Improving Infrastructure Is Creating New Investment Opportunities in Africa

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

La mejora de las infraestructuras está creando nuevas oportunidades de inversión en África
Mark Livingston, . Improving Infrastructure Is Creating New Investment Opportunities in Africa

Africa’s abundant agricultural, mineral, and energy resources have certainly helped drive the continent’s economic growth. But a new wave of infrastructure development is changing the way people think about the continent. The current model of African trade ‐raw materials in return for manufactured commodities ‐is shifting. As rapid industrialisation increases the prosperity of its youthful population, domestic consumption looks set to play a much bigger part in growth. One of the best performing regions in emerging markets in recent years, the continent is becoming an increasingly credible destination for foreign investment capital, and could massively exceed investors’ expectations in the next decade.

Make no mistake, Africa is still a tough place to do business. Corruption, bureaucracy, and unreliable electricity remain obstacles. But investments in projects like oil refineries demonstrate that investors are there for the long haul. Foreign direct investment in the continent has tripled in the last ten years, and as a group‐Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa ‐are expected to invest a staggering $530 billion in Africa’s industrial sector in 2015, up from $150 billion in 2010. Manufacturing’s share of total Chinese investment in Africa (22%) is fast gaining on the mining sector’s (29%). And the logistics companies that are now expanding in the region could have a huge snowball effect on economic activity, if they can bring down delivery times.

We think consumer staples have the greatest potential return on investment. Countries are starting from such a low base, and with incomes and population rising together, the sales of daily necessities like food and beverages are going to skyrocket. Consumer spending is forecast to double in the next ten years, as Africans become wealthier and increasingly urbanised – which should benefit companies like the brewers such as SABMiller, Heineken, and Diageo given how far below world average beer consumption is in Africa. The number of countries with average incomes above $1,000 per person a year is expected to grow from less than half of Africa’s 54 states to three‐quarters. As a case in point ‐Nigeria, whose per capita GDP quadrupled to $1600 in 2012 from $400 in 2000, looks like it is going to grow pretty strongly over the next few years as investment into the non‐oil economy picks up. An emerging middle class is providing momentum to private consumption, and boosting the share prices of companies like Nestlé, as Nigerians fill up their shopping baskets with more expensive goods.

Shoprite, a South African based supermarket group which is Africa’s largest retailer by market capitalisation has done fantastically well across the continent, where there was previously little access to large scale food shopping, and has delivered a return on equity of about 40% per annum in recent years. Another big change is the heavy investment in West Africa’s food and drink processing industry. Depending on how it develops over the next few years, a much greater proportion of retail shelf space may be devoted to lower‐cost locally produced products rather than South African imports. Interestingly, Shoprite has recently raised additional capital to spur property development in the region because the current establishments are moving too slowly to build shopping centres into which they can put their stores. The winners in this story are not just the food retailers, but also the suppliers such as snack manufacturer AVI and Nestle Nigeria, which sell Maggi’s chicken and beef stock, that are able to piggyback off the wider distribution  network of companies like Shoprite.

Telecommunications is another interesting area. Africans have embraced modern technology as soon as they could afford to, and mobile phones are becoming as ubiquitous in Africa as they are in India; with the two dominant South African based mobile operators MTN and Vodacom amongst the leader operators. To illustrate the speed of this growth, we can have a look at Nigeria, where in 2000 there were only 500,000 fixed lines and hardly any wireless handsets in the whole of Nigeria. Today, there are 90 million mobile phones. This high usage is creating a significant opportunity for financial services and in many cases bypassing the need for physical banking infrastructure. Vodafone, which pioneered mobile phone banking in Kenya through its subsidiary Safaricom, now sees a third of Kenyan GDP flowing through its mobile money‐transfer system, M‐Pesa. It is now attempting to replicate the same model across the continent.

Agriculture is bound to see massive growth too. Africa’s population is expected to double to 2 billion people by 2050, so there is an urgent need to improve agricultural productivity and increase cultivation. Africa accounts for 60% of the world’s arable land that is not in cultivation. Only 10% of the 400 million hectares of land between Senegal and South Africa suitable for farming is actually exploited.

While we are strong advocates for investing in both South Africa and Nigeria, the whole of Sub‐Saharan Africa offers a wide variety of opportunities. However, not all of these ideas are scalable into a liquid vehicle for international fund investors. Sometimes though, we have to go via the back‐door to access the ground floor opportunity. Corporate governance and market liquidity remain issues in ‘frontier markets’. This is why we often access these stories by investing in South African and UK companies. Within our EMEA strategy (which currently has around 60% exposure to Africa), we believe we have the ability to cherry pick some of the very best ideas in a wide range of countries.

Positive dividend surprises in Asia

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Sorpresas positivas en los dividendos asiáticos

The Asian universe of income stocks is witnessing a wave of positive dividend surprises in 2013. The market has generally reacted favourably to this theme and we expect the trend to continue as dividend per share growth has lagged earnings per share revisions since 2011. With capital expenditure intensity falling for the Asian universe and corporate balance sheets in the region remaining strong, we believe the environment is ripe for further positive dividend surprises.

Source: Datastream, CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets, March 2013. Data rebased to 100.

Investments in this region continue to benefit from positive share price reactions, driven by rising dividend payout ratios and continuing strong operational trends. We also believe that valuations for dividend growth companies remain at appealing levels. Two examples of stocks that have provided dividend surprises are property developer Wharf Holdings and technology firm Asustek Computer.

Wharf Holdings focuses on property and infrastructure development and investment in Hong Kong and mainland China. The company’s 2012 fiscal year (FY) results revealed a 55.7% dividend per share increase, year-on-year, which was significantly above consensus estimates. At an operational level, strong retail sales are continuing to drive the Hong Kong business and in China contract sales are expected to increase by up to 33% in 2013. Despite a rise of 85% in the price of the stock over the last 12 months, we believe the valuation is still attractive as it trades at a significant discount to its net asset value and on a price to book ratio below one.

Asustek is a leading technology company in Taiwan that designs and develops electronic-based products including PC components, such as motherboards, notebook computers and smartphones. FY 2012 dividends per share increased by an impressive 31% to 19 New Taiwan (NT) dollars, when many of its technology sector peers do not pay a dividend. Meanwhile, the company recently raised NT$4.66bn (US$158m) from the part sale of its shareholding in Pegatron, its former motherboard and graphics card subsidiary. The firm was spun-off in 2010 to increase Asustek’s competition with the likes of Dell, Hewlett Packard and Intel. The proceeds from the disposal, which takes Asustek’s stake in Pegatron to below 20%, could be returned to shareholders in the form of dividends.

Can we rely on China’s official statistics?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

¿Son fiables las estadísticas oficiales en China?
Photo: Thomas.fanghaenel. Can we rely on China’s official statistics?

For a country the size, state of development and complexity of China, the speed with which they produce certain statistics, such as quarterly gross domestic product (GDP) growth, is surprising. In fact, some analysts have gone so far as to question the fundamental accuracy of the numbers themselves.

There are a number of reasons for questioning the integrity of the data. Some claim that the highly top-down political system and China’s once-in-a-decade leadership change may have increased pressure on Communist Party officials to report strong numbers. China’s legacy of a state-controlled economy may be poorly set up to accurately gauge and measure the burgeoning and evolving consumer demand and importantly, the service sector where output is less about measurable goods. Economists worry that the numbers fail to reflect the new economic reality, or rather that they reflect political imperatives. However, China’s National Bureau of Statistics does not make it easy for independent outsiders to cross-check its work.

So, how do we, as fund managers, get around this issue? We look at the trends in macro data but rather than relying on ‘official’ government statistics, we prefer to use lower level data, such as power consumption growth, refinery throughput and manufacturing purchasing managers’ index (PMI) surveys to assess the strength of economic growth. Meanwhile, across all emerging markets, auto sales provide a useful barometer of consumer demand.

Figure 1: China auto market monthly sales overview

By combining several alternative data sources and importantly, continuously meeting many companies, we are able to form a composite picture of the overall economy.

 

Quality Companies, with Good Dividend Yields – A Successful Strategy

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Quality Companies, with Good Dividend Yields – A Successful Strategy
Photo: http://www.ForestWander.com. Quality Companies, with Good Dividend Yields – A Successful Strategy

Without doubt, the most significant economic development of 2013 has been the transformation of economic policy in Japan. The authorities have planned a massive monetary injection, combined with a fiscal stimulus and other reforms to encourage growth. Unlike previous attempts by the Japanese to fight their way out of deflation, the size of the package and the determined manner in which it has been implemented, has surprised nearly all observers.

There are clearly still difficult structural issues, which haven’t gone away but the effects of the package, combined with a much weaker yen and the consumption tax that is expected next year, which should bring forward expenditure, could be significant. We forecast 1.5% GDP this year and next, both a little above consensus forecasts.

In the US, we see reasonable growth ahead, despite the tightening of fiscal policy, as the economy appears to have built up useful momentum. Following recent revisions, it appears that employment has shown steady growth this year and the housing market continues to display a healthy recovery. We are looking for 2.0% GDP in 2013 and a further pick-up to 2.5% in 2014.

Eurozone economic activity remains very weak due to fiscal austerity and credit constraints. The recent softening of French activity is an increasing concern, and shows that the region’s problems are not confined to the periphery. Germany is also proving less of a positive factor than was previously the case, and is suffering from euro appreciation against some important competitors. We expect a fall in eurozone GDP of 0.5% in the current year, followed by some recovery to 0.5% growth in 2014. The UK just managed to achieve positive growth in Q1 and we retain our forecast for a 1.0% increase in GDP for the year as a whole. The weak eurozone has hit the UK’s trade balance, but a moderately surprising level of employment growth, a fall in oil prices and the Chancellor’s budget stimulus to the housing market should help consumption. We look for expansion next year of 1.5%.

Our forecasts for a pedestrian global economic recovery lead us to favor quality companies, with good dividend yields, in the more defensive areas. This strategy has been successful and consequently businesses with these profiles have become fairly expensively rated relative to other areas. We continue to favor this broad stance, but we have looked selectively to add to some of the more cyclical stocks, which have underperformed, as we seek value.

Equity markets have continued to show resilience despite a mediocre corporate reporting season and slow economies. We believe this is due to markets continuing to display relatively attractive levels of valuations and on account of the impact of global quantitative easing. This makes low risk investments increasingly unattractive and pushes liquidity into other assets. While valuations remain satisfactory, economies show some recovery and easy money continues, we believe it is right to remain above benchmark in equities.

Government bonds on the other hand have moved to unattractive yields and we have underweight holdings. At some point, yields will rise but it may not be imminent as central banks will endeavor to keep yields low to encourage growth. We continue to see better value in corporate and emerging market debt. These asset classes are enjoying healthy fundamentals and buoyant inflows, as investors search for higher yields.

Liquidity endures

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Liquidity endures
Wikimedia CommonsRicard Vidal. Liquidity endures

The IMF Spring Meeting confirmed that the world economy slowed down moderately in the first quarter, driven primarily by the negative growth in Europe and the anticipated slowdown in the US. Against this backdrop, the idea that the world economy, and the Spanish economy, will improve over the course of the year, is gaining more ground.  Consumption data for peripheral European countries is very poor, causing core countries (Germany,France) to stagnate as well. The economy is becoming politicised due to the pressure caused by high unemployment rates. The outcome of the Italian elections foretells a political change on the horizon, likely after German elections in September.

Liquidity bolsters the equity markets as well as the credit markets, leading to a positive month. Strong cumulative results for the year might seem contradictory given the pessimism regarding the world economy, and the Spanish economy in particular, but it is not the first time this has happened. Meanwhile, the stock markets anticipate a certain amount of increased flexibility in terms of restrictive policies and welcome the initiatives of the central banks.

Our funds have performed well in this context. The main reason for this positive performance is the strength of the companies in which we invest, evident after the reporting of their profits.

With respect to fixed income, the credit markets have capitalised on the negative news regarding the world economy and have once again recorded price increases (and drops in yield). Private fixed income (credit) also performed well. In this case, the price performance was slightly lower than that of 2012 (exceptional), due to a lower average accrued interest as well as smaller contribution as a result of the improved spread.

“Sell in May and go away?”

This traditional Wall Street saying suggests that, at some point, we will see a correction in the equity markets.  Long-term investments should take advantage of this and increase their exposure to equities, which we currently view as more attractive than fixed income. We believe that fixed income is overstated.  We must be prepared for a change in trend in bonds, since the ridiculous yields offered leave little room for an increase (and quite a bit for a decrease). As always, we know in what direction it is heading but not when.  The risk of a drop in the value of investment grade fixed income, particularly German bunds andUStreasury bonds (a safe haven recently for many conservative investors), is leading us to be very prudent regarding long terms, the most vulnerable in the event of a correction.

We continue to stand by the securities which compose our fund portfolios, whose recurring growth and sustainable profits make them more resistant and triumphant in an uncertain environment such as todays.

Is the tide turning in Brazil?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Is the tide turning in Brazil?
Wikimedia CommonsFoto: Wikimedia Commons. ¿Está cambiando la marea en Brasil?

Last year, the Brazilian government’s intervention in various sectors led to heightened uncertainty for corporations, resulting in the postponement of pro-growth investments that are vital if Brazil’s economic growth is to recover in 2013. In the utilities sector, the government made changes to concession terms aimed at reducing electricity prices, whilst in the banking sector, public banks were forced to lower loan rates, squeezing the profitability of the private banks. There was even pressure placed on the Brazilian central bank to extend the interest rate cutting cycle, despite worrisome inflation data. This government interference caused uncertainty for investors and a fall in private sector investment, culminating in sluggish gross domestic product growth of 0.9% last year. The forecast for 2013 is that private sector investment could be the ‘swing’ factor for the economy.

2013 has begun with some signs of positive change in Brazil. The government has recognised that investments by the private sector are needed in order to spur an economic rebound. The government has re-examined its policies with respect to privatisations and has increased the rates of return offered to private investors. This has prompted a marketing drive to attract investors ahead of infrastructure concession auctions due later in the year. Importantly, having offered paltry returns in the last round, the finance ministry has indicated that more attractive returns will be on offer this time. In addition, there has been recognition that rising inflation is a problem. To this end, April saw the central bank raise interest rates from the record low level reached last year. Given the scale of the cuts in the past, coupled with loose fiscal policy (the use of government revenue collection and expenditure to influence the economy), this should not be viewed as an impediment to a reacceleration of growth.

The long-term outlook for Brazil is compelling. The country is resource-rich and has favourable long-term demographic trends (e.g. rising disposable incomes). However, the government has often created problems that have held Brazil back from reaching its full potential. The tide may be turning as the incremental changes described above indicate that the government is becoming more open and conciliatory with the private sector in order to promote investment. The hosting of the next World Cup and Olympic Games provides imposing deadlines that ensure progress has to be made. These events and the recent appointment of a Brazilian to head the World Trade Organization show the country will be in the spotlight like never before in the coming years. It is up to the politicians to ensure that an improving economic picture is part of that display.

Acquisitions- Cucaracha Style

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Adquisiciones estilo cucaracha
. Acquisitions- Cucaracha Style

They lived among the dinosaurs. They live among us now. They’re the hardiest insects on the planet, able to survive up to 45 minutes without air and a month without food. Cockroaches. Cucarachas. Most people find them disgusting. Serious investors should find them enlightening.

After all, these hard-boiled insects didn’t endure hundreds of millions of years of volcanoes, shifting tectonics, meteoric explosions, Ice Ages and, for the past couple millennia, relentless attack from the human race without doing something right.

So here are the lessons they can teach even the savviest corporate acquirers and private equity investors:

1. Don’t die.  As most anyone knows, killing a cockroach—if you can catch one before it scurries away—is difficult. Stomp on it, squish it however you can, and when you’re done, most of them will still be squirming. One source says they can live for up to 30 minutes without their heads. That’s one tough insect.

For investors, the lesson is to never acquire a business that will kill your chances of survival if the deal sours. While this may seem common sense, the record of successful mergers and acquisitions isn’t all that great, especially among mid-market companies with between $20 million and $100 million in revenue. Research shows the M&A success is about the same as a coin toss—about 50 percent.[1]

While large corporations have the resources to absorb the consequences of a bad deal, mid-market companies typically don’t. So mid-market transactions, where many corporate acquirers and private equity funds play, need to be wary and hedge against failure.

One way to do so is to never pay all cash. Structure acquisitions so they’re made in incremental steps over time via buyout rights, installments or “earn-outs” that use current cash flows to pay the sellers. This strategy provides room to maneuver (or scurry) should your due diligence not have uncovered some lethal rot in the company you’ve acquired.

2. Stay in the dark. Cockroaches hate light. Investors should, too. Unfortunately, many acquirers draw attention to their deals unnecessarily either through exercising their bragging rights, getting tied up in an auction or targeting companies that are already in the limelight, for better or worse.

The safest approach, like the cockroach, is to stay in the dark, “under the radar” as they say. This way, negotiations can continue unfettered before unmanageable political, regulatory, labor, tax or other issues arise that can slow or even stop a deal in its tracks. Part of any due diligence should be to measure a company’s relative “radioactivity” regarding any of these matters. Staying dark also minimizes the risk of competitive bidders coming forward, which can lead to an auction.

Auctions can be especially troublesome for two reasons. One is that the business press likes nothing better than reporting conflicts, and most auctions pit different suitors against each other. The other is that the purpose of auctions is to get sellers the highest prices possible, which means investors are encouraged to pay the most – sometimes more than the business is worth. Then, on top of that, the deal is already in the public eye and subject to increased scrutiny—a double whammy.

3. Eat whenever you can.  Cockroaches, as noted, can go a month without food. Investors should be just as patient. But once the right deal is made, investors need to seek a return of their capital as soon as they can. The way to do this is to structure the deal as an installment acquisition or as a partnership or joint venture that means you, the buyer, participates in all future cash flows. In other words, the seller gets paid while you get paid.

Not only does this approach accelerate an investor’s return on capital, it also helps minimize risk. In part that’s because—if Lesson #1 was followed—the amount of up-front capital at risk was minimized. It’s also because paying sellers from their companies’ future cash flows aligns their interests in maximizing those cash flows with your interest in a return not just of your capital but a profit from it as well.

*          *          *

As Charles Darwin reportedly said in describing the essence of evolution’s survival-of-the-fittest concept: “It’s not the smartest or strongest creature that survives; it’s the one that responds best to change.” If investors keep these three lessons from the lowly cockroach in mind, they’ll usually find that they, too, will be able to respond to change, to hide from danger, and even better, to thrive and prosper.



[1]Why Half of All M&A Deals Fail, and What You Can Do About It, by Robert Sher. Forbes, March 19, 2012

Latin America is not Iberia

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Latinoamérica no es Iberia

As a headhunter with a special focus on the asset management industry, I have often found that the business head responsible for Iberia was also good enough for Latin America, even though the person was based in Spain, London, or other European financial centers. I believe that these managerial decisions do not fit with current market trends which are mainly based on strategies highly focused on partnership with business associated on location and third party distribution structures, totally directed towards the penetration and growth within the investment world of pension funds with a primary focus in Chile within the AFP segment, including Peru and Colombia.

However, today there is a better understanding among those in the business of funds sales that brings up the question of whether this is really the right strategy or if they are missing an important market share… The market has evolved and managers are obliged to do likewise in their business strategies. The past international managers’ agreements with local correspondents to meet their business relationships with major players in the buy side of the industry (AFPs, AFORES … first in Chile and then to a greater or lesser extent Peru and Colombia), are giving way the analysis of managing potential conflicts of interest in their representatives, the transfer of income and, most importantly, realize that today the buy side want your counterpart to be based locally. It has also opened the door to a market beyond pensions. And it is the distribution market through private banks, broker dealers, family offices… in countries with excellent growth strategies and professionalization of its industry, where the regulator increasingly allows greater international exposure … to this we can also add the recent granting of important management mandates in the region. 

Chile pioneered AFPs industry – private fund managers – with a turnover of over US$150 billion, with figures that will further international investments, today and some other firms such as JP Morgan, Schroders double those of just five years ago. Colombia and Peru are both boiling with pension systems increasingly sophisticated and open to actively managed funds, private equity, thematic funds, structured notes … as well as insurers, trusts, etc. …. distribution networks and private banking ….. Family offices, whether of the single and multi types, with capabilities to execute above US$10 million tickets. A market like Mexico, with fresh air under a new government with a new industry which has already reached US$ 250 billion between mutual and pension funds and pondering whether or not to open to active management. Blackrock signed their first agreements of asset managers that receive attractive mandates from the Afores, in this case Banamex, while Sura Afore just announced the same with Pioneer, Investec, Morgan Stanley and Blackrock. Not to mention Brazil, a country with a high development in the international investment where large houses have wanted to make local acquisitions to take relevant market positioning. 

No doubt Latin America has much to contribute. The market is fully alive and growing, where in order to take advantage of the opportunities you have, without a doubt, to be close to your client and potential business. Sooner or later location will be crucial for business expansion, but today firms are already entering the feasibility analysis phase and market positioning, and more importantly, firms are evaluating what is the opportunity cost of not being present. Some have already arrived, very few were pioneers, others are doing prospective trips, and there are still many who still are considering it … What I think it is very clear, Latin America is not Iberia ….

Debunking the ‘growth versus value’ myth

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Rompiendo el mito del "crecimiento frente al valor"
Foto cedidaFoto: Tim Stevenson, manager of the Henderson Horizon Pan European Equity. Debunking the ‘growth versus value’ myth

Dogmatically following a pure growth or pure value investment style is dangerous and misguided. Instead, equity investors need to be pragmatic and adaptable as to where to find the best investment ideas.

Europe has been dogged by political setbacks and muted growth for quite a while, and especially since the start of 2010, when the global credit crunch that began in the US sub-prime housing market evolved into a full-blown European sovereign debt crisis. During this time, however, European companies have ultimately delivered decent performance for investors. A total return of 27.6% (Source: Bloomberg, MSCI Europe Index, 1 January 2010 to 30 April 2013, in euros), cumulative performance of over 8% per annum, seems very reasonable given the level of investor uncertainty, record-low interest rates and the lacklustre macroeconomic environment.

So while progress has been intermittent, we have seen a stockmarket recovery of sorts. What is different about this upturn, compared with the historic norm, is leadership. For the majority of the past three years growth stocks have been favoured over value stocks – re-igniting the debate between growth and value managers. Over my career I have always chosen those companies that I believe can grow sustainably – allowing us to participate in their development. This generally puts me on one side of a rich industry discourse, with more value-orientated managers on the other side.

Recent evidence favours European growth stocks, which have produced a total return of 41.1% since the start of 2010 (Source: Bloomberg, MSCI Europe Index, 1 January 2010 to 30 April 2013), whilst European value stocks have returned 15.9% – a difference of over 25%.

Source: Bloomberg, MSCI Europe Index, in euros, as at 30 April 2013. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.

So what has caused this divergence in performance? Value indices are heavily skewed to financial, utility, energy and telecommunications stocks, which tend to generate a high proportion of their revenues domestically in Europe, where government spending is retrenching and economic growth is scarce. Each of these sectors are characterised by their own industry-specific issues: the capital base for a number of European banks remains questionable; utility firms are struggling to find growth as taxation pressure grows from revenue-hungry governments; energy companies are having to increase capital expenditure in search of greater productivity; and telecommunications firms are faced with intense pricing pressures and falling sales, forcing some to cut dividends sharply due to high debt levels.

In contrast, growth indices are largely biased towards those globally exposed companies where growth has, on the whole, been more robust, such as industrials, consumer, information technology and healthcare stocks. Aside from geographical diversity, many of these companies are also benefiting from other structural advantages, such as high barriers to entry, pricing power or favourable regulation.

Source: FactSet, MSCI, at 22 April 2013

Given these advantages, it is not surprising that growth companies have outperformed. And while economic growth globally and in Europe remains below the long-term trend it seems likely to me that growth stocks will continue to do well. The debate however, is not clear cut; the lines between growth and value are often blurred at any one time (and these lines move over time as well) and it is becoming harder to classify stocks as ‘pure value’ or ‘pure growth’. For example Deutsche Post is my largest holding. I like the stock because of its impressive growth in parcel deliveries as more and more consumers order their goods online. Performance is particularly strong in Asia where Deutsche Post’s DHL division is the market leader. Other managers hold the stock because of its valuation case and dividend yield.

The same is true at the sector level where the materials sector is heavily represented in the growth index – something I find surprising. A number of stocks in the sector have exhibited good growth in the last ten years as the China-fuelled resources super-cycle has been in full swing, but with China seeking to reduce its dependence on infrastructure spending, the potential for future growth seems highly questionable. To complicate this further, what is thought of as growth can also become value – and vice versa. The technology sector is one example, which has transitioned from growth to value and back again since the start of the new millennium.

Easier distinctions to make, in my opinion, are the ones between high quality and low quality– with high quality characterised as industry leaders with strong balance sheets, low borrowing costs, sustainable cash flows and management teams focusing on the long term. I would also include companies that are actively and constructively seeking new avenues of expansion. This group of stocks is naturally biased towards growth names but there are also opportunities in so-called ‘value’ businesses. Deutsche Post is one example, but others include industrial conglomerate AP Moeller Maersk, Allianz (insurance), Deutsche Telekom and BT Group (telecommunications), and Novartis and Sanofi in the pharmaceuticals industry (once thought of as the growth sector but which is now primarily value).

When constructing my portfolios I try to avoid becoming too fixated on growth or value nametags. The results have tended to lead to a judicial mix of core quality growth stocks and those that are more cyclically sensitive. I tend to favour a more holistic approach, favouring companies with diversified sources of revenues, operating in established markets, with robust business models, proven management teams and solid finances – attributes which should help them to outperform in both rising and falling markets. These are the companies that I expect to be around and do well in the years to come.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of the fund and the income from it is not guaranteed and may fall as well as rise. You may get back less than you originally invested.

Tim Stevenson, manager of the Henderson Horizon Pan European Equity Fund

China’s uncertainties won’t stop Renminbi’s rise

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

China’s uncertainties won’t stop Renminbi’s rise
Foto: Hayden Briscoe, Director Asia Pacific Fixed Income de AllianceBernstein. Las incertidumbres sobre China no detendrán la subida del Renminbi

Recent data releases and the transition to new political leadership have created some uncertainty about China’s short-term economic outlook. While positive growth surprises are unlikely in 2013, we still think nothing can stop the long-term appreciation of China’s currency, the renminbi (RMB).

The reason we expect the RMB to continue to appreciate lies in the strength of the structural, as distinct from cyclical, factors which should continue to support it in the medium to long term. The currency’s prestige, tradability and valuation bolster our expectations that the RMB will: 

  • Appreciate by 2% to 3% a year on average, just to keep pace with the country’s persistent trade surpluses, and by up to 5% a year once economic rebalancing is factored in
  • Become fully convertible by the time the current five-year economic plan expires in 2015—much faster than widely expected
  • Emerge as a core reserve currency, especially in the Asia-Pacific region and other emerging markets

China is the second-largest economy in the world. It’s also one of the most dynamic, with the gap between the Chinese and US economies in purchasing power parity terms expected to close in just a few years (Display). Global trade flows don’t yet reflect this reality and continue to be settled mostly in US dollars.

But there are signs of change. In July 2010, the Chinese government began a move to internationalize the currency by opening an offshore currency (CNH) market based in Hong Kong. Taiwan followed recently, and Singapore and London are next on the list. This will help facilitate RMB trade settlements in time zones around the world.

The proportion of China’s global trade settled in RMB has grown to 11% and continues to rise. China’s banks are supporting the trend through the provision of trade finance: letters of credit denominated in the onshore currency (CNY) now account for the third-largest share of the global total, behind US dollars and euros and ahead of yen. By 2015 one-third of China’s exports are likely to be denominated in RMB, with annual trade-settlement volume expected to hit nearly US$2 trillion, according to HSBC.

RMB-denominated trade flows are increasing in strategically important markets, in Africa and Latin America in particular. They’re also rapidly becoming institutionalized. To date, 20 central banks have agreed on CNY swap lines with the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) totaling RMB2 trillion or US$320 billion.

Portfolio flows are another potential driver of the RMB’s internationalization, as China’s capital markets open up. For example, the Chinese government bond market is capitalized at around US$2.5 trillion. It’s the third largest in the world, equivalent to the German and French bond markets combined. If included in a traditional bond index, investors would be forced to commit 10% to 12% of their fixed-income allocation to Chinese government bonds. This, together with the continuing strength of overseas direct investment into China, further facilitates the RMB’s internationalization.

We expect China will do what it can to make full internationalization of the currency a reality. This will include maintaining the RMB’s credibility as a steadily appreciating currency. Given that the RMB’s appreciation sharply lags the US$2.5 trillion growth in China’s foreign exchange reserves since 2005 (Display), we think this is a realistic goal.

The RMB already fulfills two of the three criteria necessary to become a reserve currency—the size of the underlying economy and the credibility of the currency itself. It is progressing steadily towards fulfilling the third criteria, which is openness and financial-market depth. Internationalizing the currency is one of the goals under the country’s five-year plan and, in early September 2012, Dai Xianglong, a former PBOC governor, said that China could liberalize its capital account as early as 2015. While the precise timing will depend somewhat on global economic and financial-market conditions, we think the RMB is likely to be internationalized much faster than widely expected.