What if a Tourist Attraction Could Also be a Great Investment?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

¿Y si una atracción turística a parte de ofrecer ocio y diversión fuera una extraordinaria inversión?
Wikimedia CommonsPhoto: Straco corporation. What if a Tourist Attraction Could Also be a Great Investment?

One of the most frequent questions we are asked as Fund managers is from where we get our investment ideas.  While most of us will use a screening tool to filter down companies from the investable universe (up to 17,000 stocks across the globe from which to choose!) we also use other sources: direct observation, forums, webinars, and other fund manager’s portfolios, to name a few.  My latest investment idea came to me after remembering a recent exchange I had with a close group of friends.

For a number of years now, my friends and I make an effort and force ourselves to meet up for dinner every Thursday.  No matter the occasion, we use it as an excuse to stay in touch with one and other at least once every week.  A couple of months ago, it was one of the couple’s turn to host and; as always, we found ourselves hearing about their latest holiday to yet another exotic location.  They travel quite extensively and are never short of a story having visited Angel’s Fall in Venezuela, Indonesia and its Komodo Dragons, Bora Bora’s remote beaches in French Polynesia and the Gobi desert with a short stay in St Petersburg beforehand.  Their stories are generally told through videos.  This is not always by everyone’s choice but we can hardly say no to them once they begin playing them!  On this occasion, they were telling us about Singapore, the Marina Bay Sands Skypark, its botanical gardens and the city’s iconic Ferris wheel, the Singapore Flyer. I then began wondering who owned and managed such a unique tourist attraction and much like the iconic London Eye, Mickey’s Fun Wheel in the U.S., the Riesenrad in Vienna and the Zhengzhou Ferris wheel in China… were the companies behind them good investment opportunities?  A week later and after some additional research in the industry, I landed upon Straco Corporation.

Investment Idea- STRACO CORPORATION (STCO)

Straco Corp. is a leading leisure listed company that develops and manages tourism-related assets mainly in Singapore and China.  Their businesses include: the Singapore Flyer (SF), Shanghai Ocean Aquarium (SOA), Underwater World Xiamen (UWX), The Lixing Cable Service (LLC) in China, among others.  Straco was founded in 2002 and was listed in the Singapore stock exchange from February 2004.  The company’s market capitalization is EUR 453m, a share price of around SGD 0.86 and a total turnover close to SGD 130m (EUR 80m).  

What sets Straco Corporation apart and why does this company fall into Global Quality Edge Fund’s investment philosophy?

Straight-forward and easy-to-understand business – Almost all its revenue comes from ticket sales to their tourist attractions, while their costs are mainly those associated to upkeep and maintenance of their assets and their employee’s salary (35% of total costs)

Operating Leverage – Managing tourist-related assets will involve up to 80% of fixed costs of total costs, which translates into a high operating leverage and in turn, high margins and profitability.

Pricing power – Straco is able to increase prices to their tourist’s attractions by 10 to 15% every 2 to 3 years without having an impact on final demand. From Chart 1, we can how the operating gross margin has grown over the past few years (93% correlation), proving the company’s pricing power advantage.

Barriers to entry – The strategic geographic sites in Singapore and China plus the difficulty in obtaining licensing permissions to build and run tourist attractions at a very high cost are all good indicators of high entry barriers for would-be competitors.

Assets shielded from competition – Straco has built a lot of goodwill and strong relationships with the local authorities and governments in China and Singapore that have helped and advised the leisure company locate the ideal sites for its tourist attractions.  Straco’s business is highly regulated and any new ventures would be hard to deliver without these.  

Strong experience and knowledge in the business – Mr. Wu Hsioh Kwang is the current CEO of Straco since March 2003 and has worked in the business in China since 1980, allowing him to leverage all his experience, knowledge and relationships to successfully run the day to day business.

Mr. Wu is also is chairman of the culture, education and community affairs committee at the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and vice-chairman of tourism and leisure for the Chinese business group at the Singapore Business Federation.  As a philanthropist, he donated $2m to University of California, Berkeley to aide overseas Chinese students.

Interest alignment between company management and stockholders – About 55% of Straco stock is owned between Mr. Wu and his wife, proving a clear interest alignment between investors and senior management.  This investment is structured through Straco Holding PTE.

Efficient capital management – Due to the nature of the business, Straco has been generating enough cash flow allowing the company to steadily increase dividends across the years, as well as repurchase shares whenever senior management perceives its stock is being undervalued.

Strong solvency – Total gross debt is only SGD 103m, including all off-balance sheet operating leases which add up to about SGD 50m.  If we take the company’s SGD 185m in cash, Straco’s net cash flow totals SGD 86m. It was only in the first few years that the company had debt on its balance sheet to finance the initial constructions of its tourist attractions.

Strong organic growth and potential for inorganic growth – During the last 5 to 10 years, total sales have grown at an annual compound rate above 20% with only 1 inorganic growth element after the company acquired the Singapore Flyer in deal worth up to SGD 117m for a 90% stake in 2014, using cash and debt.  Straco’s strong cash position would allow it to purchase other tourist assets to take on debt up to 2x EBITDA (SGD 160m) without compromising its balance sheet.  Mr. Wu (CEO) recently said in their 2016 annual report that “We [Straco] remain on the lookout for good projects to build or acquire, and continue to assess potential tourism investments, but until we come across the rare opportunity that is a true step forward in terms of quality, scale and potential returns, we will remain prudent in matters of cash management”

Reinvesting profits and high ROIC – Pay-out dividend rate is below 50%, allowing the company to have a strong cash position to invest in new assets or repurchase shares.  Straco is therefore not capital intensive with a low CAPEX (Capital Expenditure) and null strain on cash.  The company is able to maintain high-levels of return on invested capital (ROIC) at a sustained rate above 30%.

Management compensation – Approximately 45% of the CEO’s salary is made up of variable compensation in the shape of bonus and stock options, tied to long term business performance.

Neutral or negative cash-cycle – Straco does not need to finance its cash flow needs, as most of its ticket sales are paid in cash and suppliers are paid off within 85 days.

Low analyst coverage – The leisure company is covered only by 4 local broker analysts which is the best way to obtain information about the company is by speaking directly to its management.

Low percentage of institutional investors – We like the fact that institutional investors only represent less than 10% ownership in the company, currently hovering around 6%.  This directly translates Straco into a not-so-well-known company and increases the chances of it trading at a discount due to the limited information that can be found on the company.

Strong and sustainable competitive advantages – Straco’s competitive advantage exists in the form of a unique and regulated (intangible) asset and the strategic sites where they were built. As mentioned previously, the company faces very few if not no challenging competitors, as a result of the company’s exclusive and iconic assets that are difficult to replicate. The initial investment for a new tourist attraction would be incredibly high and pre-approval from local authorities and the government would be needed in order to operate a new project under the appropriate licenses.

The sites where the tourist attractions are located are also exclusive, offering unparalleled views of Singapore and Chinese cities in central locations making them the perfect place for first-time sightseers to visit.  This naturally protects and guarantees the company’s on-going ticket sales.

If a new site were to open, like Disneyland Shanghai did in June 2016, we do see this being a matter of concern and direct competition for Straco’s Shanghai Ocean Aquarium, as it would present itself as an opportunity to bring even more tourists to the city.

Share repurchasing announcement – On 28th April 2017, Straco announced a new share repurchase programme, authorizing a share buyback worth up to a maximum of 86.03m shares, equivalent to 10% of all shares outstanding.  Until 14th December 2017, the company had had only repurchased 0.1% of the total amount, leading us to believe that share repurchasing is a strong support for the company’s equity listing.

How do we value Straco Corporation?

The main business drivers of this leisure company can be narrowed down to 2: 1) Strong tourist traffic and 2) High consumer spending.  Stats from the China National Tourist office reveal that local tourism has been growing at 10% in the last five years accounting for almost 70% of 

China’s total tourism.  This industry makes up for 10% of China’s GDP while consumer spending is 65%, when measured for the first nine months of 2017.

A study called “Discover China’s Emerging Middle class” claims the sprawling urban middle class in China is set to reach 365m people by 2020 which widely supports the local positive trend seen in domestic tourism.  The China National Tourist office also sees a rise from international visitors that would reach 137.1million travelers by 2020 if current growth rates remain high.  In Singapore, the Singapore Tourism Board foresees a 1-3% growth in tourists coming from abroad to not only visit the island city-state but also from tourism drawn in by Indonesia and China that continue to register double digit rise in the number of visits.

Straco’s annual report breaks down the number of tourists they register each year at all their attractions:

In Chart 2, we can see how stable the business is and how almost every year it’s been able to increase the number of visitors to their sites.  Even during the last financial crisis, Straco maintained a net influx of tourists and its compound annual growth rate for the last 10 years has been above 10%.

In terms of reporting, Straco divides up its business in 3 segments: 1) Aquariums, 2) Giant Observation Wheels 3) others.  The aquariums represent approximately 70% of Total Sales and 82% of their Operating Income, while the Observation Wheels account for 29% and 16%, respectively.

Shanghai Ocean Aquarium and Underwater World Xiamen are among the Aquarium assets of the company.   Even though food and drink are sold at the parks, these do not make up as much of the Total Sales compared to the entry ticket sales.  This average at CNY 160 (EUR 20) for the Shanghai aquarium, CNY 130 (EUR 17) for Xiamen and CNY 200 (EUR 25) for the Singapore Flyer. 

To breakdown Straco total turnover worth SGD 130m, we assume an average ticket price of CNY 170 which will incorporate already a 25% discount rate (for either children, pensioners, disabled visitors, etc.) and multiply the average price by the number of visitors that were recorded until September last year: 5.05 visits.   The slight drop in 2016 which is then maintained and carried over to 2017 was owed to the lower number of tourists at Underwater World Xiamen (UWX) due to newly imposed tourism restrictions by local authorities.  We do not see this as a threat to the aquarium’s business as the company recently announced it was planning to off-set the drop in numbers by extending the hours in which the park remained open.

By now, you may know that Global Quality Edge Fund does not rely on consensus estimates as part of the investment decision process.  What we do is calculate a normalized operating margin with sufficient enough history that encompasses a full economic cycle.  In Straco’s case, we arrived at a 45% normalized operating margin, under our conservative view, which contrasts from the 52.2% actual reported by the company.   If we apply a 30% fiscal rate, our NOPAT (Net Operating Profit After Tax would result in SGD 40m over the last twelve month sales of SGD 127m.  We then move on to the Free Cash Flow and remind ourselves that the cash position of the company is neutral or negative, investments represent around 2.5% of Total Sales and the company allocates around 1.5% of Total Sales to stock option payments. From our view point, it’s an expense and therefore we subtract it.  This leaves us with a final normalized Free Cash Flow of SGD 52m, meaning the cash conversion rate is greater than 100%. Remarkable!

If we continue with our assumptions and calculate Straco’s Total Net Cash at SGD 86m, the total number of shares outstanding is SGD 865m (4m convertible shares due to stock options) and applying a last twelve month price to earnings multiple (PE) of 15x, our intrinsic value for Straco’s share price is SGD 0.96/share, 12% higher than its current price.  It is important to note that this intrinsic value of SGD 0.96 does not assume any future growth, nor does it take into account price increases or a premium on top of its multiple due to the high quality business they run.   If we were to adjust our calculation and incorporate our previous observations on growth, pricing power and premium, our theoretical value would be of SGD 126, with a safety margin of almost 50% of today’s current price of SGD 0.86.  Our floor value in the event of an economic recession (unlikely under the current conditions in the far east but still possible) is of SGD 0.65, in other words, a 25% drop from current levels, at which point we would increase our stake and allocation in our fund. 

Which are Straco’s main risks?

A more relaxed stance in their pricing power in future years, exposure to terror attacks, competing companies building more tourist attractions in surrounding areas, unexpected maintenance costs that could lead to disruptions in service or technical faults that could put guests at risk.

Are there any red flags?

We have not found any relevant accounting red flag.  We only have to bear in mind that tourist attractions have a strong seasonal component to them, especially around the 3rd quarter of the year where more than half of Total Sales are booked.

How was the company’s last quarterly result 3Q17?

Mr Wu told investors in his last earnings call for the 3rd quarter of 2017, “We are satisfied with the overall performance for the year-to-date as our attractions, other than UWX, registered positive growth. UWX’s performance had been impacted by falling visitor numbers, which dropped more than 30% in 3Q due to the further restriction on visitor 2 numbers to Gulangyu by the local authorities, as well as tight traffic control in Xiamen city in view of the 2017 BRICS Summit held in September”.

In conclusion, we see Straco Corporation as an extraordinary company with clear and sustainable competitive advantages, a unique set of assets, sound capital management, experienced Senior management, committed to their investors and trading at a discount 15x below profits or 8x EBITDA.

Column by Quim Abril, founder and portfolio manager of Global Quality Edge Fund

 

PORTFOLIO MANAGER’S NOTE: I wrote this report by myself and expressed only my opinion. This report is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Directly or indirectly, the portfolio manager has a position in the assets mentioned here.

 

Global Debt

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

La deuda global
Courtesy photo. Global Debt

On 9 February, President Trump signed a two-year budget deal that funds the US federal government up to 23 March and suspends the debt ceiling for one year. The agreement averts another government shutdown, which has now happened nine times since 1990. The solution has been a boost to spending that adds to the growing deficit in order to finance operations and governmental agencies.

The above is just an example of how debt is increasing. In January 2018, the Institute of International Finance (IIF) calculated that in the third quarter of 2017, the debt of households, businesses, banks and governments all over the world soared to a record total of €193.3 trillion. With this figure, the debt-to-GDP ratio is 318%. Broken down by economies, 74% of the debt corresponds to developed countries and the remaining 26% belongs to emerging economies. And in terms of sectors, the distribution is as follows: Households 18.70%; non-financial corporates 29.53%; financial sector 24.82%; and governments 26.95%.

There is a growing trend over the last few years, and the expansive monetary policies of the main central banks (that have brought interest rates down to zero or lower) has a lot to do with it. It has allowed for cheap financing, which has been exploited mainly by businesses, and investors, in the context of excess liquidity and a low default rate, have taken on these new issues, which have generally been very oversubscribed.

As for the public deficit, how can it be reduced? Let us examine some of the main options:

  1. Increase revenue through increased taxes and reduced spending. For example, by eliminating benefits. Governments do not like the sound of this option due to the political cost involved. Some countries may have room to manoeuvre when it comes to implementing expansive fiscal policies, as is the case in the US, but these policies mean added pressure on the debt and the sustainability of public finances.
  2. Reduce interest rates which reduce financial cost. Up until now, this has been the case, but it could come to an end, because it seems that several of the main central banks are currently moving in synch towards toughening monetary policies. An increase in interest rates could hinder the solvency of those more indebted governments. For example, in China, where there a high level of debt with regards to the real estate sector and shadow banking and there is a risk that it will end up affecting sovereign solvency. Or Japan, with a government debt-to-GDP ratio of 223.8% (estimated total debt is 400%). With 10-year rates below 0.10% and savers who are continuously repurchasing the maturities, Japan so far does not seem to be causing too much concern.
  3. Generate inflation. Central banks’ prime objective. Even if it remains low, the chance of surprise increased inflation is higher than in previous years, particularly within the context of more dynamic economic expansion that influences an acceleration in salary growth.
  4. Economic growth is the most desirable scenario. Without a doubt, this is the healthiest option, which allows for an increase in tax revenue and, therefore, a reduction in debt and an increase in financial sustainability. In this regard, the positive outlook of international institutions like the IMF and the OECD, or the early data from business confidence indicators, which are often at all-time highs, allows us to believe that economic growth will contribute to this necessary debt reduction.
  5. But if everything fails, in the event that we are unable to meet obligations, we are faced with the dreaded default, but we hope that debt is used prudently and that it does not reach this extreme.

It has taken us almost a decade to get over the last financial crisis caused by excessive leveraging. The combined action of the main central banks has played a fundamental role in restoring normality to economic activity. However, if history repeats itself, will they have enough margin to apply the same policies? Investors must be very aware of the indebtedness variable when selecting investments and demanding adequate return on each risk they assume.

At the time of writing, global public debt according to https://www.nationaldebtclocks.org/ is at $69,623,405,723,931. I suggest you visit the website and check the current figure.
 
Column by Josep Maria Pon of Crèdit Andorrà Financial Group Research.

Mariano Belinky, New Head at Santander Asset Management

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Mariano Belinky, nuevo responsable de Santander Asset Management
Foto cedidaMariano Belinky, courtesy photo. Mariano Belinky, New Head at Santander Asset Management

Banco Santander appointed Mariano Belinky as Head of Santander Asset Management (‘SAM’). Belinky joins SAM from Santander InnoVentures, the Bank’s $200 million fintech investment fund, which he has led successfully for the past three years.

Before joining Santander InnoVentures, Mariano Belinky was an Associate Principal at McKinsey where he advised global banks and asset managers across Europe and the Americas. He also worked in the research technology team at Bridgewater Associates in the United States, and as a trader in equity derivatives markets in his native Buenos Aires. He holds a bachelor’s degree in computer science and philosophy from New York University.

Víctor Matarranz, Head of Wealth Management, which comprises private banking and asset management, said: “By combining Santander’s experience and expertise in asset management with the Group’s technological capabilities, we can transform the services we offer our clients. Mariano has an outstanding track record in driving innovation and delivering for customers and I am confident he will help Santander Asset Management achieve its full potential.”

Santander Asset Management has a history spanning more than 45 years and a presence in 11 countries in Europe and Latin America. It manages €182 billion in assets across all types of investment vehicles, from mutual and pension funds to discretionary portfolios and alternative investments. SAM’s investment solutions include bespoke Latin American and European fixed income and equity mandates. The company employs more than 700 professionals around the world.

Belinky replaces Juan Manuel San Román who is leaving the Group for personal reasons. Victor Matarranz said, “I’d like to thank Juanma for his service to the Group and his support during the transition.”

Manuel Silva will continue to head the Santander Innoventures investment team and Mario Aransay will continue to lead portfolio partnerships for the fund.

Exan Capital Starts the Year Buying a 144 Million Trophy Property

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Exan Capital comienza el año con la adquisición de un edificio representativo en Washington por más de 140 millones de dólares
Foto cedidaCourtesy photo. Exan Capital Starts the Year Buying a 144 Million Trophy Property

900 G Street NW, a trophy 112,635-square- foot office building in the East End submarket of Washington, DC, has new owners. The property sold for $144 million to an affiliate of Masaveu Real Estate US that was advised by EXAN Capital. The strategic acquisition of 900 G will grow Masaveu’s footprint in the U.S. with a portfolio value of more than $720 million. ASB completed the transaction on behalf of the Allegiance Fund, its $6.2 billion core investment vehicle that owned the property.

ASB developed 900 G Street in partnership with MRP Realty and subsequently acquired MRP’s interest after the project reached stabilization in 2016. The property is now 95% leased to high profile and blue-chip legal and government affairs tenants including Simpson Thacher, Swiss RE, Rio Tinto, Herman Miller, Truth Initiative, and BMW.

The project was designed by Gensler and earned NAIOP’s award for Best Urban Office Building up to 150,000 square feet in 2016.

Larry Braithwaite, Senior Vice President and Portfolio Manager of ASB’s Allegiance Fund, said: “We saw a strategic, and somewhat unique, opportunity to take advantage of domestic and international capital demand for new Class A product after successfully leasing up this one of a kind trophy project.” “Given current supply/demand dynamics in the market, and the strong interest in assets of this caliber, the sale facilitated our plan for prudently managing the Fund’s overall portfolio,” Braithwaite said.

At about about $1,270/sf, This is a record per-foot price for a Washington office building. Last June, Norges Bank Investment of Norway and Oxford Properties of Toronto paid $1,180/sf, or $151 million, for the 128,000-sf building at 900 16th Street NW from a JBG Cos. partnership in a deal handled by JLL.

Quaero Capital and Tiburon Partners Join Forces

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Quaero Capital llega a un acuerdo para fusionarse con Tiburon Partners
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainJamesQube. Quaero Capital and Tiburon Partners Join Forces

M&A’s are off to a good start of the year. QUAERO CAPITAL and London based Asian fund management specialist Tiburon Partners have announced that, subject to FCA and FINMA approval, they will join forces.

The tie-up, under the QUAERO CAPITAL brand, will form a single business managing more than USD 2.3 billion.

In line with the shared boutique philosophy the combined business will remain 100% employee owned and continue to focus on highly concentrated, actively managed, value strategies.

QUAERO CAPITAL CEO Jean Keller said, “We are delighted to be joining forces with another excellent value specialist as our skills and expertise are wholly complementary. We are also excited to have a substantial presence in London – one of the key centres for investment talent in the world.”

Tiburon Partners’s senior partner Rupert Kimber said, “QUAERO CAPITAL’s managers think and work like us. They have a similar investment approach based on value orientated, concentrated portfolios. So, naturally, we are keen to partner with a firm which shares our philosophy, and can take our offering more widely around Europe.“

Corporate Debt and Inflation-Linked Bonds Are Amongst this Year’s Best Options in Fixed Income

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Deuda corporativa y bonos ligados a la inflación: entre las mejores opciones en renta fija para este año
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainPhoto: Petraboekhoff. Corporate Debt and Inflation-Linked Bonds Are Amongst this Year’s Best Options in Fixed Income

Asset management companies agree that 2018 will be characterized by a low rate environment and by a slow normalization of monetary policies calculated step by step to avoid damaging global growth. Once again, this leaves us with the same question as to what to expect from fixed income, to which so many investors and asset managers look with suspicion due to the low profitability it offers.

Where will the opportunities lie in this type of assets? For Hans Bevers and Bruno Colmant, Chief Economist and Head of Macro Analysis respectively, at Degroof Petercam, the context has to be taken into account. Neither one expects the normalization process of monetary policies to produce much higher yields than long-term bonds.

In an environment of very low interest rates, Degroof Petercam proposes the following alternatives to sovereign debt: investment grade corporate debt in Euros, which offers a limited return, but with durations that are often shorter than those of sovereign debt, and international bonds linked to inflation.

“Although inflation levels have recently disappointed, inflation-linked bonds remain attractive considering that overall growth forecasts and the improvement of the labor market situation should translate into a modest rise in inflation. We believe that valuations of inflation-linked bonds do not fully reflect this perspective,” says Jérôme van der Bruggen, Head of Private Banking Investment at Degroof Petercam.

In turn, SYZ AM points to credit as a key asset for 2018 within fixed income, despite its high valuations and the risks involved. “As far as the bond market is concerned, everyone knows that the sovereign returns of Western countries are low. However, it isn’t the government bond segment where the values of the fixed-income market are trivial. It’s in corporate credit. After years of ultra-accommodative monetary policy and a desperate search for profitability by investors, corporate credit in general, and high-yield markets in particular, have become the most expensive asset class in the world,” says Hartwig. Kos, Vice-CIO of Investments and Co-Head of Multi-assets at SYZ AM. He advises that, in an environment where inflationary pressures are rising and the stance on the ECB’s monetary policy is tightening, the high-yield market and its valuations are “clearly vulnerable.” According to Kos, “in investors’ minds at the present moment the asset class chosen is equity. And, in fact, although bonds are expensive, in comparison, equity is at a reasonable value. This is obviously a relative argument, but when you look at equity valuations in absolute terms the picture looks quite different.”

USA

AtEthenea, they take this into consideration and do not expect a rate hike, but they do not rule out that there will continue to be a significant demand on fixed income. “In this environment, and with continued demand from both domestic and foreign institutional investors, we believe that the pressure on long-term bonds should remain moderate. At the same time, continued strong economic conditions, favorable refinancing conditions, and low default rates should support spreads on corporate bonds,” explains Guido Bathels, Portfolio Manager at Ethnea Independent Investors.

According to Bathels, in the United States, we find a slightly different environment given the time of the economic cycle in which it is and the short-term increase in interest rates. “It’s possible that the rate increase of the first half of the year is corrected downward during the second half due to economic concerns. If this reverses, the profitability curve during the year would be a clear indicator of an impending economic slowdown. This prospect could put pressure on the risk premiums of corporate bonds. This type of scenario would definitely have an impact on interest rates and spreads in Europe towards the end of the year,” he explains.

In this context of global growth, but certain financial uncertainties, Bathels argues that active management and a flexible investment approach will be very important in order to not miss the opportunities that arise in the fixed income market.

Gonzalo Milans Del Bosch Takes Over As Santander Asset Management’s New CIO

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Santander Asset Management nombra a Gonzalo Milans Del Bosch nuevo CIO
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainGonzalo Milans Del Bosch, courtesy photo. Gonzalo Milans Del Bosch Takes Over As Santander Asset Management's New CIO

Santander Asset Management, has a new CIO. Gonzalo Milans Del Bosch has been chosen to replace the current head of Investments, Dolores Ybarra, according to sources close to the bank that confirmed the news to Funds Society.

Ybarra, which was CIO since 2011, will now be the Global Head of Products and will support Milans Del Bosch in the transition to adopt its new functions.

Milans Del Bosch has until now been responsible for the  Investment “Inversiones y Participaciones” division of Banco Santander.

Lyxor Sees in ETFs an Opportunity for Sustainable Investment to Continue Growing

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Lyxor ve en los ETFs una oportunidad para que la inversión sostenible siga creciendo
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFrancois Millet, courtesy photo. Lyxor Sees in ETFs an Opportunity for Sustainable Investment to Continue Growing

Lyxor ETF has a new route for sustainable investment. The firm argues for the expansion of this type of investment and how ETFs have become a remarkable vehicle to invest under ESG criteria. A trend that the firm believes will continue to grow given that so far only 1% of European ETFs follow these investment criteria.

According to the management company’s assessment, these figures show great potential for growth. In addition, in terms of investment strategies, and taking Europe as a reference, it is observed that all strategies increased since 2013. As an indication, Lyxor ETF points out that just those strategies with exclusion criteria grew by 22% in 2015, as compared to 2013. This trend is compounded by the popularity and demand for passive strategies, which leaves the ideal framework for the development of sustainable investment through ETFs.

“ETFs can democratize access to these strategies because it is difficult for an investor to participate in certain assets, such as green bonds, for example. Instead, by using ETFs to diversify the portfolio, this type of asset can be accessed. In addition, it should be noted that they have lower costs, especially those that are contracted through digital platforms,” explains Francois Millet, Head of Product Line Management at Lyxor. Due to these qualities, Millet argues that it will be the millennial investors who will resort more readily to this type of solutions.

In his analysis of sustainable investment, Millet points out that, within the status that sustainable investment has in Europe, “we observe that the strategies that grow the most, investment through exclusion, impact investment, and sustainability issues, are precisely those invested in by passive management,” he says.

At Lyxor ETF, they have addressed this type of investment with two proposals: thematic investment and investment in indices. “In the case of the thematic investment, we have four ETFs that are within the theme of the UN Millennium Goals. They are related to energy, equality, water and green funds. Transforming these objectives into investment strategies is complicated, but it can be done by participating in the market of those megatrends which affect these issues,” says Millet.

Regarding their second proposal, the indices, he emphasizes that “investment is based on the sustainable rating of the companies. However, in order to consider these indices, data, exclusion strategies by sector or activity, and demonstrating that they prioritize certain objectives, are required”. In this regard, the firm uses the MSCI indexes.

Passive vs. active

At Lyxor ETF, they opt for an active use of passive management or, at least, a smart combination in order to address market needs. “In less efficient market areas, active managers are able to capture greater profitability; while in more efficient markets it is more complicated, and therefore, passive management makes more sense because the active manager has a harder time achieving good investment behavior”, explains Marlène Hassine Konqui, Head of ETF Research at Lyxor, who argues that the conflicting vision of active management versus passive management is wrong.

“For us, it makes more sense for active managers to include passive strategies in their portfolios which allow them to capture returns or help the portfolio to have a certain behavior,” she points out. According to her estimates, the perfect balance between these two management styles would be 70% of passive management and smart beta strategies, and 30% of active management.

What Were the Asset Management Industry’s Major Business Operations in 2017?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

¿Cuáles fueron las grandes operaciones de negocio de la industria de gestión de activos en 2017?
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainDevanath. What Were the Asset Management Industry’s Major Business Operations in 2017?

2017 was a good year for operations, acquisitions, mergers and expansion into new markets by leading international asset management companies; yet another example of the asset management industry trend towards higher concentration, while seeking higher efficiency and margin growth. Technology, regulatory changes, opening into new markets and strengthening their product supply capacity put these operations into context.

One of the major ones was the Aberdeen Asset Management and Standard Life merger, which together have become one of the largest investment companies in the world with 737 billion Euros in assets under management. The merger was closed in August, after the operation was announced in early March.

According to the firm, the merger leverages the complementary capabilities of both companies, leaders in the investment and savings market. The result is an investment group with strong brands, at the forefront of institutional and wholesale distribution franchises, market leading platforms and access to lasting strategic alliances globally.

Also, by combining the strong balance sheets of both companies, the resulting group has greater capacity for investing, as well as to grow and innovate. Together, Standard Life Aberdeen has offices in 50 cities around the world, serving clients in 80 countries. In addition, the firm maintains a market capitalization of more than 12.1 billion Euros (11 billion pounds).

The other two major operations in 2017 were the merger between Henderson and Janus Capital, and Amundi’s acquisition of Pioneer Investments. Regarding the first of those operations, it was carried out through a share exchange: each Janus share was exchanged for 4.719 new Henderson shares. With this exchange, Henderson shareholders took control of 57% of the capital and Janus shareholders of the remaining 43%. The resulting company, Janus Henderson Global Investors, has 320 billion dollars in assets under management and a market capitalization of around 6 billion.

The combination of both businesses has created an important global leader in asset management with a significant scale, as well as a great diversity of products and investment strategies, and great depth in global distribution of funds. In fact, Janus’ strength in the US market will combine with Henderson’s in the United Kingdom and Europe, creating a very global management company, with a very diverse and widespread geographic footprint.

The acquisition of Pioneer Investments, which was closed towards the end of 2016 for an amount of 3.545 billion Euros, is the third major operation that the sector saw last year. During the first six months, Amundi established the new group’s growth strategy, defined the priorities of its business lines, and established an integration plan; so that by July it was able to completely close the purchase.

Although with a little less dimension than the previous operations, another important transaction within the industry has been Schroder’s acquisition of Adveq, an asset manager specialized in private capital worldwide. As a result, of Adveq’s acquisition – which was renamed Schroder Adveq – Schroders’ private assets business rose to more than $ 7 billion in client commitments.

Other Operations

Other operations carried out by asset management companies with the aim of growing in markets where they already had a presence have perhaps been less striking. The clearest example was BlackRock’s purchase of Citi’s asset management business in Mexico in November 2017. With this operation, BlackRock in Mexico doubled its size.

In fact, BlackRock and Citibanamex, a member of Citigroup, signed an agreement for BlackRock to acquire Citibanamex’s asset management business. Impulsora de Fondos Banamex, has approximately 31 billion dollars in assets under management through fixed-income products, equities, and multiple asset products, mainly for consumer banking clients.

UBS also looked at growth possibilities in Latin America and bought CONSENSO, Brazil’s largest family office, in May. Both companies closed an agreement under which UBS acquired a majority stake in the Brazilian multi-family office that will result in the combination of its wealth management operations in Brazil. The resulting division is being directed by both, UBS executives and CONSENSUS’ founding partners.

With this operation, UBS consolidated its capabilities in Brazil, improving its offer for local clients and offering advice from a global player in the sector. The entity recognized after closing the agreement that this transaction allows them to accelerate their expansion in Brazil and to reaffirm their commitment to grow the wealth management business.

And for 2018?

These are just some of the most significant operations of 2017, which was a year when the industry showed some concentration and the search for synergies. The trend has continued during the first weeks of 2018, during which we have already witnessed First Eagle Investment Management’s acquisition of NewStar Financial, and the announcement of a merger agreement between Quaero Capital and Tiburon Partners. The big question now is what else will this year bring.

According to experts, it would not be unusual for this trend to continue as asset management firms face a change in their own industry marked by technological challenges, such as blockchain technology or bitcoin development, by new millennial consumers, by passive management’s strength, and by the pressure that all this is asserting on its margins.

Franklin Templeton Investments to Acquire Edinburgh Partners

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Franklin Templeton Investments llega a un acuerdo para adquirir Edinburgh Partners
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainPhoto: Mikewiz. Franklin Templeton Investments to Acquire Edinburgh Partners

The M&A market is off to a good start of the year with Franklin Templeton Investments announcing that it has entered into an agreement to acquire Edinburgh Partners Limited, which managed approximately US $10 billion as of December 31, 2017 in global and emerging markets equities. The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and is expected to be completed in the first half of 2018. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.

Jenny Johnson, president and chief operating officer of Franklin Resources said, “We’re pleased to announce the acquisition of Edinburgh Partners, an established global value investment manager, and to welcome back Dr. Sandy Nairn to our organization. Dr. Nairn worked alongside the late legendary global investor, Sir John Templeton, and was employed by Franklin Templeton for more than a decade. He brings a tremendous amount of leadership experience and expertise in managing global and international equities, an area that continues to be of strong interest to our clients around the world. This is the latest example of the firm continuing to make strategic investments in relatively small, yet highly experienced asset management teams that complement Franklin Templeton’s global offerings.”  

Nairn will become chairman of Templeton Global Equity Group and remain investment partner and CEO of Edinburgh Partners. He will report to Stephen Dover, Franklin Templeton’s head of Equities.

Based in Edinburgh, with an office in London and two in the United States, Edinburgh Partners is an independent fund management company that invests globally with an emphasis on absolute returns over a long-term time horizon. Its team of 12 investment professionals are highly regarded within the international asset management industry, with a combined average tenure of 22 years managing four distinctive strategies. 

Templeton Global Equity Group is a pioneer in global investing, with a storied investment philosophy that dates back to the 1940s. Templeton’s team of 39 experienced investment professionals, based in offices around the world, search for undervalued stocks across all sectors and regions globally. Templeton Global Equity Group manages over US $101 billion in assets as of December 31, 2017.

“Dr. Nairn and his experienced team will be an excellent addition to our global equity capabilities,” said Dover. “As chairman of Templeton Global Equity Group, Dr. Nairn will bring many new insights to share, having run his own firm for the last 15 years, while also drawing upon his in-depth knowledge of the Templeton investment philosophy and process from his many prior years with the group. We look forward to having Dr. Nairn and his team join our strong lineup of investment groups.”

Nairn said, “I am very excited to be coming back to Templeton, the company that gave me my great appreciation for global investing. My team and I are deeply familiar with the history and strong reputation of the broader Franklin Templeton organization, and we’re pleased to join such a well-regarded firm. I look forward to sharing my perspective and experience with the Franklin Templeton organization. The access to Franklin Templeton’s extensive global resources will allow me to focus my time on investment management, as we continually seek to bolster our investment process and enhance our clients’ experience.”