España archivos - Page 33 of 170

Global Government Debt Set to Soar to a Record $71.6 Trillion in 2022

rocket-gac21dc7ac_1920 — Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. La deuda pública mundial se disparará en 2022: 71,6 billones de dólares

2022 will see global sovereign debt rise by 9.5%, up by $6.2 trillion to a record $71.6 trillion, according to the second annual Janus Henderson Sovereign Debt Index. The increase will be driven by the US, Japan and China in particular, though almost every country is likely to borrow further.

Global government debt jumped to a record $65.4 trillion in 2021. On a constant-currency basis, public debt levels rose 7.8% as governments borrowed an additional net $4.7 trillion. Since the pandemic began, global sovereign debt has soared by over a quarter, up from $52.2 trillion in January 2020 to today’s record.

Every country Janus Henderson examined saw borrowing rise in 2021. China’s debts rose fastest and by the most in cash terms, up by a fifth, or $650 billion. Among large, developed economies, Germany saw the biggest increase in percentage terms, with borrowing rising by one seventh (+14.7%), almost twice the pace of the global average.

Despite surging levels of borrowing, debt servicing costs remained low. Last year, the effective interest rate on all the world’s government debt was just 1.6%, down from 1.8% in 2020. This brought the total cost of servicing the debt down to $1.01 trillion, compared to $1.07 trillion in 2020. The strong global economic recovery meant the global debt / GDP ratio improved to 80.7% in 2021 from 87.5% in 2020 as the rebound in economic activity outpaced the increase in borrowing.

2022 will see debt servicing costs significantly increase

The global interest burden is set to rise by around one seventh on a constant-currency basis (14.5%) to $1,160bn in 2022. The biggest impact is set to be felt in the UK thanks to a rising interest rates, the impact of higher inflation on the large amount of UK index-linked debt, and the cost of unwinding the QE programme. As interest rates rise, there is a significant fiscal cost associated with unwinding QE. Central banks will crystallize losses on their bond holdings which have to be paid for by taxpayers.

Bond market divergence signals opportunities for investors

During the first couple of years of the pandemic, bond markets around the world converged. Now, the theme is divergence. The US, UK, Europe, Canada and Australia are focused on tightening monetary policy to squeeze out inflation – both through higher interest rates and with tentative steps towards unwinding quantitative easing programmes. By contrast, the Chinese central bank is stimulating the economy with looser policy.

Janus Henderson sees asset allocation opportunities in shorter-dated bonds as they are less susceptible to changing market conditions. Janus Henderson believes markets are expecting more interest rate hikes than are likely to materialise and this means shorter-dated bonds will benefit if the tightening cycle ends sooner.

Bethany Payne, portfolio manager, global bonds at Janus Henderson said: “The pandemic has had a huge impact on government borrowing – and the after-effects are set to continue for some time yet. The tragedy unfolding in Ukraine is also likely to pressure Western governments to borrow more to fund increased defence spending. despite recent volatility, opportunities exist for investors in sovereign bonds markets.”

Payne adds tha during the first couple of years of the pandemic, the big theme was how bond markets around the world converged. Now, the theme is divergence; regime change is underway in the US, UK, Canada, Europe and Australia, which are now focused on how to tighten monetary policy to squeeze out inflation, while other regions are still in loosening mode. Regarding Asset Allocation, there are two areas of opportunity.

“One is China, which is actively engaging in loosening monetary policy, and Switzerland, which has more protection from inflationary pressure as energy takes up a much smaller percentage of its inflationary basket and their policy is tied, but lagging, to the ECB”, she adds.

Allfunds Enters An Agreement To Acquire Web Financial Group

| For Beatriz Zúñiga | 0 Comentarios

CEO ALFFUNDS — Foto cedidaJuan Alcaraz, fundador y CEO de Allfunds.. Allfunds llega a un acuerdo para adquirir Web Financial Group

Allfunds announces that it has entered into an agreement to acquire the entire share capital of Web Financial Group, S.A. (‘WebFG’), a European financial technology company and provider of software solutions to the wealth management sector.

The acquisition will significantly enhance Allfunds’ customer proposition in digital & software solutions by gaining multi-asset and data capabilities, according the firm statement.

Headquartered in Madrid, WebFG provides bespoke digital solutions for the wealth management industry by harnessing sophisticated data management, cutting-edge technology, and industry leading expertise refined over 20 years. This technology will complement Allfunds’ already strong digital offering including data & analytics which continue to bring efficiencies to the fund distribution ecosystem.

Allfunds will reinforce its platform with stronger functionalities in multi-asset capacities and new features in multi-data connectivity. With the integration of WebFG’s technology, Allfunds will further bolster its tailor-made solutions available for the wealth management industry and progress towards an even more streamlined, efficient fund distribution ecosystem.

Allfunds will approach the combined service offering and scalability for WebFG’s existing client base, which includes retail banks, wealth managers, investment platforms and private banks.

As part of this investment, Allfunds will look to onboard the c.100 employees of WebFG which are located across six offices in Europe, further boosting its global footprint in key markets such as France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK.

The addition of the WebFG team will strengthen Allfunds’ digital expertise, further support its global infrastructure and enhance Allfunds’ position as a leader in innovative WealthTech solutions.

Juan Alcaraz, Allfunds’ founder and CEO, said: “At Allfunds, we are fully customer-centric and, with this in mind, we are always looking for growth opportunities that complement and broaden our offering. We wish not only to fulfill our clients’ needs, but to anticipate them; the synergies, technology and talented WebFG team will, no doubt, strengthen our value proposition and help us deliver the world-class service we, at Allfunds, strive to provide.”

Julio Bueso, WebFG’s founder and CEO added: “It is exciting to become a part of the Allfunds business and I look forward to working together towards becoming an even stronger WealthTech champion. Our combined experience, expertise and synergies will reinforce Allfunds’ technology, delivery and ultimately, service offering as a whole.”

The transaction, which includes around $158 millions, excludes the media business, which was carved-out in August 2021.

The transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions, including if applicable, FDI screening approvals, will aim to close during Q2 2022.

Three Ukraine-Russia Scenarios and Bond Recovery Values for Ukraine, Russia, and Belarus

| For Beatriz Zúñiga | 0 Comentarios

tank-g1558e59aa_1920 — Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. Tres escenarios para Ucrania-Rusia y valores de recuperación de los bonos para Ucrania, Rusia y Bielorrusia

In this article, we focus on what we think are the three most likely scenarios of how the war could end, while acknowledging that within each of these stylized scenarios there are also multiple variants. This framework allows us to think clearly of the potential recovery values for Russian, Ukrainian, and Belarusian bonds. As always, our subjective probabilities will be reassessed as the facts change on the ground.

Scenario 1: Peace deal in the short-term (35% probability)

Russia and Ukraine are currently engaged in negotiations for a peace deal. It appears that the involved parties are not yet ready for an immediate compromise, but a deal within the next two months appears plausible. The details are yet to be defined, but based on publicly available information, one could expect Russia to agree to withdraw its troops from Ukraine in exchange for the latter giving up its NATO membership ambitions, recognizing Crimea as part of Russia, and limiting the future size of its military.

A kind of Minsk III agreement would be needed to resolve the struggle with Ukrainian separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk – a conflict that has been ongoing since 2014. Ukraine could potentially recognize the independent People’s Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk (DPR and LPR) under the protection of Russian peacekeepers. Alternatively, DPR and LPR could be granted some independence within Ukraine’s sovereignty. Either way, Ukraine would preserve most of its territorial integrity.

Ukraine avoids default or conducts a market-friendly restructuring. This would be possible on the back of significant financial assistance that is currently being provided by western partners that has, so far, allowed Ukraine to continue servicing its external debt. This large financial assistance will also allow for a quick rebuilding of the nation. For example: Iraq’s economy expanded by a cumulative 178% in 2003 and 2004 after the 2003 invasion, Kuwait’s rose by 147% in the two years following the 1991 invasion. The recovery value of Ukraine’s sovereign bonds could be between 70% and 100% depending on whether there’s a restructuring or not.
Russia may also avoid default depending on potential sanction relief. Russia’s sovereign and corporates have been demonstrating their willingness and ability to avoid default so far, but current US sanctions would prevent bondholders from receiving sovereign bond repayments after 25 May, 2022 (see OFAC General License 9A). If the peace deal occurs before this date and it is acceptable for the US, then there’s a possibility that this and other economic sanctions could be eased allowing Russia’s sovereign to avoid default. This is far from granted though and up to the US to decide. If Russia manages to obtain sanctions relief to avoid default following a satisfactory peace deal, then we would expect Belarus to avoid default as well.
A large majority of Russia’s corporate issuers avoid default. Only a few corporate issuers that see their revenues severely disrupted could conduct market-friendly restructurings with high recovery values.

Scenario 2: A prolonged war (45% probability)

The war could go on for several months if the involved parties fail to reach a peace deal in the short-term. This would inflict much larger infrastructure and humanitarian damage on Ukraine. Russia would likely increase its territorial control of Ukraine, forcing the latter to give up a larger share of its territorial integrity. Some variants of this scenario could see Ukraine divided in two with Russia having control over eastern Ukraine and a legitimate democratic government controlling western Ukraine.

Ukraine restructures its external debt; the recovery is highly uncertain. The recovery of Ukraine sovereign bonds will depend on how much of Ukraine’s territorial integrity is preserved as well as on the length of the war, which will determine the degree of infrastructure damage as well as a likely large loss of human capital mainly due to migration.
- In the most optimistic case within this scenario, Ukraine preserves most of its territorial integrity and large financial assistance from western partners allows a quick recovery. A market friendly restructuring sees a recovery between 50% and 70%.
- In the most pessimistic case within this scenario, Ukraine loses a large share of its territory. The lowest recovery of a sovereign restructuring in recent history was Iraq’s following the 2003 invasion, where Paris Club creditors accepted an 80% principal haircut. We see this as a lower bound for Ukraine.
Russia sovereign likely defaults after the 25 May. If the conflict continues for months, we think the US would be less inclined to extend the deadline imposed by General License 9A, which would prevent bondholders from receiving payments even if Russia remains willing and able to pay. Belarus is financially dependent on Russia, thus we see no reason for the former to avoid default if the latter is forced to stop paying.
No restructuring in sight. US sanctions on Russia’s Ministry of Finance, central bank, and national wealth fund would remain in place, which would prevent the sovereign from restructuring its debts in the foreseeable future. Venezuela’s sovereign bonds, which have been in a similar situation used to trade between 20 and 30 cents on the dollar following the November 2017 sovereign default.
Deep recession but not a Venezuelan-style collapse. The Russian economy will inevitably fall into a deep recession this year but an economic collapse like those seen in Venezuela and Lebanon seems highly unlikely in an economy that until now had been well managed, with very low levels of debt and a twin surplus (fiscal and external). Thus, we think that this long default scenario has already been mostly priced in.
Most Russian corporate issuers still avoid default. Economic sanctions will affect the revenues of Russia’s corporate issuers but given that most of them are exporters, have low leverage, and have assets abroad that could be seized by creditors, we believe that most of them will avoid default. Corporates with an important share of domestic revenues and those that see their exports severely curtailed by sanctions will have to restructure, but we expect market-friendly restructurings to prevail.

Scenario 3: A Russia-controlled Ukraine (20% probability)

The strong resistance from the Ukrainian military and population, and the constant military equipment provided by the west make a full conquest of Ukraine unlikely, yet it remains a possible outcome. In this worst-case scenario, Ukraine would be governed by an illegitimate pro-Russian government. Ukraine would thus become sanctioned and lose financial support from the west. All three sovereigns default and restructuring would only occur following regime change. The outlook for Russian corporates becomes more uncertain the longer strong economic sanctions remain. We would expect more corporate restructurings than in the previous scenarios.

Outlook

The situation on the ground in Ukraine is extremely fluid, so the scenarios outlined above will change as more information emerges, and international diplomacy continues. We note that the critical factor for bond investors will be policy decisions around sanctions, so we will continue to watch this closely. We are deeply saddened that a prolonged war seems to be the most likely outcome but remain hopeful that a peaceful outcome can be reached as quickly as possible.

Guest column by Carlos de Sousa, Emerging Markets Strategist, Vontobel AM.

Insurers Prioritize Yield-Enhancing Strategies While Navigating Inflation Risk

| For Beatriz Zúñiga | 0 Comentarios

buildings-g3071b2f85_1920 — Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. Las aseguradoras planean invertir más en private equity y bonos verdes o de impacto durante 2022

Goldman Sachs Asset Management released the findings of its eleventh annual global insurance survey, titled “Re-Emergence: Inflation, Yields, and Uncertainty.”

The survey of 328 insurance company participants, representing over $13 trillion in global balance sheet assets, found that as insurers continue to prioritize yield and ESG factors in investment decisions, they plan to increase their allocation most significantly to private equity (44%) and green or impact bonds (42%) over the next year.

In the Americas and Asia, 53% of investors expected to increase allocations to private equity, the highest of any asset class, while in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA), green or impact bonds were the most favored choice at 59%.

The survey found that in a sharp reversal from the past two years, insurers now see rising inflation and tighter monetary policy as the largest threats to their portfolios, with rising interest rates displacing low yields as the primary investment risk cited by insurers.

Gráfico riesgos

“Against a complex macroeconomic and geo-political environment, demand for yield remains high, and we expect to see insurers continue to build positions in private asset classes as well as inflation hedges, including private equity, private credit, and real estate.“These assets can prove integral to diversifying portfolios while optimizing capital-adjusted returns, particularly over a longer-term time horizon,” said Michael Siegel, Global Head of Insurance Asset Management for Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

Regardless of private equity and sustainable bonds, insurers’ financial managers plan to increase their allocation over the next 12 months to include corporate credit (37%), infrastructure debt (36%), and real estate (31%), among others.

ESG triples in the investment process

According to the survey’s findings, sustainability continues to gain weight among the factors that govern investment decisions and the investment process. Thus 92% of insurance managers take ESG into consideration, almost three times more than in 2017, when only 32% took it into account.

Likewise, now more than one in five respondents (21%) say that sustainability has become a main element. This percentage almost doubles when it comes to companies in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA), where it is more than 37%.

More than half of global insurers (55%) expect ESG considerations to have a major impact on asset allocation decisions in the coming years, matching in importance what is so far the main factor for investment, regulatory capital requirements.

Asked about possible consolidation movements in the global insurance market, almost 96% expect this dynamic of concentration and new deals to continue. Finally, the 2022 survey has again asked CFOs and CIOs about their investments in insurtech and this year also about cryptocurrencies.

The search for greater operational efficiency has once again led to an increase in insurtech investment in all geographical areas of the world, and in the case of the cryptomarket, its gradual maturation explains why 11% of US insurers say they are already investing in this asset, compared with 6% of Asian companies and just 1% of European ones.

Methodology

The Goldman Sachs Asset Management Insurance Survey provides valuable insights from Chief Investment Officers (CIOs) and Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) regarding the macroeconomic environment, return expectations, asset allocation decisions, portfolio construction and industry capitalization. The survey analyzed responses from 328 participants at global insurance companies representing more than $13 trillion in balance sheet assets, which represents around half of the balance sheet assets for the global insurance sector. The participating companies represent a broad cross section of the industry in terms of size, line of business and geography. The survey was conducted during the first two weeks of February.

Carbon Investing: An Emerging Asset Class

| For Alba Menéndez | 0 Comentarios

fire-gbb8066590_1920 — Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. Inversión en carbono: una clase de activos emergente

A very important tool in combating climate change is to put a price on carbon emissions. This price factors in the negative externality of climate change and creates an incentive for the invisible hand of the market to move companies and economies away from burning fossil fuels. Achieving Paris Agreement climate targets will require the widespread use of carbon pricing to steer the world onto a low-carbon and sustainable pathway.

Currently, carbon pricing follows two main methods: carbon taxes and cap-and-trade systems (or emissions trading systems, “ETS”). The advantage of an ETS over a carbon tax is that the total amount of CO2 released by participants in the scheme is capped at a pre-determined ceiling, which is subject to annual reductions. In addition, through the use of tradable emissions allowances, CO2 reduction can be facilitated at the lowest total cost to society.

Carbon allowances have become a liquid and investable asset class that traded approximately US$800 billion in 2021 across physical carbon, futures, and options; this was more than double the volume of twelve months earlier. Carbon has exhibited attractive historical returns and a low correlation with other asset classes, making it potentially attractive within a diversified portfolio.

The World Carbon Fund is a unique investment fund that invests across multiple liquid and regulated carbon markets. It is managed by Carbon Cap Management LLP an investment management boutique based in London. Carbon Cap have established a team with industry experience gained across carbon pricing, carbon trading and fundamental carbon markets research.

The Fund’s objectives are to generate absolute returns with a low correlation to traditional asset classes as well as having a direct impact on climate change. The Fund uses long-biased allocations across the carbon markets in order to capture the medium-term positive returns forecast in these markets. It also deploys a range of shorter-term alpha generating strategies including arbitrage and volatility trading.

There is a widespread acknowledgement that the price of carbon needs to continue to appreciate in order to provide sufficient incentive to meet Paris Agreement targets. 2021 saw significant price rises in each carbon market in which the Fund invests which has helped towards a positive return of more than 70% since its launch early in 2020.

The carbon markets can display high levels of volatility and the Fund operates within clearly defined risk framework in order to maximise risk adjusted returns. In general terms there is low correlation between the individual carbon markets and this apparent anomaly can be used both as an alpha source and to manage down overall portfolio risks.

The Fund is an Article 9 fund under the EU’s SFDR. It seeks, through its investment activities, to contribute directly to the reduction in global CO2 emissions targets. In addition, the investment manager contributes a fixed percentage of performance fees generated to purchasing and cancelling carbon allowances/offsets.

Investors in the Fund are institutions, wealth managers, family offices and private clients. As well as seeking to provide investors with non-correlated returns and climate impact, carbon investing can also act as an inflation hedge as higher carbon prices are seen to be correlated to consumer price indices.

South Hub Investments S.L, a company founded by Carlos Diez, will be responsible for the distribution of the funds in Spain. The company performs this function thanks to an agreement with Hyde Park Investment International LTD, an MFSA-regulated entity, which has 16 years of experience in European fund distribution.

Australia, the Netherlands, and the United States Again Earned Top Grades in the First Chapter of the Global Investor Experience Study

| For Beatriz Zúñiga | 0 Comentarios

track-and-field-g2474d8e0c_1920 — Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. Australia, Países Bajos y EE.UU. se revalidan como los mercados más favorables para los inversores en cuanto a comisiones y gastos de los fondos

The fees investors pay for their funds are falling, according to Morningstar’s latest global report on fees and expenses in the industry. According to the report’s findings, Australia, the Netherlands and the United States receive the best ratings, while Italy and Taiwan are once again the worst performers.

The report Global Investor Experience (GIE) report, now in its seventh edition, assesses the experiences of mutual fund investors in 26 markets across North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. The “Fees and Expenses” chapter evaluates an investor’s ongoing cost to own mutual funds compared to investors across the globe.

As explained from Morningstar, a key point of this report is the analysis it makes on the running costs borne by an investor for owning mutual funds, compared to other investors around the world. And whose result reflects in a global ranking compared to the last edition of this report in 2019.

ranking costes

Morningstar’s manager research team uses a grading scale of Top, Above Average, Average, Below Average, and Bottom to assign a grade to each market. Morningstar gave Top grades to Australia, the Netherlands, and the United States, denoting these as the most investor-friendly markets in terms of fees and expenses. Conversely, Morningstar again assigned Bottom grades to Italy and Taiwan indicating these fund markets have amongst the highest fees and expenses.

Australia, the Netherlands, and the U.S. earned top grades due to their typically unbundled fund fees. This is the fourth study in a row that these three countries have received the highest grade in this area, according the study.

“The good news for global fund investors is that in many markets, fees are falling, driven by a combination of asset flows to cheaper funds and the repricing of existing investments. The increased prevalence of unbundled fund fees enables transparency and empowers investor success. However, the global fund industry structure perpetuates the use of upfront fees and the high prevalence of embedded ongoing commissions across 18 European and Asian markets can lead to a lack of clarity for investors. We believe this can create misaligned incentives that benefit distributors, notably banks, more than investors,” said Grant Kennaway, head of manager selection at Morningstar and a co-author of the study.

Highlights

The majority of the 26 markets studied saw the asset-weighted median expense ratios for domestic and available-for-sale funds fall since the 2019 study. For domestically domiciled funds, the trend was most notable in allocation and equity funds, with 17 markets in each category reporting reduced fees.

Lower asset-weighted median fees are driven by a combination of asset flows to cheaper funds as well as the repricing of existing investments. In markets where retail investors have access to multiple sales channels, investors are increasingly aware of the importance of minimizing investment costs, which has led them to favor lower-cost fund share classes.

Outside the United Kingdom, the U.S., Australia, and the Netherlands, it is rare for investors to pay for financial advice directly. A lack of regulation towards limiting loads and trail commissions can cause many investors to unavoidably pay for advice they do not seek or receive. Even in markets where share classes without trail commissions are for sale, such as Italy, they are not easily accessible for the average retail investor, given that fund distribution is dominated by intermediaries, notably banks.

The move toward fee-based financial advice in the U.S. and Australia has spurred demand for lower cost funds like passives. Institutions and advisers have increasingly opted against costlier share classes that embed advice and distribution fees. The trend extends to markets such as India and Canada.

Price wars in the ETF space have put downward pressure on fund fees across the globe. In the U.S., competition has driven fees to zero in the case of a handful of index funds and ETFs, and these competitive forces are spreading to other corners of the fund market.

In markets where banks dominate fund distribution, there is no sign that market forces alone will drive down asset-weighted median expense ratios for retail investors. This is particularly evident in markets like Italy, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore where expensive offshore fund sales predominate over those of cheaper locally domiciled funds.

The U.K. has introduced annual assessments of value, one of the most significant regulatory developments since the 2019 study. These require asset managers to substantiate the value that each fund has provided to investors in the context of the fees charged.

Methodology

The GIE study reflects Morningstar’s views about what makes a good experience for fund investors. This study primarily considers publicly available open-end funds and exchange-traded funds, both of which are typical ways that ordinary people invest in pooled vehicles. As in previous editions, for this chapter of the GIE study, Morningstar evaluated markets based on the asset-weighted median expense ratio by market in addition to the structure and disclosure around performance fees and investors’ ability to avoid loads or ongoing commissions. The study breaks up the markets into three groups of funds: allocation, equity, and fixed income. The expense ratio calculations consider two perspectives: funds available for sale in the marketplace and funds that are locally domiciled. In this most recent study, we have adjusted the assets used in the weightings for available-for-sale funds in each market to better reflect the propensity of domestic investors to invest in nonlocally domiciled share classes.

You can read the complete study in the following link.

Santander Wealth Management & Insurance Hires Laura Blanco and Augusto Caro for Its Sustainable Investment Unit

| For Alicia Miguel | 0 Comentarios

Santander Wealth Management has hired Laura Blanco to lead its ESG unit, which was created last year to support Grupo Santander’s efforts to combat climate change, protect human rights and promote good corporate governance.

Blanco, who has over 20 years of professional experience, directed Knowledge and Outreach for Impact Investment at Spain’s National Advisory Board since its creation in 2019. She began her career as an equities analyst at UBS before moving to Credit Suisse in 2003. She also worked at Lusight Research, Haitong Securities, Baring Asset Management and Nakatomi Capital.

To further strengthen the team, Blanco has also appointed Ana Rivero as sustainable investment director. She began career at Banif, before moving to Santander Investment Bolsa Sociedad De Valores and then to Santander Asset Management (SAM), where she held several senior roles, including head of Product and Market Intelligence and head of ESG.

Augusto Caro (CFA) joins Santander Asset Management as global head of ESG from Grupo Caixabank. He held a number of senior roles in the Investment team at Bankia AM (pensions, equities and balanced funds), where he also chaired its sustainability committee. He will report to José Mazoy, global CIO of Santander Asset Management.

“We are firmly committed to supporting the ecological transition and helping build a more sustainable world. These appointments will help strengthen our leadership in ESG in Europe and Latin America”, said Víctor Matarranz, head of WM&I, the bank’s asset management, private banking and insurance division.

WM&I aims to raise EUR 100 billion in sustainable funds by 2025. So far, it has raised EUR 27 billion across private banking and its fund manager. The target forms part of Santander’s push to raise or facilitate EUR 120bn in green finance by 2025 and EUR 220bn by 2030; cutting its worldwide exposure to thermal coal mining to zero by 2030; and reduce emissions relating to its power generation portfolio. Featured in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index 2021 for the 21st year in a row, with top marks in financial inclusion, environmental reporting, operational eco-efficiency and social reporting.

Banco Santander’s fund manager has its own ESG analysis team and SRI rating system. It became the first Spanish fund manager to join the global Net Zero Asset Managers initiative, which aims to achieve net-zero CO₂ emissions in all AUMs by 2050. Last November, it also announced its target to halve the net emissions stemming from its AUMs by 2030. The targets for net-zero AUMs (which are subject to emissions gauging and metrics) align with the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative. Santander Asset Management became the first Spanish multinational to join the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC), a European body that promotes collaboration between investors on climate change matters and represents investors committed to a low-carbon future. It is also a signatory to the UN’s Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI).

Janus Henderson Announces Ali Dibadj as Next Chief Executive Officer

| For Beatriz Zúñiga | 0 Comentarios

CEO JHG — Pixabay CC0 Public DomainJanus Henderson nombra a Ali Dibadj próximo consejero delegado . Janus Henderson nombra a Ali Dibadj próximo consejero delegado

Janus Henderson today announced that its Board of Directors has unanimously appointed Ali Dibadj as Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective no later than 27 June 2022.

Ali Dibadj succeeds Dick Weil, who, as previously announced, will retire as CEO and a member of the Board as of 31 March 2022. Effective 1 April 2022, the Board has appointed Roger Thompson, Chief Financial Officer, to serve as Interim CEO until Mr Dibadj joins JHG. To assist in an orderly transfer of responsibilities, Mr Weil will serve as an adviser to the Company through 30 June 2022.

Ali Dibadj joins the Company from AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. where he has served as CFO & Head of Strategy since February 2021 as well as Portfolio Manager for AB Equities since 2017.

Previously, he served as AB’s Head of Finance and Head of Strategy from April 2020 to February 2021. He co-led AB’s Strategy Committee in 2019 and served as a senior research analyst with Bernstein Research Services from 2006 to 2020, a period during which he was ranked as the number one analyst twelve times by Institutional Investor. Prior to joining AB, he spent almost a decade in management consulting, including at McKinsey & Company and Mercer. Mr Dibadj holds a Bachelor of Science in engineering sciences from Harvard College and a Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School.

Richard Gillingwater, Chairman of the Board of Directors, said, “We are pleased to appoint Ali Dibadj as the Company’s next CEO. As part of our CEO transition planning, we conducted an extensive internal and external search to identify an executive who both understands our business and has the necessary strategic expertise to help drive the firm’s next phase of growth for the benefit of our clients and shareholders. The Board is confident that Ali is the ideal choice to lead this great company into its next phase of growth and value creation.”

On the other hand, Ali Dibadj said, “I am delighted to join Janus Henderson and look forward to having the opportunity to lead such a talented group of professionals at an important time for the Company and the industry. I have long admired Janus Henderson’s commitment to deliver for its clients with investment and servicing excellence. The executive team, the Board, and I look forward to identifying, expediting, and capturing growth and innovation that creates value for our clients, employees, shareholders, communities, and all stakeholders.”

Jose Castellano Steps Away From the Day-To-Day Management of iM Global Partner and Jamie Hammond Takes Over as Head of International Distribution

| For Beatriz Zúñiga | 0 Comentarios

IM NOMBRAMIENTOS CASTELLANO — Foto cedidaJosé Castellano dará el relevo a Jamie Hammond como responsable de Distribución Internacional de iM Global Partner.. José Castellano abandona su puesto como Deputy CEO y responsable de Distribución Internacional de iM Global Partner

José Castellano, until now Deputy CEO and Head of International Distribution at iM Global Partner, is leaving the firm. As of April 4^th, 2022, he will remain as Senior Advisor of the firm.

According to iM Global Partner’s statements to Funds Society, his mission will be to assist the firm in its future developments. Jamie Hammond will take over from Castellano as head of International Distribution.

“Jose has decided to distance himself from the intense daily management required by his role as ‘Deputy CEO, Head of International distribution’. From April 4th, 2022, he will become Senior Advisor of iM Global Partner with the main mission of helping the company in its future developments,” the company explains.

From the firm, they add: “We would like to strongly thank Jose for his very significant contribution within iM Global Partner in building its international distribution network. We are also happy that he has agreed to remain active on behalf of iM Global Partner.”.

Castellano said: “Obviously I also thank Philippe Couvrecelle for envisioning and leading very passionately and successfully this amazing company.”

Jamie Hammond will take over from Castellano as head of International Distribution. Hammond is a veteran and one of the best-known distribution executives in the business, with a great track record and experience, and who fully shares iM Global Partner’s vision and values. He currently heads the firm’s EMEA Distribution area and is Deputy CEO.

Extensive experience

Castellano joined the firm in March 2021 to support iM Global Partner’s development outside the United States. At that time, he joined directly for the dual role of Deputy CEO and Head of International Business Development. He has extensive experience in the sector, having spent 25 years in the distribution business in this industry.

Within his professional career, it is worth highlighting his time at Pioneer Investments, where he spent 17 years and was one of the main distribution executives for the Asia Pacific, Latin America, United States and Iberia regions. Under his leadership, these regions experienced the highest growth worldwide, making the fund manager one of the most important players in each of these markets. Prior to joining Pioneer Investments in January 2001, he was head of Morgan Stanley’s private equity group for two years and head of Wealth Management for another seven years at Morgan Stanley. José Castellano holds a degree in finance from Saint Louis University and several postgraduate degrees from Nebrija University and IE.

Hammond has more than thirty years of experience in the sector. Prior to joining iM Global Partner last summer, Hammond worked at AllianceBernstein Limited (UK) as Managing Director and Head of the EMEA Client Group. He joined AB in January 2016 as head of EMEA Sales, Marketing and Customer Service Functions. Prior to that, he spent 15 years at Franklin Templeton Investments, where his last positions were CEO of UK regulated entities and Managing Director for Europe. He joined Franklin Templeton in 2001 following the acquisition of Fiduciary Trust Company International, where he was Sales Director responsible for mutual fund development in Europe. Prior to that, Hammond held the position of Head of National Sales at Hill Samuel Asset Management, the asset management division of Lloyds TSB Group.

Allfunds Launches Nextportfolio3, The New Version of its ESG-focused Portfolio Management and Advisory Solution

| For Beatriz Zúñiga | 0 Comentarios

desk-ged4a9a63c_1920 — Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. Allfunds lanza nextportfolio3, una nueva versión de su solución de asesoramiento y gestión de carteras orientas a la ESG

Allfunds launches nextportfolio3, a new version ready to meet the industry’s ESG challenges. The continued evolution of this tool reinforces Allfunds’ leading role in the digital transformation of the wealth management industry, the company said.

The third version of Allfunds’ nextportfolio tool, which offers advanced portfolio management solutions to more than 400 global institutions, responds to the high demand from financial institutions for ESG analysis and information. According to them, in this new version of nextportfolio3 users will now benefit from four major services such as ESG reports and filters at fund and portfolio level, so that clients can better direct their investments towards ESG-oriented funds, thus meeting the demand for more sustainable portfolios.

It will also feature a portfolio optimizer by asset allocation and fund selection, which allows firms to adjust their portfolios to achieve optimal allocation and efficiency in line with specific levels of risk; and an advanced risk and return attribution module that helps detect the specific contribution of holdings or assets, and provides information to determine the effectiveness of investment diversification. It also features a new end-client portal and mobile app that offers an excellent user experience with new investment analysis and tracking functionality.

“We are delighted to launch a new version of our nextportfolio solution, building on Allfunds’ 20 years of experience in developing technology products that support asset and wealth management with greater efficiency and agility in response to evolving market dynamics. We have leveraged Allfunds’ deep expertise and access to market data to achieve a stronger and more powerful portfolio analysis tool in nexportfolio3. Analysis and reporting tools have been incorporated with a clear focus on ESG management, helping distributors make the best decisions for their clients,” explained Salvador Mas, Global Head of Digital at Allfunds.

This tool is part of the set of digital solutions of the Allfunds platform available for fund managers and distributors. According to the company, the launch of this new version of nextportfolio proves its commitment to the constant development of its offering, introducing new leading solutions to offer efficiency and growth paths to companies in the midst of the transition to an increasingly digitized industry.