UCITS compliant absolute return funds have outperformed hedge funds over the past five years, according to a study conducted by independent asset manager Lupus Alpha.
The research, conducted among a universe of 564 alternative absolute return funds, revealed that over a five-year time period, UCITS regulated absolute return funds offered an average return of 2.72% per year, whereas hedge funds lost an average of -0.46% per year.
Over a one-year time scale, the picture was even gloomier with less than 30% of funds offering positive returns, ironically due to the high level of volatility at the beginning of the year. Added to that was a relatively high level of European equity exposure among most funds, which further dragged down performance throughout 2016.
Overall, absolute return funds offered an average return of -3.55% over the past five years, with unregulated hedge fund vehicles at the bottom-end of the scale, offering -5.63%. However, they still outperformed the European equity universe, with the Euro Stoxx 50 index falling by -13.89% throughout the same period.
Independent of average returns, the survey concluded that profitability varied greatly depending on the provider, with some asset managers offering returns of 20.56% over the past years, while others reported losses of -23.63%.
Ralf Lochmüller, founding partner and spokesperson for Lupus Alpha comments: “The performance of individual absolute return funds can vary greatly, we have noticed clear difference in terms of quality. Our research highlight that manager selection should remain a key priority for investors in order to achieve stable returns independent of the market phase.”
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: charlemange / Pixabay. Algunas fundaciones y fondos están reevaluando el uso de los hedge funds
NEPC, one of the industry’s largest independent, full-service investment consulting firms to endowments and foundations, recently published the results of its Q2 2016 NEPC Endowment and Foundation Poll, a measure of endowment and foundation confidence and sentiment related to the economy, investing and market performance. The Q2 Poll included a special focus on how endowments and foundations view hedge funds. Respondents cited strong concerns about high fees, underperformance and transparency.
“While hedge funds play an important role in many institutional portfolios, the last several years have been difficult for the industry and investors are starting to look very closely at how hedge funds can work for them,” said Cathy Konicki, Partner and Head of NEPC’s Endowment & Foundation Practice Group. “These survey results are by no means indicating a mass exodus from hedge funds, but they do point to greater pressure being felt by the industry as a whole.”
According to the survey, twenty-four percent of respondents cited having zero exposure to hedge funds, which is a significant increase from the Q2 2014 NEPC Endowment and Foundation Poll, when only two percent of respondents reported having no exposure. And while 39% of respondents in the Q2 2014 Poll had 11-20% of their portfolio allocated towards hedge funds, in the Q2 2016 survey only 23% had the same allocation.
Another concern cited by endowments and foundations was hedge fund fees. A quarter of survey respondents have asked for reduced fees or been offered reduced fees by their hedge fund managers within the past six months. When asked about the biggest challenges they face with their hedge fund investments right now, High Fees was the second highest response (54%), topped only by Low/Disappointing Returns (80%). Rounding out the top concerns was Transparency (37%).
Despite these concerns, the survey did highlight some positive findings for the hedge fund community. While 28% of endowments and foundations said they’ve either reduced or were considering reducing their allocation to hedge funds, 55% are not actively discussing this with their investment committee, and nearly a fifth of respondents (17%) have either increased or were considering increasing their allocation to hedge funds.
As for which hedge fund strategies respondents are most bullish on, 36% think Multi-Strategy hedge funds will generate the highest returns over the next three to five years. Other top results to this question include Long/Short Equity (33%), Global Macro (25%) and Credit (22%).
“This survey tells us that endowments and foundations are frustrated with hedge funds but they’re not giving up on them, and with several global concerns on the horizon, many investors may be looking towards hedge funds to protect their portfolios,” said Konicki.
Other top findings include:
50% say the US economy is in a worse place now than it was this time last year
52% say a Slowdown in Global Growth poses the greatest near term threat to their portfolios
Rising Interest Rates were the second most cited concern (16%)
Potential for overseas conflict was third (13%)
Presidential Conundrum: 70% of respondents think Hillary Clinton will win the upcoming Presidential Election, but are split on who would have a more positive impact on US markets and their portfolio.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Ferruccio Zanone
. Strategic Acquirers Drive More Than One-Third of M&A Activity in 2016
Fidelity Clearing & Custody Solutions, the division of Fidelity Investments that provides clearing and custody to registered investment advisors (RIAs), retirement recordkeepers, broker-dealer firms, banks and insurance companies, recently released the Fidelity 1H 2016 Wealth Management M&A Transaction Report, which highlights the RIA mergers and acquisitions through the first half of 2016. The report focuses on Strategic Acquirers, firms that take a financial interest in an advisory firm to help them grow and perform more effectively through strategic guidance and operating support. Those firms have driven 39 percent of all M&A activity in 2016, and, based on extensive interviews with executives at major strategic acquirers, the report outlines different models of Strategic Acquirers as well as their approaches to acquisition. The findings also highlight how a need for scale, in order to help improve firm profitability, has driven this continued industry consolidation.
“Our goal with this report is to help advisors who are considering strategies to take their businesses to the next level to better understand their options and learn more about how to navigate the M&A space,” said David Canter, executive vice president, practice management and consulting, Fidelity Clearing & Custody Solutions. “One thing they should know as they prepare for the negotiation process is that they will have to redefine their role as an entrepreneur. While that may mean giving up some control in order to continue to grow their business, a strategic acquirer may also help to drive scale and growth through capital and expertise.”
In addition to providing a detailed list of transactions for 1H 2016 and highlighting Strategic Acquirer models, this new report outlines questions that RIAs should ask themselves before beginning to engage with strategic acquirers:
What does being an entrepreneur mean to you as an advisor, and how would you like that to change to achieve your business objectives? Why do you need capital, what for, and how would you balance that need with the desire for independence/autonomy? What outcome do you seek? What do you need from a strategic acquirer: Capital? Access to talent? Management skills? An investment platform? Operating scale and leverage? What kind of a partner do you want?
“The biggest takeaway here for RIAs is that M&A strategies are becoming an increasingly important consideration for the future of their businesses,” continued Canter. “In order to realize their full potential value, advisors need to think about the firm they want to partner with and whether their businesses are in a good position for a successful acquisition.”
You can read the full report on the following link.
Pershing, a BNY Mellon company, has announced the launch of new mutual fund and exchange-traded fund solutions, offered by its affiliate, Lockwood Advisors. These will meet the needs of investors starting to build wealth and help registered reps navigate the Department of Labor’s (DOL) fiduciary rule requirements.
Pershing’s new Lockwood WealthStart Portfolios mutual fund and ETF offering, along with new solutions provided by third-party providers, both feature a diverse range of asset allocation strategies and a minimum balance of $10,000.
These portfolios include a number of asset allocation strategies targeted at investors with varying risk profiles. The strategies can be accessed through diversified risk-based model portfolios from some of the industry’s leading firms, including Pershing affiliate Lockwood.
“These flexible mutual fund and ETF solutions demonstrate our ongoing commitment to providing financial professionals with the tools they need to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape and grow their business,” said Joel Hempel, chief operating officer of Lockwood. “They may also assist registered reps who are considering a transition from a commission-based brokerage model to fee-based advisory relationships.”
The new offering is fully integrated into Pershing’s flagship NetX360 professional platform, and advisors can access them through Lockwood’s turnkey managed account solution, Managed360 or by using Pershing’s managed investments platform.
“Emerging and mass-affluent investors can now have greater access to professionally managed investment solutions,” said Hempel. “These investors represent a large, often underserved market. By offering a suite of diversified risk-based portfolios to this segment, advisors and registered reps can serve new clients and take advantage of cross-generational opportunities.”
Looking ahead, Lockwood will continue to evaluate managers to participate in its third-party offerings to provide more opportunity for financial professionals to grow their business and for investors to accumulate wealth.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Elanaspantry, Flickr, Creative Commons. Morgan Stanley IM Launches Global Balanced and Global Balanced Defensive Funds
Morgan Stanley Investment Management has announced the launch of two new multi-asset funds, the Morgan Stanley Investment Funds (MS INVF) Global Balanced Fund and the MS INVF Global Balanced Defensive Fund.
The underlying investment process for the two funds mirrors that of the existing Global Balanced Risk Control (GBaR) strategy, which is designed to maintain a stable risk profile. The funds are the first in the GBaR suite to incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into the process.
The chief difference between the funds is their targeted volatility. The Global Balanced Fund targets a volatility range of 4 to 10%. The Global Balanced Defensive Fund has a lower target volatility range of 2 to 6%.
Both funds will be managed by Andrew Harmstone and Manfred Hui in London. “The new funds will be based on our established GBaR process, which in our view is the most effective way for investors to participate in rising markets whilst providing strong downside protection,” said Mr. Harmstone, managing director and lead portfolio manager. “We expect the integration of ESG considerations into the process to further improve potential returns and enhance risk management.”
“Morgan Stanley Investment Management’s extensive multi-asset capabilities are reinforced by the addition of these two new funds,” said Paul Price, global head of Client Coverage, Morgan Stanley Investment Management. “Clients now have greater choice in the implementation of GBaR’s risk-controlled approach and their preferred level of volatility.”
The MS INVF Global Balanced Fund and the MS INVF Global Balanced Defensive Fund, registered in Luxembourg, are not yet widely available for sale and are awaiting registration in various markets. They are intended for sophisticated and diversified investors or those who take investment advice.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: peasap
. Samuel Nunez joins Bolton´s San Diego Office
Bolton Global Capital announced this week that Samuel Nunezhas joined the firm. Nunez has spent the last 23 years as a financial advisor with Merrill Lynch, compiling a client book of $125 million with annual revenues of $1 million. His clients are primarily located in Mexico and the US.
Nunez will be joining Bolton’s San Diego office, which was opened recently under the name TransAtlantic Investment Partners. James Jiao, a former Merrill Lynch complex manager and FA who left the firm last year after working 18 years, established this office. Jiao began his career in 1990 with Deutsche Bank in Germany as a portfolio manager and then transferred to Deutsche Morgan Grenfell in New York as a Private Bank Manager in 1994.
Over the last year, Bolton has recruited 8 teams from Merrill Lynch with client assets totaling approximately $1.5 billion. Typically, advisors who join Bolton operate under their own brand name using Bolton to provide compliance, back office, trading and technology support with client assets held by BNY Mellon-Pershing and other custodians.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Lain. China: How Serious is the Debt Issue?
Emerging Markets (EMs) continue to drive global growth, with China still accounting for the lion’s share. However, China’s increasing debt remains a significant concern for global investors. Pioneer Investments’ Economist Qinwei Wang, takes a closer look at China’s debt situation.
After reviewing the recent developments around the debt issue, Pioneer has not changed their view that China can still avoid a systematic crisis in the near term, “as the issue remains largely a domestic problem and in the state sector.”
“Looking into the composition, China’s debt issues are largely within the country, unlike typical cases in EMs. Its external balance sheet still looks relatively resilient as China continues to run current account surpluses. China has also been building up net foreign assets over the last decade, and is one of the largest net lenders in the world and domestic savings remains high enough to fund investments.”
In addition, looking at domestic markets, Pioneer believes the situation still looks manageable. In fact, the borrowers have been largely in the state sector, directly or indirectly, through various government entities or SOEs. The lenders are also mainly state-linked, with banks (state dominant) making loans, holding bonds or channelling a big part of shadow activities.
The People’s Bank of China has prepared plenty of tools to avoid a liquidity squeeze, with capital controls still relatively effective, at least with respect to short-term flows. Ultimately, the government has enough resources to bail out the banking sector or major SOEs if necessary to prevent systemic risks.
The private sector does not appear to present big concerns, at least for now. In particular, on the property side, following the major correction since 2013, the health of the sector looks to be improving, although there is still a long way to go in smaller cities. Households have been leveraging up, but their debt levels are still relatively low with saving rates remaining high.
“We are not too concerned about existing troubled debt, as there are possible solutions to clean it up while avoiding a systemic crisis, and the implementation process has already started. The more challenging issue is how to prevent the generation of new bad debt.” Says Wang.
He believes that a first step in this direction is to improve the efficiency of resource allocation. Ongoing financial reforms, including the liberalization of interest rates, bond markets, IPOs, private banking, a more flexible FX regime as well as the opening of onshore interbank markets over the last couple of years are positive attempts in his view.
Continued efforts to shift towards a more market-driven monetary policy transmission mechanism is also helping. In addition, the anti-corruption campaign has also effectively added relatively better supervision of the state sector. That said, SOE reforms have been relatively slow, with mixed signals, although we see certain positive developments, such as individual defaults allowed and a pledge to remove their public functions.
Preventing new problematic debt levels from rising again in the future will also require strengthened financial regulations. We think a large part of the new forms of finance, or so-called shadow banking activities, are the result of financial liberalization. The current segmented regulation system is unlikely to keep pace with the rapid financial innovation across sectors and products. This will be an issue to monitor going forward.
“From an investment perspective we keep our preference for China’s “new economy” sectors, which could benefit from the move towards a more service-driven economy.” Wang concludes.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: fancycrave1 / Pixabay. La clase media-alta de Reino Unido se decanta por la banca online
Research by financial services research and insight firm Verdict Financial has found that the UK’s mass affluents, compared to non-mass affluents, are heavier users of online and mobile banking, are more likely to favor these channels for routine activities, and are more satisfied with the performance of digital banking channels.
The company’s latest report finds that among those who use online banking, 89% of mass affluents accessed this channel at least once a week, compared to 83% of non-mass affluents. For mobile banking, the equivalent weekly usage figures were 83% and 79%, respectively.
Furthermore, mass affluents are slightly more inclined to use digital channels to carry out activities such as checking their balance, paying bills, and managing their direct debits.
Daoud Fakhri, Principal Analyst for Retail Banking at Verdict Financial, states: “Mass affluents are more confident about financial management than other consumers, finding it easier, for example, to keep track of their day-to-day spending. As such, they are more at home using digital self-service channels and less reliant on speaking to bank staff, whether in-branch or in a call center.”
Verdict Financial’s report also found that mass affluents were more satisfied than other consumers with the functionality, usability, and security of digital channels, especially mobile. For example, while only 36% of non-mass affluents were very satisfied with mobile banking security, this rose to 45% of mass affluents.
Fakhri continues: “The high level of enthusiasm for digital banking among mass affluents is good news for the banking industry. Banks are trying hard to migrate their customers to their online and mobile banking platforms, which incur far lower operational costs than branch networks and call centers, and it appears that mass affluents are happier than non-mass affluents to go along with this.
“Given that mass affluents are a highly attractive demographic in terms of their revenue-generating potential, there is clearly a strong incentive for banks to continue developing their digital channels by adding new functionality and improving ease of use.”
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: Gideon Benari. Los precavidos inversores de renta fija europea podrían estar sacrificando el rendimiento
Tom Ross, Co-Manager of the Henderson Horizon Euro Corporate Bond Fund, and Vicky Browne, Fixed Income Analyst, look at the impact of the European Central Bank’s corporate sector purchase programme (CSPP).
What is the CSPP?
The corporate sector purchase programme (or CSPP as it is commonly known) was established by the European Central Bank (ECB) and began purchasing bonds on 8 June 2016. The CSPP is a form of monetary policy, which aims to help inflation rates return to levels below, but close to, 2% in the medium term and improve the financing conditions of economies within the Eurozone.
Purchases can be made in both the primary and secondary market. By the end of July 2016 – eight weeks into the programme – secondary market purchases formed 94% of purchases with only 6% being made in the primary market according to data from the ECB.
Which bonds are eligible for purchase?
Bonds purchasable under the scheme must be investment-grade euro-denominated bonds issued by non-bank corporations established (or incorporated) in the euro area. In assessing the eligibility of an issuer, the ECB will consider where the issuer is established rather than the ultimate parent. Thus an issuer incorporated in the Euro area, but whose ultimate parent company is not established in the Euro area, such as Unilever, is deemed eligible for purchase.
How have markets responded to CSPP so far?
To date the ECB has bought 478 bonds totalling approximately €11.85bn from 165 issuers (UniCredit as of 27 July 2016). The list of these bonds (but not the quantities purchased) is available on the websites of the national central banks performing the buying. Analysing these holdings would suggest that, on an industry sector basis, considerable CSPP purchasing has occurred in utilities and consumer non-cyclicals.
In June non-financial credit spreads initially responded positively to the CSPP purchases. However, excess credit returns over the month (returns over equivalent government bonds) detracted from total returns as market volatility increased as a result of the UK voting to leave the EU. Concerns surrounding the vote led to a temporary pull-back in demand for credit and this negative headwind overpowered the positive technical effect from CSPP.
July proved to be a stronger month for credit market performance. The European investment grade market – as measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch Euro Corporate Index – delivered a total return of +1.68% in July in euro terms and excess credit returns of +1.61% (source: Bloomberg at 31 July 2016). Undoubtedly, these positive movements have been partly driven by CSPP purchases as illustrated by the graph below. It reveals how spread performance – a declining spread indicates stronger returns – of the iBoxx Euro Corporate Index has been more pronounced in eligible bonds than non-eligible or senior bank assets.
However July’s returns are not just attributable to the technical support provided by the CSPP. An improvement in market sentiment driven by reduced fears about Brexit, together with a rise in flows into bond funds, has helped to increase demand for the asset class at a time when there is a lack of European investment grade supply.
How has the fund benefited from CSPP?
The Henderson Horizon Euro Corporate Bond Fund was positioned long credit and duration risk versus the index throughout June. Although the fund still trades with a long beta bias we have lowered risk levels over the past few weeks by reducing exposure to positions that have benefited from the recent rally in credit markets. Examples of these are euro-denominated bonds from utility companies Centrica and Redexis Gas, and US real estate investment trust WP Carey.
In July, the fund added to positions from CSPP-eligible issuers on a name-specific basis such as Aroundtown Property, Telenor and RELX Group. Exposure has not just been increased in CSPP-eligible issues but also in companies we favour that are not incorporated in the euro area, such as US names AT&T (in EUR) and Comcast and CVS Health (in USD). The CSPP technical has also been apparent in the primary market. The fund benefited in July from participating in a euro- denominated new issue from Deutsche Bahn, which has performed strongly post issuance. Positive fund performance has also come from a new issue from Teva Pharmaceuticals, which has seen solid demand since coming to the market.
While CSPP should help to provide technical support to European investment grade corporates, there exist several uncertainties in the market – such as the October referendum in Italy and instability in commodity prices – that could cause weakness to arise. We therefore continue to look to reduce risk into further strength while seeking to take advantage of any attractive opportunities presented by volatility or weakness.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrMichel Rittenberg . Michel Rittenberg, in Charge of Wunderlich Miami
Wunderlich, a leading full-service investment firm headquartered in Memphis, recently announced that Michel Rittenberg has joined its wealth management team as manager of the firm’s Miami branch. Rittenberg, a 36-year veteran of the financial services industry, was previously with Raymond James & Associates.
“Michel is a well-respected industry professional who will expand our presence in Miami and Coral Gables,” said Jim Parrish, president of Wunderlich’s Wealth Management division. “Having previously been colleagues at Morgan Keegan & Co. for many years, I know that his positive management style and ability to help elevate advisors’ careers will be a tremendous asset to Wunderlich. I’m thrilled to have him join our team.”
Prior to Raymond James, Rittenberg was a branch manager for Morgan Keegan & Co. in Miami from 2005 to 2012. Before that, he was New York City complex manager for H&R Block Financial Advisor and a managing director for Prudential Global Derivatives in New York. He began his career at Merrill Lynch. Rittenberg is a graduate of Beloit (Wisconsin) College and received his MBA from the Thunderbird School of Global Management at Arizona State University.
“Wunderlich is an impressive firm with a bright future, and I’ll be working with a group of true professionals in the Miami branch,” said Rittenberg, who will oversee the branch that was once part of Dominick & Dominick before being acquired by Wunderlich in 2015. “I am proud and happy to be here and look forward to growing our presence in the greater Miami area in the months ahead.”
