monday in a memo to Fidelity shareholders.

Fidelity in one of the world’s biggest investors, managing 401(k)s and other retirement and investment accounts for 23 million people, according to the company’s website. Its 401(k) plans are used by 193 of Fortune 500 companies. At the end of last year, it was managing 566 mutual funds. The company has $2 trillion assets under management.

Abigail Johnson has worked at the Boston company since 1988, starting out as a stock analyst. Most recently she was president of Fidelity’s retail, workplace and institutional businesses. She is among the nation’s wealthiest women, worth an estimated $12.3 billion, according to Forbes.

Johnson takes over Fidelity at a challenging time for the fund giant. Investors are increasingly turning to low-cost index funds, a specialty of rival Vanguard Group. And Fidelity has been playing catch-up in another low-cost option popular with investors, exchange-traded funds, which can be bought and sold during the day.

Pierre Schoeffler Joins La Française
 as Senior Global Asset Allocation Advisor

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pierre Schoeffler Joins La Française
 as Senior Global Asset Allocation Advisor

Following the group’s initiative to organise its activities around four core business lines, La Française appoints Pierre Schoeffler as “Senior Global Asset Allocation Advisor”, a role that will cover all asset classes managed by the group. The Group’s strength and originality lies in its wide-range of expertise, as well as its coherent approach to asset allocation.

Xavier Lépine, Chairman of the Board of La Française said, “Pierre’s experience, advice and quantitative tools will help reinforce our strategic overview in terms of allocation through a quantitative approach to the various asset classes. Our strength lies in the diversity and originality of our solutions and approaches, and our ambition is to optimise their combination by drawing on Pierre’s vision as a portfolio strategist. In the current low rate environment, our aim is to help our clients manage this challenge by providing them with a comprehensive service and a 360 degree view of Asset Allocation by including all asset classes from real estate to bonds, and equities to hedge funds”.

Pierre Schoeffler is Chairman of S&Partners and a Senior Advisor at IEIF.

Pierre Schoeffler is an engineer with degrees from Ecole Polytechnique and the Ecole Nationale de la Météorologie. He began his career as a fluid mechanics researcher before being appointed as a portfolio strategist at Crédit Commercial de France. He was then appointed head of Asset-Liability Management at the bank, and became head of the Economic and Equity Research Department. In 1990, he left the CCF to open the Paris branch of the Swedish bank Svenska Handelsbanken and launch its investment banking business in France. In 2004, he left Svenska Handelsbanken to found S&Partners, a financial and alternative (including real estate) asset allocation strategy consulting company.

EFAMA Hires Gabriela Diezhandino to Head its New Public Policy Department

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

EFAMA Hires Gabriela Diezhandino to Head its New Public Policy Department

The European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA) has hired Gabriela Diezhandino, the former Head of Public Affairs for Insurance Europe, to head its newly created Public Policy Department.

The new departmentwill work closely alongside EFAMA’s other two specialist divisions – Economics and Research, directed by Bernard Delbecque and Regulatory Policy, directed by Vincent Ingham. Its primary focus will be on engaging in a constructive dialogue with policy and decision makers to promote EFAMA’s legislative agenda and the views of its members.

This development reflects EFAMA’s commitment to proactive engagement with new and existing political stakeholders through transparent dialogue, and to ensure the industry continues to be represented effectively on the European and international political stage.

As Director of Public Policy, Gabriela will take responsibility for strengthening political and public support for EFAMA’s issues and priorities, ensuring that the industry retains a strong voice and positive representation. Gabriela will also be responsible for developing the best possible political framework within which EFAMA’s members operate, working in collaboration with EFAMA’s Director General, the other two Directors, EFAMA members and industry representatives to identify, pinpoint and develop industry priorities and policies.

A 14-year Brussels and EU affairs veteran, Gabriela joins EFAMA from Insurance Europe, where she was Head of Public Affairs for seven years, responsible for devising and implementing the policy communication and engagement strategies, and promoting the policy messages of the association.

Peter De Proft, Director General of EFAMA, said:“We are delighted to welcome Gabriela to the EFAMA team. The creation of this new role is proof positive of our commitment to engaging constructively with law-makers, and is a particularly important and strategic move for us in the context of the newly elected European Commission and Parliament. Moreover, we needed someone with a strong track record on-the-ground in Brussels allied to an in-depth knowledge of the international financial services industry, and the issues that EFAMA will be engaging with.

“We now enter a new and important phase of political engagement and representation for our industry, and Gabriela will play a key role in making sure that we meet our stated intention to provide leadership and play an enhanced collaborative role with legislators and regulators. We have no doubt Gabriela will prove a worthy addition to our team.”

Blackstone to Spin Off Financial Advisory Business

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Blackstone to Spin Off Financial Advisory Business

Blackstone has announced that its Board of Directors has approved a plan to spin off its financial and strategic advisory services, restructuring and reorganization advisory services, and its Park Hill fund placement businesses and combine these businesses with PJT Partners, an independent financial advisory firm founded by Paul J. Taubman. The parties expect the transaction to close in 2015.

The new entity will be an independent, publicly traded company, which will be led by Mr. Taubman, 53, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to founding PJT Partners, Mr. Taubman spent 30 years at Morgan Stanley where he served as Co-President of the Institutional Securities Group. Prior to becoming Co-President, he was the Head of Global Investment Banking and Head of its Global Mergers and Acquisitions Department. Since leaving Morgan Stanley, Mr. Taubman, acting independently, has advised corporate clients on some of the largest M&A transactions in recent years and began building an elite team of senior bankers to form PJT Partners.

Upon completion of the spin-off, Blackstone’s current unitholders will initially own approximately 65% of the new entity. Blackstone’s advisory employees will roll their Blackstone units into the new company and, combined with Mr. Taubman and his partners, will initially own approximately 35% of the company. Mr. Taubman will serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the new company, which will also include four independent directors.

Stephen A. Schwarzman, Blackstone’s Chairman, CEO and Co-Founder, commenting on the announcement, said, “Blackstone began as an advisory firm nearly 30 years ago. The decision to spin off these businesses is possible because of our success in growing them over the past 30 years. As the largest alternative asset manager in the world, and with our investing areas considerably broader and larger than even a few years ago, we have not been free to aggressively grow our advisory businesses further out of concern for potential conflicts. The separation of our investing and advisory areas will create new growth opportunities for both businesses.”

Mr. Schwarzman continued, “Paul is one of the preeminent investment bankers in the world. He has had an impressive career over three decades as a strategic advisor to Fortune 500 corporations and as a senior Wall Street executive at one of the most respected financial institutions. With this experience, along with his recent success founding and growing an independent financial advisory business and his proven ability to attract top talent to his new firm, I am confident that Paul will help create the best advisory business on the Street. And, while we will truly miss the daily interaction with our advisory colleagues, we look forward to working with them as clients in the future.”

Added Mr. Taubman, “This is a unique opportunity to combine the legacy, scale and scope of a well-established business while capturing the entrepreneurial energy of a new firm to better serve clients. Further, by eliminating the potential conflicts that existed as part of the world’s largest alternative asset manager, these three businesses will now be positioned for significant growth. The new enterprise will include the leading restructuring franchise on the Street, a market-leading fund placement business and a strategically important advisory practice. By combining resources, we have an opportunity to establish a new leader in the advisory space and the premier destination for talent.”

Excluding capital markets revenues attributable to Blackstone’s Financial Advisory segment that will not be part of the transaction, Blackstone’s advisory businesses generated approximately $380 million of revenue for the twelve months ending June 30, 2014.

The transaction is intended to be tax-free to Blackstone and Blackstone’s unitholders. The completion of the transaction is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain customary closing conditions, including the effectiveness of a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the receipt by Blackstone of an opinion from its tax counsel as to the tax-free nature of the transaction and certain regulatory approvals. The transaction will not be subject to a vote of Blackstone’s common unitholders. There can be no assurance that the transaction will ultimately be consummated, or, as to its timing in the event the transaction is consummated.

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP is acting as legal counsel to Blackstone in this transaction. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP is acting as legal counsel to PJT Partners.

What the Fund?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

What the Fund?
Foto: Mattbuck. What the Fund?

The most challenging projects that have come across my desk this year involve domiciling Emerging and Offshore funds and finding custodian partners in established trustworthy jurisdictions for the funds’ daily operations. It may seem an easy task, but most banks in the US, UK or Ireland will not be as friendly to your Argentina Fixed Income Portfolio or your BVI Small Cap Strategy fund as you’d like.

I started this year working with several Latam investment funds that needed a custodian bank or a clearing agent, tasks that could easily be accomplished within 30 days for any fund structured in the US, UK or Ireland.

But why are custodians so cautious of any jurisdiction not a top 10 global financial hub? It is true that new regulatory changes worldwide are playing a significant role in banks being more selective regarding the clients they want to service. After working directly with banks in the selection and onboarding process, I have learned that in this case the biggest deal breaker is the fear of the unknown. Custody and trust bankers are simply not fully aware of rules, regulations and restrictions that govern funds based in emerging markets or other offshore jurisdictions.

As a fund manager or leader of your investment firm, is your job to educate them. Here are some ice-breaking topics I discuss with custodian banks when onboarding my clients:

Speak the same language

If you are working with a bank outside your jurisdiction, learn the terms, rules and regulations of the jurisdiction that will be doing your safekeeping. Make sure your banker knows what your needs are by identifying them clearly. A custodian account for example, might not have the same functionalities in the UK than it does in the US.

Explain your Investment Strategy and your Growth Potential

Custodial banking is fee-based, so any banker will be more inclined to help you if they can easily determine the number of assets they will be doing custody for, the number of annual trades to be executed and the risks involved within the investment strategy.

Draw a map of your jurisdiction

You should not assume that banks are fully aware of how funds in Uruguay are regulated, or the rules and restrictions faced by broker-dealers in Argentina, or the reporting requirements for a fund in New Zealand.  Similar to a business plan, you should explain in writing the rules and regulations that you are supervised under, the similarities between your jurisdiction and a major investment hub, the risks and the rewards of working with a client from your jurisdiction. Most importantly tell the bank why you can be such a great future client and partner.

Show your compliance cards

Make sure to have ready and available to share all the policies and procedures you will be following. Some of the main ones should be: client onboarding policy, AML policy, privacy and reporting policy. You should consider adding policies required in other jurisdictions as this may help you form a new relationship with a bank without affecting your core business strategy.

Form Relationships

Chances are that if you are not managing a minimum of US $50 million in your fund, top-tier Banks will not be fighting over your business. The best relationships I have in banking are with mid-sized banks. These banks are big enough to have recognizable brands and can give you peace of mind about safekeeping, while at the same time are small enough to understand new business means growing together and finding solutions that work for both the client and the bank.

Article by Jonathan Rivas, Managing Parter dcdb Group

Irrational Exuberance 2.0?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Irrational Exuberance 2.0?
Foto: Fondo Monetario Internacional Fotógrafo/Stephen Jaffe - Fotografías de la Reunión Anual del FMI 2007, FMI. ¿Exuberancia irracional 2.0?

The warning signs of new asset bubbles are growing almost by the day. Major institutions, like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Bank for Internatinal Settlement (BIS), as well as individuals who have been right at pointing out bubbles in the past – such as Raghuram Rajan, Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, who correctly anticipated the US real estate bubble – have all started issuing words of warning.

Stefan Hofrichter, CFA, Head of Global Economics & Strategy at Allianz Global Investors, has written a report which was discussed in Allianz GI Investment Forum in Frankfurt last month where he addresses the following issue:

Are we currently witnessing the creation of a new asset bubble or, even worse, a series of asset bubbles fuelled by ultra-easy monetary policy?

The debate should not come as a surprise: US equities were just a few percentage points off their record highs as of the day of writing the report, and other major equity markets have reached all-time highs or multiyear highs over the course of 2014. Bond spreads – be it corporate bonds, emerging market bonds or euro-zone sovereign bonds – are tight by historical standards, albeit not at historical lows. In addition, real estate prices have rebounded forcefully over the past few years in the US, the UK and several euro-area countries. House prices have risen, especially in countries that did not suffer from the burst of a debt-financed real estate bubble at the end of the last decade. This is particularly true for China, other major emerging markets – like Turkey, Brazil and India – and several industrialized markets, notably Hong Kong, Singapore, Canada, Norway, Sweden and Israel. Allianz GI therefore thinks it makes sense to update its research on asset valuation and asset bubbles.

You may access the complete report through this link, though, these are some of the conclusions:

EQUITIES: Based on the cyclically adjusted price-earnings ratio (“CAPE”), also known as “Shiller PE”, global equities look roughly fairly priced and in line with long-term average multiples. European equities, especially 
in the periphery, even look cheap on this metric. The same holds true for emerging market equities, which are again trading at a discount of around 20 % compared to equities from industrialized countries and are at their lowest valuation reading since
 2006 – and at a similar discount as they were in the mid-1980s.

While US equities today are undoubtedly at high multiples compared to their own history, valuations are not in bubble territory and do not preclude a further rise in stock prices. Current valuations are no reason to become ultra- cautious on equities at this juncture, even though current valuations are likely to imply below-average real returns in the coming decade if past experience is a guide for future developments.

BONDS: High-quality sovereign bonds, such as US Treasuries, UK Gilts and German Bunds, are trading significantly below what Allianz GI thinks are nominal trend GDP growth rates, which should be the long-term reference value, based on both economic theory and past experience. Nevertheless, Allianz GI is more relaxed about the valuation of non-German euro-area sovereign bonds relative to Bunds.

Compared to the beginning of the year, though, the valuation assessment today is less favorable for corporate bonds, even though spreads compared
to sovereigns are higher today than they were just before the burst of the real estate bubble. This statement is particularly true for high-yield bonds, be it in the US or Europe.

Emerging market bonds issued in hard currencies (benchmark: EMBI+) are reasonably priced, according to Allianz GI’s report. Still, the manager finds that local currency bonds offer better value: first, because of the higher yields compared to sovereign bonds from developed markets; and second, because they also expect additional gains from currencies, which look undervalued in the calculations based on Allianz GI’s long-term valuation approaches.

No Shooting Stars

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

No Shooting Stars
. Nada de gestores estrella

Top portfolio managers often make the headlines — whether their strategies perform well, or as we’ve seen recently, when they leave their firms. Their departures can be disruptive — whether it’s perception or reality. Fostering “star managers” is a cultural decision — but it’s not one that often works over the long term. The best investment cultures are built on humility, collaboration and mutual respect. There are no stars — only teams, equality and a healthy exchange of ideas.

A strong culture matters a lot — particularly for an investment firm, where people and judgment are your greatest assets. The way teams interact and collaborate to make investment decisions not only impacts how well a strategy performs, but also how the firm does as a whole. Those teams have to function well and create value together if they want to achieve differentiated performance.

Great minds don’t think alike

A collaborative culture doesn’t mean everyone has to think the same way. In fact, diverse views can actually lead to better decisions because they allow you to benefit from multiple perspectives and different analytics to get to a better outcome. But the process of sharing different views must be respectful, not combative. Instead of challenging each other as individuals, it’s important to challenge each other’s ideas. Encouraging team members to offer different views helps a team sift through increasingly large amounts of industry information, filter out the noise and focus on good research. By debating the information together rather than acting on it alone, you can avoid individual biases — which can cause trouble. Ultimately what you get is an environment of constructive challenge aimed at providing better results for clients.

To share different views, however, you need common cultural values. It’s tough to debate investment ideas successfully unless you have a common understanding of the end goal. For instance, if one side believes in a long-term perspective while the other side focuses on short-term market sentiment, that creates a headwind to achieving better outcomes. In fact, research on team building shows that common cultural values form the bedrock for cognitive diversity that leads to differentiated performance.

Culture supports investment beliefs

An investment firm’s beliefs and philosophies should be ingrained in its culture. For example, if you believe that a longer-term investment horizon results in greater opportunity for differentiated performance, your culture must support it. You must reward longer-term performance, tolerate short-term underperformance and follow both an investment process and team orientation that supports these objectives.

Increasing globalization and complexity calls for collaboration and teamwork, not just around the globe but also across capital structures. Consider an equity analyst who can look at company valuations, macroeconomic factors and competitors but typically wouldn’t have a lot of debt experience. Now combine that equity analyst’s view with a fixed-income perspective that looks at more complex credit issues central to the company’s capital structure, such as its financing facilities and debt covenants. Bringing these views across capital structures together provides a much more powerful perspective on a company’s intrinsic value.

Culture also creates a sense of shared responsibility, which is important to good risk management. In a risk-aware culture, shared values and consistent behavior can lead to stronger risk management — yet another case where strong culture benefits the client.

Don’t set it and forget it

It’s not enough to hire talented people. They also need the capacity to work in teams, share information and fit well into the firm’s culture. Infusing cultural values in the management of the firm — each and every day — is just as important as hiring the right people. If you want a collaborative culture to work, you need your employees to live and breathe it so it’s part of the fabric of the firm. Keeping employees connected to the firm’s culture helps them stay invested in the firm. It also reduces staff turnover — which is critical to limiting disruption to portfolio management and reducing hiring and training costs for the firm.

Culture isn’t a skill or a talent. Competitors can’t recreate culture the way they can mimic an investment or business strategy. Firms own their culture, and it’s up to the entire organization to keep it alive.

Article by Michael Roberge, President and Chief Investment Officer, MFS