A 30% Fall in Total AUMs of Funds Focused on Greater China Region is Unnerving, but a Long View is Needed

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Asset managers offering China-focused funds to European investors will need patience in abundance as they await a recovery in flows after growth in the world’s second-biggest economy slowed and its stock market plunged, but the rewards will justify the pain in most cases, according to the latest issue of The Cerulli Edge – European Monthly Product Trends Edition.

The global analytics firm, accepts that some asset managers may have to axe certain products, while others will withdraw completely from China. However, it maintains that the recent turmoil should be seen as a cyclical blip.

“China, like the rest of Asia, continues to offer huge opportunities,” says Barbara Wall, Europe research director at Cerulli. “Granted, a 30% fall in three months in total assets under management of funds focused on the greater China region is unnerving but a long view is needed. China’s economy is on course to overtake the United States, while its population of 1.35 billion includes around 100 million retail investors, according to some estimates.”

The company notes that China’s unusually high concentration of retail investors is one of the factors behind the panic reaction to what is a slowing of economic growth, rather than a recession. Also, the Chinese government still has much to learn about how best to intervene in the market when things go wrong.

“China is uncharted territory, which means there are no easy answers. However, the fundamentals remain attractive. AUM data, along with share prices, looks much better when compared with five years ago than with three months ago,” says Wall.

The firm notes that despite suffering some setbacks in China, Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management, one of the biggest European investors in Asia, describes its stance on the country as “strategically overweight“. It is among those who view the situation as a “buying opportunity”.

Fidelity, one of the longest established players in Asia, has also run into glitches in China, but Cerulli believes the firm will be rewarded in the longer term. “With sizeable teams of analysts looking specifically at China, companies such as Fidelity are better equipped than most to pick the stocks that will bounce the highest from the recent fall,” says Brian Gorman, an analyst at Cerulli.

“Volatility is likely to linger, but the rewards will be high for those willing to play the long game. For some, this will mean closing certain products and returning to the drawing board, to come up with a better offering,” adds Gorman.

Prudential IM to Change its Name to PGIM and Launch UCITS in UK and Europe

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Prudential IM to Change its Name to PGIM and Launch UCITS in UK and Europe
Foto: Sheri . Prudential IM pasará a llamarse PGIM y lanzará una plataforma UCITS en Reino Unido y Europa

Prudential Investment Management, the $947 billion investment management business of Prudential Financial, announced plans to change its name to “PGIM,” reflecting its position as one of the world’s largest asset managers and its deep expertise across a broad set of asset classes. The new name, effective Jan. 4, 2016, coincides with the expansion of Prudential Investment Management’s businesses around the world.

The company is also expanding its range of solutions and productsto address growing demand, especially among global clients, for strategies that help them balance long-term risk and return objectives across diversified portfolios. In this direction, it is establishing PGIM Funds plc, a UCITS platform serving the U.K. and Europe (Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities). The platform enables its businesses to build beyond existing fixed income UCITS to include a range of funds across asset classes offered to both institutional and individual investors.

Its businesses operate in 16 countries on five continents and offer a range of products across asset classes, including public and private fixed income, real estate debt and equity, and fundamental and quantitative public equities.  The business operates through a unique multi-manager model, with each asset class managed by a dedicated leadership team, responsible for investment and business performance, while adhering to the same global standards for controls, risk management and compliance.
Several businesses will adopt the new name:

  • Prudential Fixed Income will use PGIM in markets outside of the United States where it currently uses the Pramerica name, beginning in January.
  • Prudential Mortgage Capital Company will be renamed PGIM Real Estate Finance globally in mid-2016.
  • Prudential Real Estate Investors will be renamed PGIM Real Estate globally in mid-2016.

Invesco Adds Two Eurozone Equity Funds to Their Offer

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Looking to meet continental European investors’ demand for focused exposure within the European equity market, Invesco launched two new funds. The new additions to their European investment platform are the Invesco Euro Structured Equity Fund and the Invesco Euro Equity Fund. Both funds are registered for sale in most of the countries in Continental Europe and offer investors two distinct approaches to tapping the potential of the Eurozone equity market.

The two funds follow the established investment process and philosophy of the Invesco Pan European Structured Equity Fund and the Invesco Pan European Equity Fund within a more focused investment universe, and can thus leverage on the success of these funds.

Commenting on the dual fund launch, Carsten Majer, Chief Marketing Officer Continental Europe, said: “The launch of these two funds continues to broaden and diversify our European investment capability. Given the current low-interest rate environment and with low and falling yields on fixed income products, we think that equity funds are likely to see continued strong demand, with Eurozone equities poised to profit from the continuing European economic recovery.”

The Invesco Euro Structured Equity Fund is managed by Alexander Uhlmann and Thorsten Paarmann. They can draw on the support of the Invesco Quantitative Strategies Team in Frankfurt whose investment philosophy is based on translating fundamental and behavioural finance insights into portfolios, through a systematic and structured process that combines these insights with rigorous control based on its proprietary risk model. The fund aims to offer investors the full long-term performance potential of Euro equities while aiming to control the volatility normally associated with equities.

Thorsten Paarmann commented: “In the current market environment, we believe that the case for low-volatility investing remains strong. The fund’s defensive approach to the market and intended low correlation with the benchmark and its competitors aims to offer an efficient risk/return profile and to help preserve wealth particularly during periods of economic stress.”

The Invesco Euro Equity Fund is managed by Jeff Taylor and the Invesco European Equities Team in Henley-on-Thames. The team’s long-term investment approach seeks to capitalise on valuation anomalies in the market, with the benchmark considered to be more of a point of reference as opposed to a determinant of investment decisions. By not favouring any one particular investment style, the fund can take advantage of what we believe is the best mix of individual risk/reward opportunities in the market, at any point in time in whatever stock, sector or country they are to be found.

Jeff Taylor commented: “While the fund can potentially offer attractive alpha in strong equity markets, its flexible approach and valuation focus aim to deliver attractive performance under most market conditions.”

Rising Interest Rates: The Big Picture

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

While macroeconomic news out of China, and the price of oil has dominated the most recent financial market headlines, the U.S. Federal Reserve policy has been a subject of debate and intense focus for years.  Investors, bankers, economists and reporters alike are fixated on every word the Federal Reserve and its board of Governors releases.  The examination of, and some might argue obsession with, Fed statements has reached a point where the market can rapidly change direction based on just an alteration of word choice, even when the overall message remains the same.  These statements garner so much attention because traders and investors are trying to gain an edge in predicting when interest rates will rise.  Setting aside the debate on when the exact date of an interest rate hike might be, this paper examines what rising rates mean for your investment portfolio and argues that the long-term benefits are something investors should welcome not fear.  In order to examine this in detail, we first must have a good understanding of how the Federal Reserve works and why its policy affects interest rates.

What is the US Federal reserve and why does it matter?

The U.S. Federal Reserve Bank (commonly referred to as the Fed) is the central bank of the U.S. financial system and its primary function is to enact monetary policy that helps to stabilize and improve the U.S. economy.  The Fed’s three main objectives are: to maximize employment, keep prices of goods stable, and moderate long-term interest rates.  As the economy goes through cycles from economic booms to recessions, the Fed takes action to moderate the booms and minimize the probability and depth of recessions.  One of the key tools the Fed uses to keep the economy stable is interest rates. In this case, interest rates reflect the yield paid to buyers of U.S. Treasury bonds.  The Fed can influence the level of interest rates by buying large quantities of Treasury bonds on the open market, thereby pushing prices of the bonds up and yields down and vice versa.  In general, the Fed will increase interest rates in order to slow down the economy and decrease them to stimulate growth.

Why do investors fear rate increases?

Investors have feared the prospect of rising interest rates for two main reasons: the potential for slower economic growth and negative returns for bonds.  The Federal Reserve uses higher interest rates to slow the economy by increasing the cost of doing business and buying a house.  Companies looking to build a new factory or invest in new technologies often raise funds for these projects by issuing bonds.  As interest rates rise on Treasury bonds they rise correspondingly on corporate bonds, increasing the cost of financing for companies.  As the cost of financing increases, companies are less likely to invest in new projects, slowing the economic growth rate of the economy.  Similarly as interest rates rise on Treasury bonds, the interest rates for mortgages on homes also rise.  This increases the monthly payment required to build or own a home, subsequently slowing the pace of growth in the housing market.  While we think this is a legitimate concern in the long run because slowing economic growth can act as an impediment to earnings growth and stock prices, at this point in the interest rate cycle the effects should be limited.

Interest rate changes don’t just affect the economy; they can also have sudden and material impacts on performance of investment products.  Interest rates and the prices of bonds have an inverse relationship, as rates rise bond prices fall and vice versa.  During the past 30 years, investors have enjoyed a long cycle of declining interest rates.  In September of 1981 the 10-year Treasury Bond peaked at an interest rate of over 15%.  Since then, interest rates have been steadily declining, producing an environment of sustained strong performance as bond prices rise.  The U.S. Barclays Aggregate Index has delivered an annualized return of nearly 8% over that time span, with only a few short periods of mild negative returns, conditioning investors to expect strong consistent positive returns in fixed income.  Many fear that when the Fed changes its policy and begins to raise interest rates, negative bond returns will cause widespread selling of fixed income products causing further declines in bond prices.  This concern is certainly warranted and we have positioned our clients’ portfolios to protect against this risk, however, we continue to believe that higher interest rates is a healthy outcome for investors and the market in the long-run.

What are the benefits?

At Federal Street Advisors, we believe that rising interest rates do present real near-term risks that investors should be prepared for but recognize that higher interest rates will also bring long-term benefits to those who are well positioned.  Higher interest rates are an indication of economic strength, improve income available for investment products, and promote rational capital markets.

While the Federal Reserve does use higher interest rates to slow economic growth late in a business cycle, it is important to understand that the potential upcoming interest rate hike is not an attempt to slow growth but rather to return interest rates rate to a normalized level.  During the financial crisis of 2008/2009, the Federal Reserve lowered their interest rate policy target effectively to zero where it has remained since then.  This was a historically extreme measure designed to promote business investment, stabilize the housing market, restore confidence in the stock market and stimulate economic growth.  The Federal Funds target interest rate (the interest rate that the Fed targets for monetary policy) has been 0%-0.25% since December 16th, 2008, well below its long run average of 7.4%1.  An increase in the Fed’s target interest rate today would be indicative of their confidence in the economic strength and stability as they seek to bring interest rates to a normalized level, and not an attempt to slow the growth rate of the economy.

While a declining interest rate market has resulted in strong performance from bonds, low absolute levels of interest actually significantly reduce the potential for future returns.  One of the primary goals of a zero interest rate policy is to reduce the cost of financing for companies.  Companies have been able to issue bonds to investors at all-time low interest rates.  While this is a good deal for companies, it’s not a great outcome for investors, who are forced to take increasingly lower compensation for the risk of lending this money.  The yield on the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index was just 2.3% as of September 30th, compared to 6.6% twenty years ago.  Low coupon rates generally mean poor opportunities for returns and more recent results have reflected that as the Barclays Agg has returned just 1.7% in the last three years.  While an increase in interest rates will likely result in negative returns for bonds in the near-term, it greatly improves the long-term return potential by allowing investors to reinvest coupons at higher interest rates. In our estimation, investors in the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index might experience a drawdown of as much as 7.5% if interest rates were to rise by 2%, but would still be expected to achieve a 10-year annualized return 0.7% higher than a scenario in which interest rates remained unchanged and no drawdown occurred2.  This scenario analysis highlights both the importance of protecting against the near-term risks of an interest rate increase but also the improvements to long-term total return opportunities.

Low interest rates can cause investors to take on more risk:

Sustained low interest rates also have significant impacts on investor behavior, which can cause imbalances in the capital markets.  Low interest rates means the retiring baby boomer generation in particular are not able to depend on the same level of income from their municipal bonds portfolios. Due to the lack of income in bonds, these investors have been forced to buy areas of the equity market that pay dividends, such as the utilities sector, but may expose themselves to more risk than is appropriate as a result. Increases in interest rates will bring increases in income from bond portfolios, and allow investors with lower risk profiles to return to more suitable asset allocations.

Pension funds will also benefit from a rising rate environment.  These funds are required to report an estimate of the value of their future obligations to pay benefits to retirees.  Since the bulk of these payments will occur in the future, they use a “discount rate” to calculate the value of the future payments in present terms.  This discount rate is tied to the prevailing interest rates in the market. Lower interest rates means a lower discount rate, which results in larger future obligations.  As interest rates fall, the pension fund’s financial health deteriorates and they are also forced to adopt a more aggressive or risky asset allocation to achieve the returns needed to pay retirees.  Conversely, if interest rates rise, pension funds should regain healthier financial conditions, the risk levels of their investments can be reduced, and payments to the beneficiaries will ultimately be more secure.

Active management will benefit:

Sustained low interest rates have also presented challenges to the performance of active managers through the encouragement of irrational investor behavior and unsustainable low financing costs.  While influencing the equity markets is not a stated goal of the Federal Reserve, it is an outcome of their zero interest rate policy.  As described previously, low income and poor total return expectations in bonds have pushed fixed income investors into buying stocks in the utilities sector.  In 2014, as interest rates fell, this sector returned 29%, outpacing every other sector in the market.  Active managers were broadly underweight the sector on fundamental concerns that high relative valuations and chronically low growth rates posed significantly greater risk than the promise of 3-4% of income.  In this environment, active managers posted one of the worst years of relative performance on record (link to previous paper here?).

In addition to changing investor behavior, low interest rates offer greater support to companies in poor financial condition making it more difficult to separate good investments from bad ones.  Low interest rates mean low financing costs for companies raising money through the issuance of bonds.  This low cost financing benefits companies in poor financial condition or those that have been mismanaged disproportionately to high quality, well-run business.  The best-run companies are typically rewarded with low financing costs in all market environments, or in many cases do not need to rely on debt financing at all because they are able to fund new projects and investment from cash flow from their existing business.  A decrease in interest rates has little effect on the cost structure of these companies. Conversely, when interest rates are low, low quality companies that need to raise cash from the debt markets are able to do so at lower costs than ever before.  The stocks of these low quality companies can be rewarded in low interest rate environments as their fundamentals appear improved, but as interest rates rise and the costs of financing increase, these results will be unsustainable.  While the style of active managers can vary, most look to buy companies with superior business models and strong management teams, which should benefit on a relative basis as interest rates rise leading to active manager outperformance.

Conclusion:

Given the attention the media gives the topic it is easy to get caught up in the intense debate of when the Fed might raise interest rates, but as recent history has shown it is difficult to predict.  In the beginning of 2014, 46 economists polled by the Wall Street Journal expected the Federal Funds rate to be an average of 1% by the end of 2015 and yet today the effective rate remains roughly 0.1%.  At Federal Street Advisors, we believe the game of attempting to time an unpredictable interest rate rise is not one that our clients will benefit from playing.  While we recognize that there are near-term risks to bond portfolios associated with an interest rate increase, it is increasingly important to keep the big picture in mind: a higher interest rate environment is both inevitable and healthy for the market, and investors who are well prepared will benefit.

1“Historical Changes of the Target Federal Funds and Discount Rates.”  Federal Reserve Bank of New York, n.d. Web. 30 Oct. 2015. http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/statistics/dlyrates/fedrate.html

2Analysis assumes a parallel shift in the yield curve occurring evenly over the first 12 months with income being reinvested at higher rates. Full scenario analysis is available upon request.

 

Global Warming’s Impact on Portfolios

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Global Warming’s Impact on Portfolios
Foto de Asian Development Bank . ¿Cuál es el impacto del calentamiento global en los portafolios de inversión?

Less than one month before the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris, Cop 21, climate change is a topic gaining traction as a global policy initiative, a key risk factor and an emerging investment theme.

Cop 21’s goal is to achieve a legally binding agreement to keep global warming below the threshold of 2 degrees Celsius, the level that most scientists say is a critical one. This may pave the way for policy shifts that could ripple across multiple industries. The resulting regulatory risks are becoming key drivers of investment returns. In addition, more and more clients are expressing their interest in assessing climate risk in portfolios in order to reflect their values and deliver a long- term positive impact on the world.

Thus far, most countries globally have pledged to reduce emissions after 2020. China has committed to lower from 60% to 65% of its emissions intensity by the year 2030, and in Latin America, México and Brazil expect to lower their emissions by 22% and 37% respectively by the same time.

Things are changing for corporations and markets too. Today, some international financial regulators appear to be moving towards ultimately incorporating an assessment of climate risk into accounting standards. Securities markets also evolving to include emissions trading and green bonds, enabling investors to limit carbon exposures in portfolios and direct capital to projects that reduce emissions. In the corporate world, environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, which are a way to promote sustainability, are also becoming a mark of operational and managerial quality. 

What are investors doing to adapt portfolios?

Across the world, institutional investors managing $24 trillion in assets signed the Global Investor Statement on Climate Change in 2014. In it, they committed to manage climate change risk as part of their fiduciary duty to clients. Impact on sustainability can be achieved in three ways:

  • Prevent: Screen out securities that do not align with their values, such as those of issuers in the fossil fuels, tobacco or arms industries. Norway’s parliament, for example, has voted to divest coal assets from its sovereign wealth fund.
  • Promote: Focus on companies with strong environmental, social and governance (ESG) track records and integrate ESG factors into the investment process. Sustainable investment portfolios are an example.
  • Advance: Target outcomes that have a measurable impact on the environment. Examples include direct investments in renewable or energy-efficient projects and green bonds.

The rise of the importance of climate change considerations is impacting the way investors think about their investments and portfolios. And, as regulatory frameworks harden and/or the impact of climate change on the environment becomes more apparent, asset prices will be likely impacted.

Yet, many of these potential outcomes (think for example, of the long term effects of greenhouse gas emissions) are harder to predict and therefore to price in. Insurance companies have been at the forefront of climate risk pricing given their exposure for example to natural disasters, but many equity and credit investors still ignore this risk when building portfolios.

Admittedly, this has not been historically necessary. When looking at monthly returns over the last 20 years in the MSCI World Index there has been no climate change risk premium for equities. But the future might be different from the past in this case, and as client’s requests evolve and the regulatory burden increases, impact considerations may become more important in investment decisions. This is not only about ‘doing good’, it’s also about investing in companies that evolve with market trends, are able to adapt their businesses to future challenges and often have more engaged and productive employees.

_______________________________________________________________

This material is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice nor an offer or solicitation to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any shares of any Fund (nor shall any such shares be offered or sold to any person) in any jurisdiction in which an offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities law of that jurisdiction. If any funds are mentioned or inferred to in this material, it is possible that some or all of the funds have not been registered with the securities regulator in any Latin American and Iberian country and thus might not be publicly offered within any such country. The securities regulators of such countries have not confirmed the accuracy of any information contained herein.

 

UniCredit and Santander Sign Binding Agreement to Merge Asset Management Units

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pioneer Global Asset Management and Santander Asset Management will be combined later in 2016. The Asset Management units of Italian UniCredit and Spanish Santander have signed a binding master agreement to create a leading global asset manager that will have around 370 billion euros (alomost $400 billion) in assets under management. 

According to a UniCredit statement filed at the Borsa Italiana, the binding agreement to combine Pioneer Global Asset Management and Santander Asset Management follows the conditions announced on April 23rd, in which it was stated that the resulting company would be called Pioneer Investments, and have an estimated valuation of 5.4 billion euros ($5.8 billion).

Juan Alcaraz,  CEO of Santander Asset Management, would be in charge of the new entity, while Pioneer’s current CEO and CIO, Giordano Lombardo, will become the company’s new Global CIO.

The new manager will be owned by UniCredit, Santander and the private-equity funds Warburg Pincus and General Atlantic, which already own half of Santander’s asset-management business.

As the next step, the parties will be seeking the necessary regulatory and other approvals in many of the markets where the two firms have a presence.

Sentiment Improving, but Not Fundamentals in LatAm

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

In the monthly Latin America Investment Strategy report from Credit Suisse, Philipp E Lisibach, director of Credit Suisse in the private banking and wealth management division, discusses on how the Fed´s decision to postpone hikes on interest rates has given a break to Latin American economies. However, economic indicators such as production rate or inflation, are not showing values close to the economic recovery path.      

“The decision of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) on 17 September to postpone the initial US Fed funds rate hike has triggered concerns about the health of global economic growth and led to a significant cool-down of investors’ risk appetite and a spike in volatility in the capital markets. Emerging market (EM) equities typically behave rather poorly in this type of environment, as their sensitivity to global economic growth is high. While the initial reaction was similar this time, the decision to delay US interest rate hikes has led to cautious optimism for EM investors as the negative side effects of a potential hike (including a likely strengthening of the US dollar, a potential withdrawal of liquidity, and local central banks forced to follow suit and hike interest rates) have been delayed and so the results have been marginally beneficial”, said Lisibach.

Oversold sentiment corrected

After seeing value appearing in emerging markets equities and sentiment seeming to be oversold shortly after the FOMC decision, the Credit Suisse Investment Committee changed its previous underperform view for emerging market equities to neutral on 23 September. In a sharp recovery, emerging markets equities have outperformed developed market equities from 23 September through 21 October. However, Latin America is by far the lagging region, underperforming both global EM and developed market equities by 2.7% and 0.6%, respectively, in local currency terms. The laggard within the region has been Mexico, which continues to be one of the better-performing markets in Latin America on a year-to-date basis, although it has lost some of its momentum recently.

Mexico’s high valuation meets with slowing momentum

Mexico’s manufacturing activityhas cooled down considerably and, with a September manufacturing index reading of 50.1, it is just about at the inflection point between expansion and contraction, which stands at 50 (see chart).

Enlarge

Mexican leading indicator signals lower manufacturing activity

Earnings momentum, measured by the 1-month and 3-month change in consensus expectations for the MSCI Mexico index, has turned negative again, yet Mexico’s lofty earnings growth estimates remain the highest in the region at almost 21% for the next 12 months. “We think the pressure may persist to further adjust already high expectations and the rich valuation downward, thus leading to headwinds for prices. As a result, we maintain our underperform view versus global EM equity”, adds Lisibach (see Table 1 for a full overview).

Enlarge

Latin America equity strategy, Credit Suisse

Mexican leading indicator signals lower manufacturing activity

The MSCI Mexico Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid-cap segments of the Mexican market. With 28 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Mexico.

Inflation in Brazil not expected to converge to target before 2017

In Brazil, the central bank surprised investors when it announced on 21 October that it does not expect to meet its inflation target of 4.5% in 2016. The weak economy limits the central bank’s ability to fight against the stubbornly elevated level of inflation with higher interest rates, delaying the normalization process. The good news is that inflation seems to have peaked, see chart.

Enlarge

Inflation in Latin America

Nonetheless, Credit Suisse sees thatBrazil’s growth inflation mix has weakened further and their economists cut Brazil’s GDP growth forecasts to –3.2/–1.2% for 2015/16, and expect a slightly higher average inflation rate in 2016, now at 6.4%.

“While higher interest rates may be a headwind for Brazilian bonds, the generous level of yields should allow bond investors to absorb some of these losses, which is why we maintain our neutral view on Brazilian local currency bonds (see Table 2 for a full overview). We confirm our negative view on Brazilian hard currency bonds and the equity market. The political environment remains very difficult, and corruption investigations and attempts to push out President Rousseff are leaving the government paralyzed, making it unlikely that much-needed policy developments will be implemented in the near term”.

Acceleration of inflation in Colombia due to food and the weak peso

The economy that continues to struggle with accelerating inflation is Colombia, where the consumer price index has increased to 5.4% year-over-year, exceeding expectations and reaching a level not seen in over six years. A pick-up in food prices due to unfavorable weather and the weaker Colombian peso is partially to blame for inflation, as the peso has lost over 29% against the US dollar over the past one year (as of 22 October). The Columbian central bank raised its policy rate by 0.25% and has released a modestly hawkish statement, leading us to believe that further modest rate hikes to tame inflation cannot be ruled out. Consequently, Credit Suisse is changing their view on Columbian local currency bonds from neutral to underperform.

Enlarge

Latin America fixed income strategy, Credit Suisse

UK’s Weaker Growth Presents Challenges For Policy Makers

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

According to Azad Zangana, Senior European Economist & Strategistat Schroders, the fact that the UK economy slowed more than expected, presents challenges for policy makers.

The preliminary estimate of UK GDP for the third quarter showed economic growth slowing to 0.5% quarter-on-quarter compared to 0.7% in the previous quarter. Consensus expectations were for a small slowdown to 0.6%, “but the latest figures disappointed as the manufacturing sector struggles with a strong pound and subdued external environment,” says Zangana.

Adding that, within the details of the GDP report, the recession in the manufacturing sector continues with activity contracting by 0.3%. The wider measure of industrial production did however grow by 0.3% thanks to a pick-up in mining and quarrying activity. The services sector grew by 0.7%, as strong retail sales maintained solid growth in distribution, hotels and restaurants. Business services also posted strong growth of 1%. Finally, the construction sector contracted by 2.2%, taking the level of activity back to levels not seen since the second quarter of 2014.

The economist considers that “the slowdown in UK growth is by no means a disaster, but it will put pressure on the Bank of England to delay the first rate hike, especially as inflation remains in negative territory”. With this in mind, Schroders continues to forecast no change in interest rates until May 2016. “The slowdown in growth presents an even bigger challenge for the Chancellor as he prepares to find a way to implement substantial fiscal tightening over the course of the next few years. Moreover, the success of the introduction of the new living wage hinges on the strength of the economy to absorb the increase in labour costs. If the economy slows further, the government’s policy may cause unemployment to rise once again, making cuts to tax credits even more painful”, Zangana concludes.

Invesco PowerShares Adds Two Low Beta Equal Weight Strategies to Smart Beta Lineup

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Invesco PowerShares Capital Management, LLC, a leading global provider of exchange-traded funds (ETFs), announced the launch of two new ETFs; the PowerShares Russell 1000® Low Beta Equal Weight Portfolio (USLB) and PowerShares FTSE International Low Beta Equal Weight Portfolio (IDLB).

Both USLB and IDLB offer multi-factor concepts, which combine individual factors that may offer excess or differentiated returns. Multi-factor investing centered around low beta may potentially enhance returns while reducing risk and ultimately provide for better risk-adjusted returns.

The new USLB strategy is based on the Russell 1000® Low Beta Equal Weight Index, offering risk-adjusted exposure to domestic equity. USLB’s factor selection focuses on risk management, which centers on low beta, earnings and equal weighting.

The new IDLB strategy also offers risk-adjusted exposure, but is focused on international equity based on the FTSE Developed ex US Low Beta Equal Weight Index.

“We’re excited to be rolling out two new low beta strategies,” said Dan Draper, managing director, global head, Invesco PowerShares. “Both ETFs have potential to reduce risk for investors by following disciplined index methodologies while offering exposure to risk-management factors.”

“We are happy to be able to offer innovative new methodologies on our flagship US domestic and global indexes for investors who seek exposure through exchange-traded funds,” said Ron Bundy, CEO of North America benchmarks for FTSE Russell. “In addition, we are excited to expand on our growing relationship with Invesco PowerShares to provide indexes to underlie their family of exchange-traded funds.”

Breaking Down the Proliferation of Exchange Traded Products

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Breaking Down the Proliferation of Exchange Traded Products
Foto: Rudolf Vlček . ¿A qué se debe el éxito de los ETPs?

The SEC published this year a myriad questions about the listing, trading, and marketing, especially to retail investors, of “new, novel, or complex” exchange-traded products (ETPs).

An ETP is a derivatively priced security, meaning that it fluctuates with the price of the underlying securities, which trades on a national stock exchange stock exchange. Such ETPs include exchange-traded funds (ETFs), pooled investment vehicles (FlexETPs), and exchange-traded notes (ETNs). ETPs are typically benchmarked to indices, stocks, commodities, or may be actively managed, explains Mario Rivero, Director at ETP providor FlexFunds.

ETPs have grown and evolved enormously since 1992, when the SEC approved the first ETP, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF. Not surprisingly, the SEC also has received more—and more sophisticated—requests by ETP issuers for relief to allow ETPs to be listed on securities exchanges and requests by securities exchanges to establish listing standards for new types of ETPs.

“ETPs have experienced exponential growth since they were introduced. A recently published report by PwC in January 2015 supports this. It states that by 2020, there is likelihood that the global market for exchange traded fund (ETF) would double up to reach around US$5 trillion.” Says Rivero. While the developed markets of US and Europe are likely to witness majority of this increase, the developing nations (especially Latin America) are likely to represent the fastest growing market over the next five years.

Why the tremendous growth?

The most popular ETP is the ETF. These are securities that track an index,  commodity or basket of assets. ETFs are used by investors to access emerging markets in a diversified manner. “Although 2015 has had an overall negative impact on the stock market in Latin America, the ETFs of Brazil, Mexico and Chile are expected to continue to increase; possibly not in value, but rather in terms of assets.”

In Latin America there are numerous indexed ETFs and it is becoming increasingly difficult to create new funds that are attractive to local and international investors. Other regulated fund options would include SICAVs and UCITs. However, these options have proven to be costly and lengthy to create, and serve the purpose for conservative investors looking for a highly regulated and restricted investment vehicle. Therefore, the growth in number of available funds should come from another source.

Here the opportunity arises for ETPs that are pooled investment vehicles. These ETPs take the best of both worlds by managing the underlying assets like a fund while trading like a note, and allow a vast variety of underlying assets to be securitized quickly and economically.

Pooled and listed investment vehicles, including FlexETPs, are offering the right alternative for the small and medium size fund market that is expected to yield most of the future ETP market growth. Fund sizes from $20m to $200m are too small for the larger global banks and too large for smaller local banks. Granted, the ETP solution must keep the cost structure in check for these smaller funds.

What is most important is that ETPs provide flexibility within asset management for a vast, and fast, product creation. This will provide institutional and private investors with access to niche or customized investment products. As most developed industries have proven, it is targeted products and services what drives significant growth. It is only to be expected that the same will happen in the ETP global market.