Foto: Simon Cunningham
. El mercado de financiación alternativa online en Estados Unidos supera los 36.000 millones en 2015
The online alternative finance market, including crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending, is exploding in the U.S., generating more than $36 billion in funding in 2015, up from $11 billion in 2014, according to a new report published by KPMG, the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance and the Polsky Center at the Chicago Booth School of Business.
“The emergence of new FinTech companies will continue to transform the financial services sector,” said Fiona Grandi, National Leader for FinTech, KPMG. “The pace of disruption is sure to accelerate, forging the need and appetite for collaboration among incumbents and non-bank innovators.”
Breaking New Ground: The Americas Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report analyzed online alternative finance activity across the Americas. Among its key findings is that financial, financial innovations and the technologies that enable them have exploded by 9x in just two years, from a total market size of $4.5 billion in 2013 to $36.5 billion in 2015 – the U.S. makes up 99 percent of that.
When analyzing the various funding models, the report found that marketplace/P2P consumer lending is the largest market segment in the U.S., responsible for more than $25 billion in 2015 and a total of $36 billion from 2013-2015. U.S. Businesses are also increasingly tapping into alternative finance to the tune of $6.8 billion in 2015 alone, which is significant when comparing the total for 2013 and 2014 of $10 billion.
Between 2013 and 2015, U.S. online alternative finance platforms have provided $52 billion in funding to individuals and businesses, according to the report. During that same time, these platforms facilitated roughly $11 billion of capital into 270,000 small and medium sized enterprises. In addition to consumer and business funding, the report also found that real estate models are scaling rapidly, generating nearly $1.3 billion in 2015.
The report points to several game-changing drivers of transformation that are impacting the banking industry, including the following:
Speed:Using algorithmic technology, credit decisions and underwriting takes minutes, not days.
Transparency:Investors and borrowers alike gain visibility into the loan portfolios, including risks and rewards.
Customer-centric:Platforms bring the “brick and mortar” branch into the on-demand and mobile application generation.
Data:Platforms have re-engineered the definition of credit worthiness. FICO may still be a factor, but it’s no longer the only factor.
Grandi added: “These changes are permanent benchmarks that banks must now rise up to meet. You may argue whether today’s unicorns will be here tomorrow; however, the shift towards the digital bank is indisputable.”
Foto: Davide D'Amico
. Londres se mantiene como mayor centro financiero mundial, por delante de Nueva York
Both cities gained four points in the ratings and London remains eight points ahead of New York. The GFCI, published recently by Z/Yen, is on a scale of 1,000 points and a lead of eight is fairly insignificant. The author continues to believe that the two centers are complimentary rather than purely competitive. A number of respondents commented that the uncertainty surrounding the possible exit of the UK from the EU is having a negative impact on London’s competitiveness at present.
London, New York, Singapore and Hong Kong remain the four leading global financial centers. Singapore has overtaken Hong Kong to become the third ranked center by just two points. Tokyo, in fifth place, is 72 points behind London. The top financial centers of the world are all well developed, sophisticated and cosmopolitan cities in their own right. Successful people are attracted to successful cities and it is perhaps no surprise that financial services professionals rank these centers so high.
North American centers fortunes in GFCI 19 are mixed. Of the financial centers in the USA, New York, Washington DC and Los Angeles rose in the ratings. The three leading Canadian centers fell in the ratings after strong rises in the past year. Toronto remains the leading Canadian center with Montreal in second and Vancouver in third.
Western European centers remain mired in uncertainty. The leading centers in Europe are London, Zurich, Geneva, Luxembourg and Frankfurt. Of the 29 centers in this region, 12 centers rose in the ratings and 17 centers fell. Rome, Madrid and Brussels, three centers closely associated with the Eurozone crisis have shown signs of recovery.
Latin America and the Caribbean suffer. All centers in this region, with the single exception of Mexico City fall sharply in GFCI 19. The offshore centers in the Caribbean (in common with the British Crown Dependencies listed under Western Europe) all suffered declines along with the Brazilian centers Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
Seven of the top ten Asia/Pacific centers see a fall in their ratings. Singapore, Tokyo and Beijing rose slightly in GFCI 19. Of the top ten centers in this region, Seoul and Sydney showed the largest falls.
Centers in the Middle East and Africa also fell in GFCI 19. Having made gains in GFCI 18 all centers in this region, except Casablanca, fell in the ratings. Dubai remains the leading center in the region, followed by Tel Aviv and Abu Dhabi. Casablanca rose 11 places and is now fourth in the region.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Walter-Wilhelm
. Momentum Building in U.S. Impact Investing Market
Private investments are a growing area of opportunity for asset managers looking to get into the impact investing space, according to the last issue of The Cerulli Edge – U.S. Monthly Product Trends Edition. Thus far, only a small portion of managers has penetrated the impact investing market. In Cerulli’s 2016 alternative investments survey, just 14% of institutional asset managers polled indicate that they manage alternative asset impact funds (or thematic investing funds).
The survey, conducted in partnership with US SIF, shows that over the next two to three years, more than half of asset managers offering responsible investment products expect high demand from foundations (56%) and high-net-worth (52%) investors. Moreover, the research reveals that more than half (52%) of consultants surveyed are evaluating and, in some cases, recommending impact investments to their private wealth and institutional clients.
Mutual fund assets dropped for the fourth straight month, losing 0.7% in February to end the month at $11.3 trillion. The continued decline is now entirely attributable to performance. Despite underlying market fluctuations, February brought little change to ETF assets, as they held steady at just about $2 trillion. Flows reversed course during the month and totaled nearly $3 billion for the vehicle.
Foto: SalFalko. Los colegios deberían enseñar educación financiera
Is financial literacy an important-enough skill that it should be taught alongside reading, writing and arithmetic? Most Americans seem to think so, according to a recent survey from RBC Wealth Management-U.S. and City National Bank.
The survey, conducted in mid-March, found that 87 percent of Americans believe that financial literacy should be taught in schools. Of those in favor of incorporating financial literacy into the classroom, 15 percent said instruction should begin as early as elementary. The rest (72 percent) said it should be taught in middle and high school.
“Having a basic understanding of how money, investing and our broader financial system works is critical in our society today. Yet there is a growing realization, particularly in the wake of the last financial crisis, that many people don’t understand budgeting, investing or how simple financial products like loans work,” said Tom Sagissor, president of RBC Wealth Management-U.S. “That puts them at a disadvantage not only during their working years, but as they begin to contemplate retirement.”
The same survey found that more than one-third of American adults (35 percent) received no instruction on investing — whether from their parents, school or someone else. Another 39 percent said they simply taught themselves.
“Money has long been considered a taboo topic, even among family,” said Malia Haskins, vice president, wealth strategist at RBC Wealth Management-U.S. “We’ve seen many of our clients struggle with how to talk to their kids about money. In fact, many ask their financial advisor to have the conversation with their kids because they aren’t comfortable doing so themselves.”
But data suggests this trend may be changing. While 38 percent and 37 percent, respectively, of Baby Boomers (ages 55 and older) and GenXers (ages 35 to 54) said no one taught them about investing, only 29 percent of Millennials (ages 18 to 34) claim to have had the same experience. In fact, 29 percent of Millennials said they learned about investing from their parents and 22 percent said they learned in school. That’s a vastly different experience than that of Baby Boomers, only 10 percent of whom said they received such instruction at home and 9 percent of whom said they did in the classroom.
Foto cedida. Telecommunications, Healthcare, Consumer Products or Services: Sectors in which Muzinich sees Value in High Yield
The high yield debt market is worth $ 1.3 trillion in the US alone, that of European high yield is about 500 billion, and the corporate debt market of emerging countries is growing. Erick Muller – Head of Markets and Products Strategy at Muzinich, who recently visited Miami- thus explained the scope of the huge , corporate credit industry, in which his company has focused since its foundation in 1988. The strategies managed by the management company are neither limited to high yield, since it also invests in investment grade securities, nor to a fixed term.
Time to invest in energy…
Muller believes that the price of the oil barrel will remain low and volatile, and avoids investing in the US energy sector, except in those companies not sensitive to the price of crude oil. “Now is not the time to invest: with the barrel price remaining at around US$ 40, 30% of companies could fail in the next 12 months. There are sectors that represent better opportunities, such as telecommunications, cable television, healthcare, and consumer products or services, to name a few,” he said in an interview with Funds Society.
Equities or corporate debt ?
According to Muller, there is starting to be some competition between equities and high yield corporate debt, and there seems to be a greater flow towards the latter. “Now is the time to enter the corporate debt market, but staying within securities rated BB or B, and away from emission with a C rating,” says Muller, explaining that the crisis will continue, and lower quality debt can suffer.
Now is also the time to be tactical, because the correlations are very large; and flexible, in order to afford seizing opportunities and exiting at the appropriate time, without being tied down. Another one of this strategist’s keys for investment in the current market environment is diversification, more sophisticated diversification which dilutes risks within each asset class, while allowing him to remain loyal to his convictions.
The US high yield market, which is very domestic economy oriented, is attractive for its fundamentals (except for some activities such as oil or mining), The European is attractive for its lower volatility, while the emerging markets could be attractive for their valuation.
“We are very cautious about global growth. The Fed raised rates for reasons of financial stability and not to relax overheating in the US economy,” said the strategist, who does not believe that the conditions for more than one rate hike in 2016 are given, but also warns that we will have to wait until June to be clearer as to how the year will end.
In his opinion, the most appropriate strategies for this environmentare the short-term US high yield debt strategy, absolute return (global, tactical, and long-short), and those focused on long-term US high yield debt.
Sovereign wealth funds and central banks are emerging as large scale providers of collateral, providing a much needed boost in liquidity to the global financial system, according to a new study by BNY Mellon and the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF).
The report, Crossing the Collateral Rubicon: A new territory of challenge and opportunity for sovereign institutions, notes the liquidity boost is coming at a welcome time when financial institutions face challenges from new regulations on risk mitigation and balance sheet management. Two dozen sovereign institutions with more than $2 trillion in assets under management took part in the study. Thirty-seven percent said they are in advanced stages of considering collateral trades or already implementing them. Sixty-six percent reported that enquiries from potential counterparties in the trades were increasing.
“Collateral is becoming the sole determinant of institutions’ ability to engage in financial transactions in the cash or derivatives markets,” said Hani Kablawi, chief executive officer of BNY Mellon’s Asset Servicing business in EMEA. “Since the financial crisis, new regulations have placed a premium on counterparties gaining access to high-quality collateral. Yet, central bank macroeconomic policies have reduced the supply of collateral. This has produced a great challenge for markets and a large-scale opportunity for official holders of these securities such as sovereign wealth funds.”
Quantitative easing programmes have resulted in central banks acquiring significant amounts of government securities, moving them away from traditional suppliers of liquidity such as banks and brokerage companies. These securities are among the most sought after for collateral trading. Governments that issue the highest-rated debt have had lower debt issuance in recent years, further constricting the supply, the report said.
“We now have a situation in which the lower-rated securities that cannot be used for collateral trading are circulating more freely than the higher-rated securities, which have been taken out of the markets,” Kablawi adds. “While the mismatch between demand and supply for credit is evident in the US and the UK, it has become particularly acute in continental Europe and has been a major factor behind the sluggish recovery. Sovereign institutions that provide collateral are playing an important part in overcoming these liquidity shortages and limiting market volatility.”
In turn, the falling oil price has helped to drive up demand for collateral from energy supplying nations. One chief risk officer for a Middle East sovereign fund who took part in the study said: “In the current environment of low oil prices, the liquidity framework becomes more important so investment activity can continue. We must make sure the liquidity profile is appropriate, prioritising liquidity over returns. In the future, maintaining the liquidity management framework is the key.”
You can read the full report in the following link.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Claudia Calich, fund manager at M&G Investments. M&G’s Claudia Calich to attend Miami Summit
Claudia Calich, fund manager at M&G Investments will outline her view on where to find pockets of value in emerging markets debt assets, when she takes part in the Funds Society Fund Selector Summit Miami 2016.
Currently, emerging market investors face uncertainty from factors such as slower economic growth in China, volatile oil prices and geopolitical risk. Calich suggests flexibility in strategies such as the M&G Emerging Markets Bond fund facilitate taking high conviction positions without being constrained by local or hard currency, or differences between government and corporate bonds.
Outlining the opportunities, Calish will also explain her currency and interest rate positioning.
Calich joined M&G in October 2013 as a specialist in emerging markets debt and was appointed fund manager of the M&G Emerging Markets Bond fund in December 2013. She was also appointed acting fund manager of the M&G Global Government Bond fund and acting deputy fund manager of the M&G Global Macro Bond fund in July 2015. Claudia has over 20 years of experience in emerging markets, most recently as a senior portfolio manager at Invesco in New York, with previous positions at Oppenheimer Funds, Fuji Bank, Standard & Poor’s and Reuters. Claudia graduated with a BA honours in economics from Susquehanna University in 1989 and holds an MA in international economics from the International University of Japan in Niigata.
Foto: Perspecsys Photos
. JP Morgan Asset Management lanza dos ETFs de renta variable con cobertura de divisa
J.P. Morgan Asset Management recently announced the expansion of its strategic beta suite with the launch of two new funds, JPMorgan Diversified Return Europe Currency Hedged Equity ETF (JPEH) and JPMorgan Diversified Return International Currency Hedged Equity (JPIH).
Both new funds offer a risk-managed approach to investing that can allow investors to capture most of the upside with a goal of providing less volatility in down markets. The ETFs diversify risk across sectors, while hedging FX exposure back to USD, providing investors with exposure to international equity markets with less risk.
JPEH tracks the FTSE Developed Europe Diversified Factor100% Hedged to USD Index and JPIH tracks the FTSE Developed ex-North America Diversified Factor 100% Hedged to USD Index which were thoughtfully constructed based on J.P. Morgan’s active insights and risk management expertise.
“As volatility and currency risk continue to worry investors, clients are increasingly turning to our strategic beta products for a new approach to address the drawbacks of market cap-weighted indices.” said Robert Deutsch, Global Head of ETFs for J.P. Morgan Asset Management. “We are thrilled to expand our investment capabilities with currency-hedged ETFs, complementing our existing strategies and offering clients more choices.”
“We are excited to be able to draw on our significant global index capability to design innovative new indexes to serve as the basis for ETFs provided by our global partners like J.P. Morgan,” said Ron Bundy, CEO of North America benchmarks for FTSE Russell.
With interest rates at an all-time low, investors are looking for alternatives to term deposits and traditional savings accounts. The fund of fund BL-Fund Selection 0-50 is suitable for those who want higher yields compared to a money-market investment while retaining the advantages of defensive investing. As the name indicates, the equity weighting of the fund cannot exceed 50%.
What are the aims of the fund?
To deliver stable and satisfactory long-term performance, to provide protection against volatile market conditions and to preserve capital in the medium term.
How is the fund managed?
The BL-Fund Selection 0-50 portfolio is both flexible and defensive. I invest in a selection of funds managed by internationally renowned fund managers with no regional, sector or currency restrictions. By investing in external funds, Banque de Luxembourg is able to focus on diversification and benefit from the expertise of good fund managers with solid management processes. No asset class is excluded; the portfolio can contain equities, bonds, commodities, alternative instruments and money-market investments in all currencies. The flexible allocation means I can invest up to 50% in equities. Generally speaking, however, the equity weighting does not exceed 25% of the portfolio. The risk index is 3 on a scale of 1-7.
What are the advantages?
This fund offers natural diversification in terms of both assets and strategies. It can form the basis of a comprehensive defensive wealth management approach.
Who is the target investor?
The BL-Fund Selection 0-50 fund is designed for careful investors who wish to benefit from active, non-benchmarked management that focuses on capital preservation over a 3-year period.
What type of assets does the fund invest in?
The portfolio consists of three main investment blocks: two traditional blocks and one ‘alternative’ block whose purpose is twofold.
Two traditional blocks: Equities, with a structural position in high-quality assets and segments that ‘outperform’ in the long term, with an emphasis on high-quality medium-value stocks. Bonds in niche segments, which generate higher returns than classic securities in today’s low-interest climate.
One ‘alternative’ block whose purpose is twofold: to generate regular returns, in all market conditions, that will offset low bond yields and to create neutral or negative correlation with riskier asset markets.
Photo: Enrique Chang. Janus Capital Names President, Head Of Investments
Janus Capital has promoted Enrique Chang to the position of president, head of Investments.
Chang took up his new duties on 1 April, overseeing Janus’ fundamental and macro fixed income teams, in addition to his existing leadership responsibilities of the Janus equity and asset allocation investment teams.
“The decision to promote Enrique to president, head of Investments, is reflective of his increased responsibility in now overseeing the majority of our Janus investment teams, as well as his significant contributions to the firm over the past two and a half years,” said Dick Weil, CEO of Janus Capital Group.
Chang will partner with CEO Dick Weil and president Bruce Koepfgen.
Janus Capital specified that Perkins Investment Management and Intech Investment Management will continue to report into their respective leadership teams and relevant boards.
Chang was previously CIO Equities and Asset Allocation. He joined Janus in September 2013 and was previously executive vice president and chief investment officer for American Century Investments, where he was responsible for the firm’s fixed income, quantitative equity, asset allocation, US value equity, US growth equity and global and non-US equity disciplines.
At end December 2015, Janus Capital’s AUM reached around $192.3bn (€169.2bn).
