Equities in September Closed on a High Note, but Long-Term Rates are Still Low…

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Screen Shot 2019-10-03 at 8
Photo: PxHere CC0. Equities in September Closed on a High Note, but Long-Term Rates are Still Low...

In a notable display of resiliency, U.S. stocks closed September near all-time highs against a very uncertain investment backdrop and finished the month and the third quarter with a gain and with a double-digit return for the nine months. Stock prices gyrated as they interfaced with diverse news headlines and world events. A partial list of topics includes the China/U.S. trade war, Brexit, Saudi oil field drone attack, central bank easing, yield curve inversion, negative interest rates, U.S. recession concerns, and relatively slow growth in China and Europe.

Top trade negotiators for the U.S. and China are set to square off on October 10-11 in Washington, as both sides seem more willing to resolve some issues. The U.S. economy, though starting to show some trade war related stress in the industrial sector, is still expected to grow about two percent in the third quarter. Employment, housing and a record $113.5 trillion household net worth are key.

During the post FOMC Statement Press Conference Q&A on September 18, Chairman Powell asked a timely rhetorical question: “But why are long-term rates low?  There can be a signal about expectations about growth there for sure, but there can also just be low term premiums. For example, it can just be that there’s this large quantity of negative yielding and very low yielding sovereign debt around the world, and inevitably that’s exerting downward pressure on U.S. sovereign rates without really necessarily having an independent signal.”

Corporate earnings, as measured by the S&P 500, are currently projected to rise 4.1 percent in Q4 2019 and be up 11.2 percent in 2020 based on IBES data. Though global M&A activity declined in the third quarter due to trade war fears, a September 30 NIKKEI Asian Review headline – Japan eyes tax breaks to steer idle cash into M&A deals – Companies hoarding profits miss out on innovation, ruling party tax chief says – sets up new deals for merger arbitrage.

GAMCO continues to research new investment opportunities in the North American equipment rental market for infrastructure replacement and new structures for highways, bridges, buildings, energy and water. Public drinking water systems are projected to need about a trillion dollars in upgrades and new systems over the next 25 years.

Column by Gabelli Funds, written by Michael Gabelli

__________________________________

To access our proprietary value investment methodology, and dedicated merger arbitrage portfolio we offer the following UCITS Funds in each discipline:

GAMCO MERGER ARBITRAGE

GAMCO Merger Arbitrage UCITS Fund, launched in October 2011, is an open-end fund incorporated in Luxembourg and compliant with UCITS regulation. The team, dedicated strategy, and record dates back to 1985. The objective of the GAMCO Merger Arbitrage Fund is to achieve long-term capital growth by investing primarily in announced equity merger and acquisition transactions while maintaining a diversified portfolio. The Fund utilizes a highly specialized investment approach designed principally to profit from the successful completion of proposed mergers, takeovers, tender offers, leveraged buyouts and other types of corporate reorganizations. Analyzes and continuously monitors each pending transaction for potential risk, including: regulatory, terms, financing, and shareholder approval.

Merger investments are a highly liquid, non-market correlated, proven and consistent alternative to traditional fixed income and equity securities. Merger returns are dependent on deal spreads. Deal spreads are a function of time, deal risk premium, and interest rates. Returns are thus correlated to interest rate changes over the medium term and not the broader equity market. The prospect of rising rates would imply higher returns on mergers as spreads widen to compensate arbitrageurs. As bond markets decline (interest rates rise), merger returns should improve as capital allocation decisions adjust to the changes in the costs of capital.

Broad Market volatility can lead to widening of spreads in merger positions, coupled with our well-researched merger portfolios, offer the potential for enhanced IRRs through dynamic position sizing. Daily price volatility fluctuations coupled with less proprietary capital (the Volcker rule) in the U.S. have contributed to improving merger spreads and thus, overall returns. Thus our fund is well positioned as a cash substitute or fixed income alternative.

Our objectives are to compound and preserve wealth over time, while remaining non-correlated to the broad global markets. We created our first dedicated merger fund 32 years ago. Since then, our merger performance has grown client assets at an annualized rate of  approximately 10.7% gross and 7.6% net since 1985. Today, we manage assets on behalf of institutional and high net worth clients globally in a variety of fund structures and mandates.

Class I USD – LU0687944552
Class I EUR – LU0687944396
Class A USD – LU0687943745
Class A EUR – LU0687943661
Class R USD – LU1453360825
Class R EUR – LU1453361476

GAMCO ALL CAP VALUE

The GAMCO All Cap Value UCITS Fund launched in May, 2015 utilizes Gabelli’s its proprietary PMV with a Catalyst™ investment methodology, which has been in place since 1977. The Fund seeks absolute returns through event driven value investing. Our methodology centers around fundamental, research-driven, value based investing with a focus on asset values, cash flows and identifiable catalysts to maximize returns independent of market direction. The fund draws on the experience of its global portfolio team and 35+ value research analysts.

GAMCO is an active, bottom-up, value investor, and seeks to achieve real capital appreciation (relative to inflation) over the long term regardless of market cycles. Our value-oriented stock selection process is based on the fundamental investment principles first articulated in 1934 by Graham and Dodd, the founders of modern security analysis, and further augmented by Mario Gabelli in 1977 with his introduction of the concepts of Private Market Value (PMV) with a Catalyst™ into equity analysis. PMV with a Catalyst™ is our unique research methodology that focuses on individual stock selection by identifying firms selling below intrinsic value with a reasonable probability of realizing their PMV’s which we define as the price a strategic or financial acquirer would be willing to pay for the entire enterprise.  The fundamental valuation factors utilized to evaluate securities prior to inclusion/exclusion into the portfolio, our research driven approach views fundamental analysis as a three pronged approach:  free cash flow (earnings before, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, minus the capital expenditures necessary to grow/maintain the business); earnings per share trends; and private market value (PMV), which encompasses on and off balance sheet assets and liabilities. Our team arrives at a PMV valuation by a rigorous assessment of fundamentals from publicly available information and judgement gained from meeting management, covering all size companies globally and our comprehensive, accumulated knowledge of a variety of sectors. We then identify businesses for the portfolio possessing the proper margin of safety and research variables from our deep research universe.

Class I USD – LU1216601648
Class I EUR – LU1216601564
Class A USD – LU1216600913
Class A EUR – LU1216600673
Class R USD – LU1453359900
Class R EUR – LU1453360155

Disclaimer:
The information and any opinions have been obtained from or are based on sources believed to be reliable but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No responsibility can be accepted for any consequential loss arising from the use of this information. The information is expressed at its date and is issued only to and directed only at those individuals who are permitted to receive such information in accordance with the applicable statutes. In some countries the distribution of this publication may be restricted. It is your responsibility to find out what those restrictions are and observe them.

Some of the statements in this presentation may contain or be based on forward looking statements, forecasts, estimates, projections, targets, or prognosis (“forward looking statements”), which reflect the manager’s current view of future events, economic developments and financial performance. Such forward looking statements are typically indicated by the use of words which express an estimate, expectation, belief, target or forecast. Such forward looking statements are based on an assessment of historical economic data, on the experience and current plans of the investment manager and/or certain advisors of the manager, and on the indicated sources. These forward looking statements contain no representation or warranty of whatever kind that such future events will occur or that they will occur as described herein, or that such results will be achieved by the fund or the investments of the fund, as the occurrence of these events and the results of the fund are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The actual portfolio, and thus results, of the fund may differ substantially from those assumed in the forward looking statements. The manager and its affiliates will not undertake to update or review the forward looking statements contained in this presentation, whether as result of new information or any future event or otherwise.

 

Artemio Hernández Joins AIS Financial Group

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

artemio
Foto cedida. artemio

AIS Financial Group has hired Artemio Hernández Salort as Head of its Fund Solutions Division. He will report directly to Samir Lakkis, founding partner of the company.

AIS currently distributes over 1billion dollars a year in structured products and is currently looking to expand in order to diversify its business offering. Artemio will focus on third party fund distribution, a new business line which will be offered to clients of AIS and he will be responsible for.

Artemio has a degree in Business Administration from CUNEF and he joins AIS with over 10 years of experience in the sector. He had previously worked in the Private Banking division at Credit Suisse in Madrid, Zurich and Panama where he focused on fund selection for the Iberian and Latinamaerican markets. His most recent position was as a private banker for the Iberian market at UBS, Geneva.

With offices in Madrid, Geneva, Bahamas and currently opening a fourth office in Panama, AIS will look to partner with those managers who want to outsource their sales force and benefit from the knowledge and experience that the company has in the region.

 

 

Goldman Sachs AM Launches its European ETF Business

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

cohete
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. cohete

Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM) has launched its European ETF business on Thursday. Its debut product, is the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF, a European version of their $6.5 billion flagship U.S. product, the largest milti-factor equity ETF in the world.

To complement the product that launched today on the London Stock Exchange and will be cross listed in various other European  stock exchanges, the company plans to launch a range of ETFs providing access to a number of markets, asset classes and investment styles over the next six months.

The ETFs are designed to be complementary to GSAM’s active fund range and used as part of broader, diversified portfolios.

GSAM started offering ETFs in 2015 in the U.S. and currently has 19 products with $14 billion in assets under management.

Global Financial Assets Fell in 2018 for the First Time Since the Financial Crisis

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Allianz estudio
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. Los activos financieros globales caen en 2018 por primera vez desde la crisis financiera

The tenth edition of Allianz‘ “Global Wealth Report”, which puts the asset and debt situation of households in more than 50 countries under the microscope, presents a sad premiere: in 2018, financial assets in industrial and emerging countries declined simultaneously for the first time; even in 2008, at the height of the financial crisis, this was not the case. Worldwide, savers were in a bind: On the one hand, the escalating trade conflict between the US and China, the endless “Brexit saga” and increasing geopolitical tensions, on the other hand, the tightening of monetary conditions and the (announced) normalization of monetary policy.

The stock markets reacted accordingly: Global equity prices fell by around 12% in 2018. This had a direct impact on asset growth. Global gross financial assets of households1 fell by 0.1% and remained more or less flat at EUR 172.5 trillion. “The increasing uncertainty takes its toll”, said Michael Heise, chief economist of Allianz. “The dismantling of the rule-based global economic order is poisonous for wealth accumulation. The numbers for asset growth also make it evident: Trade is no zero-sum game. Either all are on the win- ning side – as in the past – or on the losing side – as happened last year. Aggressive protec- tionism knows no winners.”

Convergence between poorer and richer countries comes to a halt

In 2018, gross financial assets in emerging markets not only declined for the first time, but the decline of -0.4% was also more pronounced than in the industrialized countries (-0.1%). The weak development in China, where assets fell by 3.4%, played a key role in this. However, other important emerging markets such as Mexico and South Africa also had to absorb significant losses in 2018.

This is a remarkable trend reversal. Over the last two decades, the growth gap between poorer and richer regions of the world still stands at an impressive 11.2 percentage points on average. It seems that the trade disputes have set an abrupt stop sign for the catching-up process of the poorer countries. Industrialized countries, however, did not benefit either. Both Japan (-1.2%), Western Europe (-0.2%) and North America (-0.3%) had to cope with nega- tive asset growth.

The price of low yields

At the same time, fresh savings set a new record. They increased by 22% to more than EUR 2,700 billion. The increase in the flow of funds, however, was solely driven by US households, who – thanks to the US tax reform – upped their fresh savings by a whopping 46%; two thirds of all savings in industrialized countries thus originated in the US.

But the analysis of fresh savings in 2018 reveals another peculiarity: Savers seemed to turn their backs on the asset class of insurance and pensions. Its share in total fresh savings has fallen from more than 50% before and immediately after the crisis to a mere 25% in 2018. And while US households increased in return their demand for securities, all other households preferred bank deposits (and sold securities): In Western Europe, for example, two thirds of fresh sav- ings ended up in bank coffers; worldwide, bank deposits remained the most popular destina- tion for fresh savings, for the eighth year in a row. This penchant for liquid and supposedly safe assets costs savers dearly, however: Losses suffered by households as a result of inflation are expected to have risen to almost EUR 600 billion in 2018.

“It is a paradox savings behavior”, said Michaela Grimm, co-author of the report. “Many people save more because they expect a longer and more active life in retirement. At the same time, they shun exactly those products that offer effective old-age protection, namely life insurances and annuities. Seemingly, the low yield environment undermines the willingness for long-term saving. But the world needs nothing more than long-term savers and investors to deal with all the upcoming challenges.”

Growth in liabilities stabilize at high level

Worldwide household liabilities rose by 5.7% in 2018, a tad below the previous year’s level of 6.0%, but also well above the long-term average annual growth rate of 3.6%. The global debt ratio (liabilities as a percentage of GDP), however, remained stable at 65.1%, thanks to still robust economic growth. Most regions saw a similar development in that respect. Asia (excluding Japan) is a different story. In the last three years alone, the debt ratio jumped by al- most ten percentage points, driven mainly by China (+15 percentage points).

“Debt dynamics in Asia and particularly in China are, at least, concerning”, commented Patri- cia Pelayo Romero, co-author of the report. “With a debt ratio of 54%, Chinese households are already relatively as indebted as, say, German or Italian ones. The last time, we had to witness such a rapid increase in private indebtedness was in the USA, Spain and Ireland shortly before the financial crisis. Compared to most industrialized countries, debt levels in China are still markedly lower. Supervisory agencies, however, should no longer stand by and watch. Debt-fueled growth is not sustainable – even China is not immune against a debt crisis.”

Because of the strong growth in liabilities, net financial assets i.e. the difference between gross financial assets and debt fell by 1.9% to EUR 129.8 trillion at the close of 2018. Emerg- ing countries in particular suffered a drastic decline, net financial assets shrank by 5.7% (in- dustrialized countries: -1.1%).

Just a bump in the road?

For the first time in over a decade, the global wealth middle class did not grow: At the end of 2018, roughly 1,040 million people belonged to the global wealth middle class – which is more or less the same number of people as one year before. Against the backdrop of shrink- ing assets in China, this does not come as a big surprise. Because up to now the emergence of the new global middle class was mainly a Chinese affair: Almost half of their members speak Chinese as well as 25% of the wealth upper class. “There are still plenty of opportuni- ties for global prosperity”, said Arne Holzhausen, co-author of the report. “If other heavily populated countries such as Brazil, Russia, Indonesia and in particular India would have had a level and distribution of wealth comparable to China, the global wealth middle class would be boosted by around 350 million people and the global wealth upper class by around 200 million people. And the global distribution of wealth would be a little more equal: at the end of 2018, the richest 10% of the population worldwide owned roughly 82% of total net financial assets. Questioning globalization and free trade now deprives millions of people around the world of their opportunities for advancement.”

When analyzing the movements between the wealth classes, the scars of the financial and euro crisis become visible again. Whereas emerging countries – particularly in Asia – can look back on two decades of mostly social rise, the picture for Western Europeans and Americans is bleaker. In fact, it’s only in these two regions that the ranks of the low wealth class have increased since 2000 – by 4% of the population in Western Europe – and those of the high wealth class have decreased – by 6% and 9% of the population in Western Europe and North America, respectively –, when adjusted for population growth. In Germany, on the other hand, the situation remained relatively stable.

 

 

Florian Komac Joins GAM

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Florian
Foto cedidaFlorian Komac, gestor de inversiones dentro del equipo de crédito global de GAM.. GAM IM incorpora a Florian Komac como especialista en crédito y refuerza su equipo global de renta fija

GAM Investments appointed Florian Komac as investment manager on the Global Credit Team.

He joined the team on 16 September 2019. Komac is based in Zurich and works closely with Christof Stegmann and Dorthe Nielsen. The team reports to Jack Flaherty in New York.

Komac comes from AXA XL (formerly XL Catlin) in New York, where he focused on corporate bonds as a portfolio manager. Previously, he was a portfolio manager at Swiss Re in Zurich and London and a buy-side credit analyst at Activest (now Amundi) in Munich.

“According to Matthew Beesley, the incorporation of Florian highlights GAM’s commitment to have a global organization within its investment team, which positions the Global Credit to increase GAM’s fixed income experience in Zurich, New York and London. This offer complements GAM’s Global Strategic Bond team.

Andbank Promotes Eduardo Antón to Head of Portfolio Management

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Andbank nombra a Eduardo Antón responsable de gestión de carteras para  América y Latinoamérica
Eduardo Antón, courtesy photo. Andbank nombra a Eduardo Antón responsable de gestión de carteras para América y Latinoamérica

Eduardo Anton got promoted to Head of Portfolio Management America and LatAm at Andbank. Funds Society learned that his main function will be the coordination of the Portfolio Management and Advisory teams in the Latin American Jurisdictions where Andbank has a presence: Miami, Mexico, Panama, Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina.

Eduardo maintains its functional dependence on Jose Caturla Head of Asset Management and Portfolio Management at the Group level.

Graduated in Economics from the Universidad Anahuac of Mexico and MBA from the Instituto de Estudios Bursatiles (IEB) in Madrid, Eduardo joined the Group in 2014 as Portfolio Manager in Miami with responsibility for the entire portfolio management of Andbank Advisory.

Before joining Andbank, Eduardo developed his career at Inversis Banco since 2010 where he was part of the Asset Management department. It was also in this entity co-responsible of developing the ETFs platform for the bank, leading its entry and growth in Spain and achieving a position of leadership with a market Share of 20%

In Andbank, he is also member of the Global Investment Committee, President of the Fund Managers Committee and chairs the Latam Markets Committee.

Downside Risks Can Only be Minimized and Not Eliminated As Major Central Banks’ Policies Leave Little Room for Further Stimulus

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Screen Shot 2019-09-05 at 8
Walter Ellem / Pexels CC0. Dowside Risks Can Only be Minimized and Not Eliminated As Major Central Banks’ Policies Leave Little Room for Further Stimulus

Stocks dropped sharply during early August following the first U.S. Federal Reserve rate cut in ten years, setting the low for the month on August 5.  For the remainder of the month prices whipsawed irregularly higher in reaction to headlines and events related to the global trade war, economic releases, corporate deals and earnings, and falling world interest rates, ending the month with a loss.

The China vs U.S. tariff dispute has spiralled into an economic trade war and its duration and outcome are unpredictable. Rapid currency movements further complicate the dynamics for orderly corporate earnings progressions as well as the efficient procurement of global resources and supplies.  Brexit is a wild card.

Notwithstanding the White House political tactics and decision making, Fed Chairman Powell made it clear at Jackson Hole that the FOMC will reduce rates to ‘insure’ downside risks if conditions deteriorate and U.S. growth falters. But these risks can only be minimized and not eliminated as major central banks’ ongoing negative interest rate policies leave little room for further rate stimulus.

A merger and acquisition arbitrage investment strategy with its absolute return focus makes a good choice to complement portfolios.

Prominent proposed but complex mega deals – over $10 billion – in the pipeline (target / acquirer) at the end of August included Celgene / Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sprint Corp / T-Mobile US, and Viacom / CBS. In the $5-10 billion range, Cypress Semiconductor / Infineon Technologies and in the under $5 billion bracket, Tribune Media / Nexstar Media, and Cray / Hewlett Packard Enterprise. We continue to see momentum in M&A market with overall business and investment trends still in a wait and see mode.

Column by Gabelli Funds, written by Michael Gabelli

To access our proprietary value investment methodology, and dedicated merger arbitrage portfolio we offer the following UCITS Funds in each discipline:

GAMCO MERGER ARBITRAGE

GAMCO Merger Arbitrage UCITS Fund, launched in October 2011, is an open-end fund incorporated in Luxembourg and compliant with UCITS regulation. The team, dedicated strategy, and record dates back to 1985. The objective of the GAMCO Merger Arbitrage Fund is to achieve long-term capital growth by investing primarily in announced equity merger and acquisition transactions while maintaining a diversified portfolio. The Fund utilizes a highly specialized investment approach designed principally to profit from the successful completion of proposed mergers, takeovers, tender offers, leveraged buyouts and other types of corporate reorganizations. Analyzes and continuously monitors each pending transaction for potential risk, including: regulatory, terms, financing, and shareholder approval.

Merger investments are a highly liquid, non-market correlated, proven and consistent alternative to traditional fixed income and equity securities. Merger returns are dependent on deal spreads. Deal spreads are a function of time, deal risk premium, and interest rates. Returns are thus correlated to interest rate changes over the medium term and not the broader equity market. The prospect of rising rates would imply higher returns on mergers as spreads widen to compensate arbitrageurs. As bond markets decline (interest rates rise), merger returns should improve as capital allocation decisions adjust to the changes in the costs of capital.

Broad Market volatility can lead to widening of spreads in merger positions, coupled with our well-researched merger portfolios, offer the potential for enhanced IRRs through dynamic position sizing. Daily price volatility fluctuations coupled with less proprietary capital (the Volcker rule) in the U.S. have contributed to improving merger spreads and thus, overall returns. Thus our fund is well positioned as a cash substitute or fixed income alternative.

Our objectives are to compound and preserve wealth over time, while remaining non-correlated to the broad global markets. We created our first dedicated merger fund 32 years ago. Since then, our merger performance has grown client assets at an annualized rate of  approximately 10.7% gross and 7.6% net since 1985. Today, we manage assets on behalf of institutional and high net worth clients globally in a variety of fund structures and mandates.

Class I USD – LU0687944552
Class I EUR – LU0687944396
Class A USD – LU0687943745
Class A EUR – LU0687943661
Class R USD – LU1453360825
Class R EUR – LU1453361476

GAMCO ALL CAP VALUE

The GAMCO All Cap Value UCITS Fund launched in May, 2015 utilizes Gabelli’s its proprietary PMV with a Catalyst™ investment methodology, which has been in place since 1977. The Fund seeks absolute returns through event driven value investing. Our methodology centers around fundamental, research-driven, value based investing with a focus on asset values, cash flows and identifiable catalysts to maximize returns independent of market direction. The fund draws on the experience of its global portfolio team and 35+ value research analysts.

GAMCO is an active, bottom-up, value investor, and seeks to achieve real capital appreciation (relative to inflation) over the long term regardless of market cycles. Our value-oriented stock selection process is based on the fundamental investment principles first articulated in 1934 by Graham and Dodd, the founders of modern security analysis, and further augmented by Mario Gabelli in 1977 with his introduction of the concepts of Private Market Value (PMV) with a Catalyst™ into equity analysis. PMV with a Catalyst™ is our unique research methodology that focuses on individual stock selection by identifying firms selling below intrinsic value with a reasonable probability of realizing their PMV’s which we define as the price a strategic or financial acquirer would be willing to pay for the entire enterprise.  The fundamental valuation factors utilized to evaluate securities prior to inclusion/exclusion into the portfolio, our research driven approach views fundamental analysis as a three pronged approach:  free cash flow (earnings before, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, minus the capital expenditures necessary to grow/maintain the business); earnings per share trends; and private market value (PMV), which encompasses on and off balance sheet assets and liabilities. Our team arrives at a PMV valuation by a rigorous assessment of fundamentals from publicly available information and judgement gained from meeting management, covering all size companies globally and our comprehensive, accumulated knowledge of a variety of sectors. We then identify businesses for the portfolio possessing the proper margin of safety and research variables from our deep research universe.

Class I USD – LU1216601648
Class I EUR – LU1216601564
Class A USD – LU1216600913
Class A EUR – LU1216600673
Class R USD – LU1453359900
Class R EUR – LU1453360155

Disclaimer:
The information and any opinions have been obtained from or are based on sources believed to be reliable but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No responsibility can be accepted for any consequential loss arising from the use of this information. The information is expressed at its date and is issued only to and directed only at those individuals who are permitted to receive such information in accordance with the applicable statutes. In some countries the distribution of this publication may be restricted. It is your responsibility to find out what those restrictions are and observe them.

Some of the statements in this presentation may contain or be based on forward looking statements, forecasts, estimates, projections, targets, or prognosis (“forward looking statements”), which reflect the manager’s current view of future events, economic developments and financial performance. Such forward looking statements are typically indicated by the use of words which express an estimate, expectation, belief, target or forecast. Such forward looking statements are based on an assessment of historical economic data, on the experience and current plans of the investment manager and/or certain advisors of the manager, and on the indicated sources. These forward looking statements contain no representation or warranty of whatever kind that such future events will occur or that they will occur as described herein, or that such results will be achieved by the fund or the investments of the fund, as the occurrence of these events and the results of the fund are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The actual portfolio, and thus results, of the fund may differ substantially from those assumed in the forward looking statements. The manager and its affiliates will not undertake to update or review the forward looking statements contained in this presentation, whether as result of new information or any future event or otherwise.

Yield Curve Inversion: A Short-Term Concern?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Inversión de la curva de tipos: ¿de verdad es motivo de preocupación inmediata?
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. invertido_mix_gestoras.jpg

The US yield curve has been reversed again and the United Kingdom is about to do so, which worries investors. According to the main asset managers, the fact that it is invested can indicate that, at best, investors expect the economy to slow down and at worst, that a recession could be on its way.

In the opinion of Keith Wade, chief economist at Schroders, “The US curve is a reliable indicator of recession, the UK curve less so. Nonetheless, if the US goes into recession it is hard for others not to go the same way given its importance as a driver of the world economy.  So the double signal is important. There is normally a lag of about one year from inversion to recession so the curves are signalling problems for 2020.”

The same concern is shared by Mark Holman, Chief Executive Officer of Twentyfour AM (Vontobel), who acknowledges that the reversal of the curve is not good news. “In our opinion, the reversal of the yield curve is fully justified given the weight of geopolitical events, and one thing absolutely certain is that an inverted curve is not good news. The only question is how bad this news is and how it could convey and encourage greater economic concern,” he says.

“August doesn’t seem as calm as we would have thought. Tensions continue between the United States and China. The German and Swiss yield curve is in a negative territory, European equity markets continue to live out, while gold continues to rise. On the economic front, recessions in China and Germany are being felt. Although the global economy seems to resist, investors begin to fear that a recession is not far. However, the United States is managing to maintain a solid cycle and the latest figures show an acceleration in consumption. Central bank measures seem to have become the last line of defense to prolong the cycle and alleviate political tensions. However, it is by no means certain that this is sufficient between now and 2020,” says Igor de Maack, fund manager at DNCA, affiliated with Natixis IM.

For Holman, the investment of the curves is explained by the global slowdown that is continuing over time, and that keep markets restless. “A consequence of this is that fixed-income investors increase exposure to risk-free pure assets such as US, German or UK Treasury bonds, but to protect the portfolios they must maintain a duration greater than the normal, which is one of the main catalysts of the curve’s shape. As a result, the curves become lower and flatter, which is perhaps more sinister than higher and flatter returns, ”he explains.

This reading is what alerts the investor, who sees the possibility of a recession as more and more likely. But the managers ask for peace of mind and continue to insist that we are not facing a recession. “While we agree that the risk has increased, a recession over the next year is not yet an inevitable conclusion. Unlike the period prior to other recessions in the past in the US, current financial stability risks appear moderate, balance sheets are solid, family debt is manageable and the personal savings rate is high. All these fundamental factors should help cushion any economic recession,” say Tiffany Wilding, US economist, and Anmol Sinha, fixed income strategist at PIMCO.

The same message came out of the BlackRock Investment Institute (BII) in its weekly report: “We do not believe that the investment in the yield curve is a sign of recession and we believe that the accommodative turn of the central banks is dilating the growth cycle… Assets considered refuge, such as gold, rebounded. We continue to observe limited short-term recession risks, since the accommodative turn of the central banks helps to prolong the economic cycle, although we note that commercial and geopolitical tensions pose fall risks.”

“The reversal of the yield curve does not cause a recession, but it indicates that we are in an advanced phase of the economic cycle. So, instead of considering it a cause for concern, it could be a good time for investors to verify that their portfolios are well diversified and that their fixed-income positions can limit excess risk. In the final stages of the cycle it is especially important to determine whether fixed income positions offer diversification with respect to equities, as well as the appropriate level of balance,” concludes Jeremy Cunningham,  Investments Director at Capital Group.

Julius Baer Endorses UN’s Principles for Responsible Banking

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Julius Baer Endorses UN's Principles for Responsible Banking
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. suiza.jpg

Julius Baer has signed a declaration to support the United Nations (UN) Principles for Responsible Banking making it the first Swiss bank to commit to them. The Bank will formally sign the principles on the occasion of the UN General Assembly in New York in September 2019.

The Principles for Responsible Banking have been developed by the UN Environment Finance Initiative (UNEP FI) and 28 banks from around the world and will be officially launched on 22 September 2019. The Principles set out the banking industry’s role and responsibility in shaping a sustainable future and in aligning the banking sector with the objectives of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. The principles represent a single framework for the banking industry that aim to embed sustainability across all business areas.

Bernhard Hodler, Chief Executive Officer Julius Baer said: “We are very proud to be the first Swiss bank to commit to the UNEP FI Principles for Responsible Banking. At Julius Baer, we continuously include sustainability practices into our business, meeting a number of notable milestones in our pursuit of long-term value creation for clients, shareholders, and society as a whole. We see our responsibility as encompassing all aspects of sustainability: economic, social, as well as environmental. With our declaration to the Principles for Responsible Banking, we affirm our willingness to assume an active leadership role in sustainable changes.”

Henry Wong, DWS: “There are Currently More Interesting Investments than Chinese Fixed Income from a Risk Return Perspective”

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Henry Wong (DWS): “En estos momentos hay inversiones más interesantes que la renta fija china en cuanto a rentabilidad-riesgo”
Foto cedidaHenry Wong, CFA Managing Director Head of Asia Fixed Income. Henry Wong, DWS: "There are Currently More Interesting Investments than Chinese Fixed Income from a Risk Return Perspective"

Henry Wong, CFA Head of Asia Fixed Income, with close to 30 years of experience in the industry, has a management style that runs away from sentimentality, maintains its long-term investment strategy, seeks internal and external transparency. “My intention when buying an asset is to sell it and when I sell it, to buy it again at a better time market momentum” states Wong

Chinese Macroeconomic picture
For the manager, “after four decades of continued growth, the Chinese economy is tired and with significant excess capacity” . The adjustment of this excess capacity will be painful in terms of job losses and increased competitiveness by companies.

In his opinion, it is still premature to know if it will be successful or not, because this adjustment needs a change in mentality that has not yet occurred and that takes time. But “they have no choice but to do so, and the government must decide whether to do it gradually or faster,” says Wong.

In addition, Wong points out that the markets since 2007/2008 have been favored by an excess of liquidity that benefited more asset holders than ordinary people, so in his opinion, the political class, especially in the United States and Europe, has to rethink its strategy in this line to redirect this imbalance.

For Wong, the trade conflict between the United States and China is a “consequence of this money printing excess,” but to some extent this increase in protectionism is also related to sustainability policies by having to reduce the transportation costs of products to favor of local products. “I do not think we can foresee a specific termination date of the conflict, it is a global structural change that will take decades,” he concludes.

Bond Connect

From his point of view, China, like many other economies, faces a problem aging population that will lead to a reduction in income due to lower taxes collected from a depleted workforce and an increase in expenses derived from an older population,

In this sense, the Bond Connect project, which will include fixed income assets in local currency in the main world indexes, is an effort by the State to open its capital market and secure foreign financing sources.

Although Wong´s portfolio invests mostly in hard currency, the manager states that this process has just begun and that the supply of available assets is still reduced, limited to government bonds and state owned entities: “At this very initial moment the Investment alternatives are very limited for international investors, who can only move along the curve buying assets with different maturities, but the number of issuers is very limited and liquidity is reduced. I think this market will get bigger every day, but it will do so at a very gradual speed, ” concludes Wong.

Regarding the attractiveness of the Chinese fixed income market, the manager affirms that risk return ratio currently does not suggest putting too many resources in Chinese assets, or in other words: “There are currently more interesting opportunities from a risk/return perspective than China”, he points out.

India and Indonesia

Specifically, one of its current hard currency bets is Indonesia, since after the presidential elections it is one of the countries that can benefit the most from an exit from the factories of China in search of greater competitiveness. Preferably, they opt for companies that have already gone through a process of restructuring and sovereign or quasi-sovereign issuers for the good macro moment that the country is going through.
Additionally, India is also an overweight country in its portfolio, although they are very selective and avoid financial names.

Increase in portfolio duration

With regards to positioning within the curve, Wong explains that they have been extending the duration of the portfolio gradually since last October, reaching a duration of 5 years compared to the 2 years they maintained in August 2018.

This commitment responds to his conviction that global growth will be slower and less efficient affected by protectionist policies and capacity adjustments. This duration objective has been achieved through the purchase of high quality long term Asian corporate bonds and 10 year and 30 year  US treasuries up to 10% of its portfolio.