Funds Society Launches The ETF Usage Survey for Professional Investors in the Non-Resident Market

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Funds Society Launches The ETF Usage Survey for Professional Investors in the Non-Resident Market
Foto: Henri Bergius . Funds Society lanza la encuesta sobre utilización de ETFs para inversores profesionales en el mercado de no-residentes

Since their introduction two decades ago, ETFs have been extremely successful, growing far beyond their initial function of tracking large liquid indices in developed markets. Globally, ETFs hold US$3.38tr in assets, having come a long way from the US$79bn they held in the year 2000 (according to BlackRock’s Global ETP Landscape, September 2016)

Funds Society would like to know if, how, and when the international professional investors are using ETFs.

Responses from this will help us better understand attitudes and usage of ETFs, and share the findings of a growing investment tool with the international wealth and asset management community.

We kindly ask you to take some time in answering this survey, which you can access through this link. We will share its findings in a series of articles in Funds Society and publish a brochure summarizing our results.

To make this survey even more appealing… we are raffling a set of Oculus Rift Virtual Reality glasses among all the qualifying respondents who complete the survey.

We look forward to your participation in the survey.

ACCESS THE SURVEY.

Northstar Launches Range of Index-Linked Investment Plans

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Northstar Launches Range of Index-Linked Investment Plans

Northstar Financial Services has added index-linked investment plans to its growing product range.

According to a press release, the Bermuda company believes that the Global Index Protect combines the benefits of 100% principal protection coupled with participation in the S&P 500 Index.

Clients have the choice of 5, 7 and 10 year durations and also the option of an annual lock-in feature, that ensures any annual gains in the index are captured and so the guaranteed payment at maturity is increased through the life of the contract.

The Global Index Protect is therefore designed for investors to whom preservation of capital is a priority, but who also wish to benefit from the positive performance of equity markets. As is the case with all Northstar investment solutions, clients also enjoy the benefits of a Bermuda trust structure, which include financial security and enhanced wealth transfer flexibility.

Northstar’s Global Head of Distribution, Alejandro Moreno, commented: “I am very excited at the prospect of introducing these new solutions to our distribution partners. The combination of guaranteed 100% principal protection and in some cases more than 100% of the upside potential of equity markets should prove to be an attractive proposition to our advisors and their clients and perfectly complement Northstar’s existing suite of variable and fixed-rate investment plans.”

Northstar’s Vice Chairman, Mark Rogers, commented: “The addition of Global Index Protect further demonstrates Northstar’s commitment to delivering innovative products to help serve the needs of our international clients more closely. I look forward to working with advisors on our enhanced range of solutions as we introduce Global Index Protect globally.”
 

Emerging Markets May be Down, but They’re Not Out

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Emerging Markets May be Down, but They’re Not Out
    “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?”

These much-quoted words of John Maynard Keynes are appropriate in these surprising times. Back in October, I highlighted opportunities in emerging market stocks and bonds. In equities, I cited improving economic fundamentals and attractive price-to-earnings ratios, while in bonds I lauded their relatively high yields. Not anymore.

Last week our Asset Allocation Committee issued our revised asset allocation framework for global markets over the next twelve months. As a result of the unexpected victory by Donald Trump and the prospect of a unified Republican congress’s proposed economic program of lower taxes, looser regulatory burdens and increased fiscal spending, we raised our 12-month outlook for U.S. equities to slightly overweight. At the same time, we decided to lower our 12-month outlook for emerging market debt and equity.

Our new, more cautious approach towards emerging markets was driven by the realization that the environment had changed—and changed rapidly. Indeed, against a heady combination of higher US interest rates, a stronger dollar and the possibility of increasing tension over trade, we had no other option than to revisit our case for emerging markets. Investing in markets is a dynamic process. And, as Keynes observed, if a situation changes, it’s important that you have the flexibility to respond quickly.

Beyond the noise

But this change of heart is not a ‘deep sell’ mindset. There is still a robust, long-term case for investing in emerging economies and, following recent market movement, fixed income yields and equity P/E’s are more attractive than before. Indeed, while our emerging market stock and bond teams are both cautious about the short-term outlook, they continue to identify compelling opportunities within emerging markets over the longer term.

True, equities have sold off sharply and currency losses have been a major performance detractor. But it’s foolish to regard emerging markets as a monolithic block. There remain many pockets of value. Hard currency sovereign bonds, for example, are yielding 5.8% and commodities have continued their relative outperformance post the election. Indeed, over the longer term, pro-growth U.S. policies could benefit select emerging markets.

Possible trade constraints impact Latin America far more than Asia, for example. That’s because the ‘value add’ of Asian exporters is not easily replaceable. And if President Trump’s much-vaunted infrastructure spend becomes reality, this would increase the demand for select commodities and specialist engineering and technology skills. Finally, it’s also worth noting that if the US does ramp up its domestic energy and coal production, this will help emerging markets broadly as many are net consumers.

Elsewhere, China continues to be a source of concern. While the short-term position remains positive, there are risks that its recent stimulus measures have created bubbles and the devaluation of its currency is also causing anxiety, particularly in the Trump camp. Indeed, how China reacts over the next twelve months is vitally important, not just for emerging markets, but for all of us.

In the ditch

Against this backdrop, one sensible approach towards emerging market equities might be to tilt portfolios towards domestic companies trading at a reasonable price with low debt levels. This could help to minimize the threat of interest rate sensitivity and diminished global trade.

In debt markets, the Trump victory is undoubtedly having a negative impact as they experience the double-whammy of higher interest rates and growing risk aversion. However, the pickup in growth and the reduction in the account deficits of many emerging economies should help mitigate some of the downside risk.

Apart from being a renowned economist, Keynes was also an avid art collector. At the height of the First World War, he travelled to Paris to attend a fire-sale of Impressionist art. Among the paintings he purchased was one by Cézanne—Still Life with Apples. Back in England, he drove down to Sussex to visit his friends from the Bloomsbury Group. Close to their house, his car got stuck in the mud. Unable to carry all the paintings himself, Keynes left the Cézanne hidden behind a tree in a ditch, to be retrieved later.

Today, emerging markets may appear to be headed into the ditch. But they have higher average growth rates, more favorable demographics and possess better balance sheets than developed countries. Just like the Cézanne, in time they could appreciate in value.

Unigestion appoints Emanuele Ravano as Chairman of UNI-GLOBAL SICAV

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Unigestion appoints Emanuele Ravano as Chairman of UNI-GLOBAL SICAV

Unigestion, the boutique asset manager with scale, appointed Emanuele Ravano as Chairman of UNI-GLOBAL, the SICAV comprising 13 Unigestion subfunds.

According to a press release, Ravano will work closely with Unigestion’s senior management team and will be influential in mentoring and supporting Unigestion’s distribution initiatives. He is particularly well placed, given his previous experience, to support Unigestion’s accelerated distribution plans in intermediary markets.

Ravano has over 30 years of experience building long-term client relationships by providing prudent investment advice and consistent portfolio management. His track record of active portfolio management at world renowned institutions include 13 years as Managing Director and Head of Global Wealth & Portfolio Management at PIMCO and 16 years as Managing Director and Head of European Fixed Income at Credit Suisse.

Bernard Sabrier, Group Chairman of Unigestion said of the appointment: “Emanuele’s vast sector knowledge and dedication to delivering measurable results will help us build on our existing strong client relationships and form new ones in the future. We are very pleased he is joining the team.”

Emanuele Ravano commented: “I am excited to be joining such a well renowned organisation, which creates such compelling and unique propositions for investors on a global scale. My passion for quality investment ideas and innovation is shared throughout the whole staff at Unigestion and I look forward to what we can achieve over the coming years.”

Brexit and Trump, a Global Trend?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Brexit and Trump, a Global Trend?
Foto: Enrique Freire. Brexit y Trump: ¿una tendencia global?

Is the election of Donald Trump the latest example, following on from the Brexit vote and the success of Bernie Sanders and non-mainstream candidates in Europe, of a global trend in demagoguery and isolationism that will sweep all in its path, including the economies of Asia? I doubt it.

First, a psychological observation: There is a tendency to see things in the context of your own country’s experience and extrapolate that to others, even though they may be in quite different situations. For example, there seems to be a desire to see China’s housing market in the same way as one looks at what happened in the U.S. However, they are in fact quite different.

Second, a personal bugbear of mine—there’s also the tendency to view developments in Asia as always being derivatives of what has happened in the U.S. But Asia is home to over half the world’s people. Its politics are determined at home, just as its economic growth is determined at home.

So, how to make sense of the recent shifts in political power? Well, I know how I see it. I try to understand the economic environment first. Then, I see if we have a roadmap that shows us where people’s economic interests lie and whether that explains current political decisions. So here are my two assumptions: 1) the West is in a depression-like economy or what feels like depression because of the slow growth in demand and wages; Asia is still growing at a healthy clip, in nominal terms. 2) The General Theory, written in the 1930s by Lord Keynes, gives us a pretty good roadmap for understanding the forces at play.

And what are those forces?

Well, in a world of low interest rates, when central banks have given up on being able to stimulate demand, deflation (or disinflation) rules. Wages stagnate. Employment is lackluster. Without wage growth, people feel they are stagnating. And as low rates propel asset markets higher, the difference between the haves and have-nots, and the manual laborer and the equity owner, seem cut in especially sharp relief. In addition, the normal rules of economic policymaking are reversed—monetary policy takes a back seat to fiscal policy; protectionism supports demand rather than causing inefficiencies; productivity gains lead to unemployment rather than spurring growth. The government is forced to “socialize investment” because private enterprise will not invest at a high enough rate to secure full employment. This is the Keynesian playbook. You may or may not agree with it, but you can see in it key elements of policy shared by Trump, Sanders, Brexit supporters, and even Hillary Clinton. It can be seen in the trend of isolationist sentiments and stances against the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the North American Free Trade Agreement and support of massive infrastructure spending, and the key role played by the votes of the forgotten “manufacturing workers” in the U.S. election.

But then, there is no reason to suspect that these political trends of the West will be mirrored in Asia. For Asia has high interest rates and robust wage growth. Asia has room to further grow productivity. Chinese families are chasing their version of the American dream. Southeast Asia is embarking on a build-up of its manufacturing base. The middle class in Asia is growing and developing. In the Philippines, you may question how a leader like President Rodrigo Duterte came to power with populist policies, but his strongman style is not exactly a deviation from the likes of former rulers Ferdinand Marcos and Joseph Estrada. Surely, there are income inequalities in the region, but with growth spread across Asia’s classes and countries, the political strains, whilst not absent, are nowhere near as acute.

So, there is no need for Asia to have the same kind of political reaction; no need for it to react to protectionism by igniting a trade war; no need to abandon the traditional economic logic of raising productivity to spur growth. And by and large, Asian voters have put in place reformist governments intent on following these mainstream economic policies. Yes, there is the potential for U.S. and European isolationism to increase—perhaps the world will divide itself into blocs along these lines, leaving Asia as a distinct and separate bloc of capitalist growth. Perhaps this has consequences for how asset allocators might view the world. But it does little to undermine the basic view of what will drive the growth in Asian living standards—or how we will seek to invest in them.

Column by Robert Horrocks, CIO at Mathews Asia

Global Investors Have Lowered Their Cash Allocations

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Global Investors Have Lowered Their Cash Allocations
Foto: freeimages9.com / Pexels. Los inversores globales han reducido sus exposiciones a efectivo

The BofA Merrill Lynch November Fund Manager Survey shows surging inflation expectations and slumping cash levels among global investors.

“There will likely be a trade in ‘bond proxies’ soon,” said Michael Hartnett, chief investment strategist at BofA Merrill Lynch. “But our cyclical view of peak liquidity, globalization and inequality means the ‘yield’ dam has been broken.”

Manish Kabra, European equity quantitative strategist, added that, “Global investors’ equity allocations towards the UK are at their second lowest level since 2008, with the sterling considered the most undervalued in the history of our long-running survey. Europe seems placed for contrarians, with Eurozone allocations at below-average levels.”

Other highlights include:

  • A record net 56% of investors think current fiscal policy is too restrictive and global inflation expectations soar to 85%, the highest in 12 years.
  • Cash levels slumped from 5.8% in October to 5.0% in November, as global growth and profit expectations rise to one-year highs and the US election result is seen an unambiguously positive for nominal GDP
  • However, stagflation expectations also close to 4-year highs as 22% of investors expect below-trend growth and above-trend inflation over the next 12 months.
  • Protectionism is seen as the biggest risk to financial market stability (84%).
  • Forty-four percent of investors think the rotation to cyclical styles and inflationary sectors will continue well into 2017.
  • The US election result accelerates rotation into Banks, out of high dividend yield and bond proxies and catalyzes buying of US equities, selling Tech and EM.
  • Allocation to Eurozone equities improves to 5-month highs of 8% overweight from net 5% last month.
  • Allocation to Japanese equities dips modestly to net 5% underweight from net 3% underweight last month.
  • Allocation to EM equities fall sharply to net 4% overweight from 31% overweight last month.

 

Hedge Fund Performance Loses Momentum in October

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Hedge Fund Performance Loses Momentum in October

The hedge fund industry saw its lengthy run of positive performance taper off in October, as funds recorded ne returns of 0.01%. Most leading strategies recorded modest gains, with credit strategy funds returning 0.84%, and relative value funds returning 0.49%. However, equity and event driven strategy funds both saw losses, returning -0.27% and -0.26% respectively, contrasting with their position as the highest-performing leading strategies in September.

While most commingled hedge fund benchmarks were close to 0.00% in October, other fund types were underwater for the month. UCITS funds returned -0.15% for the month, while alternative mutual funds made more substantial losses of 1.40%. As result, both fund types have recorded losses for the past 12 months, returning -0.23% and -0.93% respectively. CTAs, meanwhile, recorded their third consecutive month of losses, as they returned -1.74% in October. This run of negative performance has resulted in YTD losses of 0.86%, and 12-month losses of 0.47%.

Other key hedge fund performance facts:

  • Longer Term Returns: Although October does not maintain the momentum of positive performance that the industry has recorded since March, hedge funds have still posted overall gains of 5.46% so far in 2016, and 4.99% over the past 12 months. As long as no further losses are posted, 2016 will mark the highest performance year for the industry since 2013.
  • Performance by Region: Hedge funds focused on North America and Europe both recorded losses in October, returning -0.76% and -0.39% respectively. Asia-Pacific-focused funds, however, made gains of 0.46%, while emerging markets hedge funds returned 2.35% for the month, far beyond any other region.
  • Discretionary Gains: Hedge funds using a discretionary trading methodology once again outperformed systematic funds, as they made gains of 0.13% compared to the latter’s -0.52% performance. In 2016 so far, discretionary funds have now returned 4.94%, compared to 3.34% for systematic funds.
  • Returns by Size: October performance shows little variance per fund size, but it is notable that emerging funds once again posted the highest returns, gaining 0.30%. Small and medium hedge fund both saw losses, returning -0.04% and -0.03% respectively for the month.

“Despite many hedge fund investors stating that they are dissatisfied with the returns of their hedge fund portfolios, the hedge fund industry over recent months has seen a period of positive performance unmatched since 2012-13. Unfortunately, in October this seems to have lost momentum, as the industry recorded near-flat performance.

However, many strategies and geographies have continued to make modest gains through the month, and the industry as a whole has not lost ground. Provided they can hold these gains in the last two months of the year, hedge funds are on course to mark their highest performance year since 2013. Among other fund structures, however, the overall picture is less positive. CTAs, alternative mutual funds and UCITS funds are all showing negative performance over the past 12 months, and recorded losses in October. CTAs in particular have experienced their third consecutive month of losses, and are currently on course to record lower performance in 2016 than they did in 2015”, said Amy Bensted, Head of Hedge Fund Products at Preqin.

Andbank Spain Launches Wealth Management Division for HNW Clients

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Andbank Spain Launches Wealth Management Division for HNW Clients

Andbank Spain, an entity specialized in private banking, has launched the Key Clients division, specialized in wealth management for high net worth individuals (HNWI). The objective of this business area is to attract €1bn over the next three years.

The new Key Clients division will offer a comprehensive wealth management service, with access to “exclusive” investment opportunities, Andbank said in a release. To this end, it will integrate a personalized private banking service, independent financial advice adapted to Mifid II, patrimonial planning and the “most advanced” technological tools of the market.

The head of the new Key Clients area will be Juan Carlos Solano, executive director at Andbank España since 2012, with more than 20 years of experience in the wealth management sector. Solano holds a degree in Business and Law from the University of Comillas – ICADE E3 and he is a member of the European Financial Planning Association (EFPA) in Spain.

Peter Lee, New CEO at Mirae Asset Global Investments

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Peter Lee, New CEO at Mirae Asset Global Investments

Mirae Asset Global Investments, one of the world’s largest investors in emerging market equities, has announced that Peter Lee CFA, Ph.D. is stepping into the role of CEO and Chief Investment Officer. Previously, Lee had been the Executive Managing Director of the Global Investment Unit for Mirae Asset Global Investments in Seoul, South Korea, leading the equity investment team from the group’s global headquarters.

In his new role, Lee will be responsible for leading Mirae Asset USA through its next stage of expansion in the US market. In addition, Lee has set a number of ambitious objectives for Mirae Asset USA, focusing on increasing flows into existing products as well as new product development.

“Mirae Asset has established itself as a true competitor in the US market on the strength and heritage of our actively managed, emerging markets focused investment capabilities,” says Lee. “Our objective is to continue building on the global strength of the Mirae Asset brand by introducing attractive products and investment options.”

Mirae Asset USA is the US-based asset management entity that delivers the investment capability of Mirae Asset, a diversified financial services entity with over $100 billion in client assets under management. Mirae Asset USA brings to US investors the client focus and investment resources available to investors in other global markets for two decades.

A veteran of Mirae Asset, Lee has held senior investment strategy and executive management roles at several global entities within the group since 2014. Lee has a Doctoral degree in Economics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He also holds a Master of Arts degree in economics and a Bachelor degree in economics from the Seoul National University.

Lee steps into the CEO role that had been vacated by the departure of Peter Graham.

Back to the Future: Trump and Trade

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Back to the Future: Trump and Trade

Insisting on the rules is not the same as refusing to play the game.

I spend a lot of time on the road visiting Neuberger Berman clients around the world. In June, I had the good fortune to be in London at the time of the “Brexit” vote. I was able to witness for myself this dramatic political event as it unfolded and also see it from the perspective of our clients. Earlier this month, I was in the Middle East at the time of the U.S. election. Again, I was able to experience another landmark event through the eyes of our clients.

As an American investor in the Middle East, clients sought my counsel on the implications of Donald Trump’s victory. The latter part of my trip, therefore, was largely spent helping them lay out a road map as to what might happen next.

Both political parties made many wild promises during the U.S. election campaign — it’s called politics and it’s what people do when they want to get elected. But now that the gun smoke is beginning to clear, it’s time to take a more sober look at how this could play out.

Those of us old enough to remember the Ronald Reagan years will recall a film called Back to the Future. Starring Michael J. Fox, it was the highest grossing film of 1985 and, reportedly, one of Reagan’s favorite films. The reference to Back to the Future is instructive. Fast-forward over 30 years, and I believe where we are now has many parallels with the Reagan era. And I don’t mean we’ll all be driving DeLorean cars, although a recent press article indicated that this iconic automobile will come back into production in 2017, not in Northern Ireland, but in Humble, Texas.
Regime Change

In my opinion, Donald Trump’s election marks a fundamental shift away from an era that has been dominated by central bank policy. In some respects, it accelerates a process that was already underway. People have been waking up to the limitations of monetary policy for a while now, but this represents a seismic shift away from that approach.

So what will replace it? The answer, I believe, is a much more business-friendly America, keen to generate growth, create jobs and, in some cases, generate a little more price inflation. Underpinning this will be a greater emphasis on fiscal policy to drive change. Witness, for example, the huge focus in the Trump program on infrastructure projects. Initially, there’ll likely be more attention to domestic issues, such as taxation and the reform (or repeal) of the Affordable Care Act. But in time, the focus will move overseas.

When I talked about these issues with our clients and colleagues in the Middle East last week, one of their biggest concerns was the potentially negative impact of a Trump victory on trade relations. In response, I told them to keep a close eye on the team that Donald Trump assembles around him.

Rock Star CEO

In my view, the appointment of Paul Ryan for a second term as speaker is a good first step. He knows how to operate the levers of power and is viewed as a unifying force. Indeed, he described his appointment as “the dawn of a new, unified Republican government.”

But for greater insights into the issue of trade, I pointed them in the direction of a book entitled American Made. This was written by Dan DiMicco, chairman and former CEO of Charlotte-based Nucor, America’s largest steel company. DiMicco is a rock star CEO who delivered a 720% return to shareholders over his tenure, from 2000 to 2012, in one of the world’s toughest businesses. He also acted as Trump’s trade adviser during the election campaign and is currently leading the transition team on all trade appointments.

DiMicco advocates the return of a more activist approach to world trade and commerce, similar to the approach that prevailed during the Reagan administration. He’s not anti-trade; he simply wants other countries to play by the rules when it comes to trade agreements and he has been most vocal about this in relation to China. DiMicco is a key member of the transition team, so what he has to say carries much weight. His book provides many useful pointers as to what could happen over the next few years.

The DiMicco narrative is nothing to be afraid of. He’s as much in favor of free markets and trade as any other business person. But he believes there should be greater controls and limits, as there were 30 years ago. And for those who remember the Reagan era, they’ll recall that it ushered in a period of rapid growth and great economic prosperity, not just for the U.S. but internationally as well. Back to the future, indeed!

Neuberger Berman’s CIO insight