Pictet Asset Management: Let the Rally Continue

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Luca Paolini Pictet AM

The global economy is enjoying a strong bounce.

Ample monetary and fiscal stimulus and hopes that the Covid vaccine rollout will accelerate worldwide are encouraging investors to allocate more of their assets into stocks at the expense of bonds.

We don’t expect this pattern to change in the near term, and therefore retain our overweight stance on equities.

However, we recognise that, as the economic recovery is picking up pace in developed economies, an accompanying rise in both long-term interest rates and the US dollar are a threat to countries that have come to depend on cheap dollar funding.

For these reasons, we downgrade emerging equities to neutral. We also remain neutral bonds and underweight cash.

Pictet AM

Our business cycle indicators show the global economic recovery is accelerating, thanks to broad-based strength in the US.

American consumers, whose bank accounts are about to be boosted by federal payments of USD1,400, are starting to spend.

Government transfers to households have grown to USD3 trillion since January 2020, equal to a fifth of US personal consumption and three times the amount delivered during the global financial crisis in 2009.

US households’ net financial worth rose 10 per cent to a record USD130 trillion in the year to December 2020, before they received new stimulus checks from President Joe Biden’s USD1.9 trillion package.

A 10 per cent increase in net worth typically leads to a 1 per cent rise in personal consumption, which contributes nearly 70 per cent to economic output. Taking this into account, we expect the world’s biggest economy to grow by as much as 7 per cent in real terms this year, double the pace in 2020.

Strong economic conditions will put upward pressure on inflation, but price rises should be gradual.

We think price pressures for goods – the result of temporary factors such as higher commodities and supply bottlenecks – should ease in the coming months, helping offset higher service sector inflation later this year.

We don’t think a sustained pick-up in US inflation beyond the US Federal Reserve’s 2.0 per cent target next year is likely unless tight labour market conditions trigger sharp wage increases.

Elsewhere, China’s economic recovery remains strong and self-sustaining. Non-manufacturing activity expanded for 11 months in a row in March, while export growth is 32 per cent above trend. The property market shows no signs of slowing down, underpinning demand for commodities.

We upgrade our 2021 real GDP growth forecast by 1 percentage point to 10.5 per cent.

The euro zone is lagging behind as a renewed wave of Covid infections forces countries to introduce restrictions on social and economic activity.

We expect the economy to recover in the second quarter, helped by improvements in the region’s vaccination programme. The region’s EUR2 trillion fiscal stimulus package, due to become available in the same period, will also offer some support.

Pictet AM

Our liquidity conditions indicators show that central bank stimulus remains sufficient, but a few countries are beginning to tighten the monetary reins.

In China, which is responsible for at least a fifth of global liquidity supply, conditions are becoming restrictive, which could weigh on equity valuations later this year. The country’s excess liquidity — the difference between the rate of increase in money supply and nominal GDP growth – has contracted on a year-on-year basis, while the credit impulse – or the flow of new credit from the private sector — has fallen back to its two decade average after hitting its highest since 2009 in October.

In other emerging countries, a sharp rise in global bond yields and the dollar have exposed limits to easy monetary policy. Turkey, Brazil and Russia were already forced to withdraw policy support at a time when their economies are weak in order to defend their currencies and combat inflation.

In contrast, US liquidity conditions remain supportive of risky assets for now. Our calculations show effective US interest rates – adjusted for inflation and quantitative easing measures – stand at a record low of -4.7 per cent.

The Fed is keeping monetary conditions ultra loose despite a booming economy, which raises risks that the central bank will announce a move to scale back its monetary stimulus in the near future.

Our valuation signals are negative for risky assets, with global stocks hitting the most expensive level since 2008 on our models. Our technical readings are mildly positive for risky assets with equities drawing inflows of almost USD350 billion this year.

In contrast, emerging assets are suffering. According to the Institute of International Finance, a sharp rise in US long-term rates has triggered outflows of nearly USD500 million on a six-week moving average basis, levels last seen at the height of the 2013 “taper tantrum”.

Equities regions and sectors: reining in emerging markets but cyclicals attractive

After their powerful run, we downgrade emerging market equities to neutral from overweight on a tactical basis. A number of factors weigh against these assets in the short-term. 

Having rallied some 70 per cent off  their lows of last year and delivered an 8 percentage point outperformance over global equities, emerging market stocks are no longer cheap. Growth momentum has shifted from China to the US while the dollar and real rates are both heading higher – an environment in which emerging markets typically struggle.

And then there are a few question marks over how emerging market stocks will react to the eventual withdrawal of central bank stimulus in the developed world. For the most part, developing economies’ external accounts are in better shape than in the run-up to the 2013 taper-tantrum (when the Fed slowed quantitative easing asset purchases). But they still face the prospect of having to defend their currencies and combat inflation by withdrawing policy support even as their recoveries are incomplete. Brazil, Russia and Turkey have already moved towards normalising monetary policy over the past month.

In US equity markets, rich valuations can only be sustained if trend growth remains steady, corporate profit margins remain above average and bond yields remain below 2 per cent. 

Pictet AM

By contrast rising real yields create conditions in which value stocks, and developed equities tend to outperform – particularly Japanese stocks, on which we remain overweight.

We retain a bias for cyclical stocks and continue to hold overweight positions on industrials, materials and consumer discretionary stocks. Broadly speaking, value stocks look a better prospect than their growth counterparts in light of the fact that real rates are still well below trend and heading higher. Our preferred value play is financials. Technical factors support our overweight position on the sector despite its 15 per cent outperformance since last October. 

Fixed income and currencies: steering clear of corporate debt

The fear of inflation is rippling through the global bond market. With the economic recovery gaining strength and companies and consumers sitting on piles of cash waiting to be spent, it is reasonable to expect a pick-up in price pressures at some point. But some parts of the bond market are more susceptible to inflation than others. 

Corporate debt is the most vulnerable asset class in a period of rising growth and inflation, in our view. US investment grade credit offers no coupon buffer – at 2.3 per cent, the initial yield is barely above expected inflation (US 10-year breakeven inflation, as implied by the TIPS yield, is at 2.4 per cent). 

US high yield bonds offer even less protection. They are trading at a yield premium of just 1 per cent over equities, compared to the 10-15 per cent gap seen after previous recessions (1).  

Record corporate leverage (with US total credit to non-financial corporate sector at 84 per cent of GDP, according to the Bank for International Settlements) and the prospect of upward wage pressures add further risks as they point to an erosion of corporate profit margins. For these reasons, we remain underweight US high yield debt.

By contrast, we believe Chinese renminbi bonds are well-placed to weather any pick-up in inflation. Indeed, they have already proved their resilience during the recent global bond sell-off, emerging as the only fixed income market which has managed to stay in positive territory in US dollar terms year-to-date. As well as offering attractive coupons above 3 per cent, Chinese renminbi bonds also boast strong diversification benefits as their returns do not correlate strongly with those of developed market bonds and other mainstream asset classes. 

Inflation-linked bonds are another area of relative strength, particularly US TIPS.  

We also see good potential in US Treasuries, whose valuations are becoming increasingly attractive. Yields on 10-year Treasuries have risen by around 70 basis points in the first three months of 2021, moving towards levels that have triggered rallies in the past. Furthermore, market pricing on interest rates is now broadly in line with economists’ consensus forecasts and with the Fed’s own projections. We see the 10-year yield peaking not much above 1.75 per cent.

Pictet AM

Even if yields on US Treasuries stabilise or begin to decline, they should nevertheless remain higher than those offered by other sovereign bonds. That has ramifications for the dollar as the yield gap should help prop up the greenback against most other currencies (see Fig. 4). 

However, in the long run we continue to believe that the US currency is in a secular downtrend.

Global markets overview: confidence in recovery grows

As an eventful quarter in the financial markets drew to a close, investors remained as confident as ever in the economy’s ability to bounce back from the ravages of the Covid pandemic. The S&P 500 Index ended the first three months of the year at a record high, having gained more than 5 per cent since the end of December. European stocks did even better with the Stoxx 600 index up some 7 per cent year to date. Further testifying to investors’ animal spirits was a continued decline in the gold price, which has fallen by almost a fifth since hitting a high in August last year; the precious metal’s price is now back to where it was in February 2020.

The stock market’s gains came as monetary and fiscal stimulus continued to flow, particularly across the developed world. In the US, the Biden administration passed mammoth USD1.9 trillion fiscal stimulus bill that will see households receive a payment of USD1,400. On top of that, it also published plans for a USD2.3 trillion infrastructure investment plan, financed by a hike in corporate taxes. In Europe, meanwhile, the European Central Bank stepped up the pace of bond purchases to keep a lid on borrowing costs. Stock markets were also buoyed by a rapid pick-up in merger and acquisition activity. According to Bloomberg data, the volume of M&A deals struck in the first three months of 2021 was USD1.1 trillion – the best start of the year since at least 1998.

As economic prospects brightened, government bond markets began to discount the possibility of a sustained increase in inflationary pressures. The yield on the 10-year US Treasury rose to just over 1.7 per cent from 0.9 per cent at the beginning of the year. The upward move also helped the dollar gain in the currency markets.

Outside developed markets, emerging world assets experienced bouts of severe volatility. Investors were unsettled by turmoil in Turkey, whose stocks, bonds and currency fell after President Recep Erdogan sacked both the governor and the deputy governor of the country’s central bank. The Turkish lira ended the quarter almost 10 per cent down versus the dollar; other emerging market currencies also suffered heavy falls, including the Brazilian real, which fell on concerns of about the country’s weakening fiscal position and its pandemic management. The resignation of some high-profile cabinet members from President Jair Bolsonaro’s government has added to the uncertainty. The currency ended down more than 7 per cent against the dollar.

Pictet AM

 

 

 

Opinion written by Luca PaoliniPictet Asset Management’s Chief Strategist

 

Discover Pictet Asset Management’s macro and asset allocation views.

 

 

Notes:

(1) Based on US HY yield in real terms less MSCI USA 12m forward dividend yield.

 

Information, opinions and estimates contained in this document reflect a judgment at the original date of publication and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented herein.

Important notes

This material is for distribution to professional investors only. However it is not intended for distribution to any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Information used in the preparation of this document is based upon sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of those sources. Any opinion, estimate or forecast may be changed at any time without prior warning.  Investors should read the prospectus or offering memorandum before investing in any Pictet managed funds. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each investor and may be subject to change in the future.  Past performance is not a guide to future performance.  The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed.  You may not get back the amount originally invested. 

This document has been issued in Switzerland by Pictet Asset Management SA and in the rest of the world by Pictet Asset Management Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, and may not be reproduced or distributed, either in part or in full, without their prior authorisation.

For US investors, Shares sold in the United States or to US Persons will only be sold in private placements to accredited investors pursuant to exemptions from SEC registration under the Section 4(2) and Regulation D private placement exemptions under the 1933 Act and qualified clients as defined under the 1940 Act. The Shares of the Pictet funds have not been registered under the 1933 Act and may not, except in transactions which do not violate United States securities laws, be directly or indirectly offered or sold in the United States or to any US Person. The Management Fund Companies of the Pictet Group will not be registered under the 1940 Act.

Pictet Asset Management Inc. (Pictet AM Inc) is responsible for effecting solicitation in North America to promote the portfolio management services of Pictet Asset Management Limited (Pictet AM Ltd) and Pictet Asset Management SA (Pictet AM SA).

In Canada Pictet AM Inc is registered as Portfolio Managerr authorized to conduct marketing activities on behalf of Pictet AM Ltd and Pictet AM SA. In the USA, Pictet AM Inc. is registered as an SEC Investment Adviser and its activities are conducted in full compliance with the SEC rules applicable to the marketing of affiliate entities as prescribed in the Adviser Act of 1940 ref. 17CFR275.206(4)-3.

Trends in Planning and International Taxation

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Captura de Pantalla 2021-04-05 a la(s) 12
Piqsels. ,,

From 1998 until now, two macro trends have influenced international wealth planning and international taxation

1. Tax homogenization or cartelization (which implies a global rise in taxes and the undoing of any traces of tax competition); and

2. The encroachment on individuals’ privacy (necessary to reach the objective above).

Both trends gained momentum after the 2001 WTC attack right up until Donald Trump’s leadership push and they seem to be acquiring even more relevance as we speak.

To illustrate this, it is important to remember that, between the attack and Trump’s rise to power, the following changes happened (among others), all of them leading towards the trends mentioned above:

1.  The “Patriot Act” was passed;

2.  Low or null taxing jurisdictions were forced to abolish bearer shares, and in many cases to require companies established there to register directors’ names before authorities (unlike several states of the U.S.);

3.  FATCA was passed and enacted; and

4. The Common Reporting Standard was passed and enacted.

Just like Trump’s Presidency stopped the advance of invasion to privacy (for example, IGA signing for FACTA implementation with third-country parties was halted). It implied, in fact, not just a halt but also a step back regarding wide agreements between high tax 

jurisdictions leading to a revival of tax competition once championed by Ronald Reagan. Biden’s victory, and above all, the pandemic have caused a fast return to the trends discussed above.

In between Trump losing the 2020 elections and his stepping down from office, Congress ignored his veto over the National Defense Act and forced its passing. This Act included the “Corporate Transparency Act,” which, in a nutshell, established the obligation to communicate to FinCEN the final beneficiaries of any company incorporated in the U.S.

It is uncertain how FinCEN will process such a huge amount of information – but what is not uncertain is that this provision will lead to an incredible erosion of an individuals’ privacy, with or without justification.

As for the second topic, taxes, Yellen’s words are still very fresh. “The U.S. should not have an issue with increasing its corporate taxes as it will not lose investments because this action forces the world’s countries to cooperate”. It is impossible to provide a better definition of tax cartelization.

In Latin America, both trends are the order of the day.

Starting with taxes; three countries have already approved taxes on extraordinary wealth (or on great fortunes), using the pandemic as an excuse. These countries are Argentina (made worse by the fact that Argentina, together with Uruguay and Colombia, already had a wealth tax before the arrival of Covid-19), Bolivia, and Chile.

Although a part of the world has long left this kind of tax behind, essentially because it is counterproductive for countries growth, difficult to manage, and a violation of the principle of equality, as well as for being one of the most evaded taxes, in some Latin American countries it seems to be gaining momentum due to the losses caused by the ongoing pandemic and the appearance of new populist governments.

Until recently, out of the 35 countries in the region, there was an equity tax, a personal property tax, or a wealth tax only in three of them. These countries were Argentina (besides the highest rates and the lowest minimum taxable amounts), Colombia, and Uruguay.

Towards the end of last year, Bolivia became the fourth country in the region to have this tax type. On December 28 of that year, the Bolivian parliament passed a tax on fortunes about 30 million Bolivianos reaching 152 people in Bolivia and a second wealth tax (in theory, for the only time) in Argentina. According to the information shared by the President of Bolivia over social media, the government authorities on economic matters estimated that with the new provision, around 100 million Bolivianos would be collected (approximately USD 14.3 million).

Argentina and Bolivia are remarkably different from each other, in particular:

  • Firstly, as I mentioned before, there already was a tax on personal property in Argentina, which makes this additional tax unconstitutional, as it affects the same assets twice. And since the deadline for payment of this tax was originally March 30, there are already several court filings requesting precautionary measures against it or a declaration of unconstitutionality);
  • Secondly, Bolivia’s tax reaches wealth ranges above USD 4,300,000, while in Argentina, it must be paid above USD 2,420,000;
  • In Argentina, rates for this tax vary from 2% to 3% for assets in the country and from 3% to 5.25% for assets owned abroad; in Bolivia, rates are 1.4% for persons with wealth ranges between USD 4.3 million and USD 5.7 million; 1.9% for wealth ranges between USD 5.7 million to USD 72 million; and 2.4% for wealth ranges above that; and
  • The new tax in Bolivia will be paid on an annual basis and permanent for all persons living in the country, including foreigners, having property, deposits, and securities in the country and abroad; this is not the case (so far, at least) in Argentina because there is already a personal property tax there, annual and with rates which may climb to 2.25%, with a practically null threshold. 

Besides the provisions passed in Argentina and Bolivia, there is a bill heavily underway in Chile and more or less incipient rumours or projects, sometimes with less backing, in Mexico, Peru, Uruguay, and other countries. 

In Chile’s bill, the two main differences with the cases above are the following:

  • The Chilean threshold is USD 22 million (similar to the US minimum for the inheritance tax, in line with the banking world’s standards for great fortunes); and that
  • There being a high level of juridical security in the country, likely, this “extraordinary,” “one-time-only” tax will actually be so. In Argentina, there have been numerous examples of taxes passed for a certain amount of time, then extended for decades (such as the earnings tax, the personal property tax, the check tax, the increase in the VAT rates, and so on).

Our position on this tax, whatever the specifics in each country, remains the same as always: there really are only four types of taxes: taxes on earnings, consumption, transactions, and equity, and the latter is by far the most dangerous and debilitating for any country. I would propose that a tax on current wealth is nothing but a tax on future poverty.

Going back to the issue of individuals’ privacy, another unfortunate trend in Latin America is the passing of a variety of provisions making taxpayers notify tax authorities of their wealth planning, which violates not only the privacy of persons but also principles as basic as they are important, such as attorney-client and accountant-client privilege. 

In this case, Mexico took the first step through a law passed by Congress on October 30, 2019, which entered into force on January 1, 2020. One of the effects of this law was to include the Tax Code of the Federation, the obligation, not just for taxpayers but also their tax advisors, to reveal fiduciary structures leading to a fiscal benefit.

Not unusually, after Mexico, Argentina followed suit, with AFIP’s General Resolution 4838, currently under study by several Nation’s Judges.

The revival and strengthening of both trends, not just in Latin America but the entire world, compels us to investigate current wealth structures in order to get ahead of greater changes and speed up the creation of innovative fiduciary structures for clients who have not yet done so. The growing fiscal voracity of countries will likely lead to completely legal structures now, but this could not be the case in the not-so-distant future.

All in all, there are storm clouds ahead in the wealth structuring and wealth preservation space.

A column by Martin Litwak, founder and CEO of @UntitledLegal, a boutique law firm specialized in fund investment, corporate finance, international wealth management, exchange of information and fiscal amnesties as well as the first Legal Family Office in the Americas. Litwak is the author of the books “Cómo protegen sus activos los más ricos (y por qué deberíamos imitarlos)” (How wealthiest people protect their assets and why we should do the same) and “Paraísos fiscales e infiernos tributarios” (Tax havens and tax hells).

Are Precious Metals a Hedge Against Inflation?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

It is necessary to clarify the perception that metals are a hedge against inflation. Are they really? The history of the last 20 years shows that gold (and silver), regardless of production, demand, and other elements, perform better with moderate inflation and declining rates.

What to expect for metals if inflation and yields rise?

“Gold’s ability to hedge against inflation has been… exaggerated…” an analyst at Blackrock recently argued. That of silver too, could I add. Investors channel their inflation concerns by trading the Treasury Note (10-YT). Let us compare for this article the linear behavior of gold (golden line) with that of the Note price. Do not confuse with the percentage performance.

1

  • (10-YT) generated value from 2001 to 2011, as benchmark yield fell from 5.50% to 1.80%. Gold rose in mountain shape from $260 to $1,800; Silver (not shown here) climbed to its all-time high of $ 48 from $4.
  • Between mid-2012 and the end of 2018, 10-YT accumulated losses due to the rate hike to 3.14% from 1.46%. Gold fell to $1,060 in that period, although it recovered to $1,200. Silver dropped to less than $14 with inconsistent ups and downs.

The big picture projects both prices followed the same direction. Certainly, there were periods when 10-YT tended lower while gold climbed, such as between 2015 and 2009, when the US economy grew, yields rose, and financial markets were exuberant.

From all-time highs to actual weakness

Look to this other chart from August 2020 to date.

  • The slope of the 10-YT price started when gold peaked last year. Benchmark yield was then 0.52% and four months later almost doubled to 0.96%. Therefore, gold and silver prices weakened. Gold regained its luster in December but darkened in January when the price of 10-YT sharpened its bearish process. From there both lines dropped precipitously doing almost the same formation.
  • So far in 2021, yields continued to rise reaching 1.60%. Gold accelerated losses linked to the falling prices of the Note. Silver was approaching the zone of highs, with ups and downs, but it lost steam by the pressure of gold. During the time span of this second graph, the yield went up more than triple, to 1.64%, leading to losses while gold left more than 18% on the way. It is illustrative that on March 9, 10, 11, the price of the Note rebounded, as did the metals.

2

Two opposing forces by 2021

Under this reality it is questionable to say that precious metals can be useful as hedge against the inflation the benchmark yield is anticipating. The lower the price of Note (rates up), the lower the price of gold. With different proportions and occasional distortions, of course. Good precious metal cycles occur in times of falling rates. Periods of low inflation and economic dynamism.

The macro situation presents two forces for 2021: inflationary potential and economic recovery. Metals can go down or stay horizontal with the first or gain value with the second. This may be what happens if the yield cap is not far from current levels.

Column by Arturo Rueda

AFOREs Diversify to Global GPs in Private Equity

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Captura de pantalla 2021-03-22 a las 13
CDMX, piqsels. ,,

In Mexico, Harbourvest Partners, Spruceview México and Lock Capital are the three alternative investment issuers that have called the most capital in amount. On the other hand, Harbourvest Partners, Lock Capital and Capital Global are the three issuers with more than $1 billion USD in committed capital out of the 17 GPs that have issued CERPIs as can be seen in the following table:

 

,,

CERPIs are the vehicles that allow AFOREs to invest in Private Equity globally. So far (March 2021) there are 49 CERPIs in place totaling $9.714 million USD in committed capital, of which 25% have been called.

,,

MIRA Manager was the first in 2016 before CERPIs were allowed in 2018 to invest 90% of its resources globally and 10% in Mexico. The opportunity to invest globally promoted that, in 2018, 12 issuers issued a CERPI for the first time, standing out in committed capital: Capital Global, Lock Capital (who replaced Lexington as manager, who issued in said year) and KKR. In 2019 three new GPs were incorporated (Harbourvest Partners, Spruceview and Actis Gestor) and four GPs continued to grow their offer of CERPIs. For 2020 only Arago Capital was the new GP that was incorporated as an issuer and three reissued.

3

For the potential market that global Private Equity investments have, the fact that there are only 17 issuers seems to us to represent a small number and that they are only taking a breather. In Chile, the AFPs make similar investments through 45 GPs (2.6 times more than Mexico) of which five of them have issued a CERPI in Mexico.

4

For the AFOREs with $230.110 million USD in assets under management (as of February 28, 2021), investments in local Private Equity represent 5% and 1% in global Private Equity, which shows their growth potential.

As there are 49 emissions and 17 GPs, the average per GP is close to 3 CERPIs for each one, however 9 have more than one CERPI and 8 GPs only have one CERPI. The number of issuances has grown due to the specialization in the age of the affiliated worker and due to its orientation towards private banking clients. It should be remembered that today SIEFOREs are based on the worker’s age (Target Date Funds). Spruceview and BlackRock for example have 9 CERPIs each, while Lock Capital has 8.

The 17 issuers can be classified as:

  • Global GPs,
  • Local GPs,
  • GPs who are advisers and
  • Those that are a combination of the above.

As CERPI issuance dominates in the Fund of Funds sector it is highly likely that there are more global GPs than we currently see.  However, that information is not public.

5

Global investments in Private Equity by AFOREs should continue to grow in both resources and managers.

Column by Arturo Hanono

An ETF to Capture the New Energy Revolution

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

gondolas-4741067_1920
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. Un ETF para capturar la revolución energética

The crowds of tourists vanished from Venice’s historic canals. Fish were seen swimming in the city’s normally murky waterways. Then, NASA published satellite images of Earth, showing a dramatic reduction in greenhouse gas emissions across all the major cities under lockdown.

For a moment, we saw what a future low-carbon world might look like.

Demand for new energy grew in 2020

During a turbulent 2020, demand for energy generated by coal and oil fell by 8.5% and 6.7% respectively. But demand for renewable energy rose by +1%. 

Renewable energy demonstrated its reliability, even in a recession. The massive stimulus response from central banks created favourable financing conditions for both wind and photovoltaic (PV) solar projects. And some institutional investors even saw new energy as a safer-haven investment, as its returns can have lower correlation to more mainstream asset classes.

This progress was happening as fossil fuel demand plummeted to its lowest level in more than 70 years. At one point, oil futures were trading at negative prices due to a massive glut in supply.

The chart below from the IEA shows the global energy demand by source in 2020:

Gra1

Misconceptions persist about renewable energy

Although demand for renewable energy remained positive during the pandemic and more people are carbon-aware than ever, there are still many misconceptions about it.

These misconceptions are gradually being debunked – and new energy sources could see a major increase in investment as a result. Let’s address three common concerns about renewables and new energy now:

Misconception #1: “Renewable energy is just hype”

Renewable energy is being adopted because it makes financial sense. Over half the coal plants operating today cost more to run than building new renewable energy infrastructure instead. Even cancelling new coal power station projects today could save more than half a trillion dollars globally.

The ‘levelised cost of energy’ (LCOE), which is directly linked to the costs to build and operate an energy generator, has fallen significantly for both wind and photovoltaic solar power. Across the globe, LCOE for wind, solar and battery storage has plummeted over the past decade, led by technological advances and increasing cumulative installed capacity, which have progressively reduced costs.

 

The cost of renewable energy and battery storage has plummeted

The chart below from BloombergNEF shows the Global LCOE benchmarks for PV, wind and batteries:

Graf2

Misconception #2: “All fossil fuel-related financing is unsustainable”

The world needs energy to power the economic growth that makes the low-carbon transition possible. While directly financing fossil fuel plants is not sustainable, the financing of energy efficiency for fossil fuels does help us transition towards a more sustainable world. Rather than stopping all investment in fossil fuel-related companies, it would be more effective to improve the efficiency of the existing energy model, even as we manage the transition to the low-carbon model.

We want to – and must – move towards the new energy model. But in the meantime, we have fossil fuels to manage, and improving the energy efficiency existing fossil fuel plants is an important part of that.

Many energy companies have been moving towards ‘combined-cycle’ power plants that use both a gas and a steam turbine to produce energy. General Electric has estimated that up to 50% more electricity using the same fuel can be produced this way.

Natural gas is still a fossil fuel, but it is cleaner. Burning natural gas for energy results in lower emissions for nearly all types of air pollutants. It also complements new energy well, because combined-cycle turbines are cheap to get going and can provide power at short notice or when renewable energy is not available. The two technologies used in combination could drastically cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Misconception #3: “New energy is only viable because of subsidies”

The new energy market has developed to such an extent that subsidies are no longer needed in most parts of the world. For instance, the feed-in tariff system used by European countries to accelerate investment into new energy technology has largely come to an end.

It is being replaced by a more dynamic power purchase agreement market (PPAs), which are agreements to supply energy at a fixed price and quantity. The result is that energy companies get a guaranteed cash flow, and clients receive a guaranteed price and supply of energy.

None of this would be possible unless new energy was cheap, reliable and profitable to produce. Thanks to technical improvements and more competitive marginal costs – led by the ‘learning curve’ of renewable energy that reduces costs as more is produced – this sector needs less and less subsidy.

In our view, this is a structural shift, because the cost of renewables will decline over time. Fossil fuel costs will not decline over time – they may even increase over time, as most of the accessible sources have already been extracted. Now, fossil fuel Exploration & Production (E&P) companies must increasingly target controversial reserves that are harder to extract, such as those in the Arctic, tar sands, or shale gas.

Finally, the EU ‘Green Deal’ will also drive capital towards new energy companies, while the EU is thinking of significantly reducing fossil fuel subsidies as they undermine the efforts to reach carbon neutrality by 2050, as enshrined in the Paris Agreement.

While we at Lyxor talk a lot about the Paris-Aligned and Climate Transition benchmarks for net zero investing, these are not the only relevant strategies. Trends to be financed by green deal are broader than that, including sustainable mobility and smarter city infrastructure.

How to get investment exposure to new energy

One way to gain a targeted investment exposure to new energy is through the Lyxor New Energy (DR) UCITS ETF. It tracks the world’s 40 largest companies operating in three key areas of the new energy industry: renewables, distributed energy, and energy efficiency.

Ørsted – Renewable energy

Danish power company Ørsted (formerly DONG Energy) is a global leader in the offshore wind market. It is in a strong position to capitalise on the soaring demand for new energy needs in Europe due to the emission quotas defined in the Paris Agreement.

What’s fascinating about this company is that it was once fossil-fuel focused. In 2017, the group sold its oil and gas business to British chemicals company Ineos. More recently, it offloaded its liquefied natural gas operations to Glencore. Instead of returning the cash from the sale of these businesses to investors, the company chose to make a big push into offshore wind.

Ørsted was one of the first energy companies in the world to have a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target approved by the Science Based Targets initiative, and it estimates its target is 27 years ahead of schedule compared to the 2°C scenario for the energy sector as projected by the IEA.

Plug Power – Distributed energy

Distributed energy is the concept of global decentralised electricity production close to the point of consumption. Hydrogen is part of this, and green hydrogen in particular can be an extraordinary zero-carbon source of electricity.

As a result, an important area of development in new energy is storage – stationary storage stations, or onboard vehicles, vessels, planes, and so on. American company Plug Power develops hydrogen fuel cells to replace traditional batteries in electric vehicles and supplies these cells to major clients including Amazon and Walmart.

Distributed energy is what can bring resilience, contrary to hyper centralised production and grid systems. It’s also a game-changer for renewables, whose main drawback is that they are intermittent, and unable to – for example – provide 24/7 power to a hospital. With distributed energy systems, renewable energy can become a more stable energy source.

NIBE Industrier AB – Energy efficiency

Swedish company NIBE builds and sells solutions to reduce energy consumption and improve efficiency. It develops, manufactures and markets a range of energy-efficient solutions for climate comfort in all types of property, plus components and solutions for intelligent heating in industry and infrastructure.

This includes heat pumps and solar cells for private houses, the renovation of old buildings, public buildings, and even development of products for efficient energy utilisation in cars, such as elements for battery heaters and interior heaters that use sources such as braking energy.

NIBE’s heat pumps are being used in a new housing project in the Kortenoord district of Wageningen, The Netherlands, where around 1,000 homes are being built without a gas pipeline. The houses have optimum insulation and are equipped with energy-saving products such as heat pumps, solar panels and solar water heaters.

A megatrend in progress

New energy is part of a megatrend – one that will radically shape the society and business models of the future, underpinned by the global effort to achieve net zero by 2050.

This imperative explains the significant amount of investment flowing into the new energy industry. $282 billion of renewable energy capacity was financed in 2019, led by onshore and offshore wind with $138 billion, followed by solar at $131 billion.

And yet, this shift is just beginning. A revolution is underway in the energy market. It wasn’t started by the pandemic – this is a structural movement towards new energy that has developed over several years, backed by falling costs. It was recently accelerated by the events of 2020, that reduced demand for fossil fuels and related industries such as steel and cement.

Ultimately, renewable energies are on a declining cost trajectory, while fossil fuels have high and fixed costs. That cost trajectory implies that renewables will be cheaper than fossil fuels, which is already true in many cases, with or without disruptive global events.

The pandemic accelerated what was already happening in the new energy industry. It has acted as a catalyst for more rapid change. For investors, the Lyxor New Energy ETF, which recently passed $1 billion in assets under management, could be a great way to get involved in this change and become part of the new energy revolution.

 

A column by Paloma Torres, Associate, ETF CRM and Sales for Iberia and Latam in Lyxor Asset Management

GameStop Hungover and Love-The-Planet bets

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

monitor-1307227_640
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainMonitores. Monitores

Many U.S. stock market benchmarks rallied to record highs during the first three weeks of January then dropped sharply at month end as the GameStop short squeeze (Tulip Mania 1636/7) dynamics unnerved investors. U.S. stocks closed mixed for the month as the annual 2020 earnings season got off to a good start.

Love Our Planet and People (LOPP:NYSE), our new actively traded non-transparent ETF for the decade of the 20s, is based on saving Planet Earth, helping people and creating the potential for saving the planet, and by focusing on the impact of climate change as well as on reducing/recycling plastic and on innovative companies that are developing new and sustainable solutions to carbon reduction.

Renewables, including wind, solar, battery storage and building infrastructure for transmission are the areas we want represented by some portfolio companies. The entire environmental ecosystem is receiving increasing investor focus.

One of the Gabelli stock ‘picks’ mentioned in BARRON’s 2021 Roundtable Part 2, published in the January 25 issue, that is directly impacting climate change is the Connecticut based sustainable energy company, Avangrid Inc. (AGR:NYSE), an energy and utility company, and a  love-the-planet play.  Spanish utility Iberdrola (IBE SM-Madrid), owns 260 million shares.  Avangrid announced in October that it plans to acquire PNM Resources (PNM:NYSE). Iberdrola understands the renewables world and is well positioned in the U.S.  Our equity research concludes the company could spinout a portion of Avangrid’s renewables business as a yield, similar to NextEra Energy’s (NEE:NYSE) spinout of NextEra Energy Partners (NEP:NYSE), and thereby create a higher valuation. The PNM deal will add significantly to Avangrid’s revenue and EBITDA, and investors will get a solid dividend with a current yield of around 3.80%.

In the world of merger arbitrage, dealmaking momentum carried into the new year, with global deal activity increasing 38% year-over-year to $300 billion.

Finally, the global convertible market followed up on a remarkable year with another strong month in January. The primary market was quite active as $12.6bn was offered globally. This new issuance performed well, despite some aggressive pricing. We expect this to continue through the year as companies can raise capital at attractive terms. 

With 10 year US treasuries moving higher we are starting to hear from some investors concerned about how convertibles will act in a rising rate environment. Historically convertibles are driven more by underlying equity performance than interest rates and we anticipate this will be the case this time as well. With duration at all-time lows, there are only a few select convertibles that may be significantly impacted by rising rates. For example, since August 10 year rates are up 60 bps, however convertibles are up 31%, driven by underlying equity performance of 38%.   

Overall, the investment team is enthusiastic about the prospects for further gains within convertibles while “staying” invested in equities with the benefit of asymmetric risk exposure. When equity volatility increases, convertibles’ yield advantage, maturity, and position in the capital structure help them to outperform.

 

 

_____________________________________________________

To access our proprietary value investment methodology, and dedicated merger arbitrage portfolio we offer the following UCITS Funds in each discipline:

GAMCO MERGER ARBITRAGE

GAMCO Merger Arbitrage UCITS Fund, launched in October 2011, is an open-end fund incorporated in Luxembourg and compliant with UCITS regulation. The team, dedicated strategy, and record dates back to 1985. The objective of the GAMCO Merger Arbitrage Fund is to achieve long-term capital growth by investing primarily in announced equity merger and acquisition transactions while maintaining a diversified portfolio. The Fund utilizes a highly specialized investment approach designed principally to profit from the successful completion of proposed mergers, takeovers, tender offers, leveraged buyouts and other types of corporate reorganizations. Analyzes and continuously monitors each pending transaction for potential risk, including: regulatory, terms, financing, and shareholder approval.

Merger investments are a highly liquid, non-market correlated, proven and consistent alternative to traditional fixed income and equity securities. Merger returns are dependent on deal spreads. Deal spreads are a function of time, deal risk premium, and interest rates. Returns are thus correlated to interest rate changes over the medium term and not the broader equity market. The prospect of rising rates would imply higher returns on mergers as spreads widen to compensate arbitrageurs. As bond markets decline (interest rates rise), merger returns should improve as capital allocation decisions adjust to the changes in the costs of capital.

Broad Market volatility can lead to widening of spreads in merger positions, coupled with our well-researched merger portfolios, offer the potential for enhanced IRRs through dynamic position sizing. Daily price volatility fluctuations coupled with less proprietary capital (the Volcker rule) in the U.S. have contributed to improving merger spreads and thus, overall returns. Thus our fund is well positioned as a cash substitute or fixed income alternative.

Our objectives are to compound and preserve wealth over time, while remaining non-correlated to the broad global markets. We created our first dedicated merger fund 32 years ago. Since then, our merger performance has grown client assets at an annualized rate of  approximately 10.7% gross and 7.6% net since 1985. Today, we manage assets on behalf of institutional and high net worth clients globally in a variety of fund structures and mandates.

Class I USD – LU0687944552
Class I EUR – LU0687944396
Class A USD – LU0687943745
Class A EUR – LU0687943661
Class R USD – LU1453360825
Class R EUR – LU1453361476

GAMCO ALL CAP VALUE

The GAMCO All Cap Value UCITS Fund launched in May, 2015 utilizes Gabelli’s its proprietary PMV with a Catalyst™ investment methodology, which has been in place since 1977. The Fund seeks absolute returns through event driven value investing. Our methodology centers around fundamental, research-driven, value based investing with a focus on asset values, cash flows and identifiable catalysts to maximize returns independent of market direction. The fund draws on the experience of its global portfolio team and 35+ value research analysts.

GAMCO is an active, bottom-up, value investor, and seeks to achieve real capital appreciation (relative to inflation) over the long term regardless of market cycles. Our value-oriented stock selection process is based on the fundamental investment principles first articulated in 1934 by Graham and Dodd, the founders of modern security analysis, and further augmented by Mario Gabelli in 1977 with his introduction of the concepts of Private Market Value (PMV) with a Catalyst™ into equity analysis. PMV with a Catalyst™ is our unique research methodology that focuses on individual stock selection by identifying firms selling below intrinsic value with a reasonable probability of realizing their PMV’s which we define as the price a strategic or financial acquirer would be willing to pay for the entire enterprise.  The fundamental valuation factors utilized to evaluate securities prior to inclusion/exclusion into the portfolio, our research driven approach views fundamental analysis as a three pronged approach:  free cash flow (earnings before, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, minus the capital expenditures necessary to grow/maintain the business); earnings per share trends; and private market value (PMV), which encompasses on and off balance sheet assets and liabilities. Our team arrives at a PMV valuation by a rigorous assessment of fundamentals from publicly available information and judgement gained from meeting management, covering all size companies globally and our comprehensive, accumulated knowledge of a variety of sectors. We then identify businesses for the portfolio possessing the proper margin of safety and research variables from our deep research universe.

Class I USD – LU1216601648
Class I EUR – LU1216601564
Class A USD – LU1216600913
Class A EUR – LU1216600673
Class R USD – LU1453359900
Class R EUR – LU1453360155

GAMCO CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES

GAMCO Convertible Securities’ objective is to seek to provide current income as well as long term capital appreciation through a total return strategy by investing in a diversified portfolio of global convertible securities.

The Fund leverages the firm’s history of investing in dedicated convertible security portfolios since 1979.

The fund invests in convertible securities, as well as other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities, across global markets (but the fund will not invest in contingent convertible notes). The fund may invest in securities of any market capitalization or credit quality, including up to 100% in below investment grade or unrated securities, and may from time to time invest a significant amount of its assets in securities of smaller companies. Convertible securities may include any suitable convertible instruments such as convertible bonds, convertible notes or convertible preference shares.

By actively managing the fund and investing in convertible securities, the investment manager seeks the opportunity to participate in the capital appreciation of underlying stocks, while at the same time relying on the fixed income aspect of the convertible securities to provide current income and reduced price volatility, which can limit the risk of loss in a down equity market.

Class I USD          LU2264533006

Class I EUR          LU2264532966

Class A USD        LU2264532701

Class A EUR        LU2264532610

Class R USD         LU2264533345

Class R EUR         LU2264533261

Class F USD         LU2264533691

Class F EUR         LU2264533428 

 

 

Disclaimer:
The information and any opinions have been obtained from or are based on sources believed to be reliable but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No responsibility can be accepted for any consequential loss arising from the use of this information. The information is expressed at its date and is issued only to and directed only at those individuals who are permitted to receive such information in accordance with the applicable statutes. In some countries the distribution of this publication may be restricted. It is your responsibility to find out what those restrictions are and observe them.

Some of the statements in this presentation may contain or be based on forward looking statements, forecasts, estimates, projections, targets, or prognosis (“forward looking statements”), which reflect the manager’s current view of future events, economic developments and financial performance. Such forward looking statements are typically indicated by the use of words which express an estimate, expectation, belief, target or forecast. Such forward looking statements are based on an assessment of historical economic data, on the experience and current plans of the investment manager and/or certain advisors of the manager, and on the indicated sources. These forward looking statements contain no representation or warranty of whatever kind that such future events will occur or that they will occur as described herein, or that such results will be achieved by the fund or the investments of the fund, as the occurrence of these events and the results of the fund are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The actual portfolio, and thus results, of the fund may differ substantially from those assumed in the forward looking statements. The manager and its affiliates will not undertake to update or review the forward looking statements contained in this presentation, whether as result of new information or any future event or otherwise.

The Federal Reserve Is in the Asset Purchase Taper Spotlight Once Again, What Should We Expect?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

one-3125379_640
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainDólar. Dólar

The U.S. stock market rallied to record highs during the first three weeks of February, then dropped sharply as the U.S. Treasury 10-year note yield set a one-year high of 1.614% on February 26, prompting concerns about the extreme valuations of selected stocks. At month end, stocks were higher for both February and for the first quarter to date.

 The Fed is in the asset purchase (QE) taper spotlight once again as rising nominal and real longer term UST rates reflect expectations that inflation may rise as the economic recovery strengthens due to unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus, rising consumer spending from virus relief checks, rising cumulative COVID-19 vaccinations given, and surging government debt to pay the bill.  The U.S. economy is opening up and the Fed may need to tap on the brakes.  In Congressional testimony on February 23, Fed Chair Powell told the Senate Banking Committee that the Fed’s primary focus is now on the total number of people with jobs and getting workers back into the labour market. With regard to inflation, he said, “this is not a problem for this time as near as I can figure.” 

Berkshire Hathaway ended the ‘mystery stock’ guessing game in a filing on February 16 when it disclosed large year-end positions in Verizon and Chevron.  In Warren Buffett’s released letter to Shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway, he states: In its brief 232 years of existence, however, there has been no incubator for unleashing human potential like America. Despite some severe interruptions, our country’s economic progress has been breath taking…Our unwavering conclusion: Never bet against America.

Dealmaking remained robust in February with $390 billion in new deals announced, bringing global volume to $680 billion year to date, an increase of nearly 20% over 2020 levels. Performance in February was bolstered by deals that progressed towards completion, and we crystalized profits on deals that closed including BioTelemetry’s $3 billion acquisition by Philips, Virtusa’s $2 billion acquisition by Canada Pension Plan, and People Corp’s $1.2 billion acquisition by Goldman Sachs. Newly announced deals in February, including Viela Bio’s $3 billion acquisition by Horizon Therapeutics, have added to a strong pipeline of pending deals in which to invest.

 Lastly, in the convertibles space, February issuance continued at a rapid pace, however new issue pricing became a bit stretched with a number of companies able to price zero coupon bonds at high premiums. While this is great for the balance sheets of these issuers, it is not always an attractive way for us to invest in these companies. Fortunately, there are many existing issues with attractive terms available to us. In the first few days of March, new issue pricing already improved after a few of these unattractive issues underperformed, and investors pushed back on the aggressive pricing assumptions. 

US Treasury yields have been moving higher, and traditionally this has been a good time for convertibles. Going back over 20 years, whenever US 10-year treasury yields are up 100 basis points or more, convertibles have moved higher, because their prices are more a function of the underlying stock price than a function of yield. We are closing in on another 100 basis point move and again converts will have moved higher through the time period. In the twelve months following each rising rate period, convertibles have returned over 8%, on average. We are positioned well to take advantage of this dynamic. 

We continue to invest in convertibles with an expectation of long-term total returns through a mix of income and capital appreciation. Their asymmetrical return profile allows us to stay invested and participate in rising equity markets with reduced volatility.  As interest rates move higher we anticipate improving prices on new issues, expanding our available universe of attractive investments.

 

______________________________________________________

To access our proprietary value investment methodology, and dedicated merger arbitrage portfolio we offer the following UCITS Funds in each discipline:

GAMCO MERGER ARBITRAGE

GAMCO Merger Arbitrage UCITS Fund, launched in October 2011, is an open-end fund incorporated in Luxembourg and compliant with UCITS regulation. The team, dedicated strategy, and record dates back to 1985. The objective of the GAMCO Merger Arbitrage Fund is to achieve long-term capital growth by investing primarily in announced equity merger and acquisition transactions while maintaining a diversified portfolio. The Fund utilizes a highly specialized investment approach designed principally to profit from the successful completion of proposed mergers, takeovers, tender offers, leveraged buyouts and other types of corporate reorganizations. Analyzes and continuously monitors each pending transaction for potential risk, including: regulatory, terms, financing, and shareholder approval.

Merger investments are a highly liquid, non-market correlated, proven and consistent alternative to traditional fixed income and equity securities. Merger returns are dependent on deal spreads. Deal spreads are a function of time, deal risk premium, and interest rates. Returns are thus correlated to interest rate changes over the medium term and not the broader equity market. The prospect of rising rates would imply higher returns on mergers as spreads widen to compensate arbitrageurs. As bond markets decline (interest rates rise), merger returns should improve as capital allocation decisions adjust to the changes in the costs of capital.

Broad Market volatility can lead to widening of spreads in merger positions, coupled with our well-researched merger portfolios, offer the potential for enhanced IRRs through dynamic position sizing. Daily price volatility fluctuations coupled with less proprietary capital (the Volcker rule) in the U.S. have contributed to improving merger spreads and thus, overall returns. Thus our fund is well positioned as a cash substitute or fixed income alternative.

Our objectives are to compound and preserve wealth over time, while remaining non-correlated to the broad global markets. We created our first dedicated merger fund 32 years ago. Since then, our merger performance has grown client assets at an annualized rate of  approximately 10.7% gross and 7.6% net since 1985. Today, we manage assets on behalf of institutional and high net worth clients globally in a variety of fund structures and mandates.

Class I USD – LU0687944552
Class I EUR – LU0687944396
Class A USD – LU0687943745
Class A EUR – LU0687943661
Class R USD – LU1453360825
Class R EUR – LU1453361476

GAMCO ALL CAP VALUE

The GAMCO All Cap Value UCITS Fund launched in May, 2015 utilizes Gabelli’s its proprietary PMV with a Catalyst™ investment methodology, which has been in place since 1977. The Fund seeks absolute returns through event driven value investing. Our methodology centers around fundamental, research-driven, value based investing with a focus on asset values, cash flows and identifiable catalysts to maximize returns independent of market direction. The fund draws on the experience of its global portfolio team and 35+ value research analysts.

GAMCO is an active, bottom-up, value investor, and seeks to achieve real capital appreciation (relative to inflation) over the long term regardless of market cycles. Our value-oriented stock selection process is based on the fundamental investment principles first articulated in 1934 by Graham and Dodd, the founders of modern security analysis, and further augmented by Mario Gabelli in 1977 with his introduction of the concepts of Private Market Value (PMV) with a Catalyst™ into equity analysis. PMV with a Catalyst™ is our unique research methodology that focuses on individual stock selection by identifying firms selling below intrinsic value with a reasonable probability of realizing their PMV’s which we define as the price a strategic or financial acquirer would be willing to pay for the entire enterprise.  The fundamental valuation factors utilized to evaluate securities prior to inclusion/exclusion into the portfolio, our research driven approach views fundamental analysis as a three pronged approach:  free cash flow (earnings before, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, minus the capital expenditures necessary to grow/maintain the business); earnings per share trends; and private market value (PMV), which encompasses on and off balance sheet assets and liabilities. Our team arrives at a PMV valuation by a rigorous assessment of fundamentals from publicly available information and judgement gained from meeting management, covering all size companies globally and our comprehensive, accumulated knowledge of a variety of sectors. We then identify businesses for the portfolio possessing the proper margin of safety and research variables from our deep research universe.

Class I USD – LU1216601648
Class I EUR – LU1216601564
Class A USD – LU1216600913
Class A EUR – LU1216600673
Class R USD – LU1453359900
Class R EUR – LU1453360155

GAMCO CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES

GAMCO Convertible Securities’ objective is to seek to provide current income as well as long term capital appreciation through a total return strategy by investing in a diversified portfolio of global convertible securities.

The Fund leverages the firm’s history of investing in dedicated convertible security portfolios since 1979.

The fund invests in convertible securities, as well as other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities, across global markets (but the fund will not invest in contingent convertible notes). The fund may invest in securities of any market capitalization or credit quality, including up to 100% in below investment grade or unrated securities, and may from time to time invest a significant amount of its assets in securities of smaller companies. Convertible securities may include any suitable convertible instruments such as convertible bonds, convertible notes or convertible preference shares.

By actively managing the fund and investing in convertible securities, the investment manager seeks the opportunity to participate in the capital appreciation of underlying stocks, while at the same time relying on the fixed income aspect of the convertible securities to provide current income and reduced price volatility, which can limit the risk of loss in a down equity market.

Class I USD          LU2264533006

Class I EUR          LU2264532966

Class A USD        LU2264532701

Class A EUR        LU2264532610

Class R USD         LU2264533345

Class R EUR         LU2264533261

Class F USD         LU2264533691

Class F EUR         LU2264533428 

 

 

Disclaimer:
The information and any opinions have been obtained from or are based on sources believed to be reliable but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No responsibility can be accepted for any consequential loss arising from the use of this information. The information is expressed at its date and is issued only to and directed only at those individuals who are permitted to receive such information in accordance with the applicable statutes. In some countries the distribution of this publication may be restricted. It is your responsibility to find out what those restrictions are and observe them.

Some of the statements in this presentation may contain or be based on forward looking statements, forecasts, estimates, projections, targets, or prognosis (“forward looking statements”), which reflect the manager’s current view of future events, economic developments and financial performance. Such forward looking statements are typically indicated by the use of words which express an estimate, expectation, belief, target or forecast. Such forward looking statements are based on an assessment of historical economic data, on the experience and current plans of the investment manager and/or certain advisors of the manager, and on the indicated sources. These forward looking statements contain no representation or warranty of whatever kind that such future events will occur or that they will occur as described herein, or that such results will be achieved by the fund or the investments of the fund, as the occurrence of these events and the results of the fund are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The actual portfolio, and thus results, of the fund may differ substantially from those assumed in the forward looking statements. The manager and its affiliates will not undertake to update or review the forward looking statements contained in this presentation, whether as result of new information or any future event or otherwise.

The Unsung Heroes of COVID-19 Equity Markets

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

printed-circuit-board-3113719_640
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainMicrochips. Microchips

As has been well-documented, equity markets were quick to recognize the increase in demand for many online services and businesses ranging from Amazon to Zoom (with many more in between). Many, including the FAANG stocks, have escalated in value as retail investors with their stimulus checks, as well as institutions, have piled back into equity markets since the March 2020 plunge. However, the ability of many of those businesses to deliver their virtual goods and services is dependent on the infrastructure that they use.

Perhaps somewhat overlooked are data center and semiconductor businesses, particularly memory chips vital to facilitating the digital economy. Despite their criticality to the digital economy and their ability to generate attractive cash flows and returns on capital, memory stocks continue to trade at a discount to other semiconductor and IT-related stocks. There is also a shortage of supply of the chips needed for many applications, including automotive, which should increase producer value until supply catches up. It typically takes more than two years to build a fabrication facility and ramp up production.

While we are generally bullish on the digital economy, we are finding attractive prospects in ‘old’ economy companies as well. Large U.S.-based banks are well capitalized and have been conservative in provisioning for potential risks in their loan and credit card portfolios during the COVID crisis. Given the significant support from the Fed and the U.S. government through the crisis, the economy has held up relatively well, all things considered.

This suggests that banks may end up overcompensating for loan losses, which could drive provision reversals in later periods, further supporting earnings growth. Additionally, banks stand to benefit from a rise in rates over time. As we look forward, we are encouraged by banks that are investing materially in digital transformation and innovation, such as developing attractive and convenient-to-use apps and tools for consumers and businesses. We believe this should improve the value-add to customers while driving operational efficiencies at the banks themselves. Despite strong balance sheets, prudent provisioning, stable underlying trends and investments on innovation, some of these banks generally trade at a fraction of book value, making an attractive entry point for potential investors.

Long-Term Thinking During a Period of Rapid Change

In a period of great innovation, disruption and high valuations, like we are experiencing today, we need to look beyond the very near-term and consider the medium- to long-term opportunities for a business and how it is allocating capital to support those objectives. If a company is investing in a large market opportunity with attractive returns at maturity, we welcome them investing heavily today for a much larger payoff tomorrow. The investments often obfuscate the true earnings power of the business and may make it seem expensive on statistical measures, but those investments may end up creating significant value for shareholders over time.

In today’s environment, a process that relies on deep fundamental research to narrow the universe of stocks by looking for strong companies driving idea generation, and which utilizes an intrinsic value framework in an attempt to understand the likelihood of a business’ ability to create long-term value, may have an advantage. Market commentators and investors often attempt to assess valuations and opportunities simply on near-term statistical metrics, such as a P/E or a P/B multiple. These can be useful datapoints but do not paint the complete picture of whether a business is fairly valued. We believe that investors should more thoroughly analyze and determine a security’s intrinsic value before placing it into a portfolio. 

The recent increase in retail participation in equity markets means more investors competing in the market, which, ultimately, should make the markets more efficient with periods of excessive price moves. However, increased market efficiency also means that simple strategies utilizing easily accessed valuation multiples or other metrics will create little to no excess returns on average. In fact, greater retail participation will mean that achieving alpha returns consistently will require a well-thought-out investment philosophy and rigorous process to add value over time.

 

ESG Considerations Should Be Part of Any Investment Process

ESG (environmental, social and governance) considerations provide investors with an expanded toolkit for assessing whether a business is creating value for all its stakeholders, from employees to its community to shareholders. ESG also provides insight into analyzing a business’s go-forward prospects­­­—a lens on whether that company is competing in expanding or contracting markets due to evolving environmental or regulatory considerations. Governance is another important set of issues where poor practice can lead to substantial corporate risk such as expensive legal actions and negative publicity. These insights about where risks lie are crucial in determining what the business is worth and providing effective stewardship of the investment.

So Where Do We Go from Here

While COVID accelerated many changes around the globe, equity markets rewarded many companies that were active in preparing for their future. We believe that investors should also be active and diligent with their investment allocations going forward. Opportunities abound for those that are doing the deep fundamental research on the securities that they own, who take a long-term view, and incorporate ESG considerations so that they have an even broader understanding of the risks and opportunities that each company faces.

 

 

 

Miguel Oleaga is a portfolio manager and managing director at Thornburg Investment Management.

 

Founded in 1982, Thornburg Investment Management is a privately-owned global investment firm that offers a range of multi-strategy solutions for institutions and financial advisors around the world. A recognized leader in fixed income, equity, and alternatives investing, the firm oversees US$45 billion ($43.3 billion in assets under management and $1.8 billion in assets under advisement) as of 31 December 2020 across mutual funds, institutional accounts, separate accounts for high-net-worth investors, and UCITS funds for non-U.S. investors. Thornburg is headquartered in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, with additional offices in London, Hong Kong and Shanghai.

 

For more information, please visit www.thornburg.com

 

Flashpoints in the Sino-American Rivalry: Whoever Controls the Taiwan Strait Controls the Global Economy

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

taiwan-4743542_1920
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. Focos de tensión en la rivalidad sino-estadounidense: quien controle el estrecho de Taiwán controlará la economía mundial

Mainly playing out across the vast Pacific Ocean, the great power rivalry between the US and China is the dominant geopolitical conflict of our time. There are deep-rooted economic, demographic, and geographic forces at work, reshaping the world’s most important bilateral relationship. A unipolar world where the global hegemon, the US, had unmatched global capacity and influence is morphing into a balanced, multipolar world where various countries have an ever-increasing impact on global decision-making and action.

At the end of World War II, the US accounted for a far larger share of global GDP than would be warranted given its population. To be sure, some of this was due to the US economy’s unrivaled level of productivity and innovation. The US will always punch above its weight because of these factors. But the main reason why the US was the overwhelmingly dominant economic engine of the world was that most major economies lay in ruins after that devastating conflict. In a famous study authored by the British economist Angus Maddison, the US’ share of global GDP reached a zenith of almost 40% in the early 1950s.

Insigneo expert

Since then, our share of global GDP has been steadily waning. To paraphrase economist Herbert Stein, that which can’t go on won’t. The other component to this relative slide has been China’s rising economic heft. For most of its history, the Mainland’s share of global GDP hovered between 30% and 35%, according to this same seminal work. In other words, China’s rise is merely a return to its normal, baseline level of economic clout. The previous century was the anomaly. China’s rise should and will continue.

So, what does this tell us about the ensuing power struggle between the two countries? Is confrontation inevitable? Can we avoid Thucydides’ famous trap? When paradigms shift, there will always be friction. With tectonic shifts, you might not always get an earthquake, but there are usually a few tremors. The 2018/19 trade dispute was but the first truly global spat between these two rivals. One can expect many more to come with Taiwan being at the vanguard of potential flashpoints. It is not an exaggeration to say that the Republic of China, the official name for the island nation just off the Mainland, is quickly becoming the most important and most-watched nation on Earth.

Taiwan dominates sophisticated global chip manufacturing, and its comparative advantage should only increase. Earlier this year, the shutdowns in American and European auto manufacturing plants had less to do with Covid-19 and more to do with chip shortages in Asia. While these bottlenecks will sort themselves out in the near-term, they are emblematic of a broader problem: semiconductors are the new oil and Taiwan is the new Saudi Arabia. Worryingly, this market is even more concentrated than the oil market is because there are fewer producers. Whoever controls Taiwan can effectively influence the world’s global supply of microchips.

This is not hyperbole. Because the cost of achieving higher logic density has increased so exponentially, it means that new microchip technology entails massive capital investments that require producers to operate with a very high utilization rate. The barriers to entry are prohibitively high. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company comprises half of the global semiconductor foundry market. Together with Taiwan’s other giant United Microelectronics Corporation and South Korea’s Samsung, the three companies account for 78% of global market share. In sum, the microprocessor market is highly and dangerously concentrated in Taiwan. From the West’s perspective, this is dangerous because China covets a reunification with Taiwan. Thanks to its actions in Hong Kong, everyone now knows what that would look like under Xi Jinping.

Every investor and policymaker worth their salt will have to account for the vulnerabilities inherent in a world should the situation across the Taiwan Strait deteriorate. An incident where chip production was disrupted or halted, or supply lines were permanently denied could be catastrophic for the global economy. If you think the US would not go to war over chip manufacturing in Taiwan, then you do not remember the US going to war in Kuwait over oil in the early 1990s. Of course, China would pack a stronger punch than Iraq ever could, and Taiwan’s importance means that all stakeholders around the world have incentives to de-escalate.

But as World War I showed us, rational actors can stumble into a conflict through a series of miscalculations after the assassination of an Archduke. Incidentally, World War I was the last time a rising, regional hegemon (Germany) confronted the entrenched global hegemon (the UK). To be sure, I am not saying that the result of this great power rivalry will be a third world war. I am also not precluding it from turning out that way either if the wrong policy mix makes us stumble in that direction. Certainly, Taiwan’s importance to the global economy means that all stakeholders, which in the extreme means all nations, are incentivized to cooperate, and maintain stability. Elementary game theory teaches how that decision-making process can go awry, and behavioral economics similarly suggests that not all decisions, even at the state-level, are rational and motivated by self-interest.

What are investors and market participants to do? Do we run to the proverbial risk bunker and wait out the coming conflict? Again, history provides a clear answer – an emphatic “no”. During the Cold War, broadly defined as 1947 till 1991, the S&P 500 rose 2,708% (7.70% annualized) despite enough missiles being pointed at each other to wipe out humanity many times over. Lest we forget, the world stood at the brink of doomsday several times during this now quickly receding era: The Berlin Airlift, the Korean War, the Soviet Invasion of Hungary, and the Cuban Missile Crisis. That was our conflict with the ideological and militant Soviets. Conflicts with the capitalist Chinese may turn out a tad less unnerving.

We must learn how to interpret the decisions and actions of these two great nations within the framework of this great power rivalry: the US wants to maintain the status quo, its place at the center of the post-WWII order, while China wants to regain its historical place and displace said order. From the American side, you will see intensifying economic pressure, and support of borderland states like Taiwan as an attempt to limit China to the first island chain. One will see the US trying to encircle the Chinese through alliances and balance of power moves allowing Japanese remilitarization and an Indian rapprochement.

For China’s part, it must ensure that it can keep delivering the economic growth that its masses have come to expect and that underpin the government’s credibility. To that end, we will see attempts to bypass the global commons, the oceans that the ubiquitous US Navy still dominates. The Chinese have reconnected with the Russians, as a unified Eurasian landmass will better counter the seagoing Americans. There will be other, yet to be determined, manifestations of this global conflict. It is important that we recognize them when they arrive. The markets will have to learn how to discount this risk premium, and, as they have done in earlier eras of shifting paradigms, they will adjust to the new reality.

Green and Sustainable Bonds in Emerging Markets

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

BARTON-Mary-Therese-490
Mary-Therese Barton, Pictet Asset Management. Mary-Therese Barton, Pictet Asset Management

Governments everywhere are racing to lock in historically low borrowing costs by issuing ever longer dated debt – in recent years Mexico and Argentina even managed to sell century bonds. That presents several new challenges for fixed income investors. Particularly those who own emerging market bonds.

Not only do bondholders have to weigh the usual near-term factors like political, economic and commodity cycles but, in lending money to sovereigns over such extended periods, they now also have to consider the impact of longer term trends such as climate change and social development. Both can affect creditworthiness in profound ways.

This has called for new approaches to investment thinking. Economic and financial forecasts are having to be recast with climate dynamics in mind. Meanwhile, modelled pathways of climatic change are themselves subject to expectations about future technological change as well as the evolution of political thinking in these countries. The number of moving parts only grows as investors realise they also have a role to play in shaping how governments approach making their economies sustainable and low-carbon.

It’s a complex problem. But not an insurmountable one.

The greening of EM debt

In 2015, some 17 per cent of emerging market hard currency debt had a maturity of 20 years or more. By the start of 2021, that proportion had grown to 27 per cent. Even local currency denominated emerging market debt, which tends to be shorter-dated, has moved along the maturity curve. Over the same time period, the proportion of local currency debt with a maturity of five years or longer had risen 11 percentage points to 58 per cent (1).

That shift reflects growing demand for yield from investors starved of income. But at the same time, bondholders have recognised the importance of taking a long-term view on environmental issues. This is apparent in both the appetite for green bonds – capital earmarked for environmental- or climate-related projects – and, more generally, bonds that fall under the environmental, social and governance (ESG) umbrella.

Governments are happy to meet that demand. Increasingly, they recognise the need to make efforts to mitigate climate change, and given that emerging market economies make up half the world’s output, they have a significant role to play in meeting global greenhouse gas emissions goals.

Pictet AM

 

In the five years to the end of 2020, annual issuance of green, social and sustainability bonds by emerging market governments grew nearly four-fold to USD16.2 billion (2). And demand is only increasing. For instance, in the first few weeks of January, Chile met 70 per cent of its expected USD6 billion debt issuance for 2021, all in green and social bonds and it plans only to issue sustainable and green bonds during the remainder of the year (3). In September 2020, Egypt became the first Middle Eastern government to issue a green bond. It raised USD750 million to finance or refinance green projects. Investors were enthusiastic – the bond was five times oversubscribed (4).

And generally, these bonds have longer maturities than conventional fixed income securities. Some 46 per cent of USD36.8 billion of outstanding emerging market ESG bonds priced in local currency terms have a maturity of more than 10 years, while for emerging markets hard currency ESG bonds, it’s 41 per cent of USD12.9 billion of outstanding bonds (5).

These bonds allow investors to track performance, while green agendas can also help governments to improve their credit ratings, which then lifts the value of their debt, thus rewarding bond holders.

Overall, green bonds generate positive feedback effects. The rising volumes of green and sustainable bond issuance highlights investors’ willingness to take more of a long-term approach to EM investing. But at the same time, governments are being made more accountable – in order to issue these bonds, governments are having to publish their sustainability frameworks in greater detail. This additional accountability helps to mitigate political risks that are a key consideration in EM investing. Investors, however, will need to analyse and monitor developments closely to ensure proceeds are used as intended.

Indeed, green bonds are the most exciting development in emerging market financing for decades and, we think, will have an equivalent impact to the Brady bonds of the 1980s (6) – albeit this is dependent on improved disclosure and monitoring and industry standardisation of green labels.

Climate change matters (especially in EM)

For all the sovereign issuance of green bonds so far, a great deal more funding will need to be raised to limit climate change. Globally it will cost between USD1 trillion and USD2 trillion a year in additional spending to limit global warming, some 1 per cent to 1.5 per cent of worldwide GDP, according to the Energy Transitions Commission (7). And a significant part of those costs will need to be borne by emerging economies, not least because they are likely to suffer most.

By the end of this century, unmitigated climate change – entailing warming of 4.3° centigrade above pre-industrial levels – would cut per capita economic output in major countries like Brazil and India by more than 60 per cent compared to a world without climate change, according to a report by Oxford University’s Smith School sponsored by Pictet (8). Globally, the shortfall would be 45 per cent. 

Pictet AM

Limiting warming to 1.6° C would sharply reduce that hit to roughly 27 per cent of potential output per capita for the world as a whole, albeit with considerable variation among countries. While those in the tropics countries would be hit hard by the effects of drought and altered rainfall patterns, those in high latitudes, like Russia, would be relative winners as ports become less ice-locked and more territory is opened up to extractive industries and agriculture. And though China would suffer smaller overall losses than average, its large coastal conurbations would be subject to depredations caused by rising sea levels.

Integrating risks

As these effects are felt, investors will grow increasingly wary of lending to vulnerable countries. And climate change is already having an impact on developing countries’ credit ratings. In 2018, rating agency Standard & Poor’s cited hurricane risk when it cut its ratings outlook on the sovereign debt issued by the Turks and Caicos (9). 

Investors could expect climate-related events, like droughts, severe storms and shifts in precipitation patterns, to push up output and inflation volatility in emerging economies during the next ten to 20 years, according to Professor Cameron Hepburn, lead author of the Oxford report. 

That would represent a significant reversal for emerging market sovereign borrowers. Since the turn of the century the relative rate of growth and inflation volatilities between emerging and developed markets has halved (10), which, in turn, has reduced the risk faced by investors. Rising economic volatility would feed into sovereign risk assessments, eroding their credit profiles. 

Other research from the Oxford team highlights the choices countries will need to take to remain on the path towards building a greener economy (11).

At Pictet Asset Management, we already use a wealth of ESG data – from both external and internal sources –as part of how we score countries. The environmental factors we monitor include air quality, climate change exposure, deforestation and water stress. Social dimensions include education, healthcare, life expectancy and scientific research. And governance covers elements like corruption, electoral process, government stability, judicial independence and right to privacy. Together these factors are aggregated to become one of six pillars in the country risk index (CRI) ranking produced by our economics team. 

Level playing fields

We believe that ESG considerations are inefficiently reflected in emerging market asset prices. This is a consequence of the market still being at an early stage in its understanding and application of ESG factors and analysis. There is also a lack of consistent and transparent ESG data for many emerging countries. We believe that using an ESG score alone is simply not enough. Having a sustainable lens through which to examine emerging market fundamentals helps us to mitigate risk and unearth investment opportunities. We use our own ESG data and analysis and engage with sovereign bond issuers to help bring about long-term change.

Emerging market economies vary hugely in their degree of development. This complicates how investors should weigh their ESG performance – after all, richer countries are more able to make the ESG-positive policy decisions that often have high front end costs for a long tail of benefits, such as shutting down coal mines in favour of solar power. 

Pictet AM

Applying the most simplistic approach to ESG – investing on the basis of countries’ ESG rankings – would squeeze fixed income investors out of the poorest developing countries, even if they are implementing the right policies to improve their ESG standing. Instead, it’s important for investors to recognise what is possible and achievable by poorer countries and allocate funding within those constraints – understanding countries’ direction of travel in terms of ESG is critical to analysing their prospects. 

One solution we are implementing at Pictet AM is to weigh ESG criteria against a country’s GDP per capita. So, for example, under our new scoring system, Angola does well on this adjusted basis despite having a low overall ranking. And the reverse is true for Gulf Cooperation Council member states.

Dynamic approaches

How governments react to long-term issues like climate change or to the challenge of developing their human capital will influence their economies’ trajectories and, ultimately, play a role in their credit ratings. Those long-term decisions are only growing in importance, not least given the scale of fiscal policies implemented in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. Tracking these spending programmes – through, say, the likes of the Oxford Economic Stimulus Observatory (12) – then becomes an important step towards understanding the ESG pathways governments are likely to follow. 

Countries with good, well-structured policies are likely to see their credit ratings improve, which attracts investors, drawing funding into their green investment programmes and ultimately driving a virtuous investment cycle.

Engaged investors

All this implies that investors have an active role to play – they can’t just passively allocate funding based on index weightings or be purely reactive to policymakers’ decisions. The most successful investors will help steer governments towards the path that boosts their credit ratings, gives them most access to the market and improves the fortunes and potential of citizens.

Like, for instance, explaining how electricity generated by wind turbines or solar can prove to be more cost-effective over the long term if financed by green bonds than ostensibly cheaper coal extracted from a mine paid for with higher yielding conventional debt. Or how fossil fuel investments could prove to be major white elephants as these sorts of polluting assets become stranded by shifts towards cleaner energy production. Or that failing to invest enough in education is a false economy that over the long run will fail to make the most of human capital and thus depress national output – something we raised with the South African government after our meetings with our on-the-ground charitable partners in the country.

To that end, The World Bank produced in 2020 a timely guide on how sovereign issuers can improve their engagement with investors on ESG issues (13). 

This sort of intensive analysis – using everything from long run macro models down to meetings with leaders of youth clubs in impoverished districts – can also help to paint a rounded picture of what’s happening in a country. For instance, it helped to ensure that we weren’t caught off guard by the shift to populism in Argentina ahead of their last elections and allowed us to trim our positions in the country.

For emerging market investors, ensuring all of these cogs mesh correctly is a difficult proposition, especially given that the parts are moving all the time, many driven by forces that will develop over many decades. But by using the full breadth of analytical tools, independent research and shoe leather fact-finding, it’s possible to gain a deeper and more profitable insight into these markets than a simple reading of credit ratings or index weightings offers. And, at the same time, influence policy makers to champion their country’s sustainable initiatives. Taking a sustainable approach to growth and issuing related bonds, emerging economies can fundamentally change their prospects for the better. It has the potential to be revolutionary for emerging markets and exhilarating for those of us who invest in them.

 

Written by Mary-Therese Barton, Head of Emerging Markets Debt at Pictet Asset Management.

 

Read more on Pictet Asset Management’s Emerging Markets capabilities

 

Notes:

(1) JPM EMBI-GD and GBI-EM. Data as at 25.01.21.

(2) Ibid

(3) https://www.latinfinance.com/daily-briefs/2021/1/22/interview-chile-diversifies-investor-base-with-esg-bonds

(4) https://www.reuters.com/article/egypt-bonds-int-idUSKBN26K1MJ

(5) Source: Pictet Asset Management, Bloomberg. Data as at 25.01.21

(6) Brady bonds were an innovative debt reduction programme in response to the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s, involving the issuance of US dollar denominated bonds.

(7) https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-energy-transition/global-net-zero-emissions-goal-would-require-1-2-trillion-a-year-investment-study-idUKKBN2670OA?edition-redirect=in

(8) Hepburn, C. et al. “Climate Change and Emerging Markets after Covid-19.” November, 2020. Estimates based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s shared socioeconomic pathway 2 (SSP2) using cmip5 climate models.

(9) https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/vep0j9mtowo52rlsmmww9g2#:~:text=S%26P%20Global%20Ratings%20revised%20its,two%20major20major%20hurricanes%20last%20year.&text=S%26P%20expects%20real%20GDP%20to,average%20from%202019%20to%202021.

(10) Average of rolling 2-year standard deviation of growth and inflation rates for 27 EM countries relative to 25 DM countries. Source: Pictet Asset Management, CEIC, Refinitiv. Data 01.01.2000 to 01.01.2021.

(11) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340509193_Economic_complexity_and_the_green_economy

(12) https://www.ouerp.com/totaltracking

(13) https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2020/11/08/world-bank-releases-guide-for-sovereign-issuers-to-engage-with-investors-on-environmental-social-and-governance-esg-issues

 

Information, opinions and estimates contained in this document reflect a judgment at the original date of publication and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented herein.

Important notes

This material is for distribution to professional investors only. However it is not intended for distribution to any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Information used in the preparation of this document is based upon sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of those sources. Any opinion, estimate or forecast may be changed at any time without prior warning.  Investors should read the prospectus or offering memorandum before investing in any Pictet managed funds. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each investor and may be subject to change in the future.  Past performance is not a guide to future performance.  The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed.  You may not get back the amount originally invested. 

This document has been issued in Switzerland by Pictet Asset Management SA and in the rest of the world by Pictet Asset Management Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, and may not be reproduced or distributed, either in part or in full, without their prior authorisation.

For US investors, Shares sold in the United States or to US Persons will only be sold in private placements to accredited investors pursuant to exemptions from SEC registration under the Section 4(2) and Regulation D private placement exemptions under the 1933 Act and qualified clients as defined under the 1940 Act. The Shares of the Pictet funds have not been registered under the 1933 Act and may not, except in transactions which do not violate United States securities laws, be directly or indirectly offered or sold in the United States or to any US Person. The Management Fund Companies of the Pictet Group will not be registered under the 1940 Act.

Pictet Asset Management Inc. (Pictet AM Inc) is responsible for effecting solicitation in North America to promote the portfolio management services of Pictet Asset Management Limited (Pictet AM Ltd) and Pictet Asset Management SA (Pictet AM SA).

In Canada Pictet AM Inc is registered as Portfolio Managerr authorized to conduct marketing activities on behalf of Pictet AM Ltd and Pictet AM SA. In the USA, Pictet AM Inc. is registered as an SEC Investment Adviser and its activities are conducted in full compliance with the SEC rules applicable to the marketing of affiliate entities as prescribed in the Adviser Act of 1940 ref. 17CFR275.206(4)-3.