BlackRock: 2016 Latin America & Iberia Investment Forum

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

BlackRock: 2016 Latin America & Iberia Investment Forum
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrBlackRock: 2016 Latin America & Iberia Investment Forum - foto cedida. BlackRock celebra el 2016 Latin America & Iberia Investment Forum

Connectivity brings with it a positive force for change, and in turn, innovation.  By almost all measures, the world is more connected than ever, hastening the access and speed of information and data. The impact of connectivity and innovation on the financial community is no exception. 

On March 14-16, 2016 BlackRock hosted its fourth annual Investment Forum with the objective of Connecting for a Better Tomorrow

The message throughout the conference was focused on how best to transform challenges into opportunities by working hand and hand with key partners that will help foster innovative solutions.  Through this message of connectivity, BlackRock empowered its clients to make connections to the trends, insights and solutions that will matter not only today, but also in the future investment landscape.

Over two days, The BlackRock Investment Forum connected 180 wealth and institutional clients across 10 countries in Latin America & Iberia. Clients attended a total of 15 sessions led by BlackRock leaders across the firm, such as the President of the firm, six members of the Global Executive Committee and several investment leaders. 

Notable sessions included:

Keynote: Talent and Innovation

The keynote address from Rob Kapito, President and Director of BlackRock, stressed the importance of rethinking how our industry can help clients move cash off of the sidelines in order to invest for the future. To set this catalyst for change, “modern technology can be applied to the challenges clients are facing in order to help make better investments decisions to achieve the outcomes needed.”

Big Data achieve returns

In a recent study, IBM estimated that approximately 90% of the data in the world today was created in the last two years. In addition to there being more data, we have the capability to understand this data more comprehensively and quickly than ever before.

In this forward looking session, Rob Goldstein, Chief Operating Officer of BlackRock, interviewed Raffaele Savi, Co-CIO for Blackrock’s Scientific Active Equity and Co-Lead of Active Equities on how the intersection of technology and investors will revolutionize the way we invest in the future. They focused their discussion on understanding how BlackRock’s Scientific Active Equity (SAE) Team harnesses the power of Big Data, providing new signals and indicators through advanced methods of data extraction to seek sustained alpha across market environments.

The Power of Factor Investing: Smart Beta

Other ways investors are building better portfolios is through Factor Investing. Sara Shores, Managing Director and Head of Smart Beta Strategies at BlackRock, touched on the importance of factor investing and how it is empowering investors by identifying and precisely targeting broad, persistent and long-recognized drivers of return.

Smart Beta strategies have democratized access to Factor Investing. Individuals, investment professionals and institutions alike are using these strategies to screen thousands of securities to capture single or multiple factors transparently and efficiently. As of April 2016, Smart Beta ETP flows hit a new monthly high with $7.8bn*”

Other sessions presented at the 2016 Investment Forum included: 

  • The State of the Markets
  • Geo-Political Perspectives
  • Connecting Investors to Retirement Capabilities
  • Financial Distribution Trends
  • Casting a Wider Net with Multi Asset Investing
  • Equity Markets: New Drivers, Rethinking Fixed Income in 2016 and Beyond
  • ETF Growth
  • Connecting to New Sources of Diversification: The Alternatives Approach
  • Investing with IMPACT
  • Portfolio Construction

At the end of the Forum clients walked away with a better understanding of the importance of becoming more outcome-oriented than ever before. Investment decisions are no longer just about products or asset classes but rather finding the diversified solutions that will help investors achieve their investment goals. As highlighted by the Forum, connecting with the right partner is critical in order to foster innovative solutions that can transform today’s challenges into tomorrow’s opportunities.

*Data is as of March 31, 2016 for all regions. Global ETP flows and assets are sourced from Markit as well as BlackRock internal sources. Flows for the years between 2010 and 2015 are sourced from Bloomberg as well as BlackRock internal sources. Flows for years prior to 2010 are sourced from Strategic Insights Simfund. Asset classifications are assigned by BlackRock based on product definitions from provider websites and product prospectuses. Other static product information is obtained from provider websites, product prospectuses, provider press releases, and provider surveys.

Re-Emerging Markets?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

The emerging markets comeback is still young, but encouraging.

Last Wednesday, I was fielding questions from a couple of CNBC reporters on the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange. One thing they asked me about was emerging markets, which was great as it allowed me to talk about our Multi-Asset Class (MAC) team’s views on these important regions. It also reminded me of how little space we’ve given the subject in CIO Perspectives so far.

Now is a good time to put that right. Emerging markets equities have outperformed the developed world by around four percentage points since mid-February. On the bond side, hard currency sovereigns returned more than 5% in the first quarter, while local currency was up more than 11%.

Moreover, while news out of the developed world was light last week (the European Central Bank struggled to match the excitement it generated in March), news out of the emerging world bordered on the historic.

Recent News Underlines Political Change in Latin America

It started on Sunday night, with the lower house of Congress in Brazil voting to impeach President Dilma Rousseff. This was the high watermark to-date of a wide-ranging scandal that is testing the country’s political and judicial institutions.

A few days later, Argentina returned to the international bond markets after 15 years. And what a return it was. The government sold $16.5 billion worth of bonds and could have put out four times that. Buyers got a 7.5% yield on the 10-year issue and on Friday the “holdouts” in Argentina’s defaulted debt were paid, ending one of the longest-running sovereign-debt disputes.

Both events underline the theme of electorates turning toward more market-friendly leadership in the region, but also two of our longstanding emerging markets themes: at the company level, businesses that benefit from the rise of the domestic consumer; and at country level, economies that benefit from structural reforms. Orthodox economics tend to see the two things as intimately linked, and that may explain why Brazilian assets have rebounded so strongly despite such political turmoil.

It is also worth recalling earlier discussions in CIO Perspectives on the stabilization of the U.S. dollar and oil, both of which have been positive for emerging markets.
Our Take on Emerging Markets Remains Optimistic—but Cautious.

And yet, while we on the MAC team generally have been in favor of increasing emerging markets exposures after the precipitous drop early in the year, our preference has been for shifts that are both cautious and tactical, seeking to exploit short-term moves that may or may not consolidate into something more fundamentally driven.

And we don’t think the fundamentals are there quite yet, which is why more broadly we favor emerging markets debt over equity, and hard currency bonds over those issued in local currency. As long as investors are being well compensated for taking credit and duration risk, our overall caution would weigh against adding high-volatility local currency risk at this stage. We also expect the Federal Reserve to raise rates one or two more times this year, which could give the dollar short-term support and take the wind out of emerging market sails, especially in local currencies.

That means we missed some of the upside despite timing our recent increase in exposure well. But it fits with our overall view that these past two months have seen a “relief rally” in riskier assets rather than a genuine return of confidence, and that the fundamentals have not changed much since the start of the year.

Relative Value Still Favors U.S. High Yield—for Now

For the moment, we feel that the marginal dollar of risk should still go to U.S. high yield bonds before it goes to emerging markets. Moreover, when I spoke at a conference with one of my emerging markets debt colleagues recently, he agreed that, while he saw many discrete opportunities in his own asset class, high yield was a more attractive risk-adjusted prospect. High yield spreads have since narrowed, but in my view that is still true.

The fundamentals can change, of course. Our colleagues in emerging markets debt are certainly excited about Latin America, in particular, and while I’m not 100% persuaded yet, there’s no denying that part of the world bears watching closely.

The new administration in Buenos Aires is still very young. Likewise, the process in Brazil may take a long time to play out and the story can quickly turn upside down from the way markets currently read it—as emblematic of some of the headwinds that emerging markets still face. Nonetheless, once it’s clear that the political scene really is changing in this region, turning those headwinds into tailwinds, the yields on offer could present some very interesting opportunities.

Neuberger Berman’s CIO insight

UBS, Henderson and Generali Investments, Amongst the Winners at the 2016 UCITS Hedge Awards

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

UBS, Henderson and Generali Investments, Amongst the Winners at the 2016 UCITS Hedge Awards
CC-BY-SA-2.0, Flickr. UBS, Henderson y Generali Investments, entre los ganadores de los 2016 UCITS Hedge Awards

Organized by the Hedge Fund Journal and currently in their sixth year, the UCITS Hedge Awards reward the best performing funds on a risk adjusted basis across a range of asset classes and strategies. The winners are chosen following the in-house calculation of the Sharpe ratio based upon the 2015 full calendar year data points.

Generali Investments, the main asset manager of the Generali Group, has received a significant double acknowledgement for its expertise in convertible bonds. The Generali Investments SICAV (GIS) Absolute Return Convertible Bond fund was awarded as the Best Performing Fund in 2015, and Best Performer over a 3-year period, in the Fixed Income – Convertible Bonds category at the 2016 UCITS Hedge Awards.

Henderson‘s UK Absolute Return fund won Best Performer over a 2 Year Period in the Long/Short Equity – UK category, as well as over the three year period. UBSEquity Opportunity Long Short Fund was awarded with the title of Best Performer over a 2 Year Period  in the Long/Short Equity – Europe. While the Pictet Total Return Agora fund won Best Performing Fund in 2015 for Equity Market Neutral – Europe.

Other winners include Helium Opportunités, Rothschild CFM, Muzinich, Aquila, Candriam and Finex.

Finex
Rothschild CFM

You can see the full list of winners in this link.

Kristi Mitchem to lead Wells Fargo Asset Management

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Kristi Mitchem to lead Wells Fargo Asset Management
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: LinkedIn. Kristi Mitchem liderará Wells Fargo Asset Management

Wells Fargo & Company announced this week that Kristi Mitchem has been appointed president, chief executive officer, and head of Wells Fargo Asset Management, a division of Wells Fargo’s Wealth and Investment Management Group. Effective June 1, Mitchem will lead a business with more than $480 billion in assets under management in institutional separate accounts, mutual funds and stable value portfolios.

Mitchem most recently served as executive vice president at State Street Global Advisors (SSGA), the investment management arm of State Street Corporation. She replaces Mike Niedermeyer, who had served as head of WFAM from 1994 until his retirement in March after 28 years with Wells Fargo. Based in San Francisco, Mitchem will join the firm on June 1 and will report to David Carroll, senior executive vice president and head of WIM.

“Wells Fargo Asset Management is a valuable business for Wells Fargo, with a broad range of investment capabilities, strong risk management processes and a disciplined operating approach that have produced significant results for both customers and shareholders for many years,” said Carroll. “With an impressive mix of industry experience, a deep knowledge of the needs of institutional and intermediary investor clients, and proven success in inspiring large high-performing teams, Kristi is the ideal candidate to lead WFAM through its next phase of strategic expansion and growth.”

Since 2012, Mitchem led the Americas Institutional Client Group at SSGA, focusing the organization on delivering innovative investment solutions to institutional investor clients in the United States, Latin America, and Canada. Previously, she had served as the leader of the defined contribution businesses at both SSGA and Blackrock and of the institutionally-focused U.S. Transition Services group at Barclay’s Global Investors.

Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from Davidson College, where she graduated summa cum laude and was awarded First Honors. She received her Master of Business Administration from Stanford Graduate School of Business, where she was an Arjay Miller Scholar.  Mitchem is also a Fulbright Scholar.

 

Be on the Right Side of Change

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Companies are having a much harder time producing earnings growth. Those that are positioned on the right side of change should be better placed to increase profits—and deliver investment returns—in a growth-constrained world.

Corporate profit margins today are much higher than their average since the early 1950s (Display). These profitability levels are very high, even when taking into account that the mix of US economic activity has shifted toward more capital-light business models (e.g., services and technology), which inherently generate higher margins.

But not every company or industry is facing the same squeeze on earnings growth. In particular, changes triggered by technology, regulation or structural shifts in specific markets are excellent sources of growth potential—even in an earnings-constrained world. Finding companies that are on the right side of changes like these is one of several ways that active investors can capture excess returns over long time horizons.

Using Technology Right

Technological change isn’t only about the Internet or social networks. Consider the retail sector, where new technology and information systems allow companies to take advantage of massive amounts of available data on customer behavior. Companies that recognize this potential and invest accordingly are using these tools to deepen relationships with customers—and are capable of doing better than rivals who haven’t.

Manufacturing is another case in point. Companies that are at the vanguard of manufacturing innovation have greater flexibility in managing their businesses, which provides a powerful way to boost profitability.

For example, when we researched Nike in 2015, we discovered innovations that looked likely to significantly improve the company’s earnings growth potential. Nike may be adding sophisticated chips to some of its sneakers; this will allow it to deepen its relationship with customers by offering personalized deals that bypass retail outlets, bringing more profit to the shoemaker. It’s also using a new automated manufacturing technology called Flyknit that lets customers customize their orders with minimal labor, allowing Nike to shift its production closer to consumers—in the US and around the world—and save costs on shipping, duties and tariffs. Our research suggests that innovations like these are transforming Nike’s business model and could potentially trigger a leap in its profitability.

Why the wide gap between our view and the street’s? It’s because most analysts aren’t evaluating how new technologies and processes will filter down to the bottom line over several years; the potential payoff is a couple of years beyond their horizon. In a short-term world, building thoughtful, independent models like these can make the difference in choosing stocks that stand out from the crowd.

The Innovation Factor

It’s not only giants like Nike that turn innovation into investment opportunities. It’s becoming easier every year for people to change the world because traditional barriers to innovation—such as capital and time—are falling dramatically.

Today, new ideas can be transformed into businesses for only a fraction of the prior cost thanks to continued exponential declines in the cost of computing. For example, the required costs of a typical tech start-up have fallen by roughly 95% since the dot-com era of the 1990s (Display, left). And the disruptive potential is enormous, as seen in the shift in advertising from print newspapers toward the digital world, which has had a profound impact on profits for both traditional media companies like the New York Times and new media leaders like Google (Display, right). For investors, the challenge is to get an early grasp on how unfolding changes will transform the profitability outlook for a wide range of companies.

 Transcending Traditional Industries

This often requires an understanding of broad themes that transcend traditional industries and sectors. For example, increasing environmental awareness is spurring global efforts to address challenges that include carbon emissions, clean water, food availability and sanitation. Policy support and technological progress are making the shift to decarbonized energy inevitable, in our view. And the costs of renewable energy such as solar or lithium-ion batteries for electric cars are falling dramatically (Display). We believe that many investors have underestimated the disruptive potential of exponential cost improvements to drive faster and broader adoption.

Changes like these are opening up big investing opportunities. Over the next 15 years, we estimate that $4 trillion will be invested in new solar and wind capacity. Industries like these are highly fragmented, and offer strong growth opportunities for winners.

But identifying investment targets requires a substantial research effort in order to understand the technological and business dynamics of many public companies operating in nascent industries. By searching for businesses that are on the right side of changes like these, we believe investors can find companies that should be well positioned to grow their earnings—even when broader business conditions are stagnant.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams.

 

Keys of Direct Investing in Alternatives: 69% of Family Offices Engaged in 2015

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Keys of Direct Investing in Alternatives: 69% of Family Offices Engaged in 2015
Foto: Jorge Andrés Paparoni Bruzual . Más de dos tercios de los family offices realizaron inversiones directas en alternativos en 2015

2016 FOX Global Investment Survey from Family Office Exchange (FOX) finds that 69% of Family Offices engaged in direct investing in 2015. Families with first- or second-generation leadership are much more likely to do direct investing than families with later-generation leadership, with 81% of Gen 1-2 families engaging in direct investing compared to 46% of Gen 3 and later. Growth capital is the most popular private equity deal stage (32%) followed by venture capital (30%).

“Investing directly in real estate properties or operating companies is familiar for many family offices that earned their wealth by building businesses,” says Charles B. Grace, III, managing director at FOX. “In the face of volatility in the public markets, direct investments can seem a haven for those who want transparency and prefer taking risks with companies and/or properties they can investigate and perhaps control in some manner.”

Direct investors tend to be active investors, with forty percent (40%) preferring a lead role that gives them the transparency and control that they desire from their direct investments. When asked where they are finding new direct investing opportunities, 71% of direct investors said they rely on networking or their existing relationships/word of mouth. Proper evaluation of opportunities and deal pricing are the two biggest challenges facing direct investors looking to implement their strategy.

“Deal pricing has become a bigger challenge in executing a successful direct investment strategy as the market has become more efficient,” says Karen Clark, managing director at the organization. “Evaluating opportunities is a bigger challenge for participants than finding deal flow.”

Regarding returns, the research finds out that the median overall return for survey participants in 2015 was 2%, and expected 2016 return is 6%. Also that direct real estate and direct private equity enhanced returns in 2015, gaining 18% and 15% respectively.

Seventy-eight percent (78%) of families are broadly diversified with a conservative growth orientation, including 20% to cash and fixed income, 43% to equities, 2% to hard assets, and 33% to alternatives.

The study provides an in-depth look at the investment activity of leading single family offices, providing perspective on a range of topics including Economic Outlook and Investment Opportunities for 2016, Asset Allocation and Performance, Use of Investment Consultants and Investment Committees, Reliance on Alternative Investments, and Direct Investing.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management Takes Minority Stake in ETF Provider Global X

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

J.P. Morgan Asset Management Takes Minority Stake in ETF Provider Global X
Foto: Leo Grübler . J.P. Morgan Asset Management se hace con una participación minoritaria en el proveedor de ETFs Global X

J.P. Morgan Asset Management recently announced that it has made a passive, minority investment in Global X Management Company, a New York based ETF provider with a diversified suite of over 40 ETF solutions.    

“Investing in Global X augments our ETF strategy by expanding and deepening our participation in this fast-growing industry,” said Jed Laskowitz, Co-Head of Global Investment Management Solutions for J.P. Morgan Asset Management. “We will continue to develop the J.P. Morgan ETF lineup with an eye toward future innovation in active ETFs while building this strategic partnership.”

“Widely acknowledged for its innovative products, Global X has become a leading provider of ETF solutions, and we are pleased to have them as a strategic partner,” said Robert Deutsch, Global Head of ETF Solutions for the firm. “This investment complements the growth of J.P. Morgan’s own ETF line-up, with seven strategic beta ETFs launched and many more to come.”

This investment will have no impact on how the asset management ETF Solutions and Global X operate their respective businesses.  Specifically, there will be no co-marketing, investment management, distribution agreements or shared governance between the two organizations. This investment does not result in Global X becoming an affiliate of J.P. Morgan.

Aberdeen Appoints Campbell Fleming as Global Head of Distribution

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Aberdeen Asset Management PLC(Aberdeen) announced the appointment of Campbell Fleming as Global Head of Distribution.

Campbell will be responsible for Aberdeen’s global distribution platform encompassing 450 people across business development, product specialists, marketing and client service. He will also work closely with the senior management of all of Aberdeen’s investment capabilities.

Campbell is currently Chief Executive EMEA of Columbia Threadneedle as well as Global Chief Operating Officer. He joined Threadneedle from JP Morgan in 2009 as Head of Distribution. He has in-depth knowledge of markets in Asia, Europe and the Americas and has an enviable track record of successfully managing distribution teams across a range of client channels.  Last October, Campbell was named CEO of the Year at the Financial News Asset Management Awards.

Campbell succeeds John Brett who stepped down from the role late last year. He will report to Martin Gilbert, Chief Executive and will join Aberdeen’s Group Management Board.

Martin Gilbert, Chief Executive at Aberdeen Asset Management, comments: “We are delighted to attract someone of Campbell’s caliber – this reflects the appeal of our global platform and our full-service capability across asset classes and strategies. After an in-depth worldwide search process, Campbell was identified as the outstanding candidate given his expertise and experience across client channels globally, including North America which is a key focus for us.”

Financial Advisors Have the Most Power When it Comes to UHNW Investment Decision-making

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Financial Advisors Have the Most Power When it Comes to UHNW Investment Decision-making
Foto: Ged Carroll . Los financial advisors son los que más influyen en las decisiones de inversión de los UHNW

Financial Advisors have a bigger role in investment decision-making for North American ultra-high net worth families than any other family member, group or committee, according to a new study from Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management and Campden Wealth Research

The study among 59 individuals from families with net worth in excess of $25 million asked specifically how they made decisions about overall asset allocation, investing in a specific opportunity and divesting from a specific vehicle. Respondents said these were most frequently decided by family advisors, family office executives and professional financial advisors. 

A professional financial advisor is used in 41% of cases for overall asset allocation, and a family advisor or family office executive in 38%.  These same non-family members also help make decisions about specific opportunities in 44% and 35% of cases respectively, and to divest in vehicles or companies 41% each of the time. 

 

“The fact that ultra-high net worth individuals appear to listen more to their financial advisors than their own family members shows the premium placed on good, professional investment advice,” said David Bokman, Head of Ultra-High Net Worth Resources for Morgan Stanley. 

The results are contained within the newly published ‘Family Decision-Making’ report, which examines decision-making within ultra-high net worth families in North America.  The influence of financial advisors is a recurring theme through the findings, but is particularly prevalent around investments. 

Asked how much influence key stakeholders inside and outside the family had on ultra-high net worths’ goals, 89% said their wealth advisors had either a strong (50%) influence or some (39%) influence. This was higher than any other stakeholder, inside or outside the family. 

Family business strategy or partners and affiliates were the second-most influential entity (44% strong influence and 40% some influence). Parents were a strong influence for a third of ultra-high net worth individuals and spouses for a quarter. 

Commenting on the findings, Dominic Samuelson, Chief Executive Officer, Campden Wealth said: “Financial Advisors play a very important role in family decision-making, and enjoy a special – and often very select – place at the table of these ultra-high net worth families.  In seeking to service them as best they can, Financial Advisors should look to gain as wide an understanding into families as possible and think about their complete needs.” 

“The more that Financial Advisors can understand, the more holistic advice they can offer, and the more families will gain from their interactions.  Financial Advisors may even wish to be explicit about their desire to gain more knowledge into the family from the outset to help fast-track this process,” added Mr. Bokman. 

 

EU-scepticism is Much More Serious Than the Short-term Volatility

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

A number of political developments are likely to trigger volatility in 2016, especially around the month of June. However, and according to Maxime Alimi, Economist – Euro area at Axa Investment Managers, the real risk lies in the longer term. For the first time since the 1950s, EU-scepticism is threatening the European project not just to stall, but to step back.

In Alimi’s last paper titled “Political risk in Europe: the short and the long view,” the strategist mentions that amongst the issues that may resurface around June are:

  • The UK’s Referendum
  • The possibility of elections in Spain
  • The relationship between the IMF and Greece
  • Portugal’s budget implementation review

More serious however is the EU-scepticism. Alimi mentions that “Europe has always been the subject of debates in terms of the political direction it should take: more or less pro-market, more or less social policies, more or less federal integration. But things are different today as Europe is challenged on two distinct fronts: first, the legitimacy of Europe as a relevant level for policy-making; second, confidence of Europeans in the reliability and trustworthiness of their peers. Europe is challenged as a relevant level for policy making. The line of argument is the inability of Europe to deal with the challenges of today and the ‘one size fits all’ policies: Europe has been unable to protect populations against a double crisis; Europe has been unable to lay out a policy response to international threats.”

The sovereign crisis, the QE programme and negative interest rates, as well as the terror attacks and refugee crisis of 2015 have provided further fuel to this dynamic of mutual distrust. “For the first time since its creation, one pillar of the European project – the Schengen agreement – was suspended as governments were no longer trusting their neighbours to enforce borders controls.” The risk Brexit brings is that for the first time since the project was initiated in the 1950s, Europe could not just stall but step back. “Building scenarios around a European disintegration is difficult and highly uncertain, but its impact would certainly be large,” he concludes.

You can download the full report in the following link.