Invesco expands its product range with the launch of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Swap UCITS ETF, a fund designed to replicate the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index using a synthetic structure. According to the asset manager, the benchmark index is built from the S&P 500 Index, assigning the same weight to each company in the index instead of the standard method of weighting companies by market capitalization.
“This is the world’s first Equal Weight ETF with synthetic replication. For investors seeking exposure to the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, Invesco now offers both physical and swap-based ETFs, allowing investors to choose their preferred replication method,” the firm stated.
According to Invesco, demand for Equal Weight strategies has continued to rise since Mega Cap stock prices hit multi-decade highs and began to appear overvalued. This trend has been particularly noticeable in U.S. equities, where S&P 500 Equal Weight ETFs have attracted more than $10 billion in net inflows since July 2024. The top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 Index still represent 37% of market capitalization, keeping concentration at historically high levels.
Unlike existing products in the market, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Swap UCITS ETF aims to replicate the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index through swap-based replication. The ETF will hold a basket of high-quality stocks and achieve index returns through swap agreements with major financial institutions. These swap counterparties will pay the ETF the index return, minus an agreed fee, in exchange for the returns of the ETF’s held stock basket.
Following this launch, Laure Peyranne, Head of ETFs Iberia, LatAm & US Offshore at Invesco, stated: “We are excited to start the new year with an ETF that combines two areas of Invesco’s expertise. We are a global leader in equal-weighted equity exposures, a rapidly expanding area whose demand surged significantly in 2024 and which we now offer through our solid and highly efficient swap-based structure, developed over 15 years ago. We have the world’s largest synthetic ETF, and now investors can benefit from the same advantages for their exposure to the S&P 500 Equal Weight.”
Peyranne also noted that when a Europe-domiciled ETF uses synthetic replication on certain core U.S. indices, it is not required to pay taxes on dividends received.
“This allows us to negotiate better terms with our swap counterparties, including receiving the gross return of the index, which is an advantage over a physically replicated ETF that typically pays a 15% to 30% tax on dividends. In the case of the S&P 500 Equal Weight, given current dividend levels, this translates to an approximate 20 basis point improvement,” she explained.
Invesco has committed to the swap-based replication model, maintaining an uninterrupted track record of over 15 years and accumulating more than $65 billion in assets across its swap-based ETF range. Its product lineup includes the Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF, which, at $39 billion, is the largest swap-based ETF in the world, according to the company.
This latest launch also expands the firm’s Equal Weight offering by adding the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Swap UCITS ETF to its existing Invesco Nasdaq-100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF and Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF.
Apollo Global Management has appointed Laura González as Managing Director of its globalwealth business for US Offshore and Latin America, sources at the firm confirmed to Funds Society.
González, currently Head of Allfunds for the Americas (U.S. and LatAm), will take on her new role in May. With over 13 years at Allfunds, she initially oversaw Iberia and Latin America before being promoted to Head of the Americas in 2022, according to her LinkedIn profile.
Apollo, a firm specializing in alternative investments, has set “ambitious goals” of reaching $150 billion by 2029, a target announced during its Investor Day in October 2024.
For Apollo, González is a seasoned professional who will play a crucial role in expanding the firm’s ability to serve these markets.
“Expanding our Global Wealth business is a key priority for Apollo as we respond to growing investor demand for private market solutions that offer greater diversification beyond the traditional 60/40 portfolio model. We are committed to providing institutional-quality offerings tailored to the distinct needs of individual and wealth investors,” said Stephanie Drescher, Partner and Chief Client & Product Development Officer at Apollo, in a statement accessed by Funds Society.
Apollo’s Global Wealth unit aims to deliver a comprehensive range of alternative investment solutions across asset classes such as credit, equity, and real assets, structured in ways that prioritize the needs of end investors, the firm added.
Citi will lose its Global Head of Private Banking, Ida Liu, as the executive announced in a LinkedIn post.
“After nearly two decades at Citi, including the privilege of serving as Global Head of Citi Private Bank, I have made the decision to leave the firm and embark on the next chapter of my professional journey,” Liu posted on LinkedIn.
The expert, with more than 25 years of experience, joined Citi in 2007, where she held various positions until her most recent role as Global Head of Private Banking, according to her LinkedIn profile.
“Great careers are defined by embracing new challenges and opportunities, and this is the right time to leverage my global experience, leadership expertise, and passion for growth in bold and exciting new ways,” added the executive of the U.S. bank.
In addition to Citi, Liu worked at Merrill Lynch (1999-2004) and Vivienne Tam (2004-2007).
The week has begun with the tech sector reeling. On Monday, Nvidia led a market slump—dropping as much as 17%—triggered by the strong performance of the low-cost generative AI assistant developed by Chinese company DeepSeek. According to experts, the emergence of a potentially more efficient approach to AI processing—reducing model training costs by 86%—raises questions about the necessity of the billions of dollars planned for infrastructure and intellectual property investment.
As a result, the S&P 500 index dropped 1.5%, and Nvidia‘s decline—the largest single-day market capitalization loss for the company at $589 billion—dragged the Nasdaq Composite down 3.1%. “The emergence of the new competitor has primarily impacted the entire data center value chain. This includes chip manufacturing equipment makers like ASML (-7.2%), high-performance chip manufacturers (Nvidia and Broadcom (-17.4%)), as well as companies specializing in energy infrastructure like Schneider Electric (-9.6%) or the real estate side of data centers like Digital Realty (-8.7%),” explain analysts at Banca March.
What explains these movements? In recent days, the generative AI assistant developed by DeepSeek has become the most downloaded app for iPhone, surpassing the popular ChatGPT application from OpenAI. Nvidia‘s drop has been the most visible consequence of this shift, driven by fears about the impact DeepSeek could have on the demand for high-end microchips.
“DeepSeek could be a seismic shift for the AI industry. If its advancements hold true, model training costs would drastically decrease, changing the game for everyone,” says Víctor Alvargonzález, founder of Nextep Finance. In his view, one of the main reasons behind Wall Street’s recent sell-off—particularly Nvidia‘s worst-ever trading session in U.S. stock market history—is DeepSeek‘s promise to reduce algorithm training costs. Estimates suggest that training costs could drop from the current $50 million per model to just $7 million or less, thanks to process simplification and a 75% reduction in memory requirements.
Amid these declines, Louise Dudley, portfolio manager of global equities at Federated Hermes Limited, believes there are still many questions left unanswered. “For Nvidia, as a key supplier of premium chips worldwide, the concern is whether companies will need fewer chips in the future. However, the company responded to the news by highlighting ‘excellent progress,’ signaling optimism about ongoing AI model developments, which are still in their relative infancy.
For companies involved in building data centers, the short-term impact is likely to be significant, as demand has been very strong. The new DeepSeek model code will be reviewed for potential performance improvements. Existing projects under development are at risk, and this will be a key focus for investors. This news will likely increase both corporate and consumer appetite for AI tools, given improved accessibility, leveraging this innovation and accelerating AI adoption timelines,” Dudley points out.
Market Reactions and Expert Insights
According to Hyunho Sohn, portfolio manager of the Fidelity Funds Global Technology Fund, Chinese AI startup DeepSeek has introduced AI models that perform comparably to OpenAI’s ChatGPT models while being significantly more cost-effective. “This efficiency advantage has raised a series of questions about the perceived ‘winners’ in the global AI ecosystem, the implications for hyperscaler capital expenditures, and the effectiveness of sanctions and export bans aimed at preventing high-level generative AI progress in China.
This is an evolving situation, and we may see short-term volatility until it becomes clear how much more efficient this technology really is. While broader implications must be assessed on a case-by-case basis, I generally believe this development will be deflationary,” Sohn states.
Despite the shockwaves, Fidelity’s portfolio manager believes this is ultimately beneficial for end-users and service providers, though it could have negative implications for hardware. “This is similar to what we saw in the early days of the internet when people vastly underestimated the scale of innovation, technological adoption, and service-based business potential, while greatly overestimating the total addressable market (TAM) for hardware,” explains Sohn.
In the view of Amadeo Alentorn, manager of the Global Equity Absolute Return fund and head of the systematic equity team at Jupiter AM, DeepSeek’s rise is part of a broader trend that has been developing for months. In recent times, there have been major advances in Small Language Models (SLM), which contrast with the large models used by companies like OpenAI. The central question has been whether it is possible to build more precise, specialized models that focus on specific areas, such as law or medicine, rather than encompassing all knowledge.
“So far, the rise of artificial intelligence has primarily benefited a small group of large companies. However, recent advancements suggest that we may be witnessing a paradigm shift, where smaller companies can also leverage this technology without needing massive infrastructure investments. Identifying which companies will lead this new AI phase is a complex task, but what is clear is that this evolution promotes diversification within the sector. AI could expand beyond tech giants and create new business opportunities across various industries,” Alentorn asserts.
High Valuations Under Scrutiny
In this context, Fidelity’s portfolio manager acknowledges that, as he has been saying for some time, many AI semiconductors are expensive, with sentiment, valuations, and momentum slowing down—“the most interesting opportunities lie within the services ecosystem.”
“It’s still early, but I would add that the rapid developments in generative AI highlight the need for proximity and connection throughout the tech ecosystem—something we are well-positioned for, given the breadth and depth of our research coverage,” Sohn adds.
For Oliver Blackbourn, portfolio manager in the Multi-Asset team at Janus Henderson, AI has long been considered a highly complex area of development, with industry leaders perceived as having technological advantages that would allow them to maintain rapid growth. In his view, the expectation of high earnings growth has been used to justify elevated valuations, making these stocks highly vulnerable to any disappointment.
“Competition always seemed like the biggest threat, but also the hardest to assess for investors. The market’s reaction to a perceived radical shift in the competitive landscape has been fierce. Before U.S. markets opened today, Nasdaq 100 futures had fallen 3.9%, and ASML—one of Europe’s companies most exposed to the AI theme—had dropped more than 10%,” Blackbourn notes.
In his opinion, while it is easy to get ahead of events, it is also important to remember that high expectations have driven up valuations across the U.S. stock market and, consequently, global equities. “If we start to see U.S. stock valuations drop significantly, there is a risk that this will spill over into other high-valuation areas in Europe and Asia.
Similarly, with U.S. consumers more exposed than ever to the stock market, there is a broader risk of negative feedback loops if consumer confidence is shaken. A significant tightening of financial conditions due to stock market losses could quickly change the Federal Reserve’s outlook,” Blackbourn concludes.
Is your strategy prepared for the transformations redefining asset management in 2025? Technological integration, personalization, and the reinvention of operational models are reshaping the industry. Among these trends, asset securitization stands out as an innovative solution to maximize the growth of assets under management (AUM) and respond nimbly to increasing market complexity.
In this article, FlexFunds analyzes the significant trends shaping the future of asset management and how securitization can become a key strategic tool.
Large-scale personalization: the client at the center
Investors no longer seek generic products; they now demand solutions tailored to their objectives, values, and circumstances. By 2025, digitalization, powered by advanced artificial intelligence (AI) tools, will enable asset managers to build portfolios aligned with specific risk tolerances and unique goals. Personalization is becoming the key differentiator in a saturated market.
Digitalization and hybrid asset management
The pandemic accelerated the shift toward digital financial services, and by 2025, hybrid asset management will become the norm. Technological platforms that combine the convenience of digital self-service with human advisory will allow firms to adapt to an increasingly competitive market.
Fee reduction and new pricing models
The rise of automated advisors and investment platforms has driven down fees, forcing traditional portfolio managers to justify their value. Many are adopting alternative pricing models, such as subscriptions or fees based on service complexity.
Generational wealth transfer
As the massive wealth transfer from baby boomers to younger generations unfolds, asset managers face the challenge of maintaining multi-generational relationships. Technological tools simplify this transition by offering attractive investment options tailored to diverse generational profiles—from millennials interested in ESG to traditional investors.
Artificial intelligence: the transformation catalyst
AI is revolutionizing asset management, from portfolio structuring to client interaction. Its most notable applications include:
Predictive analysis: Identifying patterns and anticipating future client needs.
Portfolio optimization: Processing real-time data to detect risks and opportunities.
Risk management: Monitoring real-time transactions and adjusting strategies in response to market volatility.
In the second Asset Securitization Industry Report by FlexFunds and Funds Society, surveying over 100 senior executives from Latin America, the U.S., and Spain, 82% of portfolio managers stated that AI could enhance their investment decision-making process.
Securitization as a strategic tool
Asset securitization is a vital tool for portfolio managers looking to adapt to these trends. It allows them to offer clients personalized investment strategies tailored to risk profiles and time horizons that are cost-efficient and agile compared to other market alternatives.
The benefits of asset securitization for portfolio managers include:
Access to a broader base of international investors.
Enhanced distribution of investment strategies on private banking platforms through a listed security available via Euroclear.
Access to alternative financing sources.
Portfolio diversification offers flexibility in investment strategy composition by securitizing any underlying asset.
Simplified investor onboarding and subscription processes.
Asset management in 2025 will be defined by the ability to integrate technology, personalization, and innovative strategies like securitization. Managers who adopt a holistic approach, combining advanced digital tools with strong human relationships, will be best positioned to thrive in this evolving landscape.
To explore how FlexFunds can help you leverage securitization in your investment strategies, contact us at info@flexfunds.com.
We know—the words you’ve probably heard the most last week are Donald Trump. The first week of the 47th U.S. president’s term has been intense, marked by 25 Executive Orders. These range from withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization to declaring a national emergency on the southern border and an energy emergency. Other areas addressed include tariffs, immigration, and ending federal workers’ remote work policies.
Experts call for caution amid the noise
“So far, he hasn’t enacted any tariffs on imports. It’s unlikely that announcements of new policy measures from the Oval Office—whether they’re implemented or not—will decrease in the short term. Reacting preemptively to these is a losing proposition for investors. At the same time, as shown by the recent tariff threats against Canada and Mexico and the related currency movements, higher financial market volatility is likely to become a permanent feature of the new Trump administration,” notes Yves Bonzon, CIO of Julius Baer.
One of the most attention-grabbing announcements, beyond concerns about tariffs, has been the Stargate initiative, which brings together SoftBank, Oracle, and OpenAI in a joint venture committed to investing $100 billion in early-stage AI. The plan starts with a data center in Texas and aims to reach $500 billion in four years.
According to analysts at Banca March, this initiative boosted the tech sector, especially Microsoft, Nvidia, and Arm, which will build the infrastructure. “For context, it’s estimated that the total investment—regular business and AI deployment—of the four major hyperscalers (Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Alphabet) will reach $260 billion in 2025. This shows the ambition and relevance of the announced investments. The new president highlighted the strategic importance of maintaining leadership in AI development, particularly against growing competition from China. However, Elon Musk commented on the social network X that the initiative doesn’t yet have the financial capacity to deploy such a large investment, marking the first public disagreement between Trump and the entrepreneur,” the analysts highlight.
Another Executive Order formally established the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Although Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy had discussed cutting $2 trillion from the government’s annual $6.8 trillion budget, the text didn’t mention any spending cuts. “Monday’s action shifts the effort away from direct spending cuts and more toward improving efficiency through technological advancements. Ironically, these improvements will likely cost more in the short term (and could require Congressional allocation) even if they save money in the long term. We’ll have to wait to see what DOGE achieves before it expires in mid-2026,” notes Libby Cantrill, Head of Public Policy at PIMCO.
Tariffs and Trade
Everything related to trade and tariffs is drawing the attention of analysts and investors, who undoubtedly see it as a concern. “On trade, we expect Trump to reinstate at least some tariffs on China to the levels implemented during his first term as an immediate first step, with potential for steady increases from there. He could also initiate Section 301 trade investigations into Mexico, Canada, and the EU, which would be a precursor to tariff increases. Ultimately, our baseline trade assumptions incorporate a significant rise in tariffs on China but a more targeted approach by sector and product with other countries, avoiding a global baseline tariff. However, a more expansive use of emergency powers related to trade, including invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), could indicate that trade policy is shifting toward our ‘Trump Unleashed’ scenario,” says Lizzy Galbraith, political economist at abrdn.
In Cantrill’s view, tariffs may not have been raised immediately. “We’d caution against reading too much into what’s more likely a delay rather than an absence of future tariff action. At the same time, we believe widespread tariffs on Mexico and Canada—particularly at the 25% level—are less likely than targeted, country-specific tariffs elsewhere. We still think the EU and China are quite vulnerable.
In the coming days and weeks, as the administration approaches its first 100 days, a flurry of decrees related to immigration, tariffs, and deregulation is expected. These will provide clues about the overall direction of its policy.
U.S. Equities
Meanwhile, the Q4 2024 earnings season in the U.S. started off well and will pick up speed next week. As Bonzon recalls, expectations for S&P 500 earnings in 2025 are ambitious, though “not unattainable,” with limited room for positive earnings surprises. “The risk/reward ratio outlook for the S&P 500 has significantly deteriorated compared to two years ago. After two consecutive years of double-digit returns driven largely by valuation multiple expansion, the index is fully valued, though not excessively,” states the CIO of Julius Baer.
In general, Bonzon notes that analysts currently forecast a year-over-year earnings growth of 14.8% for the S&P 500 in 2025. While this is certainly achievable, it leaves little room for positive surprises. “After two consecutive years of returns driven largely by valuation multiple expansion—resulting in a fully valued, but not overly expensive, index—the burden increasingly falls on earnings to drive returns,” he concludes.
Bank of America has published its first global fund manager survey of the year, reflecting a somewhat positive sentiment, particularly regarding the U.S. dollar and equities. However, the survey also reveals nuances that convey a cautious outlook, especially toward Europe, as well as concerns about inflation and monetary policy.
“Our broader sentiment measure from the FMS survey, based on cash levels, equity allocation, and global growth expectations, dropped from 7.0 to 6.1 in January, indicating that some of the ‘excess’ seen in the December 2024 FMS has dissipated. Cash levels in the FMS remained unchanged in January at 3.9%, the lowest level since June 2021. This marks the second consecutive month with a ‘sell’ signal based on the FMS cash rule since 2011. In the 12 previous instances when this ‘sell’ signal was triggered, global equity returns were -2.4% in the following month and -0.7% in the three months after the signal was activated,” the institution notes in its survey.
The most optimistic takeaway from managers is that institutional allocation to equities remains high: 41% of FMS survey investors hold an overweight position in global equities, though this has declined from the 3-year high of 49% recorded in December.
The Nuances
However, retail enthusiasm has waned in early 2025. Furthermore, in this January survey, global growth expectations fell to a net -8% from 7% in December, and optimism declined for both the United States and China.
“Global growth expectations remain moderate, but the percentage of macroeconomic investors anticipating a boom is the highest since April 2022. Inflation expectations are at their highest level since March 2022, and the probability of a ‘no landing’ scenario has increased (38%) at the expense of ‘soft landing’ (50%) and ‘hard landing’ (5%) scenarios,” BofA indicates.
When it comes to risks, the survey reveals that 41% of respondents cite inflation, which could lead the Federal Reserve to raise rates, as the biggest “tail risk,” followed by a trade war with recessionary effects.
A notable statistic is that 79% of investors expect the Federal Reserve to cut rates in 2025, while only 2% anticipate an increase. In fact, the FMS survey shows that investors, entering the first week of Trump 2.0, are most positioned for announcements related to selective tariffs (49%), immigration cuts (20%), and universal tariffs.
“When asked which development would be considered the most bullish for risk assets in 2025, respondents pointed to an acceleration in China’s growth (38%), followed by rate cuts by the Federal Reserve (17%) and AI-driven productivity gains (16%),” the report adds.
Asset Allocation
According to BofA’s interpretation of the January survey results, investors remain optimistic about the U.S. dollar and equities. Conversely, they are pessimistic about nearly everything else. This is evident in the largest underweight in bonds since October 2022 and the low cash levels of 3.9%. “However, if January’s concerns about Trump’s tariffs and messy bonds prove unfounded, asset allocation will remain tilted toward risk, allowing lagging assets to recover,” the institution states.
Looking at the asset allocation of fund managers, 41% are overweight equities, compared to an underweight of 6% in commodities, 11% in cash, and 20% in bonds. Notably, January saw a significant rotation into European equities—from a 22% underweight to a net 1% overweight—and out of U.S. equities, from 36% to just 19%. Additionally, global FMS investors rotated back into large caps over small caps and growth over value.
Specifically, investors increased their allocation to the eurozone, commodities, and defensive sectors (healthcare and consumer staples) while reducing their allocation to the U.S., financials (insurance and banks), and equities. According to the survey, investors are most overweight equities, banks, and the U.S., while they are most underweight bonds, the U.K., and energy.
The world is experiencing a new environment marked by a cycle of interest rate cuts by the major central banks in developed markets, as well as in emerging regions. According to experts, over the past quarter, most monetary institutions have adopted a more cautious stance.
The best example of this is the Fed, which has once again shifted its focus to inflation, as economic activity has remained strong while disinflation has stalled. “The Fed maintains its data-dependent approach and is beginning to shift its attention to the labor market. We believe labor market conditions could shape the path of its future policy decisions. Similarly, the Bank of England and the European Central Bank also cut interest rates by 25 basis points in the third quarter of 2024, emphasizing data dependency without precommitting to any specific interest rate trajectory,” explain experts from Capital Group.
According to Invesco in its outlook for this year, rates remain generally restrictive in major economies but are easing. “On the one hand, the Fed is likely to remain neutral by the end of 2025, but improved growth prospects may delay rate cuts. On the other hand, European central banks are easing their policies, with relatively weaker growth than the U.S.,” they note.
Divergences in Monetary Policy
This reality brings us to a key conclusion: yes, we are in a cycle of rate cuts, but there will be noticeable divergences in the monetary policies of the major central banks. In fact, Capital Group believes that this divergence will play a significant role in the coming months.
This is reflected in the Central Bank Watch report, prepared by Franklin Templeton, which reviews the activity of G10 central banks, plus two additional countries (China and South Korea), along with their forecasts.
According to the report, the Fed’s shift in strategy has refocused its attention on inflation, as economic activity has remained robust while disinflation has stalled. “The policies of the newly elected president are also likely to influence the Fed’s interest rate projections, which currently only anticipate two cuts in 2025. Across the Atlantic, the European Central Bank and the Bank of England are observing insufficient growth but remain cautious about the future interest rate path, as domestic and geopolitical uncertainties remain high,” the report states.
“Monetary policy divergence is likely to remain a prominent theme in the coming months. The Bank of Japan remains the exception among developed markets, as it has embarked on a rate hike cycle to end an era of negative interest rates. We maintain a relatively cautious stance regarding Japanese rates, as the central bank may make further policy adjustments in response to potential currency pressures. In Europe, the trajectory of monetary easing could depend on the weight policymakers place on downside growth risks compared to the pace and progression of wage pressures and services inflation,” Capital Group experts emphasize.
Another conclusion from the Franklin Templeton report is that “most central banks have become more cautious than they were a quarter ago.” According to their analysis, while the Bank of Canada cut its benchmark rate by 50 basis points in December, this may be its last significant move. “The Riksbank also seems to be taking a more neutral stance, and we believe the Reserve Bank of New Zealand will need to implement fewer cuts than the market currently anticipates. Meanwhile, the Swiss National Bank and the People’s Bank of China remain the most dovish,” the report highlights, noting the behavior of other key monetary institutions.
Lastly, the document underscores that some central banks face a set of dilemmas. “We believe the Norges Bank will lower rates, likely in the first quarter, followed by the Reserve Bank of Australia in the second quarter. Both were among the last to join the easing trend. Meanwhile, the Bank of Japan is expected to continue raising rates gradually in 2025. However, we believe the rigidity of inflation gives the central bank ample room to adopt a more aggressive stance,” the report concludes.
Jupiter Asset Management has announced that the investment team and assets of Origin Asset Management, a global investment boutique based in London, were transferred to Jupiter on January 21, 2025. This integration follows the acquisition announcement made on October 3, 2024.
According to the firm, this addition strengthens its presence in the strategic institutional client channel and enhances its capabilities in emerging market equities, while also expanding its expertise in other multiregional equity strategies. The team, led by Tarlock Randhawa, includes Chris Carter, Nerys Weir, Ben Marsh, and Ruairi Devery-Kavanagh. As noted by Jupiter AM, the team’s solid track record is based on an investment process that combines a quantitative asset selection approach with proprietary algorithms and rigorous qualitative analysis.
Following the announcement, Kiran Nandra, Head of Equities at Jupiter, stated: “Origin is the latest example of Jupiter’s ability to attract highly successful investment talent with strong commercial vision. We aim to expand our investment capabilities to serve a wide range of clients. Last year’s arrival of Adrian Gosden and Chris Morrison, followed by Alex Savvides and his team, significantly strengthened our UK equities expertise. Likewise, we eagerly anticipate the addition this year of the prestigious European equities team comprising Niall Gallagher, Chris Sellers, and Chris Legg.”
For his part, Tarlock Randhawa, who leads the team, added: “We are excited to join Jupiter, where the active and differentiated management philosophy, combined with a strong client focus, is clearly evident. The transition for our clients will be seamless, and we believe they will benefit from Jupiter’s commitment to excellence in client experience.”
In December, the global ETF industry captured $207.73 billion, raising net inflows for all of 2024 to $1.88 trillion, according to the report by ETFGI. This marks a new record for the sector, surpassing the previous high of $1.29 trillion recorded in 2021 and, of course, exceeding the 2023 total of $974.50 billion.
Additionally, global ETF assets stood at $14.85 trillion in 2024, the second-highest level ever recorded, only below the record of $15.12 trillion in November of the same year. “Assets under management increased by 27.6% in 2024, rising from $11.63 trillion at the end of 2023 to $14.85 trillion at the close of 2024,” notes the latest report by ETFGI.
Regarding the behavior of flows, the ETFGI report shows that out of the $207.73 billion in net inflows, equity ETFs captured $151.58 billion, raising 2024 net inflows to $1.11 trillion, far exceeding the $532.28 billion in 2023. As for fixed income ETFs, these vehicles attracted $16.14 billion in December, bringing 2024 net inflows to $314.32 billion, higher than the $272.90 billion in 2023.
Looking at other asset classes, commodity ETFs reported net outflows of $1.11 billion in December, bringing 2024 net inflows to $3.91 billion, better than the net outflows of $16.88 billion in 2023. Meanwhile, active ETFs attracted net inflows of $41.78 billion in December, bringing 2024 net inflows to $374.30 billion, much higher than the $184.07 billion in net inflows in 2023.
According to Deborah Fuhr, managing partner, founder, and owner of ETFGI, “The S&P 500 index declined 2.38% in December but rose 25.02% in 2024. Developed markets, excluding the U.S. index, declined 2.78% in December but increased 3.81% in 2024. Denmark (down 12.34%) and Australia (down 7.90%) recorded the largest declines among developed markets in December. The emerging markets index increased 0.19% during December and rose 11.96% in 2024. The United Arab Emirates (up 6.42%) and Greece (up 4.21%) recorded the largest increases among emerging markets in December.”
Evolution of Offerings
The ETFGI report also highlights that the global ETF industry reached a new milestone with 1,988 new products launched in 2024. It explains that this represents a net increase of 1,366 products after accounting for 622 closures, surpassing the previous record of 1,841 new ETFs launched in 2021.
Specifically, the distribution of new launches in 2024 was as follows: 746 in the United States, 606 in Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), and 323 in Europe. Additionally, a total of 398 providers contributed to these new launches, which are distributed across 43 exchanges worldwide. Notably, iShares launched the largest number of new products, with 96, followed by Global X ETFs with 69 and First Trust with 57.
“There were 622 closures from 177 providers across 29 exchanges. The United States reported the highest number of closures with 196, followed by Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan) with 156, and Europe also with 156. Among the new launches, there were 954 active products, 650 indexed equity products, and 191 indexed fixed-income products,” noted ETFGI.
Between 2020 and 2024, the global ETF industry experienced significant growth in the number of launches, increasing from 1,131 to 1,988. In 2024, the United States and Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan) recorded the highest number of launches, reaching 746 and 606, respectively, while Latin America had the fewest launches, with only 26. The United States and Canada achieved record numbers of new launches in 2024, with 746 and 189, respectively. Additionally, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan) achieved its launch record in 2021, with 645; Europe set its record of 434 in 2021; Latin America recorded 41 in 2021; Japan reached 44 in 2023; and the Middle East and Africa achieved 86 in 2020.
