FINRA Chairman and CEO Rick Ketchum to Retire in 2016

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

FINRA Chairman and CEO Rick Ketchum to Retire in 2016
Rick Ketchum, presidente y CEO de FINRA - Foto youtube. Rick Ketchum, presidente y CEO de FINRA, se jubilará en 2016

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) said on Friday that Chairman and CEO Richard Ketchum, 64, has announced his plan to retire in the second half of 2016. The Board of Governors will conduct a search for his successor that will take into consideration internal and external candidates.

Mr. Ketchum has been one of the foremost industry regulators for more than three decades. He came to FINRA from the NYSE where he was CEO of NYSE Regulation. He also spent 12 years at NASD and The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., where he served as president of both organizations. Prior to that, he was the director of the SEC’s division of Market Regulation.

“I’m proud of FINRA’s achievements over the past six years,” said Mr. Ketchum. “We have been at the forefront of investor protection in our aggressive efforts to help enforce the rules that are so crucial to fair financial markets. Our accomplishments are founded on a commitment to excellence in our core competencies: examinations, enforcement, rulemaking, market transparency and market surveillance. Investor protection is our principal reason for being, and I have been honored to work with an incredibly dedicated and talented group of professionals who take this vital mission seriously. FINRA is well-placed to continue to play an important role in educating and protecting investors in the years ahead.”

“FINRA has thrived under Rick’s leadership, and we look forward to his continued guidance over the next many months,” said Lead Governor Jack Brennan, former CEO of Vanguard Group. “His stewardship began in the aftermath of the financial crisis when public trust in the financial system was at an historic low. As a champion of initiatives such as the High Risk Broker program, improvements in BrokerCheck, the expansion of TRACE reporting of asset-backed securities, and the expansion of FINRA’s responsibilities across stock and options trading, Rick has put FINRA on the front line of the movement for stronger investor protections and greater market integrity. Under Rick’s management, FINRA has emerged as a leader in the reshaping of American financial regulation and helped to restore the faith in the capital markets that forms the bedrock of our financial system.”

Are Portfolio Decisions Feeding Volatility?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

¿Alimentan la volatilidad las decisiones de los portfolio managers?
Photo: Phil Whitehouse. Are Portfolio Decisions Feeding Volatility?

Markets had been unusually calm, until risk surged in late August. Bigger portfolio shifts when volatility is rising may be magnifying the spikes, making markets harder to navigate. AB thinks the answer is focusing on more than risk.

It’s true that volatility has moderated a bit but is still higher than it was before August, and policy makers have taken note of these sudden shifts in risk. In fact, it was one of the reasons why the US Federal Reserve decided to hold off on raising interest rates in September, point out Brian T. Brugman, portfolio manager of Multi-Asset at AB, and Martin Atkin, Head of US Client Solutions at AllianceBernstein Multi-Asset Solutions Group. To avoid being whipsawed, recommended, investors should take a holistic view of their portfolios. The focus should be on more than risk signals—return signals matter, too.

Reactions to Market Volatility Amplify It

“Our research indicates that risk factors—and oversimplified asset-allocation decisions based largely on volatility measures—can create a painful cycle. The very trigger that prompts an allocation shift away from equities is itself influenced by the resulting sale. And volatility begins to feed on itself”, said Brugman and Atkin.

There’s evidence that more managers are making decisions based largely on changes in market volatility. The firm looked at allocation changes over time, based on the implied equity exposure across different mutual fund categories, examining both high-risk and low-risk environments. Brugman and Atkin found that reductions in equity exposure have become noticeably larger since the Global Financial Crisis of 2008.

 

In fact, the downward shifts for tactical allocation strategies have almost doubled in size. It’s not surprising that tactical strategies make adjustments, but the bigger moves today are notable, explain the experts. Even world allocation strategies, which largely left their equity allocations alone pre-crisis, have begun to make significant equity reductions.

“Our analysis also suggests that portfolio shifts aren’t just bigger than before, but they’re also happening faster when volatility rises. This helps make volatility spikes more pronounced. The August episode confirmed this: selling pressure due to a collective decision to de-risk likely made the first few days more severe. Before August 24, when risk was below average, the group of strategies we isolated for this analysis had an average overweight to equity of 9%.Shortly after the spike in risk they were significantly underweight, averaging 15% less equity exposure than is typical”, point out.

 

The Problem of Volatility Tunnel Vision

One likely reason for the rush for the exits is that many risk-managed strategies exclusively use volatility gauges as a simplified trigger for making allocation changes. Because this systematic approach is so common, it creates significant selling momentum in equities when risk starts to rise and the signal turns red. This risk “tunnel vision” can lead to even sharper moves in the very metrics used to determine portfolio positioning.

Brugman and Atkin don’t think these type of asset-allocation triggers are robust enough. It’s important to determine if a sudden change in the risk environment is temporary or long-lasting. That knowledge can make a portfolio manager less likely to make the classic mistake: trend-following and selling into distress at a market trough.

A Holistic Process Must Integrate More than Risk Signals

One way to tackle this problem is to include both expected risk and expected return across asset classes in quantitative analysis. It’s also important not to leave fundamental judgement behind, and to consider how technical factors in the market impact the asset allocation equation.

All things considered, AB thinks it makes sense to be modestly underweight equities in the current environment. Volatility is above average, but we think the initial spike may have been exacerbated by indiscriminate selling from risk-managed strategies. Stalling growth in emerging markets and falling commodity demand may not be as much of a spillover risk for developed economies as some investors may think.

“In turbulent times like these, the ability to be dynamic in shifting equity beta can be very helpful. And volatility is a valuable signal that helps inform that decision. The key is to make sure that the trigger for shifting beta isn’t overly sensitive to changes in volatility alone”, concluded.

Generali Unveils Two New Funds

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Generali Unveils Two New Funds
Foto: DGTX, Flickr, Creative Commons. Generali lanza un fondo de convertibles con perspectiva de retorno absoluto y otro que aprovecha el envejecimiento poblacional

The Generali Group has recently launched two new funds within its UCITS-compliant Generali Investments SICAV (GIS). Generali Investments – the Group’s main asset management company with approximately €375 billion of assets under management- has been appointed investment manager of the new funds. 


The GIS Absolute Return Convertible Bonds fund is designed for investors seeking consistent risk-adjusted returns. The strategy combines opportunities in a broad convertible bond universe with hedging/arbitrage techniques to improve downside protection. The GIS SRI Ageing Population fund is designed to benefit from the long-term ageing demographic trend by investing in companies that are exposed to this growing market and applying a screening based on Socially Responsible Investments criteria as well as on the theme. 


Andrea Favaloro, Head of Sales & Marketing at Generali Investments, said: “As part of Generali Investments’ ambition to become a world-class investment brand and the preferred choice for our clients, we have initiated a robust plan to develop our business dedicated to third- party investors, basing on our strongest expertise areas. The two new funds demonstrate our commitment to executing this plan taking advantage of some of our most outstanding capabilities, including our credit research, macro research, SRI analysis and stock-picking.” 


The GIS Absolute Return Convertible Bonds fund invests in a global convertible bond universe, albeit with a bias towards Europe. Convertible bonds, as an asset class, combine various alpha drivers – equities, credit, implied volatility, rates, currencies and ratchet/prospectus clause. These components do not always move together depending on the market conditions and cycles. The fund has the ability to hedge the unwanted features and isolate and better exploit the desired ones. In addition, the strategy is implemented in a transparent, rigorous and risk- managed UCITS-compliant structure. 
The dedicated convertible bonds investment team manages over €950 million across open ended funds and segregated mandates. The team is headed by Brice Perin, lead portfolio manager, with over 16 years of experience in asset management and convertible bonds. Prior to joining Generali Investments, Brice was responsible for volatility funds at Acropole AM. Between 2007 and 2011 he was in charge of convertible and volatility arbitrage funds at La Française AM. From 1999 to 2007, he was head of convertible and volatility arbitrage at DWS Investments. The investment team is backed by a 18-strong in-house credit research team and a 13-strong macro research team.


The GIS SRI Ageing Population fund invests in European companies with a business model positioned to benefit from the demographic trend of the ageing of the world’s population. Due to lower birth rate and longer life expectancy, it is estimated that the world’s population over 60 will reach 1.7 billion people in 2040 from 700 million in 2010. Moreover, this age group is expected to own an increasingly larger share of total income, especially in developed countries. 
This fund is unique as it combines a long-term demographic trend and investment theme, a fundamental equity valuation process and a fully SRI-compliant portfolio. After an initial Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) screening of the investment universe (MSCI Europe), the fund manager selects companies exposed to the ageing theme based on three key investment pillars: healthcare, pension & savings and consumer goods. The fund manager then uses proprietary fundamental valuation models to select companies and create a portfolio of around 50 stocks.

The fund is 100% SRI compliant, leveraging Generali Investments’ SRI resources and process to invest in companies with strong ESG credentials. Generali Investments’ SRI team of eight analysts applies a proprietary screening model based on 34 ESG criteria. The SRI overlay brings additional scrutiny and value when analysing companies, their business models and their management’s strategic decisions. As a result, the GIS SRI Ageing Population fund caters to investors who look for long-term and sustainable returns.

The fund is managed by Mattia Scabeni, with 11 years of experience in the asset management industry. Mattia joined Generali Investments in 2009 as a portfolio manager. Previously, he worked for Swiss financial institutions both as a portfolio manager and equity analyst. Mattia holds an MBA from HEC Paris and an Executive Master in Financial Markets from SDA Bocconi.

ROAM Capital Will Open an Office in Miami to Cover the Family Offices and Latin American HNWI Markets

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

ROAM Capital is finalizing all preparations for its arrival in Miami, the main destination of high net worth Latin American investors in the United States. The company, which already has a presence in Bogota, Colombia, will have a new office and a team of professionals highly specialized in alternative investments.

Founded in 2009 by Philippe Stiernon, ROAM Capital is the first Latin American placement agent exclusively focused on private equity and other alternative investments. The company only strives to work with “top quartile”, and preferably “top decile”, managers, giving them access to its proprietary network of Latin American investors. It is usually limited to about 3 or 4 mandates per year, as their philosophy prioritizes quality over quantity. “By investing with the best, it is very difficult to lose capital, and the premium for choosing well is very high; therefore, we seek to only work with top quartile managers, as above all, we have a commitment to alpha and capital preservation,” says Philippe mentioning the rigorous “due diligence” process to which the company submits the managers. Using four key assessment criteria: team, strategy, track record, fund terms and structure, it seeks to identify segments of high conviction with managers who have demonstrated consistency in returns and have maintained a successful and proven track record that spans multiple vintages during different economic cycles, with stable teams and narrowly defined strategies. The company also has its own grading system for managers and maintains an updated ranking of all funds by strategy and vintage year.

In the company’s five-year history, ROAM Capital has raised more than US$ 750 million for the private equity funds it has represented, among which are groups like Quilvest, PineBridge, RCP Advisors, ICG, Asia Alternatives and Coller Capital, amongst others.

The company’s initial goal was to bring the best alternative strategies to Latin America. At the time, instability in the North American and European markets favored the migration of private capital to emerging markets where the company also capitalized representing Latin American fund managers, as was the case of Teka Capital in Colombia, Evercore in Mexico, The Forest Company in Brazil, and most recently, MAS Equity Partners also in Colombia, a company which is currently raising its third fund with the help of ROAM Capital, and in which the IFC is the anchor investor.

The first stage developed in Latin America while regulatory changes were taking place, which allowed Pension Fund Administrators to venture into alternative investments and authorized a designated exposure for investments in private equity funds, a segment in which ROAM Capital specializes. “We managed to compete and differentiate ourselves through specialization, since many of our competitors have other priorities and have placed alternative investments on the back burner. It is a big universe, which requires lots of study and full-time dedication. We also have no conflicts of interests, nor have we ever suffered scandals like some of our competitors, because we only do one thing, distribution of third party funds and are always guided by the highest ethical standards and our commitment to delivering results for our clients,” says Philippe Stiernon, founder of ROAM Capital.

Enlarge

ROAM Capital´s office in Bogota / Courtesy photo

The company also didn’t take long to specialize in the Latin American family offices segment, a high-growth and closed door market, in which the company has a reputation for leadership and privileged access to the largest industrial and financial groups in the region. Due to confidentiality reasons, the company does not disclose the names of the families for which it has had the privilege to work, but many of them are part of the Forbes list of billionaires. “We work with a large group of about 75 families in the region, within which there are various levels of sophistication. From the high net worth individual investor to the large single family office with institutional infrastructure. We also work with several multi-family offices who share our absolute return mentality and seek the best managers for each strategy regardless of personal biases in their due diligence process”.

One of these is BigSur Partners, a multi-family office in Florida with more than US$1 billion in assets, which has been working with ROAM Capital for several years in the construction of its private equity funds program. Ignacio Pakciarz, BigSur CEO, comments: “We have been working with Philippe and his team for the past 4 years, and we share the philosophy of collaboration between our companies entirely, as well as that of focusing on managers who are first quartile leaders in their segment. Another advantage of working with ROAM Capital is that the commission is not paid by the investor but by the manager, so that their services do not increase the transaction cost for our clients. The benefit of having ROAM Capital as a source of support throughout the “due diligence” and subscription process is really tangible. Through them, we have managed to secure capacity for our clients in several private equity funds which would normally be oversubscribed, something which really helps differentiate ourselves”.

ROAM Capital is currently in the process of expansion. Recently, the company signed a couple of strategic alliances with a global agent and a regional group, which will allow them to break into the North American market and further expand and find opportunities in other Latin America countries. The opening of the Miami office is just the ‘tip of the iceberg’ in its quest to establish itself as the leading Latin American placement agent focused on private equity and other alternative investments.

During the past 18 months, ROAM Capital has attracted three major fund managers to Miami: the first was Intermediate Capital Group or “ICG”, a leading European credit and mezzannine funds manager, the second fund manager was Asia Alternatives, a company specializing in Asian private equity funds and an investment leader within its focus region, and the third one was Coller Capital, a pioneering and innovating secondary player who provides liquidity solutions for investors in private equity funds.

“All of these managers are leaders in their respective segments in terms of returns, and have historically exemplified a singular-focus on a specific region or strategy which is what we typically look for, we like specialists. All of them also exceeded their fundraising targets and were oversubscribed in their most recent funds, a common dynamic when dealing with first quartile managers,” adds Philippe Stiernon.

In short, the history of ROAM Capital is one of success, the firm has managed to double the fundraising volumes year after year since 2010, and perhaps most notably, it has managed to gain the trust and credibility of institutional and private investors in Latin America. With their arrival in Miami, a more personalized service is expected for single and multi family offices and the creation of new work schemes will be explored. Also new job opportunities will be created for professionals with the required skills to work in the private equity and alternative investments industry.

 

Old Mutual GI Provides Answers in Boston for 2016, a Year Full of Uncertainties About “What the World holds in Store for Fund Managers”

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Old Mutual GI ofrece en Boston respuestas para un 2016 lleno de incertidumbres sobre "lo que deparará el mundo para los gestores"
Christine Johnson, Head of Fixed Income - See photos. Old Mutual GI Provides Answers in Boston for 2016, a Year Full of Uncertainties About "What the World holds in Store for Fund Managers"

Old Mutual Global Investors recently held its annual client’s conference at the Taj Boston Hotel. The meeting was attended by more than 60 clients from around the world who were able to hear about the management ideas, which the company is developing for each of its different strategies.

During the first session, five of the top OMGI fund managers from London, Hong Kong, and Edinburgh, explained their views on the market’s most important current issues. Therefore, the rate hike by the Fed and its impact on assets, volatility, problems in China, the profitability of global fixed income, and energy prices were some of the issues on the table in the first panel.

“We met here in Boston a year ago to discuss how we saw the end of the year and what are our prospects were for 2015. Today, we can say that the predictions we made then have been met only in part, and that in 2016 we are going to continue to see a high level of uncertainty as to what the world holds in store for asset managers,” said Chris Stapleton, head of distribution for the Americas Offshore market.

Christine Johnson, Head of Fixed Income, Josh Crabb, Head of Asian Equities, Ross Oxley, Head of Absolute Return strategies, Justin Wells, Global Equities Investment Director, and Lee Freeman-Shor, fund manager and author of the book “The Art of Execution: How the world’s best investors get it wrong and still make millions in the markets”, reviewed the movements carried out in their portfolios in order to adapt the portfolio to the current environment.

“Each team and each strategy has its own vision, and I think this is the key to our success, and reflects the talents of our portfolio managers. If you follow the path marked by a CIO it would be much more difficult to reach the levels of profitability that our funds currently offer,” explained Allan MacLeod, Head of International Distribution.

ConsulTree Celebrates the Opening of a New Office in Argentina

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

ConsulTree celebra la apertura de una nueva oficina en Argentina
ConsulTree opening in Argentina - Courtesy Photo. ConsulTree Celebrates the Opening of a New Office in Argentina

ConsulTree International, a Leadership and Talent Development consulting founded in United States announced the opening of a new office in Argentina as the most recent expansion of ConsulTree International’s presence in Latin America

The launch ceremony was held two weeks ago at the exclusive Palacio Duhau in Buenos Aires, with a Cocktail reception attended by a selected group of human resources professionals.  

The local partners, Eduardo Cappello -managing director for the new office, with over 17 years in the business- and Paula Valente -Senior Consultant and Partner, Human Resources & Talent Development Specialist, with over 15 years of experience in leadership roles-, joined Luisa Guzman, CEO of ConsulTree International, who spoke about the New Global Trends in Development.

The opening of the Argentina office comes in response to proven demand from the existing client base comprised of multinationals based in South Florida for extended service in the region.  “We are excited to lead the expansion of ConsulTree through a local presence in Argentina” said Luisa Guzman.

Guzman, with over 20 years of experience in Management Consulting, Human Resources, Organizational Development, Talent Acquisition and Leadership Development, is the founder of ConsulTree whose headquarters is in Miami and is present in Peru, Chile, Honduras, United Kingdom and Spain.

Advisors More Likely to Join Existing RIA Firm Than Start Their Own Firm

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Los asesores prefieren fichar por una empresa de asesores independientes que montar su propia firma
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Portobay Hotels. Advisors More Likely to Join Existing RIA Firm Than Start Their Own Firm

The latest research from global analytics firm Cerulli Associates finds that advisors are more likely to join an existing registered investment advisor (RIA) firm, rather than start their own independent firm. 

“Many advisors are daunted by the task of forging their own path and the accompanying headaches,” states Bing Waldert, director at Cerulli. “Advisors considering the RIA channel are increasingly looking to join existing firms that can provide them with not only the necessary operational infrastructure, but also a sense of community.”

Cerulli’s fourth quarter 2015 issue of The Cerulli Edge-Advisor Edition explores recruiting and retention, looking closely at the factors influencing advisors to switch firms, and the demand for support and flexibility in terms of how the advisors choose to conduct business. 

“A variety of platforms and support organizations have emerged to provide advisors with different ways to run their practices,” Waldert explains. “The rise of the Subaggregator is happening for two reasons. The first, as has been noted, is providing an option for advisors interested in the independent business model, but without the skills or desire to operate their own business. The second and unique reason for the rise of these firms centers on the culture and community of being part of a smaller organization.”

“Cerulli is naming this class of firms the Subaggregators because their business model in many cases escapes traditional definitions of broker/dealers (B/Ds), RIAs, or office of supervisory jurisdiction (OSJs). They use the platform of a larger firm, such as a B/D or custodian, that more frequently works directly with advisors,” Waldert continues. “These firms support multiple advisory practices, with advisors operating autonomously, often across multiple geographies. They have professional leadership in place. Perhaps most importantly, the advisor’s primary relationship is with the Subaggregator rather than the B/D, custodian, or platform. Advisors are recognizing this evolution and believe the rise of Subaggregators is the next generation of financial firms.”

Strategic-Beta Products Proliferation Brings Increased Complexity to ETP Landscape

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Strategic-Beta Products Proliferation Brings Increased Complexity to ETP Landscape
Foto: Zaheer Mohiuddin . La proliferación de productos de beta estratégico añade complejidad al panorama de ETPs

The strategic-beta landscape is growing faster than both the broader ETP market as well as the global asset management industry, driven by new inflows, new product launches, and the entrance of new providers during the past year. Benchmarks underlying new products are more complex as well,” Ben Johnson, Morningstar’s director of global exchange-traded funds research, said. “As strategic-beta strategies continue to proliferate and become increasingly nuanced, investors’ due-diligence burden is growing commensurately.”

At its sixth annual ETF Conference in Chicago, Morningstar published “A Global Guide to Strategic-Beta Exchange-Traded Products,” its second annual global landscape report about trends in strategic-beta exchange-traded products (ETPs). The company defines strategic beta as a class of investment products that track indexes that seek to either improve performance or alter the level of risk relative to a standard benchmark, representing a fast-growing middle ground on the active-to-passive investment spectrum.

The firm´s global report also reports that the number of strategic-beta ETPs in its database rose from 673 to 844, from June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2015. Worldwide assets rose from $396 billion to $497 billion during the same time period.

Strategic-beta ETPs account for 21.2 percent of U.S. ETP assets, which is the largest strategic-beta ETP market, and 2.9 percent of ETP assets in the Asia-Pacific region, the smallest market, compared with 19 and 1.5 percent, respectively, a year ago.

Dividend screened/weighted ETPs are again the most popular among strategic-beta ETPs by assets in all regions examined in the report except for the Asia-Pacific region. Quality strategies are the largest subset of strategic-beta ETPs in the Asia-Pacific region, representing $3.8 billion and 55.4 percent of total assets in strategic-beta ETPs as of June 30, 2015.

There is a positive relationship between the adoption of strategic-beta ETPs and the stage of development of a region’s ETP market as well as its asset management and financial services industries at large. For example, the United States has the second-oldest ETP market in the world, holding 52 percent of strategic-beta ETPs, which account for nearly 91 percent of total assets in the global strategic-beta ETP landscape.

United States: The top 10 strategic-beta ETPs by assets account for approximately 42 percent of the United States’ strategic-beta ETP market. iShares and Vanguard account for 16.5 percent of the total number of strategic-beta ETPs, holding 57.4 percent of assets in the United States.

Europe: Assets under management in strategic-beta ETPs rose by 18.6 percent in the last 12 months to $32.1 billion as of June 30, 2015. Strategic-beta ETPs’ share of the broader European ETP market expanded from 5.7 percent to 6.3 percent in the same period.

Emerging Markets: South Africa and Brazil are the main emerging markets in the strategic-beta ETP landscape. Neither market saw strategic-beta ETP launches in the last year. The single strategic-beta ETP in Brazil saw its assets under management decline by 50 percent from June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2015.

 

What are the Main Differences Between Bond and Equity ETFs?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

What are the Main Differences Between Bond and Equity ETFs?
Foto de www.gotcredit.com. ¿Cuáles son las principales diferencias entre los ETFs de bonos y acciones?

An Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) is an investment tool, which combines the features of both mutual funds and stocks, providing multiple benefits such as diversification, liquidity and transparency. Like a mutual fund, an ETF is a collection of individual stocks or bonds that track a predefined index. Like a stock, ETFs trade on exchanges and can be bought or sold throughout the day. These features provide investors with an easy-to-use, low cost and tax efficient way to invest your money.

Originating in 1993, the first ETFs originally followed only equity indexes. It wasn’t until a decade later that Bond ETFs started to appear. While Equity and Bond ETFs display the same structural characteristics and have many things in common—typically tracking a diversified index and trading on exchanges—there are some key differences, because of the fundamental difference in stock and bond markets.

Stocks trade on exchanges, making them simple to access and value. Bonds on the other hand, trade over-the-counter (OTC). Prices are negotiated privately between buyers and sellers leading to a lack of price transparency. It can also be difficult for investors to find the bonds they want to buy. So how does this impact the management and valuation of Equity and Bond ETFs?

The objective of an ETF portfolio manager (PM) is to track the performance of the ETFs target index as closely as possible. For a simple equity index such as the S&P 500, PMs will hold all the securities in the respective weights as the index. The ability to access the constituent securities can be more difficult for broader, or less liquid indexes, i.e. the MSCI Emerging Market IMI index. Tracking a bond index adds another layer of complexity. The nature of the bond market makes it extremely difficult to exactly follow the index’s composition. Due to the enormous number of issuers and bonds within the US Aggregate bond index, bond ETF Portfolio Managers use a “sampling” approach wherein they aim to replicate the risk and return characteristics of the index using a smaller portfolio of available bonds.  Large managers are able to leverage economies of scale and bond desk relationships, alleviating the legwork of tracking down bonds and simultaneously seeking to ensure fair pricing for investors.

The second main difference between Equity and Bond ETFs is the way they calculate underlying value. Price transparency in stock markets allows the price of an Equity ETF to be aligned to the value of the underlying basket of stocks, both during the day and at the close. Bond ETFs on the other hand, are often forced to rely on an estimate of Bond prices, as there’s typically no central market where investors can see where bonds were bought and sold—remember that on top of not necessarily trading every day, bonds tradeover-the-counter (OTC). This means that Bond ETF prices and the NAV values tend to deviate more than Equity ETFs, but keep in mind that NAV in the fixed income world is a best effort estimate and not necessarily an actionable price that investors could use to transact in the underlying securities. The reality is that market price of a bond ETF represents the price at which the underlying bonds can actually be traded at any given moment, derived by buyers and sellers transacting in a transparent investment tool.

The benefits Bond ETFs bring to markets have been immense. Bond ETFs have provided a price discovery tool that simply did not exist in Bond markets before. When we talk about how innovative bond ETFs are, this is what we’re referring to.

_______________________________________________________________

 This material is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice nor an offer or solicitation to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any shares of any Fund (nor shall any such shares be offered or sold to any person) in any jurisdiction in which an offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities law of that jurisdiction. If any funds are mentioned or inferred to in this material, it is possible that some or all of the funds have not been registered with the securities regulator in any Latin American and Iberian country and thus might not be publicly offered within any such country. The securities regulators of such countries have not confirmed the accuracy of any information contained herein.

The Ten Best Selling European Funds in September

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

According to the latest monthly snapshot of European fund flow trends (data as at end September 2015) from Thomson Reuters, while the European funds industry faced estimated net outflows of €17 billion from long-term mutual funds for September, the ten best selling funds that month gathered net inflows of €13.1 billion.

BlackRock ICS Institutional USD Liquidity Core Acc was the best selling individual fund for September, netting €1.7 billion inflows. In total, the ten best selling funds – seven money market products, three equity funds and one mixed-asset fund- gathered net inflows of €10.3 billion for September.

Mixed-asset funds, with net inflows of €2 billion, were the best selling asset class overall, followed by alternative UCITS products, which added €1.8 billion, and real estate funds with inflows of €400 million. Money market products faced overall net outflows of €14.4 billion for September.

The single fund markets with the highest net inflows for September were:

  • United Kingdom €3.7 billion
  • Germany €1.7 billion
  • Switzerland €0.4 billion

While the higher outflows came from:

  • France -€19.8 billion
  • Luxembourg -€9.3 billion
  • Netherlands -€4.0 billion

BlackRock, with net sales of €6.1 billion, was the best selling group for September overall, ahead of Standard Life with €1.4 billion and Vanguard which sold €1.1 billion.