Internacional archivos - Page 256 of 565

Ian Heslop (Old Mutual GI): “Our Strategies are Not a ‘Black Box’, but Rather a Very Transparent ‘Glass Box’

During his presentation at the OMGI Global Markets Forum in Boston, and questioning conventional investment thinking, Ian Heslop, Head of Global Equities at Old Mutual Global Investors, explained the double difficulty of forecasting market behavior. It’s often quite easy to make a mistake when forecasting, but even when the outcome of an event has been forecasted successfully, guessing the market reaction is just as complex. “If someone had been able to foresee the Brexit result, they could have guessed the market’s behavior for about 7 days. If someone predicted that Donald Trump would be elected for president, they could have guessed market behavior for about 7 hours. As a team, we try not to forecast, especially as regards market reactions.”

Another important issue, according to Heslop, is that investors have lost confidence in active management. In the United States, only 27% of active managers are able to beat the S & P 500, the main reason is that many fund managers are not taking enough risks to beat the index: “Firstly, if investing in an active fund which is not taking sufficient active risk, but which charges active management fees, the return will be lower than the index. Secondly, the S & P500 index is also said to be a very efficient index, which it is, to a certain extent, but to attribute the lack of higher yields to the index’ efficiency is to greatly simplify the argument. The difficulty in consistently outperforming it is real enough, but I don’t think it’s based on the efficiency of the index itself. The third reason would be concentrating on a particular style. Active funds are often cyclical in nature. Sometimes it is the value style that gains the favor of the market, in others it is the growth style, or the quality, if the fund only takes into account a particular style of investment, it will not be letting compound interest act correctly, lagging behind the market at some stage.”
As a result, investors have turned their backs on active investment by investing more than US$ 1.4 trillion in US equity ETFs since 2007. “The main problem with indexed products is that investors think they are buying diversified exposure to the US equity market, when in fact the portfolio’s performance comes from 10 shares of the S & P 500. Partly, because these companies represent a significant part of the economy, but to a larger extent it’s due to flows. “

Helsop cited as examples those ETFs that invest in the 100 less volatile stocks of the S & P 500 index, the valuations of which, in terms of price to book value rates, have increased substantially, increasing from 2.37 times in 2013 to 3.59 times in 2017. Another trend is the purchase of equity ETFs with high dividends. Investors often do not take into account their exposure in terms of risks, and are unaware that they are actually buying risk of size, momentum, market sensitivity or beta. “It should be noted that some of the dislocations in the US equity market are directly dependent on the extensive use of ETFs by investors, both from the point of view of market capitalization and from the point of view of exposure of styles in the portfolio. Investors find it very attractive that a particular investment environment can work all of the time, but this is not the case.”

How do we solve the problem?

The market sentiment and perceived level of risk in the market are two factors that determine which type of values are going to perform better than the index. At the end of the first quarter of 2016, the markets were going through a scenario of high volatility with a very negative sentiment. With a macroeconomic scenario very different to that in 2008, the market reflected an environment with little appetite for risk, behaving in the same way, but for very different reasons. Looking at the market’s behavior during the third quarter of 2017, the markets’ scenario is of low volatility and high optimism, where risk appetite has increased. “The approach that active management must take in both scenarios is different, so obtaining results above the index is extremely difficult, being especially complicated if it aims to forecast the outcome of an event and the market’s behavior towards it, something which depends on the sentiment. However, if we try to locate which moment the market is at by measuring its evolution against the change and then adjusting the portfolio accordingly, we will be somewhat behind the market, but we maximize the time in which we have a signal located, being able to discard noise. On the negative side, if we see a very abrupt change over a very short time, it will take a while for the portfolio to adjust. For each period of rapid adjustment to a new state in the market, there are multiple periods of time in which there is no direction in the market, minimizing the loss in those moments.”

The investment and stock selection process

Old Mutual Global Investors’ global equity team uses five variables or themes to identify which type of company will achieve a good result at each moment in the cycle: a dynamic valuation that allows them to be alert at every moment of the cycle and to buy a certain style of investment, sustainable growth, which looks for opportunities within the market, analyst sentiment, which allows them to assess what happened in the company, the company’s management team, whose communications are used to control whether they are acting in the best shareholder interest, market dynamics, with which they try to understand the demand and supply of each stock.

“Our way of managing strategy is not a ‘black box’, but rather a very transparent and rigorous ‘glass box’. We invest and create portfolios in a very rigorous way. The investment process uses the five themes to have or not to have assets in the portfolio. We look at metrics for valuation, quality, growth, revenue, information, momentum, and trends, but what really sets us apart is that we are trying to understand the motives that make a stock perform well. There are environments in which the market is willing to buy stocks of a certain style: value, growth or quality, and if at that time you maintain exposure to that particular style in the portfolios, it will most likely add return to the portfolio”

Helsop also commented that what really matters to the management team is to know the elements that are influencing the market’s direction, something that is the key to understanding how the investors will behave. “We try to respond to the requirement that clients have for a different type of alpha, without forecasting or minimizing the amount of forecasts we use. In our alpha generation process we don’t consider a top-down macroeconomic analysis or a fundamental bottom-up analysis, but we mix all the factors and the result is a different approach that provides the opportunity to diversify”.

Funds under the same approach

With nearly 18 billion in assets under management, Old Mutual Global Investors’ equity team manages a number of different strategies; all of them with a high active share. The Old Mutual North American Equity fund strategy, the Old Mutual Global Equity Fund and the Old Mutual Global Equity Income fund are long-only strategies. The first one has about 200 securities in the portfolio and has been managed by Ian Heslop’s team since 2013. The second one has approximately 450 securities and the third has 500 securities and doesn’t invest in those classic names that pay a high dividend and that the rest of funds have in their portfolios. Lastly, the Old Mutual Global Equity Absolute Return strategy with over 650 names in the portfolio is market neutral, being a clear example of how the five factors combine to generate alpha in a different way from the rest of the market. This fund manages about 11 billion dollars in assets.

Investec AM Brought Together Over 130 Professionals from the United States and LatAm in Washington

| For Meritxell Sedo | 0 Comentarios

At the 10th annual Investec Global Insights held in Washington, Investec Asset Management brought together over 130 professionals from the investment industry, mostly from the United States and Latin America, at the Four Seasons Hotel. The event, which took place on the 19^th and 20^th of October, was attended by the firm’s leading managers and strategists, who shared with attendees their perspectives and positions in the portfolios.
Richard Garland, Managing Director of the Global Advisor division and Hendrik du Toit, CEO of Investec AM, were responsible for the welcoming to the event. Following them, Philip Saunders, Co-Head of the Multi-Asset Growth strategies, explained how to navigate mature bull markets, where both fixed income and equities are at maximum price levels.

Then came the turn to disclose where the opportunities in fixed income and currencies may be found, John Stopford Head of Multi-Asset Income, reminded the audience that despite the low interest rate environment in developed markets, emerging markets continue to offer a decent real profitability. In addition, a selected basket of emerging currencies shows relatively attractive levels.
Then, in a discussion moderated by Stopford himself, Jeff Boswell, Strategy Leader of Developed Markets Credit, Matthew Claeson, Latin American Debt Portfolio Manager, Peter Eerdmans, Co-Head for Emerging Market Fixed Income, and Abrie Pretorious, Quality Capability Portfolio Manager, discussed where to find sustainable sources of income for investors.

To concludethe morning presentations, strategist Michael Power explained the implications of the improvement in solar and wind energy efficiency on the fourth industrial revolution. During the afternoon meetings the attendees had the opportunity to meet with the management teams. Once these meetings were over, they enjoyed a gala dinner at the Warner Theater.

On the second day of the conference, Robert J O’Neill, the Navy Seal who shot Bin Laden, opened with a motivational talk on how to persevere in achieving goals. Following him, Aniket Shah, Program Leader of the Financing for Sustainable Development Initiative at the UNexplained the paradigm shift in an economy that shifts from focusing on theWest to looking to the East and where China takes the lead in global prominence

Emerging markets were the subject of the conferences’ third discussion. Participating in the discussion panel were Chris Freund, Head of SA Equity & Multi-Asset, Carina Güerisoli, Portfolio Manager for Latin America, Victoria Harling, Strategy Leader for Emerging Market Corporate Debt, and Asian Equity Portfolio Manager, Greg Kuhnert.

Lastly, Richard Garland moderated a fourth discussion which addressed the trends of the financial advisory business, participating in this panel were Shane Balkhan, CIO of Beaufort Investments in the UK, Gonzalo Cordova, CEO for LarrainVial in Latin America, Joshua Heimann, Head of WMA International Sales and Business Development for UBS International in the US, and Erich Lang, Executive Director, Head Fund Provider Management for Julius Baer in Switzerland.

How to navigate mature bull markets

In a bullish market environment which seems unstoppable, and with most assets at levels above their historical averages, Philip Saunders remarked that valuations by themselves are rarely the trigger for a sharp drop in the market, revealing that the trigger is usually, in 93% of cases, a significant increase in the cost of capital.

Although fundamentals are favorable and the leading indicators still show no signs of going into recession, Saunders advised taking a somewhat more cautious position, suggesting an increase in liquidity in the portfolios, greater structural diversification, and wider exposure to different sources of return beyond traditional asset classes.

Carrying out a structural diversification requires focusing on the behavior of the assets rather than on their classification. According to Saunders, each asset class can be attributed a growth characteristic if it reacts positively to an increase in risk appetite, a defensive characteristic if its returns are positive when expectations of economic growth decline, and a decorrelation characteristic if returns are not related to economic growth or corporate profits. “Mixing these three characteristics is when you get superior diversification and more consistent results. Selection is important in this type of diversification, we do not have exposure to all assets all the time,” said Saunders.

Regarding the positioning of their portfolio, within growth assets they have a preference for a selective exposure in equities, where, due to the corporate benefits and alpha potential, exposure to global equity markets is favored, with the exception of the US, and they balance the risk with a selection of defensive assets.

A Paradigm Shift: China’s global prominence

Beginning with an allusion to a recent cover of The Economist, which showed Xi Jinping as the most powerful man in the world, Aniket Shah, explained the main themes that are developing in China and how we should think about the side-effects that its development has on Asia and on the rest of the emergent economies. China continues to grow, at a lower rate of growth, but on a higher growth basis. Assuming that China continues to grow at an average rate of 6.5% and the US at an average rate of 2.5%, China’s gross domestic product will reach 22.8 trillion as of 2026, while the US would not reach that figure until 2030.

Although China often has a rather negative narrative, with an excess of debt and production capacity, its prominence is an issue which goes beyond the construction of large infrastructures. “A frequent error in analyzing China’s economy is to believe that its growth depends on the accumulation of physical capital that began in the 1990s, without realizing the importance of human capital; an investment that began in the late 50’s and 60’s, and which is now much more productive. In a recent analysis of the growth of the scientific research which is published in different parts of the world, it can be seen that, from 2003 to 2013, the US has gone from 26% to 18.2% of publications, while China has gone from 6% to 18%, reaching parity with the United States. “

China has set out to stop being a technological copy-cat country by investing heavily in R&D. “One of the most interesting initiatives being carried out by the Chinese government is the “Made in 2025” initiative. The idea, inspired by the German initiative “Industry 4.0”, is that China wants more prominence in the country’s production chains, and the figures are quite impressive, specifically, it seeks to make domestic content of the main components of production chains grow from 40% in 2020 to 70% in 2025 “.

The program aims to position itself as a pioneering country in the generation of new information technologies, in high-end machines and robots, in maritime equipment and highly technological ships, in rail transport, in new sources of energy and in energy saving vehicles, in new agricultural machinery, new materials, and in biopharmacy; all of which are critical industries for development within the next 30 years.

Another growth dimension in China that must be taken into account is geographical expansion. China has stepped up its efforts to expand its economic growth across the country, specifically in the western regions. The “one belt, one road” initiative, an attempt to rebuild the old silk route and the creation of a parallel maritime route, created in 2013 by the Chinese authorities, benefits from the enormous low-cost capital capacity of the Chinese economy.

In terms of renewable energy investment, China’s investment is above that of the US, the UK and France combined. In addition, it considers it a key industry when it comes to positioning its global prominence. Most importantly, China is making the necessary efforts to build an economy and society that can meet most of the challenges of the future.

In terms of world trade, China is the largest trading partner of 124 countries, while the US is the main trading partner of only 56 countries. Equity and debt financial markets are growing and gaining in depth. China has already outgrown the Japanese stock market, although it still lags behind the US and European markets, while its bond market is behind that of both the US and Japan.

Shah is therefore convinced that China’s role in the Asian region, and in the world, will only grow, despite the many challenges it faces: “China is becoming the leader in global innovation, in economy, in politics, in international diplomacy and in innovation,” he concluded.

MFS Investment Management: “It’s a Very Complex World for the Fixed Income Investor; a Passive Approach Doesn’t Make Sense”

| For Fórmate a Fondo | 0 Comentarios

During the 2017 MFS European Investment Forum in London, Bill Adams, Global Fixed Income CIO for MFS Investment Management, explained the different structural reasons why the Boston-based global investment management firm argues that the low interest rate environment will persist for some time, mainly because of a series of structural factors that are persistent headwinds, such as the level of global indebtedness, the disruption of technology which fundamentally affects the lack of inflation in wages, and demographic trends.

Examining structural trends

From a cyclical perspective, global growth has improved, but inflation expectations, both from the point of view of market participants, and from the point of view of central banks, have been persistently wrong.

“It is mainly in developed markets where inflation projections in economies are not being met. This is due to the lack of inflation in wages, money is not being put into workers’ hands and they have less money to return to the economy. And it is precisely this discontent with wages that has provoked the resurgence of populist movements. The disruption of technology has affected workers from both the middle and working classes, who’ve had to return to the labor market with lower wages. The economy’s inability to create inflation is an important issue,” said Bill Adams.

Another issue affecting wage inflation is demographic trends. In developed countries, birthrates have fallen below the level needed to sustain population growth (i.e., more deaths than births). According to MFS ‘research, this has very clear implications for economic growth, inflation and the demand for fixed income products. When older, more experienced workers retire, they do so with higher wages than those workers entering the labor market who may have lower productivity, less experience, and lower wage expectations. “We are seeing an economy that is constantly being challenged by lower growth and inflation in wages.” Adams noted that as more people approach retirement, their needs for income are greater than their needs for growth, the natural movement of these people is to seek greater exposure to fixed income than to equity. “This movement creates a persistent demand in the market for high quality debt.”

Incidentally, the leverage level of the global economies has increased considerably. “Any economy whose debt-to-GDP ratio exceeds 100, is impeding future growth by bringing it into the present. We know that the central banks responded to a challenging macroeconomic situation during the Global Financial Crisis, increasing the level of debt on their balance sheets, which caused higher leverage in the economy. There has certainly been an improvement in the metrics on the corporate side, but on public balance sheets, we are reaching the future that we have leveraged, and therefore, we are now struggling to achieve greater growth.”

The performance of central banks

Following Janet Yellen’s announcement at the Federal Reserve’s last meeting in September, the Fed’s balance sheet assets will decline from $ 4.5 trillion to $ 3.5 trillion. This will gradually remove liquidity from the market. But when you look at the central banks as a whole, they continue to provide greater liquidity. But, in global terms, the market continues to pursue an accommodative policy as long as central banks continue to maintain a large number of assets in their balance sheets. This is a trend that MFS does not expect to be reversed until the second half of 2018.

“The Fed’s performance has been very transparent and patient, revealing its plans very prudently. The plan that has been put in place to gradually reduce the size of its balance sheet reflects that they have spent a lot of time, energy, and trillions of dollars in getting the economy out of the stagnation of the financial crisis. I doubt they’d want to risk that progress because of a miscalculation in monetary policy, so the withdrawal will be very slow. Reducing that balance will put interest rates on a positive trajectory, but as long as it runs smoothly, it will ensure that interest rates rise gradually.”

Although similar growth trends are being observed in Europe, there is still no impact on the interest rate environment. European growth has lagged behind the US for years and is now closing that gap with the help of the European Central Bank. “Inflation in Europe starts from a smaller base, and is not yet at a US level.” explained the asset manager.

Where are the opportunities in global fixed income?

Adams argued for the importance of talking to investors about preserving capital, but believes that it is equally critical to expand the opportunities presented in fixed income beyond the country in which the investor resides, seeking global alternatives, and ultimately seeking an active process, with a strong credit selection process, rather than a passive investment or exposure to ETFs.

“At MFS we are increasingly comfortable with the duration of the United States, rather than with the duration of developed Europe or Japan. We are comfortable in choosing portfolio duration, but we are overweighting US duration over developed Europe and Japan. This is an example of how global duration is diversified.”

Since mid-2016, it has been a wonderful environment for risky assets, both high-yield fixed income and emerging fixed income experienced a rally, but at MFS they are beginning to question those good tidings, wondering whether it’s time to ‘take the foot off the accelerator’ and emphasize the preservation of capital.

“Investors should continue to invest in fixed income. There are still opportunities in the market for adding value, but instead of being in an environment where all you had to do was to buy the market, this environment requires higher levels of selection. You need to understand the companies and know what they are offering their investors.”

Adams compared the dispersion in the spreads of the lower part of the high-yield debt spectrum (with CCC rating) against the higher part (BB rating). A collapse in the levels of spreads has been observed and risk has positioned itself aggressively as compared to its lower risk alternative. “High-yield debt with a CCC rating has a default rate of approximately 35% historically, so if you try to get returns by investing in this type of debt, your losses could be greater than what you expect to earn. We are not convinced investors are being adequately compensated for the level of risk in the CCC part of the market.”

Finally, the MFS global debt specialist points out that emerging sovereign debt has responded less aggressively than the high-yield market, so that relative value bets can still be positioned in emerging markets.

“We live in a very complex world, with many challenges for bond investors. We are promoting among our investors the benefits of expanding their investment horizon, with an active selection of securities in that type of environment. When the spreads are compressed and the markets lack dispersion, a passive focus on investments doesn’t make sense to us,” he concludes.

Who Are the European Rising Stars of Asset Management 2017?

| For Gabriela Huerta | 0 Comentarios

The 25 men and women under the age of 40 standing out in the European investment industry, according to Financial News, includes a list of “talented individuals that are also the asset managers, consultants, strategists and client relationship specialists who have the opportunity to change the way the industry generates and distributes wealth in the years to come”.

The winners of this year’s award were voted by a panel of Financial News editors and industry judges who assessed entrants on four criteria: investment criteria, strength, new developments and ‘better than the rest’, and are:

Maya Bhandari, portfolio manager, multi-asset, Columbia Threadneedle Investments (38)
Olivier Blin, head of systematic strategies, Unigestion (36)
Emma Cameron, partner and senior investment consultant, Hymans Robertson (37)
Gunjan Chauhan, head of cash, Emea, State Street Global Advisors (35)
Joanna Crompton, portfolio manager, JPMorgan Asset Management (33)
Daniel Danon and Tobias Knecht, portfolio managers, Assenagon (35)
Gaetan Delculee, global head of ETF, indexing and smart beta sales, Amundi (32)
Louise Dudley, portfolio manager, Hermes Investment Management (32)
Dana Harlan, senior client strategist, transition management, BlackRock (32)
Joubeen Hurren, portfolio manager, Aviva Investors (28)
Christopher Inman, principal consultant and head of UK DC investment advisory, Aon Hewitt (34)
Amy Jupe, executive director, alternative investments and manager selection group, Goldman Sachs Asset Management (34)
Wesley Lebeau, portfolio manager, CPR Asset Management (35)
Howie Li, chief executive, Canvas — part of ETF Securities — (34)
Garvan McCarthy, CIO for alternatives, Europe, Mercer (35)
Tom Morris, fund manager, Majedie Asset Management (30)
Joseph Mouawad, emerging markets analyst, Carmignac (33)
Andrew Mulliner, portfolio manager, Janus Henderson Investors (34)
Henning Potstada, portfolio manager and deputy head of the multi-asset total return unconstrained team, Deutsche Asset Management (37)
Jean Sayegh, head of fixed income, Lyxor Asset Management (35)
Simon Smiles, chief investment officer for ultra high net worth, UBS Wealth Management (39)
Nicolas Trindade, senior portfolio manager, AXA Investment Management (34)
Felipe Villarroel, portfolio manager, TwentyFour Asset Management (33)
Naomi Waistell, portfolio manager, emerging markets equities, Newton Investment Management (32)
Matthew Yeates, quantitative investment manager, Seven Investment Management (27)

According to the publication, “this year’s crop reflects the efforts of their firms to produce strong performance in order to attract investors and grow assets during a time of low yields and low interest rates.”

Spend Your Time Wisely

| For Gabriela Huerta | 0 Comentarios

Both professional fund investors and asset managers are wasting valuable time in fund due diligence. The processes fund investors use to collect, and asset managers use to provide, due diligence information on funds are outdated and long due an upgrade.

Fund investors would like to spend less time gathering and organising information and more time performing analysis. Asset managers have similar inefficiencies. They are spending too much time repetitively ‘cutting and pasting’ the same content to respond to similar fund investor requests. Asset managers want to provide high quality information, faster responses, greater transparency – and highlight the strengths of their offering.

At Door, we are reimagining the future of fund due diligence. Bringing asset managers and professional fund investors together, we have collaborated on a new industry-led platform – a digital solution to streamline the due diligence process and drive value to all participants.

Door is solving a common problem

The challenge for fund investors is that fund information is not always provided by managers quickly and in consistent and easily comparable formats. While DDQs are a primary source of critical information for undertaking fund research and ongoing monitoring, current industry practice involves exchanging Word or Excel documents over email. The process is slow and archaic. Changes to information through time are not easily captured or understood.

Today, we know professional fund investors are spending as much as two thirds of their time gathering and organising basic due diligence information on funds and only one third on analysis and decision-making. Door aims to put better, more efficient tools into the hands of fund investors and to make responding to information requests more it more efficient for asset managers to respond to information requests.

Receiving fund information quickly and in an easily comparable format is key. Door is making this possible. We have brought together principles of standardisation and digitisation. This combination creates far-reaching benefits for professional fund investors and asset management companies alike.

Creating industry best practice

There is a high level of overlap between the questions asked by professional investors in their DDQs. While differing in shape and size, the vast majority of questions asked by investors intend to elicit similar responses from asset managers. Our research shows that over 90% of all the questions asked by investors of asset managers’ products around the world are common!

Standardisation has played an important role in the development of many modern advancements. It provides the basis for consistency in measurement and technical development.

The benefits of applying best practice standards to the questionnaire process were recognized first by the professional fund investor community – within the membership of the Association of Professional Fund Investors (APFI). Door has worked alongside APFI to deliver an independent and industry-led solution that continues to evolve with the changing investment environment and due diligence requirements: The Standard Questionnaire.

The Standard Questionnaire was built through an intensive 12-month collaboration that explored a wide array of questionnaires, RFPs, RFIs and DDQs from around the world and across many categories of investors. Dozens of participants, including leading global fund investors and asset management firms, provided input and feedback. 500 hours of research, analysis and collaboration went into the development of The Standard Questionnaire. With the support of the firms collaborating on Door, The Standard Questionnaire is fast becoming the new industry best practice. Asset managers’ responses to The Standard Questionnaire are designed to sit at the ‘core’ of a fund investor’s due diligence information gathering process. One of the key benefits of The Standard Questionnaire is that asset managers can better understand the information requirements of their clients. The questions are clear and easily understood. The quality of responses and the level of transparency improves.

Fund selectors point out that it takes far too long to receive responses to information requests: a turnaround time of three to five weeks. Asset managers are challenged with an ever-growing backlog of requests. Door enables asset managers to provide access to The Standard Questionnaire for their funds to fund investors on a real-time basis and investors are alerted to the most recent changes to information.

Fund selectors also struggle with the level of quality and depth of responses to questions asked. Because volumes are so high and asset managers receive many similarly worded questions, they often simply ‘cut/paste’ ready made responses. In many cases, these responses are a good fit for a question posed but too often, similar sounding questions don’t receive adequate attention. With a wider breadth of questions being asked, the depth and quality of responses suffer.

Tools for Humans

We believe that fund due diligence is a vital function. We believe that humans, not robots, are best equipped to make investment decisions on funds. In depth analysis and ongoing reviews of both robust qualitative and quantitative information is crucial. As both funds and asset management firms are ultimately managed by people, we think it takes solid human judgment and decision-making to invest in them. To make decisions, fund investors must have robust, up to date, easily comparable information. Changes to information need to be communicated more quickly.

Door’s aims are simple. We want to improve the due diligence information gathering process. We want professional fund investors to be able to apply their analysis to easily comparable, deep fund information. We want faster and more democratic communication of changes to information.

We want to give back the time to both fund investors and asset managers to focus on value.

About Door collaborators

Collaboration and mutual understanding are key facets of Door’s success. As Co-Founders of Door, we have brought together complementary, hands-on experience from both sides of the due diligence process.

The industry has been seeking innovation. So, Door brought the innovators together. The firms helping our drive for change include All Funds, Santander, Mediolanum, Pictet Wealth and EFG. Asset managers include Franklin Templeton, Columbia Threadneedle, Schroders, Aberdeen Asset Management, Robeco, M&G, Artisan Partners, Aviva Investors, Pictet Asset Management and Nordea Asset Management. Door is now working with 20 cross-border asset managers and over 50 fund investor firms. The number grows daily.

If you would like to join our community, please visit www.doorfunds.com

Column by Door

OMGI: You Missed the Rally… Is it Still a Good Time to Invest in Asian Equities?

| For Fórmate a Fondo | 0 Comentarios

The Asian equity market continues to rise, exceeding by over 50% the lows it touched in 2016. So far this year, the MSCI Asia Pacific Ex Japan index surpasses the S & P 500 by more than 21%, while the renminbi appreciated 6% against the dollar, is it still a good time to enter this asset class if you missed the rally? Josh Crabb, Head of Asian equities for Old Mutual Global Investors, thinks so.

During the OMGI Global Markets Forum in Boston, the Lead Manager for the Old Mutual Asian Equity Income and Old Mutual Pacific Equity funds reviewed potential threats to this asset class, their valuations, and the likelihood of a positive return in the next 12 months, along with the issues that are the main alpha generators in their portfolios.

What should concern the Asian equity investor?

In recent weeks, rising tensions between the United States and North Korea have created a lot of noise in the markets. According to Crabb, it should not be something that worries investors too much, because it estimates a 99% probability that nothing happens and only 1% that something truly bad happens that entails a 100% drop in the markets. Multiplying probabilities, this only represents a 1% impact on the markets.

“If we look back in history and review other events which were much more extreme, such as the Cuban missile crisis, with two powers which were more equipped and with a much worse possible final result, we can see that the market only moved between 3 % and 4%. If, as investors, this issue genuinely concerns us, and without this comment being meant as advice, the solution would be to buy put options on the Kospi (Korea Stock Exchange Index) index, which are “out of the money” and whose expiration date is long-term, this strategy will pay better than leaving some extra cash in the portfolio.”

The spectacular rally experienced by this asset class since last year to date has made some investors think that they are late for the party, but it’s still a good time to enter if you take into account the valuations in terms of the price /book value rate: “If investors had entered to buy in February 2016, when the price / book rate was 1.2 times, they would have obtained, with 100% probability, a positive return in the next 12 months, according to historical data of this asset class for the last 20 years. At present, the market stands at a rate of 1.7 times, at some distance from the lows, but still with a very favorable outlook, with a probability of obtaining positive returns around 70% to 80%. Right now it’s one of the cheapest asset classes and it’s still a good time to invest, with a good chance of making a profit.”

Another common concern is how Asian equities will react to potential interest rate hikes by the US Federal Reserve. The base scenario many investors anticipate is that if there is a new rate hike due to rising inflationary pressures, the dollar will appreciate, impacting negatively on commodity prices, emerging markets and in particular in Asia. Which is something that, according to Crabb, should not necessarily occur. To explain his vision, the Old Mutual manager goes back to the period between 2003 and 2007 to contrast the behavior of the dollar, as measured by the DXY (US Dollar Index), and the Asian equities under a restrictive cycle by the Fed : “While the American market was recovering from the technological bubble, Asian market rates were at low levels for a number of reasons: qualitative easing measures in Thailand, terrorist attacks on Indonesian discos, SARS disease, prices of real estate in Hong Kong were at half their current value and the economy was weak. When the Federal Reserve began to raise rates, the dollar began to appreciate at first to then depreciate, but the stock market continued to rise throughout the cycle. It is not until the Federal Reserve begins to lower rates that the MSCI Asia ex Japan index begins to fall. If we go back to the current cycle and review what happened so far, we can see that the dollar started its rally in anticipation of the Fed rate hike and Asian equities began to get better returns. The dollar has already begun to depreciate, but Asian markets continue to rise.”

Crabb also argues that now that global conditions seem to improve, with China and Europe offering attractive valuations and greater economic strength, investors will begin to allocate more resources to these asset classes.

What is the correct approach to positioning in Asian equities?

When investors think of the next economic crisis, they refer back to the 2009 crisis. Although, according to Josh Crabb, the next crisis is likely to look more like the 2000 crisis, in spite of the fact that the S&P 500 fell quite a lot, many value stocks rose in absolute terms. In this way, the asset manager seeks exposure to companies expected to have a great growth because their market is going to have great growth. At present, there are five trends that the manager is considering as the main alpha drivers of the portfolio: Indian infrastructure, frontier markets, pollution in China, the Internet of Things (IOT) and artificial intelligence (AI).

Beginning with companies linked to the internet of things and artificial intelligence, Crabb emphasizes the irruption in homes of new products that will represent a revolution in the same scale that the mobile phone represented in its day. “Most of those present will have heard of Amazon Echo and Google Home. The previous week I was in Europe and basically nobody knew these products, or the fact that Microsoft, Alibaba, Samsung and a good number of companies are in the process of launching their own versions of these products that will completely change the way in which people interact. These devices allow you to connect every household appliance in the house using voice as a command. This will lead to a cycle of mass product proliferation that we can benefit from by participating in companies of a relatively small size in terms of market capitalization today.”

As an example, the asset manager mentions Primax Electronics, a Thai company that specializes in manufacturing microphones that are able to identify voices, used by Google home and Amazon Echo. While the valuation of the company measured as a P/E ratio is about 10.5 times, that of Alibaba is around 50 times. “When we think that this product has not yet reached Latin America, Asia or Europe and how many people will have it in a short period of time. We can see it’s a fantastic opportunity. In addition, this technology will be integrated into televisions, light systems, door bells and sprinklers. This reasoning can also extend to manufacturers of sensors, camera lenses and other products whose companies show cheap valuations and massive potential growth.”

Finally, Crabb mentions the issue of pollution in China, noting that those highly polluting companies, such as steel manufacturers that are not complying with environmental regulation or paying their taxes, will have to close in the not very distant future, deriving their production to those companies which are complying. “The population in China has reached a socioeconomic level which is high enough to start worrying about pollution. This is why the creation of job positions is no longer a priority, and they are beginning to give more importance to steel manufacturing companies that respect the rules, that create quality standards and that in the future will gain the extra volume lost by companies which fail to comply “.

MFS Investment Management: “We Cannot Emphasize Enough the Fact that We Are Active Managers”

| For Fórmate a Fondo | 0 Comentarios

MFS Investment Management held its 2017 European Investment Forum on September 28-29, in London, an event that focused on the culture and investment philosophy of the Boston-based international asset management firm and offered its perspective on the challenges facing its clients. Through various presentations, the firm’s investment teams presented the outlook for its fixed income, equity and multi-asset strategies as well.

MFS’ CEO, President and CIO, Michael Roberge, reviewed the firm’s key differentiating attributes, and William J. Adams, CIO of Global Fixed Income, walked clients through the firm’s spectrum of fixed income capabilities. Attendees were then able to meet with MFS Meridian Funds’ managers, who shared the investment objectives, key features, current positioning and future outlook for each of the asset classes in which they invest.

The event was attended by the MFS Meridian Funds Global Opportunistic Bond Fund’s portfolio manager Pilar Gómez-Bravo, the MFS Meridian Funds Emerging Markets Debt Fund’s institutional portfolio manager Robert M. Hall, the MFS Meridian Funds U.S. Corporate Bond Fund’s portfolio manager Robert Persons, the multi-asset MFS Meridian Funds Global Total Return Fund’s institutional portfolio manager Katrina Mead, and the MFS Meridian Funds Prudent Capital Fundy Prudent Wealth Fund’sportfolio manager Barnaby Wiener.

An active management firm

Lina Medeiros, president of MFS International Limited, hosted the event and welcomed attendees from Germany, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, France, Portugal and the United Kingdom. During her presentation, she reminded those present that MFS continues to seek investment opportunities for its clients around the world. “Today we are one of the top active asset managers, focusing on what is important -a company’s fundamentals- to provide the returns that clients expect. This focus results in low-turnover and high active share portfolios.”

For MFS, having an integrated global research platform, in which ideas are developed and heard, translates into better performance. While performance over 3- and 5-year periods is important, MFS is pleased to deliver strong over longer time horizons, according to Medeiros.

“For the 10-year period ending on July 31, 2017, 93% of our MFS Meridian Funds Assets are in the top half of their respective Morningstar categories. In addition, approximately 70% of these funds’ assets are in the top quartile compared to their Morningstar peer groups. As a management firm that has been in existence since 1924, we know we can take a long-term perspective on how we invest. We marry that long-term perspective with a disciplined, repeatable investment process.”

Medeiros emphasized the importance for MFS to demonstrate its culture and values through its managers’ different presentations. “We treat our clients honestly, with as much transparency as possible regarding our approach, our products and our people. We are a company based on teamwork and collaboration, which we believe drives better decision-making. We are not satisfied, nor are we complacent, with our achievements; we must continually strive to achieve high standards, especially in the dynamic industry in which we work and in an increasingly complex world where intellectual curiosity is vital. Everything changes so fast that without that intellectual curiosity, it would be easy to fall behind.”

For MFS, it’s essential to do the right thing for its clients, employees and communities. They take their responsibility very seriously, as it is vital to manage clients’ assets prudently. “We are passionate about client service and about the MFS culture. We like what we do and we believe in what we do. It is precisely our values that have helped us to create a sustainable and diversified business.”

With more than EUR 400 billion in assets under management at the end of the third quarter of 2017, MFS has a diversified client base of institutional and retail clients globally, which allows it to bring efficiencies of scale in major markets around the world. At the asset class level, they have also developed in-depth experience in all areas of equities, fixed income and multi-asset class investing.

What are clients’ main worries?

In order to get a better understanding of the concerns of institutional investors, financial advisors and professional fund buyers, MFS commissioned a study in which it sought to know the sentiment of investors. Medeiros also referenced an independent study at the event, which sought to uncover the factors that motivate their investors’ decisions.

For professionals surveyed in the 2016 MFS Active Management Investment Sentiment Study -500 financial advisors, 220 institutional investors and 125 professional buyers – the main concern is a sharp drop in the markets. This is followed closely by global geopolitical instability. For the retail financial advisers (1,628) and professional fund buyers (670) surveyed in the NMG Global Investment & Brand Study, cited by MFS at the event, long-term performance was the most decisive factor, followed by the consistency and quality of the investment process. “Investors are as worried about how the results are obtained, as about the results themselves,” Medeiros added.

The signals sent by the market

There are numerous forces that are changing the value chain in all aspects of the financial services industry. Companies are shifting their business models to meet current challenges. According to MFS, facing all the factors that are challenging the industry – the backlash against globalization, the move toward passive and heightened regulatory scrutiny – it is imperative to have conviction in what they do and in how they do it. “Sometimes clients ask us why we don’t offer a certain product or capability. If it turns out that the capability is needed for clients in the long run, in a strategy where we feel we can add alpha, we will develop it. But, if it’s just a fad, we will pass. We cannot emphasize enough the fact that we are active managers. Now more than ever, when the tide of passive investment has raised all markets, it’s important that we remain on course.”

How to Invest in Funds Affiliated with Not One But Two Nobel Prize in Economics Winners

| For Gabriela Huerta | 0 Comentarios

Richard H. Thaler received the 2017 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. Back in 2002 the recipient was Dr. Daniel Kahneman. They both are associated with Fuller & Thaler Asset Management. Founded in 1993, the company has pioneered the application of behavioral finance in investment management taking advantage of over or under reactions in the stock market.

Primarily focused on U.S. small-cap equities, they offer tailored strategies which include two mutual funds as well as separately managed accounts. As Benjamin Johnson, Associate Director at the firm, told Funds Society, they would be open to potential new opportunities with Latin American family offices.

They currently also have two mutual funds that invest in small caps and one would be considered a US Small-cap blend strategy –the Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHSX), as well as a sub-adviser for a US Small-cap Value focused mutual fund offered by JPMorgan Distribution Services, the Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund (UBVLX).

According to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, “Thaler’s contributions have built a bridge between the economic and psychological analyses of individual decision-making. His empirical findings and theoretical insights have been instrumental in creating the new and rapidly expanding field of behavioural economics, which has had a profound impact on many areas of economic research and policy.”

Thaler has written six books and several articles. He also performed a Cameo in the 2015 movie The Big Short, were he explains the psychological fallacy of a hot hand to help reveal how a key part of the financial crisis came about.

OMGI Global Markets Forum Brought Together over 50 Latam and US Offshore Business Professionals at its Annual Boston Conference

| For Fórmate a Fondo | 0 Comentarios

Old Mutual Global Investors held its conference’s fourth edition in Boston on September 20^th and 21^st. This event was attended by more than 50 industry professionals from the main US Offshore business centers in the United States – Miami, New York, San Francisco, Houston, San Antonio – and major markets in Latin America – Santiago, Montevideo, Lima, and Bogota.

After a brief presentation of the agenda by Chris Stapleton, Head of Americas Distribution, Allan Macleod, Head of International Distribution, welcomed the attendees and presented the latest corporate level changes experienced by Old Mutual Global Investors (OMGI). Its parent company Old Mutual plc, is going through a process of splitting the business into four new independent units. This ‘managed separation’ which began in March 2016 is expected to be completed by the end of March 2018. Following this, Old Mutual Emerging Markets, Old Mutual Wealth, Nedbank, and OMAM, will operate separately.

Furthermore, he mentioned that OMGI’s single strategy business, will start operating as a separate entity from its multi-asset strategy business, which is distributed through Old Mutual Wealth, and which is mainly carried out in the United Kingdom. The details of the organizational structure of the new entity are still pending.

In terms of business volume, the project which began in 2012 with US$ 17.9 billion and 162 employees, and a clear inclination for the UK business – which at that time represented 95% of its client base, and with only 2 people engaged in the international distribution business, is now a reality with US$ 47.4 billion dollars in assets under management (figures at the end of Q2 2017) and 292 employees, including 22 members of the international team, with presence in London, Edinburgh, Zurich, Milan, Singapore and Hong Kong, along with Boston, Miami and Montevideo, through entities affiliated with Old Mutual.

“For the third consecutive year, our net business in terms of international clients is higher than the UK business. And, this does not mean that we are having a bad year in the UK, where we are third in the market. We are having a fantastic year, but the international side is even stronger,” he pointed out.

Among the features that distinguish Old Mutual from the competition, Macleod pointed out that OMGI is an investment-led business in which there is no chief investment officer, since each of the strategies has its own investment process, its own philosophy, and its own profit and loss account. Which is something that provides a series of benefits, the most obvious being the fact that it allows business diversification. “We have some portfolio managers who operate based on the fundamentals, others who follow a systematic approach, while certain managers base their operations only on macro factors and others only focus on stock selection. But they all have active management with a high alpha in common.”

With respect to the firm’s culture, OMGI identifies itself as a small-sized asset manager, and has the intention of remaining so, displaying an extremely flat structure, something that is reflected in the fact that both the portfolio managers and the sales representatives have remained in the firm, which is especially significant in London which has a high turnover ratio in the sector. Another key factor has been the incorporation of talent from other large firms such as Schroders, BlackRock, Invesco, with Nick Payne, Head of Emerging Global Equities, and his team being the latest recruits.
As for the Americas team, the unit went from consisting solely of Allan Macleod and Chris Stapleton, to include five other people: Andrés Munho, Head of Sales LatAm, Santiago Sacias, Regional Manager for the Southern Cone, Francisco Rubio, Sales Specialist for Americas Offshore, and Valentina Rullo and Collen Rennie, as part of the sales support team.

The Event’s Agenda

Following the introduction came the turn of the investment specialists; Mark Nash, Head of Global Bonds shared his vision on how the withdrawal of monetary stimuli by central banks will affect the global fixed-income market.

Then, Josh Crabb, Head of Asian Equities, pointed out that despite the latest rally in Asian markets, valuations remain reasonable and the probability of making money in the next 12 months is very high. In turn, Old Mutual Gold & Silver FundManager, Ned Naylor-Leyland, spoke of the return of gold to its traditional role as means of facilitating trade, particularly in the East.

Before lunch, Ian Heslop, Head of Global Equities and Justin Wells, Global Equity Investments’ Director, commented on the difficulty of predicting macroeconomic events and their effect on markets, as well as the importance of active investment in the current market.

Following the break, Paul Shanta, Manager of the Old Mutual Absolute Return Government Bond Fund, explained the opportunities created in the interest rate market and inflation after the growth spurt in Europe. In emerging markets, Nick Payne, Manager of the Old Mutual Global Emerging Markets Fund, noted that the gradual withdrawal of monetary stimulus by the Fed should not divert the course of these markets. Meanwhile, Ian Ormiston, Manager of the Old Mutual European (ex UK) Smaller Companies Fund, commented on the importance of investing in companies rather than countries in order to find opportunities in the European region.

The day was brought to a close by David Sandham, an investment writer who moderated the discussion between Ian Heslop, Mark Nash, and Ian Ormiston, where it became clear that each strategy is free to choose its own investment process and philosophy, giving differing degrees of importance to economic factors, markets or companies.

Investing with a micro or macro approach, which side wins the debate?

During his speech in the discussion panel, Mark Nash advocated the importance of macroeconomic factors for recognizing the moment for exiting the market, something that in his opinion is decisive in generating an excess return.”Macro investment will return with the withdrawal of monetary policy stimulus, as markets resume their ability to price assets, and more importantly, when divergence between different economies begins to emerge. Volatility will then return to the macro and opportunities in operations with currency and interest rates will appear. How will these movements affect the price of assets? It’s something directly related to the level of current interest rates and where they are headed. We believe asset prices will not rise, especially as long as the central banks maintain a gradual withdrawal.”

He also pointed out the importance of geopolitical events as a factor that will shape fundamentals in bond markets: “The Brexit referendum, Trump, the forthcoming elections in Italy, introduce some de-correlation in the markets, creating opportunities in macroeconomic level opportunities, at least in fixed income markets”.

However, while Ian Heslop acknowledges the importance of macroeconomic factors in the determination of asset prices, he points out that the problem lies in the lack of capacity to predict interest rate behavior and then trying to construct a portfolio based on the shape taken by the yield curve. “Our team made a conscious decision not to take that road, given the difficulty of getting it right. While we do not make explicit predictions, if we are capturing our predictions in the portfolio, we obviously do so implicitly.”

Meanwhile, Ian Ormiston commented that it is generally believed that asset prices depend on fundamentals, when in fact they depend on investment flows. In turn, the latter depend on the various bets that investors are making in the market. “There is always the possibility of market distortion at any moment, pushing prices away from fundamentals, and that is when the opportunities appear.”

Regarding whether the asset management team should have a committed relationship with the company’s management team, Ormiston again stressed the importance of knowing the corporate governance apparatus, since many opportunities for investment can be derived from this. “If we talk about the cultural differences in Europe, the culture of each company is linked to sociological factors, which although important are difficult to quantify. At OMGI, we have the opportunity to manage our portfolios as if the business was our own; we have their confidence because we have the right motivations. It is extremely important to know a CEO’s motivation. In Europe, it is quite common to find businesses managed by families, so we have to be careful when it comes to how the management is aligned with our interests. We are investors, we need to be sure that these managers will deliver credibility and sustainability, although to be fair, we must admit that the first filter is quantitative, if the characteristics of the balance are not good, the stock is not considered.”

With an opposing approach, Ian Helsop acknowledged that while the quality of the management team is an important issue to be understood, since Reg FD (Fair Disclosure) was issued by the SEC, the management team cannot provide more information than what can be extracted from the balance sheet and from the income statement. In particular, he recalls an occasion when, after having spent a lot of time and effort in preparing the questions, before he actually finished asking each question, the firm’s investor relations representative began to answer, because he already had a predetermined answer for it. However, Heslop did acknowledge that when you move down the market cap scale, a relationship with company management does become more important.

Finally, Helsop also added that his fund’s investment philosophy can be summed up as “today’s search for stocks which investors will want to buy tomorrow” and disclosed its investment methodology: “In order to invest efficiently, we have to have a good knowledge of fundamentals and information at the company level, plus a good understanding of how the macro part will affect the company. But I think there are better ways to understand a company than to perform a traditional bottom-up and top-down analysis, such as trying to understand where investors are positioned in the markets, something that later translates into the styles and themes that are used in the portfolio. This bias derives from the market, rather than having a country or sector bias drawn from macroeconomic factors.”

Trying To Pick Winners Is Not Enough

| For Gabriela Huerta | 0 Comentarios

Deciding on the most fitting vehicles to implement a strategy is no easy task. The investments we want to own in the portfolio can conflict with the investments we need to own. Human nature creates bias, which leads us to desire investments that have recently performed well, potentially hindering us when the market turns. These biases can also create concentrations that can leave the portfolio woefully off-balance at times, potentially limiting its ability to deliver the return goals we seek.

Investing should be about the windshield—not the rearview mirror. Everything you choose should ultimately be valued by its ability to enhance your portfolio’s potential performance against its benchmark (which should represent your return and risk targets). If it doesn’t raise the level of expected risk-adjusted return—either by enhancing future returns or reducing risk—then it shouldn’t go in your portfolio.

Important questions to ask

When evaluating an investment, investors should ask: (1) How does it align with your overall investment strategy and objectives? (2) What could cause it to gain or lose value, and by how much? and (3) How does it work with the other holdings in your portfolio? Finally, if you decide to include it in the portfolio, (4) How much of it should you own?

Assessing the choices

The selections are vast. Individual stocks may offer terrific upside, and individual bonds can offer permanence and definition, but both security types also bring security-specific risk that can be undiversifiable in a portfolio, and thus, tough to recover from if anything goes wrong. Owning a stock that doubles in price is terrific to share at cocktail parties, but remember that if the stock can go up a lot, it also has the ability to fall a lot. Just ask anyone that owned internet stocks in 2001 or energy stocks in 2015. Big winners can be great to brag about, but big losers can wreak havoc on a portfolio.

Examining mutual funds extends beyond looking up rankings and reading analysts’ reports. Evaluating each fund’s track record is important. However, don’t simply screen for top performers, but rather understand each fund’s performance, and how it was created. How have both the fund and its benchmark performed in a variety of market environments, in terms of both risk and return? What types of markets does the fund do well in (both absolute and relative to its peers/benchmark), and when does it lag?

If you’re considering exchange-traded funds (ETFs), many factors play a role in selection, but cost is usually a big determinant. In addition to fees, you should also consider implicit costs, including your cost of trading, and the ETF’s own rebalancing costs. Whether you seek a targeted or broad market exposure, ensure the ETF you choose provides what you’re looking for, without introducing additional market factors. In addition, examine the ETF’s liquidity and structure. Is it truly an ETF, or is it really structured like a unit investment trust in an ETF wrapper? This can be an inefficient way to track the index you’re seeking to mirror. Is the ETF connected to an index mutual fund? This will potentially cause it to lose some of its tax efficiency. These issues are easily avoided with a little research.

Whether you’re after mutual funds or ETFs, one common question should be, “Is the manager who runs this product any good at it?” Answering this question involves evaluating the manager’s tools, experience, process, and history. Two products could have similar returns over a five-year period. One delivered an amazing return for one of those years, combined with four so-so years, while the other delivered four years of above average performance and one year that was a little below. Which of these two would you rather own in the future?

Asking the right due diligence questions

Researching and choosing from the ever-growing number of options can be time consuming and confusing. A disciplined investment selection process helps a portfolio to potentially capture the returns the market offers, while limiting the decisions that either unintentionally lever bets or reduce diversification—either of which can negatively impact its ability to generate the return goal.

When adding something new to your portfolio, two key thoughts to consider: (1) Does it offer something unique that the portfolio doesn’t currently have, or is it increasing the bet on something I already own? And (2) What do I plan to sell in order to buy it, and what happens when I remove that security from the portfolio? You don’t automatically become better diversified simply because your list of “best ideas” gets longer.

Selecting the right investments is a lot more than choosing what you think will go up the most in the future. It also involves owning a few things that you likely aren’t happy to own—this is where real diversification comes from. At BlackRock, in-depth knowledge on every investment being considered is gleaned by putting each through rigorous analysis. It’s critical to devote the necessary time to this step in the portfolio construction process, or find ways to outsource it to a party capable of conducting the necessary, ongoing research.

Build on Insight, by BlackRock, written by Patrick Nolan, CFA

Investing involves risks, including possible loss of principal.
In Latin America and Iberia, for institutional investors and financial intermediaries only (not for public distribution). This material is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or an offer or solicitation to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any shares of any fund or security and it is your responsibility to inform yourself of, and to observe, all applicable laws and regulations of your relevant jurisdiction. If any funds are mentioned or inferred in this material, such funds have not been registered with the securities regulators of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Portugal, Spain Uruguay or any other securities regulator in any Latin American or Iberian country and thus, may not be publicly offered in any such countries. The securities regulators of any country within Latin America or Iberia have not confirmed the accuracy of any information contained herein. No information discussed herein can be provided to the general public in Latin America or Iberia. The contents of this material are strictly confidential and must not be passed to any third party.
This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of September 2017 and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this post are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by BlackRock, its officers, employees or agents. This post may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this post is at the sole discretion of the reader.
©2017 BlackRock, Inc. All rights reserved. BLACKROCK is a registered trademark of BlackRock, Inc., or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.
256132