Pricing is one of the most important financial levers that companies have at their disposal to influence the financial success of their business. However, it is not an easy task.
As Tayfun Uslu, Finance Expert at Toptal states, firstly, pricing affects multiple stakeholders, both inside and outside the company. “Experimenting with pricing is therefore not a task that should be taken lightly. Secondly, finding the right price is notoriously hard. Customer preferences are hard to gauge ex-ante, and internally, it can be difficult to foresee the effects of pricing changes on the financial performance of a company. And finally, of course, pricing doesn’t happen in a vacuum. In any competitive market, pricing changes can often lead to retaliatory actions which end up canceling out the intended effect of the pricing adjustment.”
With this in mind, techniques and methods for getting around these challenges, such as Software as a Service (SaaS) are extremely useful. In his experience, “the SaaS business model and its delivery mechanism have important ramifications related to pricing which, in turn, can be extremely useful in the financial management of your company” and, amongst other things, very pricing-friendly. Reason why he believes the shift to SaaS from On-Premises software is likely to continue at a steady pace.
To know more about the ramifications and benefits of SaaS, visit Toptal.
Whilst the equity research industry worldwide has endured substantial declines since 2007, there are still roughly 10,000 analysts employed by investment banks, brokerages, and boutique research firms. And even more analysts offer their services independently or on a freelance basis, and there are still more voices in the crowd contributing to blogs or sites like SeekingAlpha.
The reason for the above is clear: equity research provides a very useful function in our current financial markets. Research analysts share their insights and industry knowledge with investors who may not have them, or may not have the time to develop them. Relationships with equity research teams can also provide valuable perks, such as corporate access, to institutional investors.
Nevertheless, despite its obvious importance, the profession has come under fire in recent years.
Analysts’ margin of error has been studied, and some clear trends have been identified. Some onlookers bemoan the sell-side’s role in stimulating equity market cyclicality.
In some cases, outright conflicts of interest muddle the reliability of research, which has prompted regulation in major financial markets. These circumstances have generated distrust, with many hoping for an overhaul of the business model.
With the above in mind, I’ve divided this article into two sections. The first section outlines what I believe the main value of equity research is for both sophisticated and retail investors. The second looks at the pitfalls of this profession and its causes, and how you should be evaluating research in order to avoid these issues.
Why Equity Research is Valuable
Sophisticated Professional Investors
As sophisticated or experienced investors, you likely have your own set of highly developed valuation techniques and qualitative criteria for investments. You will almost certainly do your own due diligence before investing, so outside parties’ recommendations may have limited relevance.
Even with your wealth of experience, here are some things to consider.
To maximize the use of your time, buy-side professionals should focus on the research aspects that complement their internal capacities. Delegation is vital for every successful business, and asset management is no different. External parties’ research can help you:
Secure enhanced corporate access
Gain deeper insights
Outsource tedious, low-ROI research
Generate ideas
Gain context
Enhanced Corporate Access
Regulations prevent corporate management teams from selectively providing material information to investors, which creates limitations for large fund managers, who often need specific information when evaluating a stock.
To circumvent this, fund managers often have the opportunity to meet corporate management teams at events, hosted by sell-side firms that have relationships with executives of their research subjects.
Buy-side clients and corporate management teams often attend conferences that include one-on-one meetings and breakout sessions with management, giving institutional investors a chance to ask specific questions.
Language around corporate strategies, such as expansion plans, turnarounds, or restructuring, can be vague in conference calls and filings, so one-on-one meetings provide an opportunity to drill down on these plans to confirm feasibility.
Tactful management teams can confirm the legitimacy and plausibility of strategic plans without violating regulations, and it should quickly become obvious if that plan is ill-conceived.
Institutional clients of sell-side firms also have the opportunity to communicate the most relevant topics that they want to see addressed by company management in quarterly earnings conference calls and reports.
Deeper Insight
The sell-side analyst’s public role and relationship with corporate management also allows him to strategically probe for deeper insights. Generally, good equity research demonstrates the analyst’s emphasis on teasing out information that is most relevant to institutional clients. This often requires artful posing of incisive questions, which allows management teams to reach an optimal balance of financial outlook disclosure.
Buy-side analysts and investors have a massive volume of sell-side research to comb through, especially during earnings season, so succinct, analytical pieces are always more valuable than reports that simply relay information presented in press releases and financial filings. If these revelations echo the interest or concerns of investors, the value is immediately apparent.
Outsourcing Tedious or Low-ROI Aspects of Research
Smaller buy-side shops may lack the resources to monitor entire sectors for important trends. These asset managers can effectively widen their net by consuming research reports. Sell-side analysts tend to specialize in a specific industry, so they closely track the performance of competitors and external factors that might have sector-wide influence. This provides some context and nuance that might otherwise go unnoticed when concentrating on a smaller handful of positions and candidates.
Research reports can also be useful ways for shareholders to spot subtle red flags that might not be apparent without carefully reading through lengthy financial filings in their entirety. Red flags might include changes to reporting, governance issues, off-balance sheet items, and so forth.
Buy-side investors will of course dig into these issues on their own, but it’s useful to have multiple eyes (and perspectives) on portfolio constituents that may number in the hundreds. Likewise, building a historical financial model can be time consuming without providing the best ROI for shops with limited resources. Sell-side analysts build competent enough models, and investors can maximize their added value by focusing entirely on superior forecasting or a more capable analysis of the prepared financials.
Idea Generation
Identifying investment opportunities falls under the umbrella of tedious activities since effectively screening an entire market/sector can be overwhelming for a smaller team at some buy-side shops. As such, idea generation has become an important element of some sell-side firms’ offerings. This is especially pronounced regarding small and medium cap stocks, which may be unknown or unfamiliar, to institutional investors.
It’s simply impractical for most buy-side teams to cover the entire investable universe.
Research teams fill a niche by identifying promising smaller stocks or analyzing unheralded newcomers to the market.They can then bring this to the attention of institutional investors for further scrutiny.
Creating Context
Reports might be most useful for sophisticated investors as an opportunity to develop a meta perspective. Stock prices are heavily influenced by short-term factors, so investors can learn about price movements by monitoring the research landscape as a whole.
Consuming research also allows investors to take the temperature of the industry, so to speak, and compare current circumstances to historical events. History has a way of repeating itself in the market, which is driven in part by the industry’s tendency to shake during crashes, and pull in new professionals during bull runs.
Having a detached perspective can help shed light on cyclical trends, making it easier to identify ominous signals that might be lost on the less acquainted eye. In turn, this drives idea generation for new investing opportunities.
With that being said, investors should not consume research that only confirms their own bias, a powerful force that has clearly contributed to historical booms and busts in the market.
Retail Investors
The value of equity research is much more straightforward for retail investors, who are usually less technically proficient than their institutional counterparts.
Retail investors vary substantially in sophistication, but they mostly lack the resources available to institutional investors. Research can supplement deficiencies on some basic levels, helping investors with modeling guidance, framing an investment narrative, identifying relevant issues, or providing buy/sell recommendations.
These are great starting points for retail investors seeking value out of research. Individuals probably can’t consume the sheer volume of reports that asset managers can, so they should lean on the expertise of trustworthy professionals.
What are the risks associated with equity research?
Despite the above, there are clear risks to over-relying on equity reports to make trading decisions. To properly assess the dangers of equity research, one must consider the incentives and motivations of research producers.
Regulations, professional integrity, and scrutiny from clients and peers all play significant roles in keeping research honest, but other factors are also at play. Research consumers should be mindful of the producer’s business model. I highlight the five key issues below.
Equity research can be exaggerated due to the need to drive trading volumes
Reports that are produced by banks and brokers are usually created for the purpose of driving revenues. Sell-side equity research is usually an add-on business to investment banks that earn significant fees as brokers and/or market makers in traded securities and commodities.
As a result of this, research tends to focus on highlighting opportunities for buying and selling stocks. If research reports only included forecasts of “steady” performance, this would result in less trading activity. The incentive for research analysts is therefore to come out with predictions of a change in performance (whether up or down).
This isn’t to say the content of the research is compromised, but that opinions on directional changes in performance may be exaggerated.
Numerous academic studies and industry white papers are dedicated to estimating the magnitude of analyst error. The findings have varied over time, between studies and among different market samples. But all consistently find that analyst estimates are not particularly accurate.
Andrew Stotz indicates an average EPS (earnings per share) estimate error of 25 percent from 2003 to 2015, with an annual minimum under 10 percent and annual maximum over 50 percent.
Research analysts may avoid criticizing companies they cover due to the need to maintain a positive working relationship
Another important point to consider is that analysts generally benefit from having a positive working relationship with the executive management and investor-relations teams of their research subjects.
Analysts rely on corporate management teams to provide more specific and in-depth information on company performance that is not otherwise publicly provided.
Brokers also provide value to investors by providing seminars and one-on-one meetings that are attended by those executive teams, so a strong roster of presenters at conferences can be dependent on the relationships built by the research teams.
I’ve witnessed the negative impact of a souring relationship: One of the tech analysts at a company I worked for was covering a small-cap stock and built up a good relationship with both the corporate management team and the investor relations person who worked with them. Being a small company, this visibility was valuable to the research subject.
Poor results one quarter were downplayed by management as a temporary speed bump, but the analyst had concerns that these were longer-term problems.
The executive team was upset when the subsequent report negatively portrayed the recent events, and soon thereafter withdrew from an upcoming conference our research firm hosted. The analyst’s bonus compensation suffered as a result as well.
Obviously, this all has very serious implications.
Sell-side analysts tend to produce reports that portray their subjects favorably, and they are more likely to set attainable expectations. It also means that analysts may hesitate to downgrade a company’s stock. This is especially true when poor executive management would be the primary culprit causing a downgrade. All of this may help explain why EPS estimates are disproportionately bullish (see chart 2).
Research analysts may avoid making contrarian calls due to the need to maintain good reviews and a trusted reputation.
Equity research reports are influenced by the means by which analyst quality is measured. Analysts compete with peers at rival banks.
Taking a contrarian stand that results in bad recommendations could genuinely harm an analyst’s compensation and career prospects. These mechanisms create a herd-like mentality.
This can be extremely detrimental if it goes unnoticed or unaddressed by research consumers. These are precisely the sorts of circumstances that fuel bubbles. It’s hard to look especially foolish if everyone else looks foolish too.
Independent equity research may be sensationalized due to the need to stand out.
Research produced by independent firms, which substantially derive all revenues from the sale of research and do not maintain a brokerage business, is not meant to motivate trading.
This eliminates some of the conflicts of interest inherent in the sell-side banks, putting extra emphasis on accuracy. However, independent and boutique analysts are tasked with creating income by selling something that’s been largely commoditized, and they compete with banks that have vast resources.
To survive, they have to offer something specialized or contrarian. Their philosophy must radically depart from the herd. They have to claim special industry knowledge through independent channels, or they must cover stocks that are largely uncovered by the larger powers in the research space.
This creates the incentive for sensationalized research that can attract attention amongst the sea of competing reports.
Putting it all together
As we have seen, there are important facets of the equity research profession that often lead to skewed incentive mechanisms, and may ultimately compromise the quality of research being done.
To be fair, the practice of making complex and precise forecasts is necessarily flawed by the requirement to make assertions about future conditions, which by definition are unknowns.
Nevertheless, whilst this might be acceptable if the errors appeared random and with a predictable margin of error, this is not the case.
According to Factset research, consensus 12-month forward EPS estimates for S&P constituents were about 10 percent higher than the actual figures for the years 1997-2011. These numbers are skewed by large misses, and the median error is only 5.5 percent, but several important conclusions can be drawn:
Analysts tend to be too bullish. In 10 of those 15 years, consensus estimates were higher than the reported figures.
Analysts were especially bad at navigating recession periods, overcooking their numbers by 36 percent in 2001 and 53 percent in 2008. The error is less extreme for years with rapid EPS growth. Forecasts only lagged actual results by eight percent in 2010, indicating asymmetric tendencies to misforecast earnings.
How can you avoid equity research pitfalls?
There are several ways that consumers of research reports can judge the validity and quality of such reports,in light of what’s been discussed above.
Analyst Credentials
Analyst credentials are an obvious method for vetting quality. CFA designations don’t necessarily guarantee quality, but it indicates a baseline level of competency.
Research produced by reputable banks ensures that it was created and reviewed by a team of professionals with impressive resumes and highly competitive skills. Likewise, veterans of big banks who leave to start an independent shop have been implicitly endorsed by the HR departments of their former employers.
Producers can also be distinguished by specialized backgrounds, for example former doctors turned healthcare analysts or engineers weighing in on industrial/energy stocks. If the analyst has been recognized in financial media, it usually indicates extremely high quality.
Analyst Track Record
Investors can also look at historical analyst recommendations and forecasts to determine their credibility.
Institutional Investor provides a service that tracks analyst performance, and there are similar resources available, especially for investors with deep pockets.
Fintech startups, such as Estimize, actually focus on attracting and monitoring analyst recommendations to identify the most talented forecasters.
However, while third-parties and financial media offer helpful ranking systems based on earnings forecasts or performance of analyst recommendations, these tend to put a lot of emphasis on short-term accuracy. This might therefore be less useful for consumers with a long-term approach or emphasis on navigating black swans.
Investors should consider these factors and look for red flags that an analyst is hesitant to turn bearish. These could include shifting base assumptions to maintain growth forecasts and target prices, suddenly shifting emphasis away from the short-term to the long-term outlook, or perhaps an apparent disconnect between the material presented in the article and the analyst’s conclusions.
Investors should also consider context.
Some stocks simply don’t lend themselves to reliable research. They might have volatile financial results, an unproven business model, untrustworthy management, or limited operating history, all of which can lead to wide margins of error for earnings growth and intrinsic value.
The business cycle’s phase is also extremely important. Research shows that forecasts are less reliable in downturns, but investors are also more likely to rely most heavily on research during these times. Failure to recognize these issues can severely limit one’s ability to glean full value from research.
Research consumers should also make sure they know their own investment goals and be mindful about how these differ from those implied by research reports. A temporal mismatch or disconnect in risk aversion could completely alter the applicability of reports.
Consume a lot of research, and hold analysts accountable
For those fund managers wishing for a more reliable research product, the most effective move is to vote with your wallets, and buy reports from the most accurate and conflict-free sources.
It might be expensive to source research from multiple sources, but there’s value in diversifying the viewpoints to which you are exposed. It’s unlikely that you will move on from low-quality research if that’s all you are reading.
Additionally, consuming a large volume of research from different sources helps forge a meta perspective, allowing investors to identify and overcome worrisome trends in research.
Equity Research Continues to be Useful, but Should be Consumed Thoughtfully
The equity research industry has undergone profound changes in recent years, due to regulatory changes, the emergence of independent research shops, as well as more automated methods of analyzing public company performance.
At the same time, smart investors are looking at broader sets of investments and taking a more active approach to research. This is facilitated by the increasing quantity of publicly available information on listed companies.
Nevertheless, good research continues to be extremely valuable. It lets you manage a wider pipeline of investment opportunities and be more efficient.
An informed and thoughtful approach can enhance the value of research reports for investors, so asset managers can better serve clients (and their own bottom lines) by considering the content above.
Research consumers need to be wary of predictable errors, analyst incentives, conflicts of interest, and the prevalence of herd-like mentality.
If you can adjust your interpretation of research along these lines, then you can focus on the most valuable aspects of research, namely idea generation, corporate access, and delegation of time-consuming activities.
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainNational Doral Golf Course. IV torneo de golf de Funds Society
Funds Society will host its IV Golf Tournament on Thursday, March 9th, at the National Doral Golf Course (Golden Palm). At the event, participants will be able to take the opportunity to discuss about Global Markets along with portfolio managers from Henderson Global Investors and M&G Investments, followed by a golf tournament and networking reception.
Spanning from 9:30 in the morning with a welcome breakfast, followed by chats with Guy Barnard and Chrisophe Machu, a lunch and the tournament, which will conclude with a cocktail and prize ceremony starting at 6:00pm, participants will enjoy an all day event at the National Doral Golf Course at 4400 NW 87th Ave, Doral, FL 33178.
To RSVP, please email info@fundssociety.com or call +1 786 254 7149.
2017 will, not in the least, be a quieter year than 2016, and from Amundi analysts point out three key issues to watch: the consequences of Donald Trump’s presidency in the US, the upcoming elections in Europe, and the negotiations over Brexit which, according to Philippe Ithurbide, Global Head of Analysis and Strategy in Amundi, are not priced into the markets. “The consequences for Europe and the United Kingdom will be greater than is believed, and the probability for the UK to get everything it wants is zero: you cannot have everything without paying a price for it.” The expert, who does not believe that the process will be canceled, or that it will be short, predicts long negotiations, lasting many years, which will lead to painful consequences for both the EU and the British. But, despite all of the above, his star commitment for this year is the European stock exchange.
In 2017, growth will not expand beyond 3% (with the exception of markets such as Brazil, Russia or the USA, which will increase their growth), due to the impetus of protectionism, the fall of global trade, and the weakness of the investments, and in which neither is inflation going to spiral (in more than 80 countries throughout the world, the expectations of inflation surpass reality, in some cases there are negative inflations and in Europe it has not arrived yet, he says), the expert explains that the fund management company plans to reduce positions in US stocks and bonds markets (in which they strongly positioned themselves months ago) and to allocate part of those investments to Europe (both stocks and credit) and also to the emerging world.
“In the United States, markets have risen greatly, but neither growth, nor inflation, nor the Fed justify those levels,” explains Ithurbide, who only expects two rate hikes in the US during the year. “After the election, the market became more expensive and we decided not to be short because the momentum was there, but now we can say that the US market is preparing a bubble,” he adds.
He says, however, “in European equities, valuations are more attractive, there is more potential for profit growth, and dividends are the highest in the developed world,” he adds. Which is something that Alexandre Drabowicz, global Co-Head of Equity in Amundi, confirms: “Unlike at other times when profit expectations were high, this year starts from a very low base so that there is room for surprises” , He says, and predicts improvements in sectors such as energy and banks. The management company does not think there will be a re-rating of the asset, but believes that the European stock exchange will be revalued due to the effect of profits, as the expert expects a growth of 10%, coupled with dividend yields of 4% that lead him to predict “very decent returns”.
The fund manager is also very positive with the Japanese stock exchange, which has been the best after the US elections, due to the effect of a low yen, and where he sees “tremendous opportunities from a stock picking point of view”, also in part because of the inflows that will come from pension fund investments and the return of foreign investors, net sellers of the asset last year, who could begin to return.
Emerging Markets: A constructive vision
Their vision is also very constructive in emerging equities, given the economic adjustment of recent years and improvements in current account balances, their attractive valuations (with a discount of 25% -30% in some markets), their cheap currencies (which will be another catalyst for profitability), and also by the low investor positions: “Many investors are underweight in this asset in their portfolios, but will have to reduce those positions: in 2016 they took a first step when entering into emerging debt, and if they go one step further and enter into emerging equities – even if only to place that underweight in a neutral position – they could strongly boost stock market returns. “
The management company is committed to markets with good stories of internal growth (more so than external, in a world that is decelerating globally) with emphasis on countries such as India (where, for example, they’re playing on banking history, since in the last 18 months more than 200,000 current accounts opened, and it is a market in which Pension funds are opening up their investments to the country’s stock), the Philippines, Russia or China. In Latin America, these stories are harder to find, because their economies are more closely tied to commodities, although Peru would be the country of choice. They are underweight in Brazil and, although they are reducing that position somewhat, they believe that it is difficult to be positive with the political problems facing the country. It would also be difficult to commit to markets like Turkey (where they have not invested for years), but the fund manager does support Mexico’s investment case: “There may be volatility, the peso may fall even further… but we will reassign positions gradually, it is a candidate for it,” he says.
Latin America… Debt is Best
In fact, rather than an attractive market from the point of view of equities, Latin America is so from the point of view of fixed income, according to Abbas Ameli-Renani, emerging markets’strategist. In contrast to their 2014-2016 commitment to Central and Eastern European markets (due to the ECB’s EQ benefits and low inflation; markets which he now considers as overvalued and risky if there is an inflationary rebound), their commitment when it comes to debt in local currency is now on Latin America. Thus, markets like Brazil are attractive, both when considering local currency debt and external debt in hard currency, along with other prominent markets such as Russia or Indonesia. He likes local debt because, in many markets (with some exceptions), inflation is lower than that forecast by central banks, which not only does not lead to rate increases, but which will cause them to be maintained or even for some authorities to adopt an accommodative bias, which is positive for local debt. The exception would be Mexico, but it is a market in which the fund manager is looking for buying opportunities, as the central bank is prepared to support the currency if necessary in the face of Trump’s threats. He does not see the same attraction in Turkey.
Nonetheless, Amundi’s strong conviction overweight is emerging market debt in hard currency, thanks to the improvement of fundamentals in those countries, and reminds us that it is an asset which offers the same return as global shares but with a quarter of its volatility.
Trump: A demon for emerging markets?
The fund manager, who believes that China may be a key risk for emerging markets, explains, however, that although the Trump effect may be seen as negative in these markets because of protectionist rhetoric and the implications of rate hikes by the Fed, it should, in fact, help the emerging world due to the implementation of US tax policy, and the country’s growth, which supports greater global growth. “Historically, when the United States has raised rates, the spreads of emerging countries have narrowed,” he points out. And if the Fed raises rates for the same reason, because there is growth, there is no impact either. “Trump will not necessarily be negative for emerging markets: only if there is a combination of strong protectionism, while at the same time the Fed raises rates very aggressively, will there be an impact, but it is unlikely that both events coincide” he added.
Ecuador appears to be in the mood for change. Lenin Moreno, anointed successor to President Rafael Correa, was predicted to win but now looks unlikely to avoid a run off in elections this weekend. The polls have been narrowing and now even more so after Moreno’s running mate Jorge Glas was implicated in the Petrobas scandal.
A poll last week by Quito-based CEDATOS gave Moreno just a 32 percent share of the vote. He would need to secure a majority of all valid votes or win over 40 percent and a 10 point difference with the closest rival.
Moreno’s threat comes from conservative candidates Guillermo Lasso and Cynthia Viteri. The CEDATOS poll gave Lasso, a banker, 21 percent share of the vote and centre-right lawyer Viteri 14 percent. Another poll is due later this week and one of them is likely to join Moreno in the second round.
Both Lasso and Viteri would be broadly welcomed by international investors. They would represent a pro-business break from the market unfriendly policies of Correa.
But the drop in oil prices has hit the country hard. Oil accounts for over half of Ecuador’s export revenue and nearly a third of government revenue. Unfortunately, the country did not use the good years of high oil prices to sufficiently diversify its economy. Industry and manufacturing are taxed heavily, companies have not invested enough and so remain uncompetitive. The state has swollen even as the private sector has failed to flourish. An inflexible labour market hinders growth.
All of this has seen the country’s external and bilateral debt to China grow again. Last year’s earthquake has compounded the effect of the decline in oil revenue. The upshot is that Analytica estimates that the economy contracted 2.5 percent in 2016 and it is predicted to decline by 1 percent this year.
One of Correa’s legacies is the establishment of a middle class which grew as oil revenues created growth. But that middle class has now grown weary of corruption, inefficiency and stagnation. The election victor will have to prescribe tough medicine to them, and the rest of the country, but who does the prescribing remains to be seen.
Column by Edwin Guttierez, Head of Emerging Market Sovereign Debt at Aberdeen Asset Management.
The seventh annual Morningstar Institutional Conference Europe will be held at the Hotel Okura Amsterdam on 16-17 March 2017. Some 230 investment professionals from across Europe are expected to attend.
The conference will explore key themes relevant to long-term investors through a series of presentations and discussions led by leading investors, academics, and industry experts. The conference agenda offers delegates a holistic view of the current environment, with particular focus on valuation-driven opportunities and behavioural science. The event will also feature Morningstar’s latest thinking in asset allocation, securities research, manager research, and the inclusion of environment, social, and governance (ESG) considerations in portfolios.
Dan Kemp, Chief Investment Officer, EMEA, of Morningstar’s Investment Management group, comments: “Long-term investing, valuation-based investing, inherent behavioural bias, and finding value in deeply challenged markets are themes we have distinctly chosen to deliberate at this year’s conference, in anticipation of a bumpy 2017 for investors. Each speaker offers profound insight on a key area of interest to investors. I look forward to welcoming delegates to Amsterdam for two days of market-leading discussion and debate.”
Headline speakers include Saker Nusseibeh, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Hermes Investment Management, who will deliver the conference opening keynote, “Building a Better Fund Management Industry,” addressing how reputational damage from press and regulator criticisms can discourage investors and impede their ability to reach investment goals. Jeremy Grantham, founder of GMO, will explore the investment implications of climate change in a live interview from Boston, Massachusetts. Attendees will also hear from Gerd Gigerenzer, Director, Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Harding Center for Risk Literacy, a recognised preeminent thought leader in the understanding and communication of risk.
Kunal Kapoor, CEO of Morningstar, Inc., and Daniel Needham, President and Chief Investment Officer of Morningstar’s Investment Management group, will discuss what it means to be a valuation-driven investor and how this principle is applied across Morningstar’s global investment management business. Michael Hasenstab Ph.D., Executive Vice President, Portfolio Manager, and Chief Investment Officer, Templeton, will discuss his valuation-driven approach to fixed-income investing.
Other presenters include:
Christopher Davis, Chairman, Davis Advisors, on the best approach towards superior returns when seeking to invest for the long term in U.S. equities;
Dan Kemp, Chief Investment Officer, EMEA, Morningstar’s Investment Management group, on the seven investment principles designed to help investors overcome behavioural biases and encourage good investor behaviour;
Derek Stuart, Co-Founder and Fund Manager, Artemis Funds, on using a ‘special situation’ approach to investing and its application in the current Brexit environment to identify long-term investment opportunities;
Hilde Jenssen, Lead Product Strategist, Skagen Funds, on how to uncover value in emerging-market equities, one of the cheapest asset classes in recent years, in an environment where value is hard to find;
Isabel Levy, Managing Director – Chief Investment Officer and Founder, Metropole Gestion, on how to employ fundamental industrial analysis to avoid value traps and identify the fair value of European equities;
Dr. Martijn Cremers, Professor of Finance, The University of Notre Dame, on his research about active share portfolios and fund performance; and
Mats Andersson, Vice Chair, Global Challenges Foundation, on why the inclusion of ESG criteria is an essential component of successful long-term investing and how these ideas can be applied by institutional investors in Europe.
During the conference, delegates can attend three breakout streams covering asset allocation, securities research, and manager selection. The sessions will include a discussion about the major factors influencing performance of financial services companies and the impact of the ‘behaviour gap’ on European investors. For the full conference agenda, please click here.
Foto: 526663. Raymond James presenta su plataforma tecnológica "Connected Advisor"
Raymond James is revealing a strategy that bridges its advisor-centric technology infrastructure with collaborative and client-facing digital tools that together comprise its “Connected Advisor” digital advice platform.
The platform fully reflects the firm’s advisor-centric business model, and includes already-released client-facing tools that support digital communications and online collaboration, as well as new capabilities to meet a range of client needs. The new initiatives center around robo-advisor-like technologies, as well as data-driven insights that will help advisors address the more complex needs of higher-net-worth clients.
“This significant, multi-year ongoing investment ensures we continue to be an industry leader in advisor-oriented technology,” said CEO Paul Reilly. “While many industry alternatives seek to disintermediate advisors, Connected Advisor will support advisors and their commitment to serving clients.”
Connected Advisor is focused on three key areas: Greater automation to help advisors more efficiently manage their businesses and their clients’ basic investment management requirements so they can spend more time on building relationships and more fully understanding client needs; Increased collaboration through tools that support online communication and information sharing between advisors and their clients; And enhanced sophistication of proactive financial solutions through the use of big data to provide advisors with insights into their practices and their clients’ needs.
“We are advancing a strategy that has become clear as we’ve spoken with advisors and clients, observed evolving preferences, and watched new technology advances unfold at a rapid pace,” said Executive Vice President of Technology and Operations Bella Allaire. “Our advisors and clients require – and deserve – an even higher level of service and support as they confront new multi-generational challenges, changing regulatory standards and increasingly complex financial needs.”
Among the tools available or rolling out over the coming months are digitally driven data collection, discovery and proposal systems; secure cloud storage and consolidated access to important documents; enhanced mobile capabilities; sophisticated goal planning and monitoring tools; advanced analytics capabilities; and investment options for multigenerational households and varying financial situations.
“We’re focused on providing a platform that reinforces the value of advisors’ affiliation with Raymond James by providing easy-to-use, customizable tools that help them better serve their clients and grow their businesses,” said Chief Information Officer Vin Campagnoli. “These resources will help our advisors increase engagement with clients, improve their understanding of client needs as life, market and economic conditions change, and support the long-term financial planning that is at the core of our offerings.”
Many of the efficiency and collaboration tools at the foundation of the Connected Advisor platform are in place, with the robo-advisor-like technology and data insight features expected to be rolled out in 2017, and other planned enhancements scheduled into next year.
“We’re approaching this as we always do,” said Campagnoli. “We are thoughtfully and deliberately moving forward with a focus on ensuring advisors and clients understand and are leveraging these new offerings, and that we’re listening to their feedback and adjusting to ensure we’re fully meeting their needs.
“I like to say we build our technology tools ‘from the mind of the advisor’ and this platform does that, helping support their already strong client relationships by creating stronger connections and, in turn, better meeting clients’ increasingly complex financial needs.”
Photo: Philippedelavie. Deutsche Bank pagará 629 millones de dólares para cerrar procesos judiciales por negociaciones de valores rusos
Deutsche Bank this week has reached settlements with the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS). The settlements conclude the FCA and the DFS’s investigations into the bank’s anti-money laundering (AML) control function in its investment banking division, including in relation to certain securities trades that occurred between 2011 and 2015 involving its Moscow, London and New York offices.
“The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has today fined Deutsche Bank AG (Deutsche Bank) £163,076,224 for failing to maintain an adequate anti-money laundering (AML) control framework during the period between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2015. This is the largest financial penalty for AML controls failings ever imposed by the FCA, or its predecessor the Financial Services Authority (FSA),” said the FCA in its statement. “Deutsche Bank was used by unidentified customers to transfer approximately $10 billion, of unknown origin, from Russia to offshore bank accounts in a manner that is highly suggestive of financial crime.”
“Under the terms of the settlement agreement with the FCA, Deutsche Bank agreed to pay civil monetary penalties of approximately 163 million pounds (USD 204 million). The bank qualified for a 30 percent discount for agreeing to settle at an early stage of the FCA’s investigation. The FCA noted in its findings that the bank has committed significant resources to improving its AML controls and recognises the work already undertaken in this area. The FCA also noted that the bank has been exceptionally cooperative in bringing the matter to its attention and throughout its investigation,” Deutsche Bank explained in its statement.
Under the terms of the settlement agreement with the DFS, Deutsche Bank entered into a Consent Order, and agreed to pay civil monetary penalties of 425 million dollars and to engage an independent monitor for a term of up to two years.
The settlement amounts are already materially reflected in existing litigation reserves, said the bank.
Foto: ASSY. Pan American Finance contrata a Peter Wallin como asesor senior
Pan American Finance has announced that Peter R. Wallin has joined the firm as Senior Advisor.
Peter comes to Pan American Finance with nearly 40 years of investment banking experience in the Latin American region, having held senior positions with, among others, INTL FCStone, Standard Bank, and Midland Bank.
In his new role, Peter will advise clients on merger and acquisition, project finance, and capital raising transactions across various industries and sectors, including Infrastructure, Oil & Gas, Power, and Real Estate.
Pan American Finance is an independent advisory firm providing investment banking services, including M&A advisory, project finance, and debt & equity capital raising, to business owners and asset managers primarily in the Latin American and U.S. markets.
Canadian asset manager British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (bcIMC) has reached an agreement with Britain-based credit investment firm Hayfin Capital Management to fully acquire the majority shareholding of Hayfin from the existing consortium of institutional shareholders.
Financial details of the transaction, subject to regulatory approval, remain undisclosed.
The deal aims to support Hayfin’s long-term growth plans and simplify its ownership structure. Hayfin’s management and employees remain shareholders alongside bcIMC. Also the new majority shareholder will pour capital into Hayfin’s funds.
“Hayfin’s principal focus will remain managing assets for third parties; the day-to-day independence of the Hayfin team over operations, investments, and personnel will be unaffected by the change in ownership,” stated Hayfin, which has €8.2bn of assets under management.
Tim Flynn, CEO of Hayfin Capital Management, commented: “This long-term investment from bcIMC will provide the access to capital and streamlined ownership structure to realise our ambition of becoming Europe’s leading credit platform. What won’t change under the new ownership arrangements is the independence of Hayfin’s experienced team of credit investment professionals, or our commitment to delivering high-quality returns for the third-party investors whose capital we manage.”
Jim Pittman, senior vice president of private equity at bcIMC added: “We see this as a strategic long-term investment in a leading company that has the potential to generate value-added returns for our clients. Having known the Hayfin team since inception, I’m confident in their strategy and ability to further expand their business and raise additional capital through their funds.”
British Columbia Investment Management Corporation has C$122bn (€86.4bn) in assets under management.
