CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: David Evers. Banque de Luxembourg Investments Expands Its Equity Fund Team
Banque de Luxembourg Investments S.A., the fund management company of Banque de Luxembourg, has hired Jérémie Fastnacht as a portfolio manager. The 30-year-old Frenchman’s main task will be to support Guy Wagner, BLI’s Managing Director, in managing the BL-Equities Dividend fund. Jérémie comes from Banque de Luxembourg, where he served for one and a half years as an analyst and equity portfolio manager in the Private Banking Investments department.
“Quality research is even more important in today’s market environment. We are therefore staying on our chosen path and – as we have done successfully with our BL-Equities Europe and BL-Equities America funds – have provided our fund manager with a co-manager,” said Guy Wagner. “With Jérémie we have selected an in-house candidate, especially as he knows the Bank, our investment philosophy, and shares our values.”
Jérémie Fastnacht added: “I am pleased to take on this new role on the equity fund team of Banque de Luxembourg Investments. Alongside Guy I will share responsibility for the Bank’s flagship funds, which is highly motivating.” Jérémie holds a master’s degree in Finance from Université Paris-Dauphine and completed a post-graduate program in Financial markets from SKEMA Business School / North Carolina State University. Jérémie began his career as an equity fund manager at BCEE Asset Management in Luxembourg in August 2012.
Photo: Dennisikeller. Fidentiis Gestión Launched the Fidentiis Tordesillas Iberia Long‐Short
Last March 9th, 2016 was the 9th anniversary of Siitnedif Tordesillas FIL one of the first Hedge Funds set in Spain under the Fondo de Inversion Libre format.
Managed by Fidentiis Gestión, Siitnedif Tordesillas FIL is one of the Hedge Funds with longest track‐ record within the Spanish hedge fund industry, and it is one of the three funds with the largest AUM. With a Long‐Short Equity Iberia strategy, long biased, it has as main feature the common feature offered by Fidentiis Gestion in its strategies: risk management.
considering their former vehicle structure limited access to a number of investors, Fidentiis Gestion decided to launch he UCITS version of Siitnedif Tordesillas FIL, named Fidentiis Tordesillas Iberia Long‐Short, which will be available to all. This new vehicle began its path on Thursday March 17th and is part of their UCITS IV vehicle domiciled in Luxembourg Siitnedif Tordesillas Sicav.
With daily liquidity and different classes of shares, the strategy will have similar characteristics to the original fund, keeping its features and constraints in force, and as mentioned above will be available for all type of investors through the different fund distribution platforms.
. CTA & Merger Hegde Funds Insulated From Rotations
The Lyxor Hedge Fund Index was down -0.9% in February. 3 out of 11 Lyxor Indices ended the month in positive territory. The Lyxor CTA Long Term Index (+2.2%), the Lyxor Merger Arbitrage Index (+0.5%), and the Lyxor LS Equity Long Bias Index (+0.4%) were the best performers.
“In a make-or-break environment, we recommend keeping some directionality through tactical styles. We would remain put on relative-value strategies, but focusing in areas least correlated to current themes.” says Jean-Baptiste Berthon, senior cross asset strategist at Lyxor AM.
Brexit risk helped Global Macro funds recoup some of the losses endured early February. It was a hill-start for the strategy, which suffered on their short bond and long European equities exposures (we note that positioning divergence among managers remained elevated). The collapse of the pound below $1.39 then allowed Global Macro funds to regain some of the lost ground. Indeed, London mayor Boris Johnson throwing support to the exit cause led markets to implement stronger protection against a risk of Brexit. The relative economic and monetary pulses between the UK and the US also played out. Funds remain slightly long in European equities. In bonds, they are long US and short EU bonds. Their top plays remain on their long dollar crosses.
The rally by mid-February triggered multiple macro and sector rotations. The selling pressure exhausted by mid-month. The rally in risky assets unfolded in poor trading volumes as most market players were initially reluctant to join in. An unstable market tectonic and multiple downside fundamental risks kept investors – hedge funds included – on the cautious side. In that context, CTAs outperformed, hoarding returns in the early part of the month, while remaining resilient thereafter thanks to stubbornly low yields. Besides, the longest bias strategies enjoyed a V-shape recovery. By contrast, those exposed to the rotations suffered the most.
L/S Equity: volatile and dispersed returns, skepticism prevails. Long bias funds enjoyed a V-shape recovery over the month and ended up slightly positive. They continued to generate strong alpha. Variable bias funds pared losses on the way down thanks to their cautious stance, but they underperformed on the way up. The rotation out of defensive back into value stocks proved costly. Market Neutral funds were the worst performers. They were hit by multiple sector and quant factor rotations, amid high equity correlation, while keeping their leverage steady. They endured a double whammy through untimely portfolio shifts.
Overall Lyxor L/S Equity funds slightly raised their market beta mainly through short covering. But skepticism prevails as to the sustainability of the rally. Interestingly, a number of funds are increasingly tactical in their stock and sector positioning.
Merger Arbitrage continued to defy risk aversion. The performance of Special Situation funds mirrored that of broader markets. They suffered in the early part of the month – especially in their healthcare and telecom positions – before recouping most of their losses. The returns of Merger Arbitrage funds were less volatile. Deal spreads initially factored higher macro risks, before settling down. Short duration operations with small P&L to lock in continued to lure managers. They maintained their elevated long exposures, reflecting their confidence in the current merger opportunity set.
The underperformance of European credit hurt L/S Credit strategies. The pressure mounting on global banks, and in particular European institutions, hurt some funds. Underperforming junior debt in Europe, and concerns about coupons suspension in contingent convertibles took a dent in some funds (as a reminder, “cocos” convert into shares if a pre-set trigger is breached – the level of solvency ratios for example. These securities were designed to enhance capital levels and provide investors with greater safety). BoJ venturing into negative yield regime also hurt Japanese and Asian issues.
Perfect conditions for CTAs, which continued to outperform. Continued de-risking in the early part of the month was beneficial to most CTAs. They kept on making strong gains in their long bond positions, their equity and energy shorts. In the second part of the month, most of the gains were made in EU long bonds and on GBP. The recovery in risk appetite led their models to shave off their most aggressive bearish positions. They reduced their short on energy and brought their equity allocation up to neutral. Their main vulnerability lies with their long bond exposure.
Photo: Tristan Hanson . M&G Investments Appoints Tristan Hanson To Its Multi-Asset Team
M&G Investments, a leading international asset manager, today announces the appointment of Tristan Hanson as Fund Manager to its Multi-Asset team, starting on 21st March. Tristan will be responsible for developing the team’s absolute return proposition and will report to Dave Fishwick, Head of Multi-Asset.
Tristan has 15 years’ experience in asset management and joins M&G from Ashburton Investments, where he was Head of Asset Allocation with responsibility for global multi-asset funds. Prior to this, Tristan worked as a Strategist at JP Morgan Cazenove covering equities, fixed income and currencies.
Graham Mason, Chief Investment Officer at M&G Investments, says: “We are very pleased to welcome Tristan to our team. He has extensive experience across multi-asset strategies and will play a key role in broadening our capabilities around absolute return products. This will strengthen our Multi-Asset team and meet increasing demand from our clients.”
Over the past 15 years, M&G’s 16-strong Multi-Asset team has successfully developed a robust investment approach by combining valuation analysis and behavioural finance.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Matthieu Duncan, new CEO of Natixis Asset Management. Matthieu Duncan Becomes Natixis Asset Management CEO
The Natixis Asset Management Board of Directors met today, chaired by Pierre Servant, to appoint Matthieu Duncan as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Natixis Asset Management following the resignation of Pascal Voisin. This new appointment will take effect on April 4, 2016. Until that date, Jean François Baralon, Natixis Asset Management’s Deputy CEO, will serve as interim CEO of Natixis Asset Management.
Matthieu Duncan will be looking to accelerate the international growth of Natixis Asset Management and to continue to integrate Natixis Asset Management within Natixis Global Asset Management’s global multi-affiliate business model.
The Board of Directors would like to thank Pascal Voisin for his role over the past eleven years leading Natixis Asset Management’s operational management. He brought new life to the company internationally and successfully contributed to the development of Natixis Global Asset Management’s multi-affiliate model by taking majority equity interests in H2O Asset Management and Dorval Asset Management and by using Natixis Asset Management’s expertise to create Seeyond and Mirova.
A dual French and US citizen, Matthieu Duncan completed his studies at the University of Texas (Austin) and the University of California (Santa Barbara). He began his career in the financial industry at Goldman Sachs, where he held various positions in the capital markets sector in Paris and London between 1990 and 2003. Since 2004, he has held various positions in the asset management area in London: Chief Investment Officer (CIO) Equities at Cambridge Place IM, Head of Business Strategy and member of the Board of Directors of Newton IM (a Bank of New York Mellon company), and Chief Operating Officer (COO) and member of the Board of Directors of Quilter Cheviot IM.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: Thomas Leth-Olsen. Claves para entender el ciclo de crédito
Consistent dividend growth is generally a sign that a business is doing well and should provide investors with a degree of confidence. If dividends are rising steadily over time, said Alex Crooke, Head of Global Equity Income at Henderson, then a firm’s earnings, cashflow and capital should also be growing.
An indicator of sustainability
Payout ratios identify the percentage of corporate earnings that are paid as dividends and can be an indicator as to whether a company has the scope to maintain or increase dividends. The payout ratio, explains Crooke, can be influenced by a number of factors, such as the sector the company operates in and where the company is within its growth cycle. As the chart below shows, the level of current payout ratios varies considerably between countries and regions both at an absolute level and when compared to historical averages.
“Although the payout ratio chart shows that opportunities exist for dividend increases in the emerging markets, the outlook for earnings and dividends remains uncertain and at present we are finding the most attractive stock opportunities for both capital and income growth in developed markets. Within the developed world, Japan and the US have the greatest potential to increase payout ratios, although from a relatively low base with both markets currently yielding just over 2%” points out the Head of Global Equity Income at Henderson.
An active approach is important
Conversely, payout ratios from certain markets, such as Australia and the UK, are above their long-term median. “Companies from these countries are distributing a greater percentage of corporate earnings to shareholders in the form of dividends than they have done historically. This leaves the potential for dividend cuts if a company is struggling to grow its earnings. One area of concern for income investors with exposure to UK and Australia is the number of large resource-related companies listed within these market indices”, said Crooke. Henderson believes that earnings, cashflow and ultimately dividends from these types of firms are likely to be impacted by recent commodity price falls.
Nevertheless, explains Crooke, the UK in particular has a deep-rooted dividend culture and outside of the challenging environment for the energy and resources sectors is home to a number of businesses that are delivering sustainable dividend growth. Our approach is to invest on a company-by-company basis using an actively-managed process that considers risks to both capital and income.
Seeking dividend growth
Recent market volatility has affected share prices globally. Despite this, Henderson believes attractive businesses with strong fundamentals and the potential for capital and dividend growth over the long term can be found across nearly all regions and countries.
“Within our 12-strong Global Equity Income Team we continue to seek companies with good dividend growth, and payout ratios that are moderate or low, which provides the potential for dividend increases. Typically, we avoid the highest-yielding stocks and focus on a diversified list of global companies that offer a sustainable dividend policy with yields between 2% and 6%”, concludes.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Investment Europe. Invesco Hires Deutsche AM Head of EMEA Marketing
Invesco announce the appointment of Henning Stein as Head of Institutional Marketing for the EMEA region. Based in Zurich, Stein will report to will report to David Bower, head of Marketing at Invesco and will be part of the distribution leadership team led by Colin Fitzgerald, head of Invesco’s EMEA Institutional Business.
Henning joins from Deutsche Asset Management where he led EMEA Institutional and Retail Marketing. One of his core focus areas has been the development of research-based marketing programmes for institutional investors. As Chair of the firm’s academic foundation, he established and developed a thought leadership programme to provide clients with a wide range of perspectives and research. This helped clients develop ideas and solutions to address wider financial requirements beyond their immediate manager selection activities. In so doing, he has established a broad academic network of finance professors from institutions such as the University of Cambridge, the University of Zurich and MIT; a network that we believe will complement our ongoing activities in the institutional market. Henning holds a PhD from the University of Cambridge (Darwin College) in Business and Economics.
“I would also like to take this opportunity to thank Carsten Majer who since 2013 has been responsible for EMEA Institutional Marketing. Under his leadership we have consolidated our institutional marketing efforts in the region and progressed our marketing activities particularly in the UK, CH, DE, AT and the Middle East. With the near doubling in size of the Cross Border retail channel over the period and corresponding growth in complexity and depth of marketing activities, I’m delighted that Carsten will have more time to focus on this critical activity”, points out Bower.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Arturo Sánchez
. Investors Want Transparency, Ethics, and Performance, CFA Institute Survey Reveals
Investors are expecting higher levels of transparency than ever before, holding their investment managers to the highest ethical standards, and are laser-focused on returns, according to a newly released study “From Trust to Loyalty: A Global Survey of What Investors Want,” by CFA Institute, the global association of investment professionals, that measures the opinions of both retail and institutional investors globally.
The findings reveal that investors want regular, clear communications about fees and upfront conversations about conflicts of interest. The biggest gaps between investor expectations and what they receive relate to fees and performance. Clients want fees that are structured to align their interests, are well disclosed and fairly reflect the value they are getting from their investment firms.
“The bar for investment management professionals has never been higher. Retail and institutional investors, as always, crave strong performance, however both groups also demand enhanced communication and guidance from their money managers. Building trust requires truly demonstrating your commitment to clients’ well-being, not empty performance promises or tick-the-box compliance exercises. Effectively doing so will help advance the investment management profession at a time when the public questions its worth and relevance.” said Paul Smith, president and CEO of CFA Institute.
“While an increase in overall trust in the financial services industry is a net positive for financial professionals,” continued Smith, “performance is no longer the only ‘deal breaker’ for investors. They are continuing to demand more clarity and service from financial professionals and, with the rise of robo-advisors, they have more alternatives than ever before. Further, if investment professionals don’t provide this clarity, then regulators may force them to, for better or worse.”
The study also shows that investors are anxious about global markets, and do not believe their investment firms are prepared. Investors revealed a growing anxiety about the state of global finance. Almost one-third of investors feel that another financial crisis is likely within the next three years (33 percent of retail investors/29 percent of institutional investors), with significantly more in India (59 percent) and France (46 percent). In addition, only half of all investors believe their investment firms are “very well prepared” or “well prepared” (52 percent retail investors/49 percent institutional investors) to manage their portfolio through a crisis.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Leticia Machado
. The Majority of New Assets in European Equities Have Landed in The Most Active Funds
Average active share for European large-cap funds was 69.6% in the three-year period through March 2015, with a median of 72.4% when measured against the funds’ appropriate style indexes. That is the finding of a new study from Morningstar.
“Our results show that between 2005 and 2015 “closet indexing” has become rarer among European large-cap funds, and those funds with higher active shares have received the lion’s share of new assets. We find that funds with higher active share have delivered better investment results than the least active funds in most of our research period, but not unambiguously. Because dispersions in returns and risk characteristics become much wider as a portfolio’s active share rises towards 100%, investors should not rely solely on active share when selecting funds”.
Among other findings of the report, the percentage of funds with a three-year average active share below 60% (so-called closet indexers) was 20.2%. The portion of funds that can be characterized as closet indexers has been falling in the researched categories in recent years. The majority of new assets in European equities have landed in the most active funds.
Although funds in the most active quartile charge 33 basis points more on average than those in the least active quartile for their retail share classes, we find that when price is measured per unit of active share, European investors are overpaying for low active share funds. Investors should compare fees carefully as dispersion in fees among funds with similar active shares is high.
Morningstar finds a strong inverse correlation between active share and market risk. Active share numbers dropped considerably during the financial crisis of 2008-09 but have been rising at a steady pace since then.
Funds across the board lowered the share of mid- and small-cap stocks in their portfolios in 2008-09, but this was especially the case for the most active funds.
The funds with the highest active shares have done better, on average, than those in the least active quartile in all of the five-year periods tested between 1 July 2006 and June-end 2015. However, the difference in excess returns between the most and the least active quartile has decreased recently, which implies that the strength of active share as a selection tool is time-period dependent. Invariably, however, the funds with the lowest active shares have been the worst performers.
The study finds that funds in the highest active share quartile have displayed much stronger style biases than the average fund. This may not always be desirable from a fund investor’s point of view, and complicates the use of active share in fund selection. The style effects have been especially strong in the small group of funds with an above 90% active share. After controlling for style effects in a four- factor regression model, we find their alpha to be lower than for any other group in the most recent five-year period researched.
Investors who use active share as a fund selection tool should exercise caution. As active share increases, dispersion in returns and risk levels rises sharply; the best and worst performing funds are to be found among the more active ones. Therefore, we advise using active share only in combination with other quantitative and qualitative tools.
Combining active share with tracking error adds a useful dimension to the analysis, and we find this to be an adequate analytical framework in the European large-cap space. Confirming results in US markets, we find that funds that exhibit a large tracking error but a low or moderate active share (so- called factor bet funds) have underperformed.
“We find that funds with Positive Morningstar Analyst Ratings tend to have above-average active shares and tracking errors”, says the study.
“In less than a decade, “active share” has become a widely used concept in fund analysis. However, much of the available active share research references only US-domiciled funds. In this paper we study a subset of European funds investing in European equities to see how their active share has developed over time, and evaluate how the active share measure might be used as a tool to aid fund selection within the European fund universe. The study encompasses the period 1 January 2005 through June-end 2015. By including only large-cap funds, we reduce the difficulties arising from benchmark selection and the impact of the small-cap effect”.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Ben W.
. Basel III Fundamentally Changes How Asset Managers Are Connected To The Financial System
Basel III reforms have fundamentally changed how asset managers are connected to the financial system, with hedge funds challenged to understand expense, usage and access to the financing power grid, according to a joint survey and report by the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA), the global representative body for alternative asset managers, and S3 Partners, a leading financial data, analytics and services firm.
Jack Inglis, CEO of AIMA, commented: “There is no doubt that the Basel III banking standards are having a significant impact on hedge funds and other alternative asset managers. Financing costs are rising and the fund manager / prime broker relationship is changing fundamentally. It is our hope that this timely and important report will provide clarity and direction to those who have felt the impact of the recent regulations, and to give context to issues that are being felt across the industry.”
Bob Sloan, CEO of S3 Partners, commented: “New bank capital regulations are creating downstream financing challenges and opportunities for asset managers and hedge funds. The survey clearly shows how plugging into the financial power grid is getting more expensive.”
Mr Sloan continued: “Managers of all shapes, sizes and strategies now seek to answer the question: How can we maintain access to the grid, while optimizing for the right amount of efficiency? As the survey results show, access to unbiased data, comprehensive Return on Assets/Return on Equity analytics, and a common language are critically important towards determining fairness – as rates, margin, spreads and contracts will be a key determinant for an asset managers’ success.”
Rising financing costs. The survey of fund managers worldwide found that:
Financing costs have risen for 50% of firms, with an even split between those who quantify the level of cost increase as being greater than 10% and below 10%.
75% of firms expect further cost increases over the next two years.
The impact is consistent regardless of a fund manager’s size, investment strategy or location.
Rethinking prime brokerage relationships:
Fund managers responding to the survey said they are having to rethink their prime brokerage relationships due to Basel III.
75% have been asked to change how they do business with their prime brokers, while more than 67% have had to cut the amount of cash they keep on their brokers’ balance sheets.
Importantly, the survey found that:
Most alternative asset managers over the last two years have either maintained or increased the number of prime brokers they use, with the average number of financing relationships found to be four.
Only 20% of fund managers have a clear understanding of how their prime brokers calculate their worth in terms of the revenue they provide relative to balance sheet impact, known as “return on assets” or RoA. Fewer still have the data necessary to calculate this themselves.
